戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 al pars plana vitrectomy with peeling of the internal limiting membrane.
2 retina similarly was stained to evaluate the internal limiting membrane.
3 t often found together, and only with a torn internal limiting membrane.
4 counting retinal cell nuclei anterior to the internal limiting membrane.
5 e vessels, including capillaries, and in the internal limiting membrane.
6 ithelium and was especially prevalent in the internal limiting membrane adjacent to the vitreous body
7 subretinal fluid (72.5% vs 34.5%, P < .001), internal limiting membrane and inner retinal undulations
8  years and had CFCs with fine folding of the internal limiting membrane and mild pigment changes.
9  surfaces, and the average thickness between internal limiting membrane and outer retinal pigment epi
10  Center subfield thickness (CSF) between the internal limiting membrane and the top of the retinal pi
11 tance between Bruch membrane opening and the internal limiting membrane) and peripapillary total reti
12  the automated segmentation of the anterior (internal limiting membrane) and the posterior boundary o
13 t has investigated the role of the vitreous, internal limiting membrane, and posterior vitreous detac
14 collagen fibrils with close adhesions to the internal limiting membrane are not always detectable by
15                                          The internal limiting membrane, Bruch's membrane/retinal pig
16 chisis in the outer retina, with six showing internal limiting membrane detachment.
17 after epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling with internal limiting membrane (ERM/ILM) peeling and without
18 ll layer changes following temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap (i-ILMF) surgery for idi
19 y with a 2.5-disc-diameter temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap (i-ILMF) technique.
20 onal outcomes after vitrectomy with inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique combined with
21 g macular hole who underwent vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane flap technique combined with
22 chment, SPOT successfully assisted different internal limiting membrane flap techniques and achieved
23 s capsular flap transplantation and inverted internal limiting membrane flap.
24                                              Internal limiting membrane flaps likely improve closure
25                                              Internal limiting membrane flaps were likely more benefi
26 nal vasculature with active flow through the internal limiting membrane; Flat neovascularization in a
27 hyaloid hemorrhage in 5 eyes, premacular sub-internal limiting membrane hemorrhage in 2 eyes, an oute
28 er retina (P = .002); (2) the outpouching of internal limiting membrane (ILM) (P = .004); (3) the bre
29                                              Internal limiting membrane (ILM) abrasion is an alternat
30 s elevated when they were separated from the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and attached when there
31                                          The internal limiting membrane (ILM) and BMO were manually s
32 to sequences containing 3-O-sulfation in the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and in the basement mem
33 eoretinal interface abnormalities, including internal limiting membrane (ILM) detachment with retinal
34                                              Internal limiting membrane (ILM) drape sign is an import
35 coelastic device (OVD) to stabilize inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap for the treatment
36 ompare the surgical outcomes of the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and ILM
37 ical and functional outcomes of the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique and the
38                                              Internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap techniques are use
39 s capsular flap transplantation and inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap were reported to c
40   To compare anatomic and visual outcomes of internal limiting membrane (ILM) flaps versus peeling in
41                                     Inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flaps were developed to
42  in capillaries in some individuals, but the internal limiting membrane (ILM) had the most intense re
43 calized primarily to the vitreous cavity and internal limiting membrane (ILM) of the retina, where th
44                      A PPV was combined with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peel in 94.1% and catar
45                                      Lack of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peel, increasing hole s
46 rwent surgery with pars plana vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peel, with a minimum fo
47 (iOCT DISCOVER group) or PPV with compulsory internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling (conventional g
48  identify predictive factors for spontaneous internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling after idiopathi
49 yes with MHRD that underwent vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and inverted fl
50 t successful pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for idiopathic
51 gents are used with vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for the treatme
52              The 23G vitrectomy with ERM and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling was performed b
53 tervention with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, and gas tampon
54                                              Internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, ILM flap use,
55 embranes, and gas tamponade, with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling.
56 yes displaying EVG were captured with manual internal limiting membrane (ILM) segmentation and analyz
57 tical coherence tomography (OCT) findings of internal limiting membrane (ILM) separation and posterio
58                      Epiretinal membrane and internal limiting membrane (ILM) specimens were removed
59 le (FTMH) after vitrectomy with the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) technique.
60         High preoperative reflectance of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) to outer plexiform laye
61                       After core vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane (ILM) was peeled between the
62  of fibrillary protrusion of sRNFL above the internal limiting membrane (ILM) were documented.
63             Four masked operators delineated internal limiting membrane (ILM), retinal nerve fiber la
64 hat underwent vitrectomy with peeling of the internal limiting membrane (ILM).
65 ent pars plana vitrectomy and peeling of the internal limiting membrane (ILM).
66  with the greatest reaction product near the internal limiting membrane (ILM).
67 treous gel, subhyaloid space, or beneath the internal limiting membrane (ILM).
68  membrane (P = 0.03), and the peeling of the internal limiting membrane (ILM; P = 0.02), with a great
69  0.128), total surgical-duration(p = 0.299), internal-limiting membrane(ILM) peel time(p = 0.682), an
70  traction in 3 eyes, noncompliance of native internal limiting membrane in 2 eyes, epiretinal membran
71 The method of counting cell nuclei above the internal limiting membrane in histologic sections is con
72 l cells and vitreous collagen fibrils on the internal limiting membrane in specimens removed from eye
73 ting neovascular nuclei extending beyond the internal limiting membrane into the vitreous.
74 r surface excimer laser ablation through the internal limiting membrane, into the Muller cell foot pr
75            OCT image sets were evaluated for internal limiting membrane irregularities, abnormal reti
76 resent work addresses whether peeling of the internal limiting membrane is necessary during vitrectom
77 oth its attached and detached state) and the internal limiting membrane of the retina is essential to
78    Immunofluorescence of the residual intact internal limiting membrane on the retinal surface also s
79                                          The internal limiting membrane, outer nuclear layer (ONL), e
80 uccess; subsequently, pars plana vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane peel and gas tamponade was pe
81 idence figures varied from 0.05% in PPV with internal limiting membrane peel to 0.65% in those underg
82 s, pars plana vitrectomy with epiretinal and internal limiting membrane peel was ineffective in the t
83 ith pars plana vitrectomy and epiretinal and internal limiting membrane peel.
84 ith pars plana vitrectomy and epiretinal and internal limiting membrane peel.
85 the area of fluorescein staining or with the internal limiting membrane peeled area, but were matched
86 ignificant differences between fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling (FSIP) and standard i
87 imiting membrane peeling (FSIP) and standard internal limiting membrane peeling (ILMP).
88 aser treatment (JPL; 146 patients), PPV plus internal limiting membrane peeling (ILMP; 50 patients),
89                            A vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling and an air tamponade
90                                              Internal limiting membrane peeling and endolaser are use
91 atients underwent pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling and sulfur hexafluori
92                   Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling followed by a short-t
93                                              Internal limiting membrane peeling may not be necessary
94                                              Internal limiting membrane peeling was associated negati
95                                              Internal limiting membrane peeling was associated with i
96                                              Internal limiting membrane peeling was associated with l
97 ll patients underwent pars plana vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane peeling, and 17% hexafluoroet
98 urteen eyes underwent pars plana vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane peeling, and gas or silicone
99 nitis pigmentosa, ocular hypotensive lipids, internal limiting membrane peeling, and intravitreal tri
100                 The PPV, in conjunction with internal limiting membrane peeling, effectively removed
101 ptoms, spherical equivalent refraction (SE), internal limiting membrane peeling, tamponade choice, an
102                                              Internal limiting membrane peeling, with perihole ILM sp
103 ith epiretinal membrane or proliferation and internal limiting membrane peeling.
104 tomated method with manual correction of the internal limiting membrane, RNFL, and retinal pigment ep
105  cells and vitreous collagen remnants on the internal limiting membrane should be further elucidated
106  We analyzed surgically excised flat-mounted internal limiting membrane specimens and epiretinal memb
107                                              Internal limiting membrane specimens were removed from 1
108 neovascularization did not break through the internal limiting membrane; Subclinical neovascular buds
109 e, cherry hemorrhage, perimacular ridge, and internal limiting membrane tear.
110                                              Internal limiting membrane tears were identified in 21 o
111                              Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane technique combined with scler
112  The peripapillary microvasculature from the internal limiting membrane to the retinal nerve fiber la
113  interruption of all retinal layers from the internal limiting membrane to the retinal pigment epithe
114 tween Bruch's membrane opening (BMO) and the internal limiting membrane to the standard sequential mi
115 he use of cytokine adjuvants, peeling of the internal limiting membrane, vital staining of the intern
116 s peeled, and "double peeling," in which the internal limiting membrane was also stained and peeled.
117                                              Internal limiting membrane was peeled under iOCT control
118 PPV alone was performed in 30.8% (171 eyes), internal limiting membrane was removed in 25.7% (143 eye
119   The OCT slab from 0 to 3 microns above the internal limiting membrane was used to detect MLCs.
120                             Nuclei above the internal limiting membrane were then counted in a masked
121 his study indicate that it forms part of the internal limiting membrane when the vitreous is in its a
122 nal limiting membrane, vital staining of the internal limiting membrane with indocyanine green dye, a
123 to Muller cell processes, extending from the internal limiting membrane, with very low staining, to t
124 atio of pixels occupied by vessels below the internal limiting membrane within the temporal area of t
125 %), myelinated nerve fiber layer (1.3%), and internal limiting membrane wrinkling (1.3%).

 
Page Top