ライフサイエンスコーパス: interaural

1 The most ventral aspect of the HDB (interaural +0.9-1.3 mm) had proportionally fewer tempera

2 eurons (65% vs. 88%) than areas more dorsal (interaural +1.3-1.7 mm), and only one of seven ventral H

3 with two cochlear implants showed reasonable interaural alignment, whereas those with one cochlear im

4 idally varying linear acceleration along the interaural and naso-occipital head axis.

5 n a concentric manner around the overlapping interaural and visual axes.

6 h elements presented dichotically at varying interaural asynchronies, were used to parametrically mod

7 muth lines instead converged in front of the interaural axis for all listeners, often at a point betw

8 lar aSRFs, with a ring-like shape around the interaural axis, mainly present in the FRLx.

9 ear acceleration of the whole body along the interaural axis, we examined the LVOR in six patients wi

10 g distances (15-100 cm) along the right-side interaural axis.

11 th lines retreated toward or even behind the interaural axis.

12 ce should intersect near the midpoint of the interaural axis.

13 eration (0.24 g) of the whole body along the interaural axis.

14 This interaural (between the ears) time difference (ITD) prov

15 A large interaural CF map misalignment of DeltaCF approximately

16 ion was analyzed in terms of ITDs, ILDs, and interaural coherence, both for whole stimuli and in a ti

17 ency envelope ITDs and significantly reduced interaural coherence.

18 Decreasing interaural correlation also causes the response of the o

19 imuli, possibly the periodic fluctuations in interaural correlation at the modulation frequency.

20 In each case, sensitivity increases with interaural correlation difference.

21 livocochlear efferents, disrupted the normal interaural correlation in response amplitudes to sounds

22 orally, listeners' sensitivity to changes in interaural correlation is asymmetrical.

23 for the variance of behavioral responses as interaural correlation is decreased.

24 rity between the left and right ear signals (interaural correlation).

25 ynamics of cortical processing of changes in interaural correlation, a measure of interaural similari

26 the same noise with intermediate degrees of interaural correlation.

27 cross-correlation analysis suggests that low interaural correlations cause misalignment of cross-corr

28 tory-nerve model was used to verify that the interaural correlations in TFS differed across condition

29 Misalignment of interaural cortical response maps in asymmetric hearing

30 Interaural cortical threshold map misalignment faithfull

31 erwater, however, the physics of sound makes interaural cues very small, suggesting that directional

32 ust to temporal stimulus degradations (e.g., interaural decorrelation due to reverberation), or, in h

33 in front is due to neural sensitivity to the interaural decorrelation of sound, at both low and high

34 is not caused by envelope distortion, static interaural decorrelation, or spectral coloration.

35 tivation that depends on the availability of interaural delay cues.

36 In acoustical recordings, we found that interaural delay varies with frequency at a fine scale.

37 recordings of midbrain neurons sensitive to interaural delay, we found that preferred delay also var

38 ear differs between the ears and creates an interaural delay.

39 y dependence of acoustical and physiological interaural delays are matched in key respects.

40 cological environments, rather than to fixed interaural delays.

41 uclei relies on the detection of microsecond interaural differences in action potentials that encode

42 sources in azimuth depends on sensitivity to interaural differences in sound timing (ITD) and level (

43 Interaural differences in stimulus intensity and timing

44 In mammalian hearing, interaural differences in the timing (ITD) and level (IL

45 e that is based on the tuning of neurons for interaural differences in the timing of sound.

46 ish evolved an extreme sensitivity to minute interaural differences or that fish might compare sound

47 ction to a sound source can be determined by interaural differences, and the mechanisms of direction

48 es of nucleus laminaris neurons showed small interaural differences.

49 r olive (LSO) in the brainstem process these interaural disparities by precisely detecting excitatory

50 arn owl's head grows after hatching, causing interaural distances to more than double in the first 3

51 account for progressive realignment of both interaural frequency and threshold maps.

52 olution of left primary auditory cortex (AI) interaural frequency map changes is chronicled in squirr

53 preferred ITDs were not correlated with the interaural frequency mismatches.

54 re P16 disrupts the normal coregistration of interaural frequency tuning, whereas CHL on P16, but not

55 bat while presenting stimuli that varied in interaural intensity and in interaural time of arrival.

56 In this paper, we propose that the Interaural Intensity Difference (IID) and travel time of

57 binaurally inhibited, and an orderly map of interaural intensity difference (IID) sensitivity is pre

58 Modelling of interaural intensity difference suggests that the increa

59 Interaural intensity differences (IIDs) are important cu

60 superior olive (LSO) respond selectively to interaural intensity differences (IIDs), one of the chie

61 ing in mammals and is thought to make use of interaural intensity differences for localizing high-fre

62 SON circuitry, in part, functions to offset interaural intensity differences in interaural time diff

63 Sensitivity to interaural intensity differences predicts azimuth tuning

64 s pathway is part of a circuit that computes interaural intensity differences used in sound localizat

65 s pathway is critical for the computation of interaural intensity differences, which are used in soun

66 excitatory-inhibitory (EI) neurons] can code interaural intensity disparities (IIDs), the cues animal

67 siveness of IC cells to dynamic signals with interaural intensity disparities that change over time,

68 ry/inhibitory (EI) neurons, are sensitive to interaural intensity disparities, the cues animals use t

69 e two cues for azimuthal sound localization, interaural intensity or level differences and interaural

70 mpute sound location based on differences in interaural intensity, coded in ascending signals from th

71 cy tones, indicating that they could use the interaural intensity-difference cue.

72 We found impaired interaural interaction that depended on the ROBO1 in a d

73 variety of auditory spatial cues, including interaural level and time differences, as well as change

74 ignificantly enhances discrimination of both interaural level and time differences, whereas directing

75 e auditory brainstem to small differences in interaural level and timing occurring within a submillis

76 Spike rate sensitivities to binaural interaural level difference (ILD) and average binaural l

77 Conversely, when both ITD and interaural level difference (ILD) cues are available, di

78 te that interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level difference (ILD) play a role in the for

79 The gain value is modulated by interaural level difference (ILD) primarily through scal

80 In the present study, we focused on the interaural level difference (ILD) processing in the prim

81 l motion stimulus produced by modulating the interaural level difference (ILD), a major cue for sound

82 aural time difference and frequency-specific interaural level difference (ILD).

83 tion of interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level difference (ILD).

84 ratio (D/R) is more reliable and robust than interaural level difference (ILD).

85 frequency response area, and a shift in the interaural level difference function of LSO neurons.

86 PSC kinetics are required to generate mature interaural level difference functions, and that longer-l

87 HL on P16, but not before or after, disrupts interaural level difference sensitivity contained in lon

88 the increased EPSC duration after AT shifts interaural level difference to the right and compensates

89 he results suggest that linear processing of interaural level difference underlies spatial tuning in

90 etized ferrets with noise sequences in which interaural level differences (ILD) rapidly fluctuated ac

91 ation, and disrupted binaural integration of interaural level differences (ILD).

92 s used to localize the sources of sounds are interaural level differences (ILDs) and interaural time

93 ction: interaural timing differences (ITDs), interaural level differences (ILDs) and the direction-de

94 (ITDs) from the stimulus fine structure and interaural level differences (ILDs) from the stimulus en

95 LSO neurons weigh interaural level differences (ILDs) through precise inte

96 that LSO neurons can signal small changes in interaural level differences (ILDs), a cue to horizontal

97 he auditory system of guinea pigs to compare interaural level differences (ILDs), a key localization

98 nds, ie, interaural time differences (ITDs), interaural level differences (ILDs), and pinna spectral

99 ocation: interaural time differences (ITDs), interaural level differences (ILDs), and spectral notche

100 uding sound localization information such as interaural level differences (ILDs), interaural timing d

101 both ears, and LSO neurons are sensitive to interaural level differences (ILDs), one of the primary

102 ing interaural timing differences (ITDs) and interaural level differences (ILDs).

103 cate that distance to the nearest object and interaural level differences allows steering the robot c

104 obotic model of bat obstacle avoidance using interaural level differences and distance to the nearest

105 ment 3 maintained faithful long-term average interaural level differences but presented scrambled int

106 Faithful long-term average interaural level differences were insufficient for produ

107 ying cues of interaural time differences and interaural level differences) and distance for normal-he

108 cortical neurons and in their sensitivity to interaural level differences, the principal localization

109 tion and contralateral inhibition to compute interaural level differences.

110 d vary their output spike rates according to interaural level differences.

111 om both ears, and its cells are sensitive to interaural level disparities (ILDs) when stimulated by s

112 uency sounds in the horizontal plane uses an interaural-level difference (ILD) cue, yet little is kno

113 at high-frequency monaural spectral cues and interaural-level differences (ILDs) are used to generate

114 Here, we investigated how interaural-level differences are combined across frequen

115 therefore investigated the relation between interaural mismatches in frequency tuning and ITD tuning

116 nsistent with a non-zero central estimate of interaural or superior-inferior linear acceleration.

117 elicited similar responses in roll tilt and interaural perception of translation, with differences l

118 000 Hz and by two measures of sensitivity to interaural phase at low frequencies.

119 mates the highest frequency at which a fixed interaural phase difference (IPD) of varphi (varied here

120 ortex showed robust and consistent tuning to interaural phase difference (IPD).

121 ed in the firing rate of neurons that detect interaural phase difference (IPD).

122 mely, a following response to modulations in interaural phase difference (the interaural phase modula

123 Such periodic modulations to interaural phase difference can evoke a steady state fol

124 As the IPM-FR magnitude varied with interaural phase difference modulation depth, it could p

125 itude-modulated signal is presented, and the interaural phase difference of the carrier is switched p

126 Frequencies with interaural phase differences that are shared by both sou

127 pendent: spike rates elicited by a 0 degrees interaural phase disparity (IPD) were very different whe

128 r vertebrates makes an ongoing comparison of interaural phase for the localization of sound in the az

129 and the acoustic change complex evoked by an interaural phase inversion; (b) psychoacoustic tests inc

130 of anesthetized guinea pigs were recorded to interaural phase modulation (IPM) before, during, and af

131 ulations in interaural phase difference (the interaural phase modulation following response; IPM-FR).

132 ere we show that detection of changes in the interaural phase or amplitude difference occurs through

133 ency, but not the measures of sensitivity to interaural phase, supported the suggestion that preferen

134 ral modulation detection, and sensitivity to interaural phase; and (c) speech tests including filtere

135 e, CT scans revealed relatively little BI-CI interaural place mismatch (26 insertion-angle mismatch)

136 These results suggest that reducing interaural place mismatch and potentially improving bina

137 Clinical correction of interaural place mismatch using binaural or computed-tom

138 Interaural place mismatch was evaluated in 19 BI-CI and

139 ways over time-can compensate for peripheral interaural place mismatch.

140 The resulting interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch can diminish sp

141 For these populations, however, interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch can occur and t

142 ted from FRAs, and they are used to quantify interaural response map differences.

143 nges in interaural correlation, a measure of interaural similarity, and compare them with behavior.

144 ment allow ICC neurons to dynamically encode interaural sound localization cues while maintaining an

145 y assumptions about frequency relationships, interaural symmetry or etiology.

146 eurons to tens of microsecond differences in interaural temporal delay (ITD) derives in part from the

147 Neurons in the medial superior olive encode interaural temporal disparity, and their receptive field

148 The owl's auditory system computes interaural time (ITD) and level (ILD) differences to cre

149 processing pathways specialized in encoding interaural time (ITD) and level (ILD) differences, respe

150 agation, which is defined by combinations of interaural time (ITD) and level (ILD) differences.

151 spatial receptive fields (RFs) computed from interaural time (ITD) and level (ILD) differences.

152 Interaural time and intensity differences (ITD and IID)

153 sensitivity to acoustical cues-particularly interaural time and level differences (ITD and ILD)-that

154 binaural sound localization are comprised of interaural time and level differences (ITD/ILD), which a

155 sers' access to binaural information, namely interaural time and level differences (ITDs and ILDs), c

156 Computational models of sensitivity to interaural time and level differences suggest that upreg

157 ch subject's ear canals, which preserved the interaural time and level differences that are critical

158 g: sensitivity to monaural spectral cues and interaural time and level differences, integration acros

159 loss, model spike rates varied smoothly with interaural time and level differences, replicating empir

160 the bird to a constantly increasing range of interaural time cues.

161 n of the function relating discharge rate to interaural time delay (ITD) fell close to midline for al

162 nd localization in humans depends largely on interaural time delay (ITD).

163 ns and tunable RC circuits for imitating the interaural time delay neurons following the Jeffress mod

164 en sound-frequency tuning and sensitivity to interaural time delays for neurons in the midbrain nucle

165 ral stimulus; most neurons were sensitive to interaural time delays in pure tone and noise stimuli su

166 h is equivalent to a specific combination of interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level di

167 Our data further indicate that interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level di

168 These neurons use interaural time difference (ITD) as a cue for the horizo

169 NL neurons may exert a dynamic modulation of interaural time difference (ITD) coding in a CF-dependen

170 The barn owl (Tyto alba) uses interaural time difference (ITD) cues to localize sounds

171 Both mammals and birds use the interaural time difference (ITD) for localization of sou

172 Neural tuning for interaural time difference (ITD) in the optic tectum of

173 Interaural time difference (ITD) is a critical cue to so

174 Interaural time difference (ITD) is a cue to the locatio

175 among the two groups.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Interaural time difference (ITD) is an important cue for

176 When an interaural time difference (ITD) is conveyed by a narrow

177 The interaural time difference (ITD) is the primary cue to l

178 Sensitivity to changes in the interaural time difference (ITD) of 50 msec tones was me

179 rgic inhibition can shift the tuning for the interaural time difference (ITD) of the cell.

180 Monaural neurons early in the interaural time difference (ITD) pathway encode the phas

181 Interaural time difference (ITD) plays a central role in

182 Through study of interaural time difference (ITD) processing, the functio

183 In a previous study, a reduction of the interaural time difference (ITD) sensitivity has been sh

184 In the barn owl, interaural time difference (ITD) serves as a primary cue

185 We investigated whether interaural time difference (ITD) statistics inherent in

186 tems localize sound sources by computing the interaural time difference (ITD) with submillisecond acc

187 associations between auditory cues, such as interaural time difference (ITD), and locations in visua

188 l neuron in the MSO is tuned to its own best interaural time difference (ITD), indicating the presenc

189 mary cue for localization along the azimuth, interaural time difference (ITD), is based on a cross-co

190 signal-to-noise ratio in the encoding of the interaural time difference (ITD), one of two primary bin

191 mative model of sound source localization by Interaural Time Difference (ITD), that reproduces a weal

192 ICX neurons are tuned for interaural time difference (ITD), the owl's primary cue

193 olive, and these sites were correlated with interaural time difference (ITD)-sensitive responses to

194 the sound at the left and right ears, called interaural time difference (ITD).

195 e timing information from each ear to detect interaural time difference (ITD).

196 nes and coincidence detection to measure the interaural time difference (ITD).

197 ry space that is based, in part, on a map of interaural time difference (ITD).

198 s compute horizontal sound location from the interaural time difference (ITD).

199 erences in the sounds reaching the two ears [interaural time difference (ITD)] to identify where the

200 ptive fields (RFs) because of sensitivity to interaural time difference and frequency-specific intera

201 of the brain can acquire alternative maps of interaural time difference as a result of abnormal exper

202 Both species determine the interaural time difference by finding the delay necessar

203 ing versus location during the processing of interaural time difference cues in vivoSIGNIFICANCE STAT

204 ever, the first-order central neurons of the interaural time difference detection circuit encode info

205 of the chicken nucleus laminaris, the first interaural time difference encoder that computes informa

206 nucleus laminaris (NL), the first encoder of interaural time difference for sound localization in bir

207 ween binaural and monaural responses nor the interaural time difference for which nucleus laminaris n

208 ons to the most potent localization cue, the interaural time difference in low-frequency signals (< a

209 o offset interaural intensity differences in interaural time difference processing.

210 s are sufficient for estimating the stimulus interaural time difference using responses from single t

211 citatory input to lose their selectivity for interaural time difference when coincidence of impulses

212 ris neurons from losing their sensitivity to interaural time difference with intense sounds.

213 many mammals to locate a sound source is the interaural time difference, or ITD.

214 a shift in the tuning of tectal neurons for interaural time difference.

215 as coincidence detectors for measurement of interaural time difference.

216 ons depended on the neurons' selectivity for interaural time difference.

217 r implant users do poorly on tasks involving interaural time differences (ITD), a cue that provides i

218 anatomical substrate for the computation of interaural time differences (ITD).

219 of changes in tuning for frequency-specific interaural time differences (ITDs) and level differences

220 t process different sound localization cues, interaural time differences (ITDs) and level differences

221 ations in the match between their tuning for interaural time differences (ITDs) and the locations of

222 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are a major cue for l

223 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are a major cue for l

224 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are a major cue for s

225 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are an important cue

226 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are the dominant cue

227 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are the dominant cues

228 When interaural time differences (ITDs) are the only availabl

229 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are the primary cue f

230 Sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs) conveyed in the tempo

231 Birds and mammals exploit interaural time differences (ITDs) for sound localizatio

232 The detection of interaural time differences (ITDs) for sound localizatio

233 Accurate use of interaural time differences (ITDs) for spatial hearing m

234 location in the horizontal plane, extracting interaural time differences (ITDs) from the stimulus fin

235 Detection of interaural time differences (ITDs) is crucial for sound

236 eral CIs, bilateral CI users' sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs) is still poorer than

237 laminaris (NL) is involved in computation of interaural time differences (ITDs) that encode the azimu

238 e capable of great accuracy in detecting the interaural time differences (ITDs) that underlie azimuth

239 Many animals use the interaural time differences (ITDs) to locate the source

240 ns in the medial superior olive (MSO) encode interaural time differences (ITDs) with sustained firing

241 erally implanted human subjects discriminate interaural time differences (ITDs), a major cue for soun

242 a major category of sound localization cue, interaural time differences (ITDs), in juvenile barn owl

243 nteraural intensity or level differences and interaural time differences (ITDs), interact perceptuall

244 em uses three cues to decode sound location: interaural time differences (ITDs), interaural level dif

245 athway where cues used to locate sounds, ie, interaural time differences (ITDs), interaural level dif

246 anipulation altered the relationship between interaural time differences (ITDs), the principal cue us

247 studied example is the computational map of interaural time differences (ITDs), which is essential t

248 circuitry responsible for the computation of interaural time differences (ITDs).

249 detector neurons that are tuned to different interaural time differences (ITDs).

250 are interaural level differences (ILDs) and interaural time differences (ITDs).

251 cts in direction (and its underlying cues of interaural time differences and interaural level differe

252 Responses to interaural time differences and spectral cues were relat

253 on of a sound's direction by detecting small interaural time differences and visual processing, which

254 These interaural time differences are an important source of i

255 l sources relative to large mammals, because interaural time differences are much smaller.

256 This suggests that appropriate interaural time differences are necessary for restoring

257 ergic inhibition can influence the coding of interaural time differences for sound localization in th

258 mmalian brainstem circuit for computation of interaural time differences is composed of monaural cell

259 y inputs that convey sensitivity to relevant interaural time differences is instructed by the experie

260 mmonly assume that sound lateralization from interaural time differences is level invariant.

261 tal frequency discrimination limens (F0DLs), interaural time differences limens (ITDLs), and attentiv

262 previous study, uCDCs were less sensitive to interaural time differences than HCs, resulting in unmod

263 auditory brainstem of mammals and birds use interaural time differences to localize sounds.

264 e detectors necessary for the computation of interaural time differences used in sound localization.

265 al level differences but presented scrambled interaural time differences with vocoded speech.

266 ed on different time of arrival at the ears (interaural time differences, ITDs).

267 lternative, direct measure of sensitivity to interaural time differences, namely, a following respons

268 delays between sounds reaching the two ears (interaural time differences, or ITDs).

269 ts to the MSO, which tune the sensitivity to interaural time differences, undergo substantial structu

270 had poor cortical sensitivity to changes in interaural time differences, which are critical for loca

271 ns in the nucleus laminaris (NL) that detect interaural time differences.

272 Interaural time disparities (ITDs) are the primary cues

273 aural inputs and is implicated in processing interaural time disparities used for sound localization.

274 i that varied in interaural intensity and in interaural time of arrival.

275 rovides an adaptive mechanism for preserving interaural time-delay information (a proxy for the locat

276 ensitivity was assessed through detection of interaural time/phase differences, while speech percepti

277 ects (both sexes) using binaural processing (interaural-time-difference discrimination with simultane

278 binaural sound localization cues, including interaural timing differences (ITDs) and interaural leve

279 Interaural timing differences (ITDs) are computed using

280 such as interaural level differences (ILDs), interaural timing differences (ITDs), and spectral cues.

281 cues can be used to compute sound direction: interaural timing differences (ITDs), interaural level d

282 t contributes to sound localization based on interaural timing differences.

283 SCs, thus refining coincidence detection and interaural timing differences.

284 rior-inferior translation ("z-translation"), interaural translation ("y-translation"), and roll tilt