ライフサイエンスコーパス: international classification

1 eriphery using the categories defined by the International Classification confirmed the presence of w

2 SE +/- 21.2); it was 74.3% (SE >/= 18.8) for International Classification group C to E eyes.

3 l fundus photography graded according to the International Classification of Age-related Maculopathy

4 The 2015 International Classification of Corneal Dystrophies clas

5 ave been hindered by the lack of a validated International Classification of Disease (ICD) coding alg

6 ing Comprehensive Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Disease (ICD)-9/10 codes

7 ric disorder and specific diagnosis based on International classification of disease (ICD-10) criteri

8 TBI, and PTSD were ascertained by validated International Classification of Disease 9th revision (IC

9 clampsia (n = 1804) were identified from the International Classification of Disease codes in the Dan

10 sing a validated frailty definition based on International Classification of Disease codes to identif

11 Patients were identified using International Classification of Disease for Oncology, Th

12 they had two or more records with a relevant International Classification of Disease in the patient r

13 ured sepsis events by screening records with International Classification of Disease methods and then

14 ed patients with primary aldosteronism using International Classification of Disease, 9th and 10th Re

15 We used a validated approach involving International Classification of Disease, 9th edition, Cl

16 hicago-wide database of medical records with International Classification of Disease, Ninth Edition c

17 ascular morbidity score were calculated from International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision

18 onic medical records of all patients with an International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision,

19 xtract data on all bronchiolitis admissions (International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision,

20 ere considered pulmonary embolism-related if International Classification of Disease-10 code for acut

21 (PDD) or autistic disorder (AD) according to International Classification of Disease-9th edition (ICD

22 Adults with International Classification of Disease-9th Revision-Cli

23 International Classification of Disease-Ninth Revision (

24 tic breast cancer without prior CVD, we used International Classification of Diseases (9th and 10th r

25 Register using validated algorithms based on International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 8-10.

26 e was a marked increase in the complexity of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes wit

27 We compared admission rates between the two International Classification of Diseases (ICD) periods,

28 databases worldwide increasingly use the WHO International Classification of Diseases (ICD) system to

29 e ascertained using discharge codes from the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), Ninth Re

30 least in part, to difficult coding under the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10.

31 hypersensitivity conditions according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11 revisi

32 persensitivity conditions in the forthcoming International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-11 versio

33 ASD was defined from International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 and ICD

34 Patients were identified based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) for ci

35 French adaptation of the 10th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10).

36 development of the eleventh revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), WHO a

37 th and without a glaucoma diagnosis based on International Classification of Diseases (Ninth Edition

38 s COVID-19 death, defined as the presence of International Classification of Diseases 10 codes U07.1

39 ses 9th Revision (ICD-9) transitioned to the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (

40 Diseases 9th revision (ICD-9) code 446.1 or International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (

41 tegories of health conditions defined by the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision c

42 ation on sleep problems (severe/extreme) and International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision d

43 for individual patients was identified using International Classification of Diseases 9th edition (IC

44 mortality was determined on the basis of the International Classification of Diseases 9th or 10th Rev

45 When the International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision (I

46 disease were identified by first-in-365-days International Classification of Diseases 9th revision (I

47 d as having a new endophthalmitis diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision 36

48 ugh December 31, 2010 were ascertained using International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision co

49 ify renal condition diagnoses categorized by International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision co

50 a on hospital admissions with CVEs (based on international classification of diseases [ICD]-10 coding

51 ems such as the El Escorial criteria and the International Classification of Diseases are systematic

52 Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases billing codes w

53 e who had at least 2 ambulatory care claims (International Classification of Diseases code 367.1) dur

54 as those who had >=2 ambulatory care claims (International Classification of Diseases code 367.1) in

55 sented with troponin >99th percentile or the International Classification of Diseases code for MI ove

56 arital status, sex, educational level, site, International Classification of Diseases code, Current P

57 ADHD was defined by International Classification of Diseases codes (Ninth or

58 ient and outpatient visits and defined using International Classification of Diseases codes for bipol

59 disease deaths were defined according to the International Classification of Diseases codes for disea

60 Cases were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes for inter

61 ter databases were queried for the following International Classification of Diseases codes from May

62 International Classification of Diseases codes identifie

63 gurgitation on color Doppler in FHS and from International Classification of Diseases codes in Sweden

64 for neuropathy defined according to relevant International Classification of Diseases codes in the Sw

65 Cases were identified using RSV-specific International Classification of Diseases codes to captur

66 International Classification of Diseases codes were used

67 Incident HF was defined by the International Classification of Diseases codes.

68 ection, cancer, other, or not reported using International Classification of Diseases codes.

69 halmic immune-related AEs were identified by International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes

70 Counts of International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes

71 International Classification of Diseases diagnostic code

72 Causes of death were determined using International Classification of Diseases diagnostic code

73 Summary SMR estimates for the International Classification of Diseases disease categor

74 cies were defined by morphology codes in the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, t

75 e files for HCC, which was identified by the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, t

76 cs, ARV and anticoagulant prescriptions, and International Classification of Diseases Ninth and Tenth

77 We used International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision

78 UD was defined by discharge diagnoses of the International Classification of Diseases or a purchase o

79 nt Register) because of psychosis, using the International Classification of Diseases version 10 defi

80 A total of 647 patients had an International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition d

81 dified Angus criteria, and for records using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition,

82 Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition,

83 er work is required to determine the optimal International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition,

84 Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition,

85 Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition,

86 uating estimates of two previously published International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition,

87 s Trial) admitted to the medical ICU with an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition,

88 myocardial infarction (AMI) or stroke using International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision

89 en until 5 years of age by primary/secondary International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision

90 ord search, browsing of an arborized list of International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision

91 -malignant blood disorder-related costs (WHO International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision

92 day or arrival in Sweden, if later, until an International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision

93 een 1993 and 1999 who later received ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision)

94 he relative hazards of cardiovascular death (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision,

95 ended in 2014 to avoid the transition to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision,

96 e primary diagnosis of allergic reaction per International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision.

97 ch participating ICU were screened using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision.

98 th an infection, classified according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Version.

99 of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, and the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision,

100 re classified as having mental illness using International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th R

101 training the algorithm were required to have International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition co

102 ogy of sepsis across the transition from the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, a

103 lation were identified using prior validated International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

104 By comparison, explicit International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

105 We used International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

106 We also used International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

107 incidence estimates using the modified Angus International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, c

108 edictive value = 34%; F1 = 0.48) and "Angus" International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, C

109 For the records using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, w

110 ses of syphilitic uveitis was defined by (1) International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (

111 Ocular diagnoses were determined by International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision c

112 osis and decompensation were determined from International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision c

113 rom statins to ezetimibe monotherapy, having International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision,

114 Cirrhosis was documented, based on International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision,

115 we identified 10,768 PICU admissions with an International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

116 patients with severe sepsis were created: 1) International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

117 We aggregated primary International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

118 Progressive HM was defined as HM with the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision,

119 International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

120 2007-2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

121 weeks) and ELBW (<1000 g) infants with PDA (International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision,

122 o identify those newly diagnosed with NAION (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

123 ears of age with 2 or more NIIPPU diagnoses (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

124 el was developed and internally validated in International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,

125 We identified individuals ages 18-64 with International Classification of Diseases, 9thRevision di

126 ng an ED for ocular conditions identified by International Classification of Diseases, billing codes.

127 nfections and secondary SUD diagnoses, using International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modif

128 , we identified PWID by using codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Current Proced

129 ldren were followed up for diagnoses of ASD (International Classification of Diseases, Eighth Revisio

130 Parental depression diagnoses (based on the International Classification of Diseases, Eighth Revisio

131 ped to popular hierarchical ontologies (e.g. International Classification of Diseases, Human Phenotyp

132 disease age-standardized death rates (as per International Classification of Diseases, ninth and tent

133 en 2012 and 2016 using implicit and explicit International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tent

134 ied with the diagnosis of endophthalmitis by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tent

135 d positive and negative predictive values of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tent

136 tic cardiovascular disease (self-reported or International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition

137 e CHS adjudicated event (CHS[adj]), selected International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition

138 for rate of keratoplasty performed for FECD (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition

139 r instance, the positive predictive value of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition

140 We used laboratory results, International Classification of Diseases, ninth edition

141 ment, photocoagulation) and patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition,

142 We used the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition,

143 sified as having severe mental illness if an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition,

144 rhythmias, or heart failure), ascertained by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition,

145 ith a diagnosis of DME were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition,

146 tcome was incident CVD events, identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition,

147 -of-pocket costs, and firearm injury-related International Classification of Diseases, Ninth or 10th

148 nfluenza-like illness (ILI) using diagnostic International Classification of Diseases, Ninth or Tenth

149 An algorithm using 4 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

150 ssigned an SSTI-associated code based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

151 year they had (1) >=1 principal or secondary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

152 yloidosis and (2) >=1 principal or secondary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

153 d clinical trial and Medicare claims data, 4 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

154 ty, and diabetes mellitus diagnosis by using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

155 Clinical diagnoses of ASDs identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

156 injury (Barell Matrix Type 1 classification, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

157 Retinal artery occlusion was identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

158 t of 2995 persons diagnosed with giardiasis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

159 Tenth Revision [ICD-10] codes F20 to F29 and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

160 talizations were identified by the principal International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

161 ed risk factors were identified by secondary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

162 ecord review included 40011 patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

163 mber 30, 2006, we identified 156 743 with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

164 d compared with claims-based estimates using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

165 es to identify patients with histoplasmosis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

166 y 15, 2013 to May 14, 2015) with a principal International Classification of Diseases, Ninth revision

167 Thyroid disease was determined based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

168 choroidal neovascularization as indicated by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

169 Participants included patients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

170 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

171 diagnosis of Alzheimer disease based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

172 Codes from International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

173 Medicaid Services inpatient claims data and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

174 Demographic data and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

175 le patients with codes for delivery from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

176 s not attending the ARIC-NCS visit, or by an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

177 Primary diagnoses were classified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

178 ncidence of PCP defined as patients with the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

179 itive impairment, suggested by corresponding International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

180 18 years) with meningitis or encephalitis by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

181 Influenza infection was defined by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

182 between 2000 and 2013 were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

183 Septic patients as identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

184 Patients who were included had 1 or more International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

185 tional Health Insurance Research Database by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

186 Infection diagnoses were ascertained by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

187 and bleeding events were identified per the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

188 in the study required the patient to have an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

189 Participants were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

190 With the use of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

191 mon diagnosis in both settings was diplopia (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

192 Cases of HZ were identified using validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

193 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

194 trocardiographic (ECG) phenotypes defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

195 sion visits in the EHR were defined based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

196 prediction models for ADHF separately for 3 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

197 0 to December 2010, sepsis was identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

198 Exfoliation syndrome outcome was defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

199 We included individuals aged 18-65 with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

200 identified using diagnosis-related group and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

201 We used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

202 ural Terminology codes; comorbidities as per International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

203 y were identified using both diagnoses (from International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

204 betic patients were screened by diagnosis of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

205 cation of Diseases, Eighth Revision [ICD-8], International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

206 Truven Health MarketScan Database and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

207 CLD who underwent an EGS procedure based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

208 on opioids were identified by codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

209 dex, sepsis, number of acute organ failures, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

210 in Boston, Massachusetts, was searched using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

211 ds for research, it is important to validate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

212 onfatal opioid overdose was identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

213 ned from the final hospital discharge codes (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

214 t children with stroke were identified by an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

215 , and inpatient costs calculated per 3-digit International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

216 Hospitalized HF, identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

217 Design, Setting, and Participants: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

218 s (19%) with major depressive disorder (MDD; International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

219 cated another diagnosis were available for 4 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

220 We used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

221 Incident AF was ascertained by use of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

222 uding Asperger syndrome, or unspecified PDD (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

223 of interest was hospital admission for ICH (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

224 ationwide Inpatient Sample (2003-2009) using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

225 We identified CHB patients by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

226 We identified International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

227 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

228 uated in the emergency department who had an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

229 ns in terms of bipartite graphs and provides International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

230 ional Trauma Data Bank were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

231 ected using the codes for anaphylaxis in the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

232 ith severe sepsis, as defined by concomitant International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

233 ospective analysis of adult patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

234 Cases were identified by the combination of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

235 s undergoing an endoscopy were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

236 on-ST-segment-elevation MI was identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

237 was defined as a discharge with a secondary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

238 epair with and without LAA ligation by using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

239 sion, Clinical Modification procedure codes (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

240 We identified MSSA and MRSA bacteremia using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

241 ring at age 18 to 49 years, documented using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

242 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

243 rocedural codes related to DED from selected International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

244 They were identified according to International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision

245 on for asthma, bronchitis and bronchiolitis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Version

246 ses, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification or International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition

247 There were 184,562 records with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

248 An algorithm using 3 International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

249 ernal causes of death in accordance with the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

250 Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification and 3 International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

251 Incident cases of PLC (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

252 Failure Registry to national registries with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

253 ly attended infectious diseases according to International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

254 Databases to identify adult outpatients with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

255 sease conditions were coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision

256 s on in-hospital complications registered by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

257 documented in the medical records using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

258 on to severe stress or adjustment disorders (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

259 residents were modeled using hospitalization International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

260 ision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

261 Subjects were identified by the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

262 tions between 2016 and 2018 that included an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

263 orized using the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

264 team of medical experts and coded using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

265 We identified patients diagnosed with SMI ( International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision

266 sexual orientation as a binary outcome, and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth, Revisio

267 ted between 2009 and 2014 were identified by International Classification of Diseases,9th Revision, C

268 We compiled Australian Modification-International Classification of Diseases-10 codes from t

269 National Health Service in England with the International Classification of Diseases-10 codes in Hos

270 national Classification of Diseases-9 and/or International Classification of Diseases-10 codes, where

271 "legal intervention" in accordance with the International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision (

272 m of China, which has coded deaths using the International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision (

273 47 patients from an initial 76 identified by International Classification of Diseases-9 and/or Intern

274 from the electronic medical record by use of International Classification of Diseases-9 billing codes

275 spitalizations with primary diagnosis of VT (International Classification of Diseases-9 Clinical Modi

276 ification code: 427.1) and cardiac ablation (International Classification of Diseases-9 Clinical Modi

277 The diagnosis of PBC was established with International Classification of Diseases-9 code 571.6 us

278 e for patients with a admission diagnosis of International Classification of Diseases-9 code 584.xx (

279 MI (Medicaid, Medicare, and Veterans Affairs International Classification of Diseases-9 codes) and de

280 ents identified as having a history of HF by International Classification of Diseases-9th and/or 10th

281 Specifically, we extracted International Classification of Diseases-9th revision di

282 Based on International Classification of Diseases-9th Revision, C

283 om those identified with previously deployed International Classification of Diseases-based methods.

284 ularization procedures were identified using International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Edition-C

285 ational Inpatient Sample 2001 to 2012, using International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision

286 ents over the age of 18 years with a 3-digit International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision

287 lculated using patient safety indicators and International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision,

288 METHODS AND Patients undergoing TAVR (International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-

289 Subjects were identified using International Classification of Diseases-Oncology (ICD-O

290 nal hospital admission database according to International Classification of Diseases-tenth revision

291 he eighth, ninth, and tenth revisions of the International Classification of Diseases.

292 al Disorders and the eleventh edition of the International Classification of Diseases.

293 sified using the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability,

294 tion of ICD-11 and implementation in the WHO International Classification of Health Interventions (IC

295 e Reese-Ellsworth group IV to V, and 37 were International Classification of Retinoblastoma group C t

296 sed according to the minimal criteria by the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD).

297 International Classification of Sleep Disorders, second

298 T) and was graded according to the OCT-based International Classification System developed by the Int

299 Images were graded according to the International Classification System for age-related macu

300 Fundus images were graded using the International Classification System for Age-Related Macu