ライフサイエンスコーパス: interspecific

1 ariflorus populations demonstrates extensive interspecific admixture and hybridization, and documents

2 ip between mating system, floral morphology, interspecific and interpopulation compatibility and pist

3 however, the impact of these transitions on interspecific and interpopulation reproductive barriers

4 ailed knowledge of the oak genome and of oak interspecific and intraspecific phenotypic variation wil

5 pproach applied here can be used to quantify interspecific associations and gain a more nuanced under

6 Mechanisms such as interspecific associations are important in structuring

7 still lack an understanding of how important interspecific associations are in structuring gut microb

8 ectively, our results suggest that microbial interspecific associations coupled with host spatial pro

9 We found that interspecific associations were the most important mecha

10 We identify key microbial interspecific associations within the moose gut and quan

11 These data provide proof-of-principle for interspecific blastocyst complementation as a viable app

12 Previously, we demonstrated by interspecific blastocyst complementation between mouse a

13 Here, we examine how motorboats affect an interspecific cleaning mutualism critical for coral reef

14 Interspecific coevolutionary interactions can result in

15 ganisms play a key role in intraspecific and interspecific communication; therefore, it is possible t

16 ential rooting depth, facilitating extensive interspecific comparison.

17 This theory is largely based on interspecific comparisons and has never been tested usin

18 Most of our knowledge is derived from interspecific comparisons between inbreeding species and

19 In birds, interspecific comparisons have been foundational in conn

20 Furthermore, interspecific comparisons identified a small number of h

21 Similarly, interspecific comparisons suggest that proteostasis may

22 ution have previously been evaluated through interspecific comparisons, which capture numerous change

23 Here we demonstrate that interspecific competition alters both expansion speed an

24 munities is understudied relative to that of interspecific competition among prey.

25 the importance of understanding the role of interspecific competition and disturbance when studying

26 ivores by increasing the probability of both interspecific competition and human-carnivore conflict.

27 Among carnivores, niche overlap can trigger interspecific competition and intraguild predation, whil

28 host-microbe interactions, thereby reducing interspecific competition and promoting the coexistence

29 our study highlights multiple ways in which interspecific competition can alter selective regimes, c

30 Theoretical models suggest that such interspecific competition can alter the speed of expansi

31 Interspecific competition can drive niche partitioning a

32 Interspecific competition can play a key role in structu

33 Whilst increased interspecific competition can result in coexisting speci

34 In contrast, for blue tits, interspecific competition contributes as much as intrasp

35 staneum and Tribolium confusum, we show that interspecific competition dramatically slows expansion a

36 experimental ponds, we demonstrate that (i) interspecific competition drives rapid genotypic change,

37 Here, we show that evolution in response to interspecific competition feeds back to change the cours

38 The consequences of increased interspecific competition from a model alien fish Leucis

39 Although interspecific competition has long been recognised as a

40 including age-specific effects of intra- and interspecific competition in density-dependence models i

41 he relative strength of intraspecific versus interspecific competition in dominance hierarchies.

42 mechanism by which the perceived pressure of interspecific competition influences the transition from

43 s was projected to increase, indicating that interspecific competition is likely to play an important

44 g part of the temperature performance curve, interspecific competition is predicted to increase.

45 s are diminished, population consequences of interspecific competition may become apparent, especiall

46 propose a new hypothesis that adaptations to interspecific competition may help to explain difference

47 Classic theory shows that interspecific competition may select for traits that inc

48 Interspecific competition may thus be a pervasive force

49 ting range limits of species, but showed how interspecific competition might slow the advance of an i

50 r results provide experimental evidence that interspecific competition promotes the transition from i

51 Interspecific competition reduces resource availability

52 Moreover, interspecific competition resulted in an increase in the

53 Further, interspecific competition resulted in more variable spat

54 In contrast to the common expectation that interspecific competition should drive the evolution of

55 ess of intraspecific competition relative to interspecific competition that inherently slows or even

56 ection in the presence and absence of strong interspecific competition using a greenhouse experiment

57 se stabilized coexistence, which intensified interspecific competition within predator-free refuges a

58 Moreover, shrub facilitation mediates the interspecific competition within the associated annual c

59 s is not easy due to the fast invasion rate, interspecific competition, and pesticide resistance.

60 he trade-off between foraging efficiency and interspecific competition, and underline niche partition

61 specific driver of habitat selection, namely interspecific competition, can vary at different spatial

62 ge Pleistocene carnivorans imply intensified interspecific competition, given that tooth fracture ris

63 as niche expansion following a reduction in interspecific competition, may prompt invasion success,

64 tacommunity-level extinctions likely relaxed interspecific competition, which could explain the absen

65 treatments, suggesting trophic impacts from interspecific competition.

66 ntraspecific competition to be stronger than interspecific competition.

67 d measurements to be generally stronger than interspecific competition.

68 oorly matched resources, and the strength of interspecific competition.

69 artition soil P, but this does not eliminate interspecific competition.

70 e curves will be narrower in the presence of interspecific competitors, causing a species' optimal br

71 Interspecific conflict and partner-maladaptation are fra

72 Interspecific conflict was also confirmed at the metapop

73 call for linking within-species responses to interspecific coordination of plant traits.

74 scions were easy to perform and suitable for interspecific cotton grafting.

75 an important allopolyploid crop derived from interspecific crosses between Brassica rapa (2n = 2x = 2

76 Specifically, it was developed by multiple interspecific crosses between northern highbush blueberr

77 ring and flight potentially explain the high interspecific DEE slope for hummingbirds compared to oth

78 c density dependence should be stronger than interspecific density dependence.

79 rly-season irradiance, our results highlight interspecific differences and the importance of mid-late

80 us expression to determine whether there are interspecific differences at the target-site level.

81 terrestrial artiodactyls, exhibit tremendous interspecific differences in a number of phenotypes, inc

82 While the mutations that caused the interspecific differences in floral color and scent have

83 ans and chimpanzees that are consistent with interspecific differences in lactation, diet, and immune

84 ablished, we lack a framework for predicting interspecific differences in litter decay within and acr

85 on in an ancient neuropeptide contributes to interspecific differences in parental care.

86 h three additional C4 grass species in which interspecific differences in stomatal behavior could be

87 ic variation is quite similar to that of the interspecific differences in terms of the number, distri

88 We also found interspecific differences in the relative importance of

89 ical variables; we thus conclude either that interspecific differences in transport cost have no infl

90 is single trait axis insufficiently captures interspecific differences in water requirements and ther

91 crease in pest pressure. We suggest that the interspecific differences observed (robusta vs. Arabica)

92 There were considerable interspecific differences, but some generalisations emer

93 ription of a community given the ubiquity of interspecific differences, which presumably lead to ecol

94 Levels of interspecific differentiation were lower in parapatry th

95 Despite numerous correlations between interspecific divergence in behaviour and nervous system

96 ong positive effect on male, but not female, interspecific divergence rates.

97 This plant genus exhibits considerable interspecific diversity in morphology and physiology; fo

98 The high interspecific diversity of Glomeromycotina gene repertoi

99 elationships concerns the role of intra- and interspecific diversity of mycorrhizal fungi, which are

100 Interspecific dominance hierarchies, analysed using thre

101 taneous fat stores and dominance rank in the interspecific dominance hierarchy, whereas in egalitaria

102 Hence, considering only interspecific ecological differences generating density

103 cally distant, but sharing a need for common interspecific emotional understanding.

104 richness, total abundance and probability of interspecific encounter) vary over the theoretical struc

105 pathways, which additionally contributed to interspecific epigenomic variation across fungi.

106 sion analysis in the C. maxima x C. moschata interspecific F1 hybrid and their two parents indicates

107 Interspecific gene exchange is expected to have greatest

108 ion can select for floral traits that reduce interspecific gene flow and contribute to prezygotic iso

109 Phylogenetic analysis is complicated by interspecific gene flow and the presence of shared ances

110 Botanists have long recognised interspecific gene flow as a common occurrence within wh

111 evaluate the relevance of hybridization and interspecific gene flow for developing a conservation pl

112 We show that extensive interspecific gene flow involving multiple species pairs

113 this concept as "good species." Nonetheless, interspecific gene flow involving their tetraploid forms

114 The evolution of genetic barriers opposing interspecific gene flow is key to the origin of new spec

115 ks, in which species remain distinct despite interspecific gene flow, are called syngameons, a concep

116 capensis sensu lato, which possibly includes interspecific gene flow, is not reflected by taxonomy.

117 Despite seemingly ubiquitous interspecific gene flow, we found evidence of strong rep

118 how mating system can facilitate or restrict interspecific gene flow.

119 For species delimitation, interspecific genetic distance threshold values of 0.4%

120 However, there existed limited studies on interspecific grafting and approaches.

121 along which tree species align, known as the interspecific growth-mortality trade-off.

122 analysis, multilocus genotype assignment and interspecific heterozygosity suggest incomplete reproduc

123 e drainage-wide pattern of selection against interspecific heterozygotes.

124 resent study was to investigate an infertile interspecific hybrid (recipient) as an appropriate host

125 In total, 503 F(2) interspecific hybrid individuals were genotyped using 7,

126 ated blueberry plants of cultivar 'Emerald' (interspecific hybrid of Vaccinium corymbosum and V. darr

127 red grape pomace (RP) on the composition of interspecific hybrid wine was studied using the Vitis sp

128 ur, the phenolic and volatile composition of interspecific hybrid wine.

129 to analyse the evolutionary consequences of interspecific hybridisation between asexual females and

130 Allopolyploidization, which entails interspecific hybridization and whole genome duplication

131 To determine the extent of interspecific hybridization between male sterile grain s

132 and associated genomic regions, spontaneous interspecific hybridization during soybean domestication

133 ing environments to uncover the influence of interspecific hybridization in yeast adaptation and dome

134 Interspecific hybridization is a common breeding approac

135 ural) selection plays a prominent role, that interspecific hybridization may be an important mechanis

136 Interspecific hybridization or barriers to hybridization

137 Our results reveal how interspecific hybridization provides an important evolut

138 circumstances and evolutionary aftermath of interspecific hybridization remain unanswered.

139 Interspecific hybridization substantially alters genotyp

140 ation (that is, genome duplication following interspecific hybridization) from two now-extinct progen

141 sses from the tribe Triticeae have undergone interspecific hybridization, resulting in allopolyploidy

142 , to dissect early and late events following interspecific hybridization, we examined the epigenome a

143 to the female gametes, a critical barrier to interspecific hybridization.

144 ansposon-mediated dispersion, or possibly by interspecific hybridization.

145 numerous microchromosomes and propensity to interspecific hybridization.

146 fertilization and can result in barriers to interspecific hybridization.

147 estication of the apple was mainly driven by interspecific hybridization.

148 iva), and improved varieties derived through interspecific hybridizations.

149 ultivars of white, red and pink grape, as 28 interspecific hybrids and 2 Vitis vinifera L. popularly

150 ficantly, methylation changes induced in the interspecific hybrids are largely maintained in the allo

151 study of allele-specific expression (ASE) in interspecific hybrids has played a central role in our u

152 g, yet examples of evolutionarily successful interspecific hybrids have been reported in all kingdoms

153 Interspecific hybrids have played a key role in research

154 With two genomes in the same organism, interspecific hybrids have unique fitness opportunities

155 l extracted from E. oleifera x E. guineensis interspecific hybrids is known to have lower palmitic ac

156 ls, and anthocyanins in two the most popular interspecific hybrids of red grapes, Rondo and Regent, n

157 to affect metabolic and biomass heterosis in interspecific hybrids or allotetraploids.

158 6 polymorphic markers between cultivated and interspecific hybrids, and 15 897 polymorphic markers wi

159 elated traits, allele-specific expression in interspecific hybrids, and/or high-impact polymorphisms

160 t reads from six Juglans species and several interspecific hybrids, we identified simple sequence rep

161 acylglycerol (TAG) biosynthesis processes in interspecific hybrids.

162 the variation observed in FA composition of interspecific hybrids.

163 ures, enabled us to test for both intra- and interspecific identity and richness effects, and transgr

164 Both intra- and interspecific identity and richness of ECM fungi regulat

165 Intra- and interspecific identity had modest but significant effect

166 izing the geographical variation in self and interspecific incompatibilities within a species can rev

167 ns to characterize the variation in self and interspecific incompatibility across 29 populations of P

168 The correlated strength of self and interspecific incompatibility across the range of P. dru

169 with P. cuspidata have significantly higher interspecific incompatibility and self-incompatibility t

170 The strength of self and interspecific incompatibility is significantly correlate

171 tative variation in self-incompatibility and interspecific-incompatibility with its close congener P.

172 he expansions and shifts when a constraining interspecific interaction is reduced or removed.

173 r, community composition of seedlings in the interspecific interaction treatment was more similar to

174 action treatments of each ant species and an interspecific interaction treatment.

175 structure that cannot be explained by direct interspecific interactions among native and exotic speci

176 hifting ranges without considering potential interspecific interactions and demographic variability i

177 de applications, in mediating the outcome of interspecific interactions and produce rapid unanticipat

178 gical uncertainty may affect the dynamics of interspecific interactions and shape the course of evolu

179 Strong interspecific interactions are disproportionately positi

180 ationships with others, and show that strong interspecific interactions are rarely conserved across t

181 We show that interspecific interactions between mutualist species in

182 n the utilization of latex components and in interspecific interactions between the pathogen and othe

183 Niche construction through interspecific interactions can condition future communit

184 nteraction networks constantly reorganize as interspecific interactions change across successional st

185 Interspecific interactions dampened seed dispersal relat

186 This emergent pattern of interspecific interactions feeds back to the efficiency

187 ubpopulations) and among species (disrupting interspecific interactions in communities).

188 of intertidal fauna such that the balance of interspecific interactions involved in community structu

189 Similar interspecific interactions may exist with other arthropo

190 espite this dampening, we found no effect of interspecific interactions on seedling recruitment.

191 Theoretically, the physiological costs of interspecific interactions should likewise alter CUE, ye

192 vioural types are related to the strength of interspecific interactions, an invasion by a biased subs

193 ns, e.g. mating or competitive behaviours or interspecific interactions, assessing invasiveness poten

194 Mutualisms, or reciprocally beneficial interspecific interactions, constitute the foundation of

195 lly varying protein interactions, ecological interspecific interactions, functional connectivity in t

196 Through interspecific interactions, inducible defences have majo

197 endent taxa whose dynamics are controlled by interspecific interactions-in particular, cross-feeding

198 nities and the varying mechanisms underlying interspecific interactions.

199 the role of behaviour as a first response to interspecific interactions.

200 pulation mean phenotypes of traits mediating interspecific interactions.

201 rophic impacts by modulating the strength of interspecific interactions.

202 are regulated by their own energy intake or interspecific interactions.

203 ons should be investigated in the context of interspecific interactions.

204 physiology and the nature of its intra- and interspecific interactions.

205 ntal aspects of the ecology and evolution of interspecific interactions.

206 lability, landscape features, and intra- and interspecific interactions.

207 likely as a way to reduce the probability of interspecific interference.

208 hropogenic habitat modification in promoting interspecific introgression in sympatric species by rela

209 We envision that interspecific introgression serves as an important mecha

210 howing frequent regulatory divergence at the interspecific level.

211 ctomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi at the intra- and interspecific levels affect ecosystem multifunctionality

212 reveal if and how the evolution of self and interspecific mate choice are linked.

213 terospecifics may be an adaptive response to interspecific mate competition.

214 Selection to prevent interspecific mating can cause an increase or a decrease

215 , suggesting occasional strong selection for interspecific mimicry.

216 Interspecific mixtures outperformed the most productive

217 riation in niche position, niche breadth and interspecific niche overlap of these species through tim

218 has important implications for understanding interspecific niche partitioning.

219 e negative intraspecific interactions versus interspecific ones.

220 Interspecific overlap of foraging areas was higher than

221 ngle nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for the interspecific Petunia recombinant inbred line (RIL) popu

222 e, smaller flowers, and weakened (or absent) interspecific pollen-pistil barriers.

223 bidopsis halleri during self-pollination and interspecific pollination and during infection with Fusa

224 Interspecific pollination of A.thaliana significantly up

225 ia and highlight the power of using multiple interspecific populations to elucidate genetic determina

226 cies were included for use in cultivated and interspecific populations.

227 composed of four segregating alleles from an interspecific pseudotestcross F(1) potato population (n

228 strong genetic divergence, a small number of interspecific reciprocal introgression events are found

229 Evolutionary history shapes the interspecific relatedness and intraspecific variation, w

230 Given the unique interspecific relationship between dogs and humans, two

231 However, the interspecific relationship between seedling performance

232 f mass and metabolic rate, and show that the interspecific relationship between these traits in anima

233 ps extend to climatic extremes, and if these interspecific relationships are confounded by trait vari

234 A few interspecific relationships remained unresolved within t

235 of specialisation and generalism in complex interspecific relationships.

236 The alpha has high interspecific repeat homogeneity and was mapped to the c

237 Previous studies have shown that some interspecific reproductive barriers (IRBs) are related t

238 m SI to MP were not associated with weakened interspecific reproductive barriers or loss of known pis

239 tionship are mainly driven by asymmetrically interspecific responses contrary to the direction of the

240 ot tips but decreased hyphal length, whereas interspecific richness had no effects.

241 were consistently significantly higher than interspecific scores (1.193 to 1.624), with the exceptio

242 Tb and lowest Tc germinated fastest, and the interspecific sensitivity of the germination rate to tem

243 hich include background matching, intra- and interspecific signaling, and physiological influences.

244 ally to serve functions including intra- and interspecific signalling.

245 Interspecific social information transfer can play a key

246 alone are not enough to explain patterns in interspecific sociality.

247 properties, three-dimensional geometry, and interspecific structural diversity of chiton girdle scal

248 cover the genome-wide spectrum of intra- and interspecific SV segregating in natural populations of s

249 t the presence of many species and extensive interspecific territoriality favors recognition of songs

250 The territorial signals linked to interspecific territoriality in birds depend on the evol

251 maintained and reinforced by selection when interspecific territoriality is adaptive.

252 nstrained by habitat structure, we find that interspecific territoriality is positively associated wi

253 We find that interspecific territoriality is widespread in birds and

254 ysis of the distribution and determinants of interspecific territoriality.

255 ent scales, from the intra-population to the interspecific, the murine first upper molar shows repeat

256 te and boreal zones, decreasing the ratio of interspecific-to-intraspecific competition by 0.25% for

257 There was an interspecific trade-off in species responses to shade ve

258 r, the slopes in the logarithmic transformed interspecific trait relationships hold stable under envi

259 These findings suggest robust interspecific trait relationships under global changes,

260 raits will change within species and whether interspecific trait relationships will shift under futur

261 and the directions mostly do not follow the interspecific trait relationships.

262 lated with species turnover, suggesting that interspecific trait variation was a significant predicto

263 among species, mirroring global estimates of interspecific trait variation.

264 In contrast, interspecific transmission from bobcats to mountain lion

265 The intersite and interspecific variability in growth patterns before mort

266 ed at small scales, but the high spatial and interspecific variability in leaf phenology has preclude

267 hese community shifts are likely a result of interspecific variability in response to increased pCO2

268 g data below detection limits as well as the interspecific variability of delta(15)N and PFAS levels

269 aphic variables that predict this intra- and interspecific variation can guide our projections of how

270 in mammals and birds shows remarkably little interspecific variation compared with other taxa.

271 Despite interspecific variation due to differences in leaf thick

272 e for future integrative work to resolve how interspecific variation in body size influences the emer

273 al. (2020) were able to quantify intra- and interspecific variation in buffering ability, and specie

274 We found significant interspecific variation in buffering ability, which vari

275 ions at the community level, and much of the interspecific variation in CNDD is explained by how tree

276 The mechanisms underlying interspecific variation in conspecific negative density

277 sus the proximate effects of temperature for interspecific variation in embryonic development time re

278 We evaluate intra- and interspecific variation in floral scent, which is a comp

279 Previous research has attempted to explain interspecific variation in geographic range size based o

280 itivity among woody species can be linked to interspecific variation in leaf morphology.

281 iating these mechanisms will require linking interspecific variation in life history with immunity, p

282 of the epigenetic landscape and may explain interspecific variation in lifespan.

283 ivity among woody plants can be explained by interspecific variation in LMA and that large-scale ozon

284 Our results did not reveal any evidence that interspecific variation in migration response is predict

285 ariation in response, substantial intra- and interspecific variation in migratory response remains to

286 history traits also explain the considerable interspecific variation in niche-distribution mismatches

287 iled to detect the influence of phylogeny on interspecific variation in other traits such as shoot de

288 Interspecific variation in peat production is thought to

289 stress-sensing mechanisms partially explain interspecific variation in regenerative ability.

290 ore, the model was used to explain intra and interspecific variation in reproductive output based on

291 Furthermore, the interspecific variation in slopes of ozone flux-response

292 ng electron microscopy, we find considerable interspecific variation in the geometry of the holes in

293 y candidate transcription factors underlying interspecific variation in the styles of Petunia flowers

294 tive to interannual rainfall variability but interspecific variation in these responses was large, ov

295 r the majority of envenomings, but extensive interspecific variation in venom composition dictates th

296 Our findings show considerable interspecific variation indicating that the chemosensory

297 ical and geographic predictors of intra- and interspecific variation.

298 is a useful tool to evaluate the strength of interspecific versus intraspecific competition, which co

299 Understanding interspecific viral transmission is key to understanding

300 , we sequenced and phenotyped a large set of interspecific yeast hybrids isolated from brewing enviro