ライフサイエンスコーパス: interaural time difference

1 as coincidence detectors for measurement of interaural time difference.

2 ons depended on the neurons' selectivity for interaural time difference.

3 a shift in the tuning of tectal neurons for interaural time difference.

4 ns in the nucleus laminaris (NL) that detect interaural time differences.

5 t contributes to sound localization based on interaural timing differences.

6 SCs, thus refining coincidence detection and interaural timing differences.

7 ptive fields (RFs) because of sensitivity to interaural time difference and frequency-specific intera

8 cts in direction (and its underlying cues of interaural time differences and interaural level differe

9 Responses to interaural time differences and spectral cues were relat

10 on of a sound's direction by detecting small interaural time differences and visual processing, which

11 These interaural time differences are an important source of i

12 l sources relative to large mammals, because interaural time differences are much smaller.

13 This suggests that appropriate interaural time differences are necessary for restoring

14 of the brain can acquire alternative maps of interaural time difference as a result of abnormal exper

15 Both species determine the interaural time difference by finding the delay necessar

16 ing versus location during the processing of interaural time difference cues in vivoSIGNIFICANCE STAT

17 ever, the first-order central neurons of the interaural time difference detection circuit encode info

18 ects (both sexes) using binaural processing (interaural-time-difference discrimination with simultane

19 of the chicken nucleus laminaris, the first interaural time difference encoder that computes informa

20 nucleus laminaris (NL), the first encoder of interaural time difference for sound localization in bir

21 ween binaural and monaural responses nor the interaural time difference for which nucleus laminaris n

22 ergic inhibition can influence the coding of interaural time differences for sound localization in th

23 ons to the most potent localization cue, the interaural time difference in low-frequency signals (< a

24 mmalian brainstem circuit for computation of interaural time differences is composed of monaural cell

25 y inputs that convey sensitivity to relevant interaural time differences is instructed by the experie

26 mmonly assume that sound lateralization from interaural time differences is level invariant.

27 Our data further indicate that interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level di

28 h is equivalent to a specific combination of interaural time difference (ITD) and interaural level di

29 These neurons use interaural time difference (ITD) as a cue for the horizo

30 NL neurons may exert a dynamic modulation of interaural time difference (ITD) coding in a CF-dependen

31 The barn owl (Tyto alba) uses interaural time difference (ITD) cues to localize sounds

32 Both mammals and birds use the interaural time difference (ITD) for localization of sou

33 Neural tuning for interaural time difference (ITD) in the optic tectum of

34 Interaural time difference (ITD) is a critical cue to so

35 Interaural time difference (ITD) is a cue to the locatio

36 among the two groups.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Interaural time difference (ITD) is an important cue for

37 When an interaural time difference (ITD) is conveyed by a narrow

38 The interaural time difference (ITD) is the primary cue to l

39 Sensitivity to changes in the interaural time difference (ITD) of 50 msec tones was me

40 rgic inhibition can shift the tuning for the interaural time difference (ITD) of the cell.

41 Monaural neurons early in the interaural time difference (ITD) pathway encode the phas

42 Interaural time difference (ITD) plays a central role in

43 Through study of interaural time difference (ITD) processing, the functio

44 In a previous study, a reduction of the interaural time difference (ITD) sensitivity has been sh

45 In the barn owl, interaural time difference (ITD) serves as a primary cue

46 We investigated whether interaural time difference (ITD) statistics inherent in

47 tems localize sound sources by computing the interaural time difference (ITD) with submillisecond acc

48 associations between auditory cues, such as interaural time difference (ITD), and locations in visua

49 l neuron in the MSO is tuned to its own best interaural time difference (ITD), indicating the presenc

50 mary cue for localization along the azimuth, interaural time difference (ITD), is based on a cross-co

51 signal-to-noise ratio in the encoding of the interaural time difference (ITD), one of two primary bin

52 mative model of sound source localization by Interaural Time Difference (ITD), that reproduces a weal

53 ICX neurons are tuned for interaural time difference (ITD), the owl's primary cue

54 olive, and these sites were correlated with interaural time difference (ITD)-sensitive responses to

55 s compute horizontal sound location from the interaural time difference (ITD).

56 e timing information from each ear to detect interaural time difference (ITD).

57 the sound at the left and right ears, called interaural time difference (ITD).

58 nes and coincidence detection to measure the interaural time difference (ITD).

59 ry space that is based, in part, on a map of interaural time difference (ITD).

60 erences in the sounds reaching the two ears [interaural time difference (ITD)] to identify where the

61 r implant users do poorly on tasks involving interaural time differences (ITD), a cue that provides i

62 anatomical substrate for the computation of interaural time differences (ITD).

63 t process different sound localization cues, interaural time differences (ITDs) and level differences

64 of changes in tuning for frequency-specific interaural time differences (ITDs) and level differences

65 ations in the match between their tuning for interaural time differences (ITDs) and the locations of

66 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are a major cue for l

67 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are a major cue for l

68 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are a major cue for s

69 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are an important cue

70 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are the dominant cue

71 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are the dominant cues

72 When interaural time differences (ITDs) are the only availabl

73 Interaural time differences (ITDs) are the primary cue f

74 Sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs) conveyed in the tempo

75 Birds and mammals exploit interaural time differences (ITDs) for sound localizatio

76 The detection of interaural time differences (ITDs) for sound localizatio

77 Accurate use of interaural time differences (ITDs) for spatial hearing m

78 location in the horizontal plane, extracting interaural time differences (ITDs) from the stimulus fin

79 Detection of interaural time differences (ITDs) is crucial for sound

80 eral CIs, bilateral CI users' sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs) is still poorer than

81 laminaris (NL) is involved in computation of interaural time differences (ITDs) that encode the azimu

82 e capable of great accuracy in detecting the interaural time differences (ITDs) that underlie azimuth

83 Many animals use the interaural time differences (ITDs) to locate the source

84 ns in the medial superior olive (MSO) encode interaural time differences (ITDs) with sustained firing

85 erally implanted human subjects discriminate interaural time differences (ITDs), a major cue for soun

86 a major category of sound localization cue, interaural time differences (ITDs), in juvenile barn owl

87 nteraural intensity or level differences and interaural time differences (ITDs), interact perceptuall

88 athway where cues used to locate sounds, ie, interaural time differences (ITDs), interaural level dif

89 em uses three cues to decode sound location: interaural time differences (ITDs), interaural level dif

90 anipulation altered the relationship between interaural time differences (ITDs), the principal cue us

91 studied example is the computational map of interaural time differences (ITDs), which is essential t

92 circuitry responsible for the computation of interaural time differences (ITDs).

93 detector neurons that are tuned to different interaural time differences (ITDs).

94 are interaural level differences (ILDs) and interaural time differences (ITDs).

95 binaural sound localization cues, including interaural timing differences (ITDs) and interaural leve

96 Interaural timing differences (ITDs) are computed using

97 such as interaural level differences (ILDs), interaural timing differences (ITDs), and spectral cues.

98 cues can be used to compute sound direction: interaural timing differences (ITDs), interaural level d

99 ed on different time of arrival at the ears (interaural time differences, ITDs).

100 tal frequency discrimination limens (F0DLs), interaural time differences limens (ITDLs), and attentiv

101 lternative, direct measure of sensitivity to interaural time differences, namely, a following respons

102 many mammals to locate a sound source is the interaural time difference, or ITD.

103 delays between sounds reaching the two ears (interaural time differences, or ITDs).

104 o offset interaural intensity differences in interaural time difference processing.

105 previous study, uCDCs were less sensitive to interaural time differences than HCs, resulting in unmod

106 auditory brainstem of mammals and birds use interaural time differences to localize sounds.

107 ts to the MSO, which tune the sensitivity to interaural time differences, undergo substantial structu

108 e detectors necessary for the computation of interaural time differences used in sound localization.

109 s are sufficient for estimating the stimulus interaural time difference using responses from single t

110 citatory input to lose their selectivity for interaural time difference when coincidence of impulses

111 had poor cortical sensitivity to changes in interaural time differences, which are critical for loca

112 ris neurons from losing their sensitivity to interaural time difference with intense sounds.

113 al level differences but presented scrambled interaural time differences with vocoded speech.