ライフサイエンスコーパス: intimate partner violence

1 st 1 other requirement-driven screening (eg, intimate partner violence).

2 isk factor for experiencing and perpetrating intimate partner violence.

3 ys provided data for assessing the trends of intimate partner violence.

4 actors such as condomless sex, drug use, and intimate partner violence.

5 d self-harm exhibited weak associations with intimate partner violence.

6 sed measures of physical or sexual, or both, intimate partner violence.

7 ignificant associations with a lower risk of intimate partner violence.

8 ntion that aims to empower women and prevent intimate partner violence.

9 up in unsafe neighbourhoods, and witnessing intimate partner violence.

10 association between women's empowerment and intimate partner violence.

11 of an effect on reported sexual or emotional intimate partner violence.

12 olence; and attitudes and beliefs related to intimate partner violence.

13 , and exacerbate risk of food insecurity and intimate partner violence.

14 rtner violence, and both physical and sexual intimate partner violence.

15 y participants endorsed the acceptability of intimate partner violence.

16 ore, days unable to work, or perpetration of intimate partner violence.

17 ported emotional distress, and none reported intimate partner violence.

18 factors to affect individual women's risk of intimate partner violence.

19 r association between political violence and intimate-partner violence.

20 was significantly related to higher odds of intimate-partner violence.

21 ess likely to express attitudes accepting of intimate partner violence (0.45, 0.34-0.61; p<0.0001) or

22 ince last visit (1.43, 1.23-1.65), reporting intimate partner violence (2.03, 1.59-2.59), or depressi

23 ry sexual trauma (24.0% vs 5.4%), and recent intimate partner violence (2.6% vs 1.4%).

24 ever, support was highest in cases involving intimate partner violence (71.4%-78.6%) and lowest in ca

25 re past-year physical, sexual, and emotional intimate partner violence; acceptability and tolerance o

26 alence ratio 1.8 [-2.4 to 6.0]; p=0.25), and intimate partner violence (adjusted prevalence ratio 3.0

27 Intimate partner violence affects millions of people glo

28 On average, intimate partner violence affects nearly one in three wo

29 The health impacts of intimate partner violence against women and childhood se

30 imed to assess the prevalence and changes of intimate partner violence against women in LMICs.

31 Intimate partner violence against women is a global publ

32 Intimate partner violence against women is a major publi

33 These findings show that intimate partner violence against women was already high

34 ment could be one strategy to further reduce intimate partner violence against women.

35 f risk factors for perinatal depression (eg, intimate partner violence and history of mental illness)

36 arch to address the intertwined epidemics of intimate partner violence and HIV among key populations

37 c evaluations that concurrently address both intimate partner violence and HIV exist, with no interve

38 The intersection of intimate partner violence and HIV is a public health pro

39 ain the unique multilevel mechanisms linking intimate partner violence and HIV.

40 personal beliefs about the acceptability of intimate partner violence and perceived norms about inti

41 The study identifies the interaction of intimate partner violence and the quality of the relatio

42 lysis to investigate the association between intimate partner violence and women's empowerment measur

43 , we evaluated the evidence strength linking intimate partner violence and/or childhood sexual abuse

44 ns between GBV (including but not limited to intimate partner violence) and eight health outcomes: se

45 ients and seven (<1%) male partners reported intimate partner violence, and 60 (3%) female index clie

46 s pregnancy, sexually transmitted infection, intimate partner violence, and age-disparate sex.

47 ildhood trauma were associated with physical intimate partner violence, and both physical and sexual

48 oeconomic disadvantage, childhood adversity, intimate partner violence, and caregiving stress, are es

49 f proxy-identified child abuse, elder abuse, intimate partner violence, and combined violence when co

50 ints of care, support for women experiencing intimate partner violence, and control of gun ownership

51 hysical abuse, sexual abuse, and exposure to intimate partner violence, and deployment-related trauma

52 ns, strengthen the public health response to intimate partner violence, and ensure it is addressed in

53 or of public health issues such as bullying, intimate partner violence, and homicide.

54 health problems, substance or alcohol abuse, intimate partner violence, and incarceration).

55 anaemia in pregnancy, depression or lifetime intimate partner violence, and maternal HIV infection).

56 core, days unable to work, suicide attempts, intimate partner violence, and resource use and costs of

57 l activation, suicidal thoughts or attempts, intimate partner violence, and resource use and costs of

58 ing abuse and neglect, as well as addressing intimate partner violence, and to maintain vigilance abo

59 iolence is associated with increased odds of intimate-partner violence, and exposure to many traumas

60 ner violence; acceptability and tolerance of intimate partner violence; and attitudes and beliefs rel

61 More than 12 million adults experience intimate partner violence annually and more than 10 mill

62 pproximately 1.5 million US women experience intimate partner violence annually.

63 tion arm were less likely to report physical intimate partner violence (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41-0.99; p

64 these standards were less likely to condone intimate partner violence (AORs ranged from 0.29 to 0.70

65 Four participants reported intimate partner violence as a result of self-test distr

66 survey variant were more likely to perceive intimate partner violence as normative (AORs ranged from

67 survey variant were less likely to perceive intimate partner violence as normative (AORs ranged from

68 seven electronic databases for literature on intimate partner violence-associated and childhood sexua

69 ession was found among women who experienced intimate partner violence, at 38.9% (95% CI, 34.1%-43.6%

70 l to jointly estimate lifetime and past year intimate partner violence by age, year, and country.

71 shifted power from men to women and reduced intimate partner violence by five percentage points, com

72 omen and girls, despite robust evidence that intimate partner violence can be prevented.

73 at risk for depression, injurious falls, or intimate partner violence compared with screening perfor

74 a indicate there is widespread acceptance of intimate partner violence, contributing to an adverse he

75 infections, including low school attendance, intimate partner violence, depression, transactional sex

76 No participants reported intimate partner violence due to HIV testing.

77 The aim of this study was to assess intimate partner violence during pregnancy and its assoc

78 significant association between exposure to intimate partner violence during pregnancy and low birth

79 o assess the association between exposure to intimate partner violence during pregnancy and preterm b

80 Women who experienced intimate partner violence during pregnancy had an increa

81 of health to take measures aimed at avoiding intimate partner violence during pregnancy to reduce adv

82 The prevalence of intimate partner violence during pregnancy was 7.3% and

83 tors, the pregnant women who were exposed to intimate partner violence during pregnancy were two time

84 The prevalence of intimate partner violence during pregnancy, low birth we

85 y region about adverse birth outcomes due to intimate partner violence during pregnancy.

86 We also assessed women's experiences of intimate partner violence during the pandemic.

87 ve sex (1.82, 1.38-2.42); having experienced intimate partner violence during the previous 6 months (

88 lated with violence) for child maltreatment, intimate partner violence, elder abuse, and their combin

89 ghtened women's exposure to gender-based and intimate partner violence, especially in low-income and

90 not increase intimate partner violence (one intimate partner violence event related to partner notif

91 l risks of an interpersonal nature (that is, intimate partner violence, family conflict) but not OXTR

92 included anxiety symptoms; parenting stress; intimate partner violence; functioning; quality of life;

93 DR, -12.5; 95% CI, -19.1 to -6.0; P < .001), intimate partner violence (GDR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.

94 nd experiences of childhood trauma, physical intimate partner violence, harsh parenting, and other fa

95 Intimate partner violence has been noted in 3-13% of pre

96 Notably, the prevalence of psychological intimate partner violence has risen (average annual rate

97 etween poverty and women's increased risk of intimate partner violence have been observed.

98 ards of behavior were more likely to condone intimate partner violence in a greater number of vignett

99 d norms, we asked about the acceptability of intimate partner violence in five different vignettes.

100 d increased assessment and interventions for intimate partner violence in health-care settings.

101 e first estimated the weighted prevalence of intimate partner violence in LMICs with available data,

102 e partner violence and perceived norms about intimate partner violence in the community.

103 on, and overall genetic risk), experience of intimate partner violence in the year before the birth (

104 ave experienced physical or sexual, or both, intimate partner violence in their lifetime, with 13% (1

105 for physical and 2.23 (1.49-3.35) for sexual intimate-partner violence in respondents whose husbands

106 osure were associated with increased odds of intimate-partner violence in the Gaza Strip only.

107 violence was associated with male-to-female intimate-partner violence in the occupied Palestinian te

108 x workers, migrant women, women experiencing intimate partner violence, incarcerated women, and women

109 The control website was a static intimate partner violence information website.

110 improve depressive symptoms compared with an intimate partner violence information website.

111 Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects millions of US r

112 avior problems associated with resolution of intimate partner violence (IPV) after an investigation f

113 Health implications of intimate partner violence (IPV) against men is relativel

114 Intimate partner violence (IPV) against women is a major

115 Although intimate partner violence (IPV) against women is a subst

116 Intimate partner violence (IPV) against women is associa

117 Intimate partner violence (IPV) among men who have sex w

118 unstable and/or unsafe living situations and intimate partner violence (IPV) among pregnant individua

119 Both intimate partner violence (IPV) and alcohol misuse are h

120 Despite the high prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) and antepartum depressio

121 Intimate partner violence (IPV) and caregiver abuse of o

122 Intimate partner violence (IPV) and heavy drinking are c

123 Parental intimate partner violence (IPV) and maternal depression

124 the past-year prevalence of male-perpetrated intimate partner violence (IPV) and risk factors is esse

125 Intimate partner violence (IPV) and sexual violence agai

126 Intimate partner violence (IPV) and termination of pregn

127 Efforts to prevent or respond to intimate partner violence (IPV) and violence against chi

128 Infertility and intimate partner violence (IPV) are of serious concern g

129 Intimate partner Violence (IPV) can affect any woman, ir

130 a higher incidence and severity of physical intimate partner violence (IPV) during the coronavirus d

131 Evidence suggests that intimate partner violence (IPV) experience is associated

132 ess) and both non-partner violence (NPV) and intimate partner violence (IPV) experienced by women.

133 Women who experience intimate partner violence (IPV) face increased risks of

134 Intimate partner violence (IPV) has been described as be

135 The practice of screening women for intimate partner violence (IPV) in health care settings

136 droughts and physical, sexual, and emotional intimate partner violence (IPV) in India by using 2 diff

137 d women aged 15 to 49 years have experienced intimate partner violence (IPV) in their lifetimes, whic

138 There are few longitudinal estimates of intimate partner violence (IPV) incidence and continuati

139 -19 pandemic, the prevalence and severity of intimate partner violence (IPV) increased.

140 Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a complex problem wit

141 Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a critical public hea

142 Background Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global social and p

143 Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a leading cause of ho

144 Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a public health probl

145 Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a serious and prevale

146 Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant public

147 Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a substantial cause o

148 Intimate partner violence (IPV) is an important cause of

149 Intimate partner violence (IPV) is associated with HIV i

150 Intimate partner violence (IPV) is associated with incre

151 ase for the assumed psychological impacts of intimate partner violence (IPV) is derived primarily fro

152 Intimate partner violence (IPV) is highly prevalent in l

153 The public health burden of intimate partner violence (IPV) is immense, particularly

154 Intimate partner violence (IPV) is increasingly recogniz

155 Intimate partner violence (IPV) is linked to substance u

156 Intimate partner violence (IPV) is the leading cause of

157 Women experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV) might be at an increased

158 opted laws restricting firearm possession by intimate partner violence (IPV) offenders.

159 Children with known exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) or maternal depression a

160 Approximately 1 in 4 women experience intimate partner violence (IPV) or nonpartner sexual vio

161 icit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and later intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration.

162 eristics of children and parents affected by intimate partner violence (IPV) presenting in health-car

163 Understanding the contribution of intimate partner violence (IPV) to childhood health outc

164 Childhood maltreatment and intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization are major

165 ratures are associated with a higher risk of intimate partner violence (IPV), a serious violation of

166 We tested a model including these factors, intimate partner violence (IPV), and continuing adversit

167 ded symptom measures of depression and PTSD, intimate partner violence (IPV), and disability.

168 ed with changes in inequitable gender norms, intimate partner violence (IPV), and modern contraceptiv

169 es were MHCs, SAs, all drug ODs, opioid ODs, intimate partner violence (IPV), and suspected child abu

170 al stressors, including maternal exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV), maternal depressive sym

171 niques to ensure the best care for patients: intimate partner violence (IPV), mental health issues, a

172 V incidence, HIV-related challenges, such as intimate partner violence (IPV), remain unacceptably hig

173 ly-life stress exposure, such as exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV), to predict self-regulat

174 iminating structural inequalities, including intimate partner violence (IPV).

175 ding to and mitigating the increased risk of intimate partner violence (IPV).

176 n about the relationship between drought and intimate partner violence (IPV).

177 ervention's effects on contraceptive use and intimate partner violence (IPV).

178 sess the radiologic findings associated with intimate partner violence (IPV).

179 eight (LBW), women's knowledge, and physical intimate partner violence (IPV).

180 influence spatial variations in the risk of intimate partner violence (IPV).

181 dation statement on screening for family and intimate partner violence (IPV).

182 insufficient to support screening women for intimate partner violence (IPV).

183 sive sexual harassment, and forced sex), and intimate partner violence (IPV; emotional, physical, or

184 (0.45, 0.34-0.61; p<0.0001) or beliefs that intimate partner violence is a private matter (0.51, 0.3

185 addition to being a breach of human rights, intimate partner violence is associated with serious pub

186 Family and intimate partner violence is common in the United States

187 Addressing intimate partner violence is crucial to ending the HIV e

188 Although the literature on family and intimate partner violence is extensive, few studies prov

189 cian screening, counseling, and referral for intimate partner violence is lacking.

190 l intimate partner violence, suggesting that intimate partner violence is preventable in high-risk se

191 , and the robust evidence demonstrating that intimate partner violence is preventable.

192 ine interventions to help women experiencing intimate partner violence is scarce.

193 Violence against women, especially intimate partner violence, is recognized as a global pub

194 between social constructions of masculinity, intimate partner violence, male dominance in relationshi

195 t ACE domains, including child maltreatment, intimate partner violence, maternal substance misuse, ma

196 Intimate-partner violence might increase during and afte

197 4.7%), depression (n = 156; 23.7%), lifetime intimate partner violence (n = 310; 47.3%), and history

198 tion models, and many forms of violence--ie, intimate partner violence, non-partner sexual assault, f

199 e prevalence and determinants of nonphysical intimate partner violence (NP-IPV).

200 ationship status and women's risk behaviour, intimate partner violence (odds ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.15-

201 y index had an increased odds of any type of intimate partner violence (odds ratio 1.58 [95% CI 1.12

202 Assisted partner services did not increase intimate partner violence (one intimate partner violence

203 en who had screened positive for any form of intimate partner violence or fear of a partner in the 6

204 ns about their perpetration or experience of intimate partner violence or non-partner sexual violence

205 tory was associated with increased emotional intimate partner violence (OR = 2.66; 95% CI, 1.17-5.57)

206 women reported past-year physical or sexual intimate partner violence, or both, compared with 119 (2

207 Reported physical or sexual intimate partner violence, or both, was reduced among wo

208 ite of reported past-year physical or sexual intimate partner violence, or both.

209 online interventions for women experiencing intimate partner violence, particularly into the duratio

210 Intimate partner violence perpetration resulting in inju

211 ood trauma were associated with all forms of intimate partner violence perpetration.

212 Intimate partner violence persistence was associated wit

213 -income and middle-income countries (LMICs), intimate partner violence poses a substantial barrier to

214 Intimate partner violence presents a complex dilemma tha

215 omicide risk include increased investment in intimate partner violence prevention, risk assessments a

216 There were 4 instances of intimate partner violence related to study participation

217 The prevalence of intimate partner violence remains high, and some countri

218 Intimate partner violence results in greater risk of HIV

219 ndex cases, with no positive responses to an intimate partner violence screen, and with one or more c

220 ld physical abuse, homicide, youth violence, intimate partner violence, self-directed injury, firearm

221 ld physical abuse, homicide, youth violence, intimate partner violence, self-directed injury, firearm

222 des child abuse and neglect, youth violence, intimate partner violence, sexual violence, and elder ab

223 most severe forms of violence against women: intimate partner violence; sexual abuse by non-intimate

224 ss personal beliefs or perceived norms about intimate partner violence should attempt to eliminate, a

225 ment-driven screening for SDOH risk factors (intimate partner violence, substance use, and mental hea

226 although the effect was greater for physical intimate partner violence, suggesting that intimate part

227 el women's empowerment and the prevalence of intimate partner violence suggests that accelerating wom

228 onse bias in telephone prevalence studies of intimate partner violence, the authors asked women visit

229 DHS methods used to elicit attitudes toward intimate partner violence, to date there has been little

230 0.08); other outcomes (days unable to work, intimate partner violence toward females) did not statis

231 Conclusion Intimate partner violence victims undergo more imaging s

232 The weighted prevalence of any type of intimate partner violence was 37.2% (95% CI 36.6 to 37.8

233 Intimate partner violence was common (270 [47%] reported

234 Intimate partner violence was conceptualized as physical

235 n (standard deviation) number of items where intimate partner violence was endorsed as acceptable was

236 all decline in the prevalence of any type of intimate partner violence was observed with an average a

237 Across the two trials, three cases of intimate partner violence were reported (two in the cont

238 tner, and who had provided information about intimate partner violence, were included in the analysis

239 hown to successfully combat gender-based and intimate partner violence when delivered in person can b

240 Intimate partner violence, which describes physical or s

241 ly diagnosed HIV without a recent history of intimate partner violence who had not yet or had only re

242 Results indicated a moderate association of intimate partner violence with major depressive disorder

243 d prevalence of physical or sexual, or both, intimate partner violence with other forms of violence,

244 werment were associated with a lower risk of intimate partner violence: women from countries with the