戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  high complexity, nonstationarity, and large interindividual differences.
2 far has failed to account for these possible interindividual differences.
3 g revealed that short-term stability exceeds interindividual differences.
4 n toward the periphery in presence of marked interindividual differences.
5 ts revealed considerable intraindividual and interindividual differences among epitope-specific T-cel
6 e metabolites was performed to determine the interindividual differences and assess the relative bioa
7 e, may underlie many aspects of normal human interindividual differences and may be an important poin
8 e consistency over time, accounting for both interindividual differences and trial-to-trial fluctuati
9                               The magnitude, interindividual difference, and tight link to age of the
10 hematical models that can explain intra- and interindividual differences, and to examine how key anci
11 ng of previously acquired knowledge using an interindividual differences approach.
12                                       Robust interindividual differences are consistently observed in
13 ers, but the neurogenetic mechanisms driving interindividual differences are largely unknown.
14         Yet, the mechanisms underlying these interindividual differences are largely unknown.
15                                         Such interindividual differences are likely to be disease rel
16                                Whether these interindividual differences are mirrored by idiosyncrati
17                                        These interindividual differences are often more than tenfold;
18  that we can use machine learning models and interindividual differences at the brain level represent
19 orneal staining and TBUT are associated with interindividual differences but not intraindividual chan
20 (WM) capacity is often studied by exploiting interindividual differences, capacity may also differ ac
21       Further PK optimization to account for interindividual differences could be achieved by real-ti
22                          Large, reproducible interindividual differences exist in resting sympathetic
23                                  Substantial interindividual differences exist in the vulnerability t
24 l be useful for future investigations of the interindividual differences for CPA-induced DNA-DNA cros
25                                          Are interindividual differences, for example in tract latera
26 2) deficiency/insufficiency can arise due to interindividual differences in absorption and metabolism
27                     These data indicate that interindividual differences in activity of enzymes that
28  span and life span require understanding of interindividual differences in age-dependent functional
29 ion differentially drive intraindividual and interindividual differences in altruistic behavior.
30 serotonin receptor genes, were predictive of interindividual differences in anxiety-like behavior.
31 on in healthy individuals by controlling for interindividual differences in baseline dopamine functio
32 mic, whole-body stimuli while accounting for interindividual differences in baseline dopamine.
33 rsion might provide the functional basis for interindividual differences in behavior and cognition.
34 imit this flexibility, leading to consistent interindividual differences in behavior.
35 resented by neuroimaging features to predict interindividual differences in behavioural measures.
36 ta(2)-adrenoceptor have been associated with interindividual differences in blood pressure and the di
37 on of drug metabolism genes may explain some interindividual differences in both anticancer drug phar
38                                     Finally, interindividual differences in brain activity relate to
39 rogen levels and, thereby, may contribute to interindividual differences in breast cancer risk associ
40 etabolism and, thereby, may possibly explain interindividual differences in breast cancer risk associ
41 hether genetic differences could account for interindividual differences in breast cancer risk.
42 elevant to dietary choice; 2) characterizing interindividual differences in chemosensory function and
43       A compartmental model that allowed for interindividual differences in cis- and all-trans-lycope
44            There are important and sustained interindividual differences in cognition during aging.
45  a better understanding of the mechanisms of interindividual differences in cognition.
46 onship informs about the biological basis of interindividual differences in cognitive control.
47 mage to gray matter hubs, helping to explain interindividual differences in cognitive outcomes after
48                                              Interindividual differences in colon DNA adducts levels
49  individuals into 2 distinct groups based on interindividual differences in concentrations of differe
50 EBA); activity in the PMv moreover reflected interindividual differences in congruent arm ownership.
51 its unique features, with stable, meaningful interindividual differences in connectivity patterns and
52 tics, and diet are reported to contribute to interindividual differences in conversion of daidzein to
53    These results demonstrate that intra- and interindividual differences in cortical network integrat
54 al events mediating the relationship between interindividual differences in cortical surface area and
55 oter sequences that also might contribute to interindividual differences in CYP2C9 expression.
56  in clopidogrel efficacy might be related to interindividual differences in CYP3A4 metabolic activity
57  control, and recent studies have shown that interindividual differences in dACC anatomy are associat
58 ults enhance the biological understanding of interindividual differences in dietary intake by highlig
59 we report that hippocampal activity reflects interindividual differences in discounting rates, with s
60                   We have observed extensive interindividual differences in DNA methylation of 8590 C
61 ggesting that quantitating and understanding interindividual differences in DNA repair capacity (DRC)
62 y within the oxytocin gene appear to explain interindividual differences in dopaminergic responses to
63 man receptor polymorphisms may contribute to interindividual differences in drug effects.
64 uces a model system that can rapidly analyze interindividual differences in drug metabolism.
65  help to evaluate potential CYP2D6-dependent interindividual differences in drug response in the cont
66 attempts to elucidate the inherited basis of interindividual differences in drug response, with the e
67 in prefrontal-amygdala interactions underpin interindividual differences in economic decision making.
68 ividual variation in the FPC signal predicts interindividual differences in effectively adapting beha
69 g substrates with important implications for interindividual differences in efficacy and toxicity.
70  diverse downstream effects that manifest as interindividual differences in efficacy, adverse effects
71 lutamine (Gln), GABA or their ratios predict interindividual differences in effort-based motivated ta
72                      Genetic determinants of interindividual differences in energy expenditure (EE) a
73 sociation remained significant regardless of interindividual differences in exposure to discriminatio
74                                     We found interindividual differences in expression patterns in vi
75  may be the biological basis that determines interindividual differences in extrahepatic microsomal d
76                                   Consistent interindividual differences in fixation positions were h
77 The first-principles model better quantifies interindividual differences in food intake, shows how as
78 ask-based fMRI data, these two DCS predicted interindividual differences in frequency of behavioral l
79 identified hundreds of proteins that explain interindividual differences in functional connectivity a
80 igenetic mechanisms that are associated with interindividual differences in gene expression in brain
81                                              Interindividual differences in generation of new fat cel
82  abnormalities, which collectively determine interindividual differences in GGH activity and influenc
83 , that GM and KM allotypes contribute to the interindividual differences in humoral immunity to MUC1.
84 her candidate genes that are associated with interindividual differences in humoral immunity to rubel
85                             There were large interindividual differences in IBS-SSS scores associated
86 only during TLR signalling and contribute to interindividual differences in immune response.
87 polar disorder risk, schizophrenia risk, and interindividual differences in intelligence.
88 rmal range of plasma hepcidin values, 36% of interindividual differences in iron absorption are expla
89   Pain is a deeply personal experience, with interindividual differences in its chronification and tr
90 gulation and provide testable predictions on interindividual differences in LD as well as neurocognit
91 3% increase to a 49% decrease) contribute to interindividual differences in LDL-C levels.
92 dy how experience and genetics contribute to interindividual differences in learned song.
93 ge accuracy of ~70% but yielded considerable interindividual differences in listeners' response speed
94 duced statin sensitivity is a determinant of interindividual differences in low-density lipoprotein c
95 idual variability in GABA level is linked to interindividual differences in many aspects of visual pe
96                                              Interindividual differences in many behaviors are partly
97               However, there are significant interindividual differences in McGurk perception: some c
98 ) in metallothionein (MT) genes may underlie interindividual differences in mercury biomarker levels.
99 nd M3 in four out of six samples, suggesting interindividual differences in metabolism.
100 ateral alpha amplitude selectively predicted interindividual differences in metacognitive abilities (
101                             Furthermore, the interindividual differences in methylation seen across t
102 vary in parallel; clinically, however, great interindividual differences in mitral regurgitation can
103 of plasma CK-M and CA-3 revealed changes and interindividual differences in muscle tissue proteome dy
104                        There are significant interindividual differences in naturally occurring antib
105 lear to what extent genetic factors underlie interindividual differences in network topography.
106 ll, we demonstrated how FKBP5 contributes to interindividual differences in neural and real-life affe
107 nal psychiatry approaches allow for modeling interindividual differences in neural as well as subject
108 sms in HLA-DPB1 are strongly associated with interindividual differences in neutralizing antibody lev
109 e of KIR and HLA genes in disease as well as interindividual differences in NK cell potency.
110 s have been described, which may account for interindividual differences in odorant detection thresho
111                            Identification of interindividual differences in OSA endotypes and disease
112 h the host genetic background contributes to interindividual differences in other determinants of HIV
113                                  At present, interindividual differences in outcomes of psychotic dis
114  variants to both disease susceptibility and interindividual differences in outcomes.
115 erential DNA repair activity and may explain interindividual differences in overall survival after th
116 euron excitability and thereby contribute to interindividual differences in pain in other families, t
117 ional brain connectome that is predictive of interindividual differences in pain sensitivity.
118     Furthermore, brain activation related to interindividual differences in pain was not detected, de
119  subject-specific iPSCs can be used to model interindividual differences in pain.
120  modulates pain signaling and contributes to interindividual differences in pain.
121 at modulate pain signaling and contribute to interindividual differences in pain.SIGNIFICANCE STATEME
122  in peripheral sensory neurons contribute to interindividual differences in pain; and third, using wh
123  in peripheral sensory neurons contribute to interindividual differences in pain; and third, using wh
124 of beta1AR at this locus may be the basis of interindividual differences in pathophysiologic characte
125                             The existence of interindividual differences in personality traits poses
126                                              Interindividual differences in plasma low-density lipopr
127  This relationship occurred independently of interindividual differences in preferential facial infor
128                                      Linking interindividual differences in psychological phenotype t
129                             This can explain interindividual differences in regurgitation for compara
130 provided anatomically specific evidence that interindividual differences in response speed is associa
131                                              Interindividual differences in response to diet exist, b
132 n glucagon secretory responses contribute to interindividual differences in response to SGLT2 inhibit
133                               However, large interindividual differences in responses to rTMS have be
134                                    The large interindividual differences in responses to the interven
135                                              Interindividual differences in resulting plasma concentr
136 ked activity in the pre-SMA was predicted by interindividual differences in risk-aversion attitudes e
137             These results suggest widespread interindividual differences in RNA stability related to
138                                              Interindividual differences in sensitivity to evening li
139    Thus, our findings suggest a link between interindividual differences in sensorimotor speed and se
140 STPP as a potential genetic locus underlying interindividual differences in serotonin transporter fun
141                                          The interindividual differences in severity of acute radiati
142 f parietal and occipital cortices related to interindividual differences in size, orientation, and br
143 in amygdala gray matter volume accounted for interindividual differences in social transitivity perfo
144  sequence of activation was identified, with interindividual differences in specific patterns.
145 ect brain development, contributing to shape interindividual differences in stress vulnerability and
146                                              Interindividual differences in such positive and negativ
147          Furthermore, this activity predicts interindividual differences in susceptibility to novelty
148 ve TAM metabolites play an important role in interindividual differences in TAM metabolism, cell line
149  functional MRI paradigm and correlated with interindividual differences in task accuracy.
150 rks (Delta connectivity lFPN-rFPN) predicted interindividual differences in task performance more acc
151                                Additionally, interindividual differences in task preference, assessed
152 he human experience of pain and may underlie interindividual differences in the adaptation and respon
153                                              Interindividual differences in the amplitude of this ele
154 "compensation" for underlying genetic-driven interindividual differences in the baseline chromatin an
155 ion-polymerase chain reaction to investigate interindividual differences in the cutaneous expression
156                               We found large interindividual differences in the degree of model-based
157 etic and environmental influences explaining interindividual differences in the developmental course
158                                              Interindividual differences in the effects of reward on
159 ance imaging and tractography, could explain interindividual differences in the effects of rTMS.
160 , and other drug targets have been linked to interindividual differences in the efficacy and toxicity
161       Single-subject analysis revealed clear interindividual differences in the extension of such per
162                                 We show that interindividual differences in the extension of the PPS
163 absorbed in the jejunum but with substantial interindividual differences in the extent of absorption.
164 dence also suggests a potential link between interindividual differences in the gut microbiota and va
165                                   In humans, interindividual differences in the gyral architecture of
166                                              Interindividual differences in the linear change in hype
167 ange in representational similarity predicts interindividual differences in the malleability of subje
168                                       Strong interindividual differences in the microbial conversion
169                 This new evidence hints that interindividual differences in the microbiome may accoun
170 sed on loss aversion with the aim to address interindividual differences in the neural bases of choic
171 ta-glucuronidase (GUS) enzymes may influence interindividual differences in the onset and treatment o
172                               Traditionally, interindividual differences in the population are accoun
173 actions and microbial metabolite profiles to interindividual differences in the risk of HFD-driven co
174  has become clear that there are substantial interindividual differences in the risk of HIV acquisiti
175  this study were to compare the magnitude of interindividual differences in the severity of liver inj
176 art of the phenotype and explain the intense interindividual differences in the severity of the disea
177 in dopamine clearance that account for large interindividual differences in the steady-state plasma d
178                 Previous work has shown high interindividual differences in the susceptibility to the
179                                              Interindividual differences in the toxicity and response
180                                    Capturing interindividual differences in the translated genome wil
181 A methylation pattern analysis showed little interindividual differences in the WBCs and normal epith
182      Moreover, AhR-deficient mice had higher interindividual differences in their microbiome.
183 amyloid biomarker measurements may be due to interindividual differences in total amyloid-beta produc
184 ted with multiple myelin markers, suggesting interindividual differences in tract myelination may pla
185       The aim of this study was to elucidate interindividual differences in trans-resveratrol metabol
186                                              Interindividual differences in transgene expression were
187                               We found large interindividual differences in TSP responses, which were
188 N-OH-MeIQx-N2-glucuronide is probably due to interindividual differences in UDP-glucuronosyltransfera
189    Activity assays demonstrated 2- to 4-fold interindividual differences in UGT activity and qualitat
190 als, and this variability is associated with interindividual differences in visual perception.
191 n in these regulatory pathways might explain interindividual differences in vulnerability to stress.
192 c proactive interference (PI) contributes to interindividual differences in working memory (WM) capac
193 To understand the genetic basis of extensive interindividual differences in xenobiotic disposition, w
194                                 In addition, interindividual differences, including genetic variation
195 ographics and anthropometrics), such that an interindividual difference of 200 pg/mL was associated w
196                             In contrast, the interindividual differences of F(ue)'s between the volun
197 netic resonance imaging (fMRI), finding that interindividual differences of glutamate levels in the d
198 association into intraindividual changes and interindividual differences over time.
199 tive enhancement has neglected the effect of interindividual differences, such as traits, on stimulat
200               Therefore, it does not capture interindividual differences that may exist due to geneti
201  occur periodically in each brain, or marked interindividual differences that may persist throughout
202                                              Interindividual differences vary across environmental co
203                                    Examining interindividual differences, we find the benefit of proa
204                                       Strong interindividual differences were also observed for rhyth
205                                     Although interindividual differences were detected, animals prese
206 rains of three other dogs appears to reflect interindividual differences, which are associated presum
207 ism by human gut microbiota shows pronounced interindividual differences, which should be taken into
208                Although animals showed large interindividual differences while learning this task, mo
209                                   There were interindividual differences, with ONL thicknesses at mos

 
Page Top