戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 tion and contralateral inhibition to compute interaural level differences.
2 d vary their output spike rates according to interaural level differences.
3 cate that distance to the nearest object and interaural level differences allows steering the robot c
4 obotic model of bat obstacle avoidance using interaural level differences and distance to the nearest
5 ying cues of interaural time differences and interaural level differences) and distance for normal-he
6                    Here, we investigated how interaural-level differences are combined across frequen
7 ment 3 maintained faithful long-term average interaural level differences but presented scrambled int
8  frequency response area, and a shift in the interaural level difference function of LSO neurons.
9 PSC kinetics are required to generate mature interaural level difference functions, and that longer-l
10         Spike rate sensitivities to binaural interaural level difference (ILD) and average binaural l
11                Conversely, when both ITD and interaural level difference (ILD) cues are available, di
12 te that interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level difference (ILD) play a role in the for
13               The gain value is modulated by interaural level difference (ILD) primarily through scal
14      In the present study, we focused on the interaural level difference (ILD) processing in the prim
15 l motion stimulus produced by modulating the interaural level difference (ILD), a major cue for sound
16 ratio (D/R) is more reliable and robust than interaural level difference (ILD).
17 aural time difference and frequency-specific interaural level difference (ILD).
18 tion of interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level difference (ILD).
19 etized ferrets with noise sequences in which interaural level differences (ILD) rapidly fluctuated ac
20 ation, and disrupted binaural integration of interaural level differences (ILD).
21 uency sounds in the horizontal plane uses an interaural-level difference (ILD) cue, yet little is kno
22 s used to localize the sources of sounds are interaural level differences (ILDs) and interaural time
23 ction: interaural timing differences (ITDs), interaural level differences (ILDs) and the direction-de
24  (ITDs) from the stimulus fine structure and interaural level differences (ILDs) from the stimulus en
25                            LSO neurons weigh interaural level differences (ILDs) through precise inte
26 that LSO neurons can signal small changes in interaural level differences (ILDs), a cue to horizontal
27 he auditory system of guinea pigs to compare interaural level differences (ILDs), a key localization
28 nds, ie, interaural time differences (ITDs), interaural level differences (ILDs), and pinna spectral
29 ocation: interaural time differences (ITDs), interaural level differences (ILDs), and spectral notche
30 uding sound localization information such as interaural level differences (ILDs), interaural timing d
31  both ears, and LSO neurons are sensitive to interaural level differences (ILDs), one of the primary
32 ing interaural timing differences (ITDs) and interaural level differences (ILDs).
33 at high-frequency monaural spectral cues and interaural-level differences (ILDs) are used to generate
34 HL on P16, but not before or after, disrupts interaural level difference sensitivity contained in lon
35 cortical neurons and in their sensitivity to interaural level differences, the principal localization
36  the increased EPSC duration after AT shifts interaural level difference to the right and compensates
37 he results suggest that linear processing of interaural level difference underlies spatial tuning in
38                   Faithful long-term average interaural level differences were insufficient for produ