ライフサイエンスコーパス: intraocular lens

1 e cataractous lens and implant an artificial intraocular lens.

2 to be pseudophakic with a posterior chamber intraocular lens.

3 d by phacoemulsification and insertion of an intraocular lens.

4 ular hole, vitreous opacities, or dislocated intraocular lens.

5 ially in eyes with an angle-supported phakic intraocular lens.

6 coemulsification and insertion of an acrylic intraocular lens.

7 nufacturers in designing suitable contact or intraocular lenses.

8 contrast sensitivity when compared to all 3 intraocular lenses.

9 ed keratometer for surgery planning of toric intraocular lenses.

10 ents implemented either as corneal inlays or intraocular lenses.

11 ird (n = 64; 38%) of original approvals were intraocular lenses.

12 vs. phakic eyes: 1.15 for posterior chamber intraocular lens, 1.43 for anterior chamber intraocular

13 Five eyes had sutured posterior chamber intraocular lenses, 1 eye had a sulcus intraocular lens,

14 aphakic, 4 patients with an anterior chamber intraocular lens, 2 patients with a scleral-fixated post

15 short-term visual outcomes of a new trifocal intraocular lens (AcrySof PanOptix).

16 ome, aniridia, aphakia, and anterior chamber intraocular lenses, among others.

17 lts proved that contamination of hydrophilic intraocular lenses and the preservative solution was the

18 imens cultured, only the hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses and their solution grew P. aeruginosa

19 amber intraocular lenses, 1 eye had a sulcus intraocular lens, and 2 eyes were aphakic.

20 aphakic eyes and eyes with anterior chamber intraocular lens, and eyes with PK (compared with eyes w

21 ion by air, solutions, surgical instruments, intraocular lens, and wound leakage have been identified

22 stable vision attributable to the subluxated intraocular lenses, and 40.3% of them required aphakic c

23 Three eyes had sclerally-fixated intraocular lenses, and one eye had a posterior chamber

24 Phakic and pseudophakic piggyback intraocular lenses are also being used to treat high deg

25 Toric intraocular lenses are also safe and effective for treat

26 In recent years new models of intraocular lenses are appearing on the market to reduce

27 inical details and analysis of the explanted intraocular lenses are provided with environmental scann

28 patient had bilateral dislocated in-the-bag intraocular lenses at 5.5 years and 6 years after surger

29 However, presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses, at least at their current stage of d

30 spherical results were achieved by selecting intraocular lenses based on a hyperopic shift of -0.75 D

31 Scleral-sutured MX60 intraocular lenses can experience intraoperative or post

32 Dislocation of the intraocular lenses can occur frequently, however.

33 Intraocular lens complications are uncommon with modern

34 Intraocular lens decentrations and dislocations can appe

35 as objective visual acuity measurements and intraocular lens design.

36 ics of 8 patients presenting with in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation after repair of retinal det

37 In-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation is an uncommon but serious

38 Patient was diagnosed with late intraocular lens dislocation, which was subsequently for

39 ibility of zonular dehiscence and subsequent intraocular lens dislocation.

40 ght in the newly developing light-adjustable intraocular lenses does not increase ECL.

41 nal results of a new extended depth of focus intraocular lens (EDOF-IOL).

42 Intraocular lens exchange was performed in 40% of patien

43 No intraocular lens exchange was required.

44 stent with a hypermetrope (21.67 mm) and the intraocular lens exchange was successful in correcting t

45 As multifocal intraocular lenses, femtosecond laser technology, and ot

46 Colored spectacle or intraocular lens filters reduce both proportionately, so

47 0 year old male patient implanted with toric intraocular lens for the treatment of post PKP astigmati

48 requently required removal of ocular device (intraocular lens, glaucoma implant, or scleral buckle).

49 Intraocular lens haptic misplacement was confirmed by ul

50 rm the clinical suspicion of misplacement of intraocular lens haptics were reviewed.

51 ent, long-term studies of a hyperopic phakic intraocular lens have shown excellent visual outcomes an

52 New trifocal intraocular lenses have been developed to try and fullfi

53 Iris-sutured intraocular lenses have been used as an alternative to t

54 dvances in the design and material of phakic intraocular lenses have made them very predictable, safe

55 incisions and cataract extraction with toric intraocular lenses have proven to be effective.

56 ction than patients with a posterior chamber intraocular lens (HR, 3.23; P<0.0266), but not more like

57 exis (C), 3) phacoemulsification (P), and 4) intraocular lens implantation (IOL).

58 0.25+/-0.41 logMAR at the final visit after intraocular lens implantation (p=0.000).

59 ed with most intraocular surgeries including intraocular lens implantation after cataract removal, it

60 Implementing safety protocols for intraocular lens implantation and asking for legal advic

61 Inaccurate biometry can lead to the wrong intraocular lens implantation and result in refractive s

62 abeculectomy and/or cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation and uncontrolled glaucoma

63 l implantation after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation appealed to the clinic.

64 phacoemulsification cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation between January 1, 2014, a

65 g stress induced on corneal incisions during intraocular lens implantation by 7 injectors revealed di

66 phacoemulsification cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation by a single surgeon betwee

67 ulsification of uncomplicated cataracts with intraocular lens implantation can be performed safely in

68 g phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation for age-related cataract.

69 sification, and the most recent advancement, intraocular lens implantation for dogs, cats, and horses

70 ng phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in patients with primary o

71 Cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation in the setting of meticulo

72 Intraocular lens implantation is not recommended for chi

73 neventful phacoemulsification and in-the-bag intraocular lens implantation on intraocular pressure co

74 tive range for surface ablation--need phakic intraocular lens implantation or clear lens extraction,

75 arly results demonstrate that monocular IC-8 intraocular lens implantation provides a continuous, bro

76 ho had undergone cataract extraction without intraocular lens implantation reported generally lower s

77 rized as having had phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation vs no cataract surgery at

78 Intraocular lens implantation was completed in 56 eyes;

79 Phacoaspiration and intraocular lens implantation was done in children with

80 Initial intraocular lens implantation was not commonly performed

81 Phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation was performed and recorded

82 Phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation was performed by 3 surgeon

83 nd anterior vitrectomy combined with primary intraocular lens implantation were included.

84 rwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation with a routine postoperati

85 ng cataract surgery (cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation), of which 33 cases (34.7%

86 Twenty simulation scenarios, including wrong intraocular lens implantation, wrong eye operation, wron

87 th phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.

88 apsular cataract extraction and "in the bag" intraocular lens implantation.

89 iatric eyes undergoing cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation.

90 patients underwent phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation.

91 follow-up underwent cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation.

92 pheral corneal relaxing incisions, and toric intraocular lens implantation.

93 dable IOP sensor in a single procedure after intraocular lens implantation.

94 d phacoemulsification, PPV, ILM peeling, and intraocular lens implantation; 20 preoperative pseudopha

95 eported efficacy and complications of phakic intraocular lens implantations in children for correctio

96 were either left aphakic (n = 53) or had an intraocular lens implanted (n = 55).

97 ery with bilateral implantation of the study intraocular lens in a private practice clinic were consi

98 The ideal intraocular lens in cases of aphakia without capsular su

99 lenses, and one eye had a posterior chamber intraocular lens in the capsular bag, with a capsular te

100 ccessful implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens in the capsular bag.

101 of small-aperture corneal inlay or specific intraocular lens in the correction of presbyopia.

102 dy, and it led to long-term stability of the intraocular lenses in 93.55% of cases.

103 n few recent reports on the use of 'premium' intraocular lenses in the setting of endothelial keratop

104 tremely long eyes implanted with a low power intraocular lens indicated that predicted RE was signifi

105 aract extraction by phacoemulsification with intraocular lens insertion performed by the Comprehensiv

106 he patient underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens insertion using the provided biometry c

107 With the introduction of several new intraocular lenses into the US ophthalmology market over

108 Initial undercorrection of intraocular lens (IOL power) is a common practice in chi

109 To describe management of a case of intraocular lens (IOL) and capsular bag (CB) dislocation

110 The 9 patients (56%) who had intraocular lens (IOL) and capsular bag removals had bet

111 ce of PCO types and the distance between the intraocular lens (IOL) and the posterior capsule (PC), i

112 To compare the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas (Barrett Uni

113 nt contributions addressing the challenge of intraocular lens (IOL) calculation in patients undergoin

114 excised membranes were gently moved in a 2.2 intraocular lens (IOL) cartridge and pulled further in t

115 e implantation of a new trifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) combined with Enhanced depth of f

116 As cataract surgery has evolved, intraocular lens (IOL) complications are rare.

117 We compared rates of intraocular lens (IOL) decentration, neodymium-doped ytt

118 PCO) after cataract surgery is influenced by intraocular lens (IOL) design and material.

119 ulotomy rate (%) of eight rigid and foldable intraocular lens (IOL) designs in a series of 5416 pseud

120 equirements in patients with late in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation operated with 2 diffe

121 y of 2 operation methods for late in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation.

122 s; multifocal (diffractive optic) and phakic intraocular lens (IOL) dysphotopsia were excluded.

123 Intraocular lens (IOL) exchange after cataract surgery i

124 rature addressing the surgical approaches to intraocular lens (IOL) fixation in the setting of inadeq

125 Scleral intraocular lens (IOL) fixation is an accepted treatment

126 a or luxated or subluxated posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) following complicated cataract su

127 ety can be improved by intraoperative use of intraocular lens (IOL) for cataract phacoemulsification.

128 niques for fixation of the posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) have been developed.

129 its underwent standard cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implant and postoperative topical

130 gone cataract surgery with posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and 7 patients had e

131 nts underwent phacoemulsification with toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and Group 2 patients

132 Toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation can be an effective

133 Evaluate the usefulness of toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation during cataract surg

134 The efficacy and safety of primary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation during early infancy

135 t 5 years of age after cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for infants enrolled

136 Patients undergoing cataract surgery and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for senile cataracts

137 Pediatric primary posterior intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in children older th

138 ong-term outcomes of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in eyes with uveitis

139 k of visual axis opacity (VAO) after primary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in infancy are neces

140 nisometropia at age 5 years after unilateral intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in infants.

141 Cataract extraction with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is a well tolerated

142 yet their relationship to aphakia vs primary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation remains unsettled.

143 More eyes undergoing cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation than eyes left aphak

144 during the surgery in terms of capsulotomy, intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, and anterior vitrec

145 urface-based method, in candidates for toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

146 on was combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

147 abbit eyes, leading to successful in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

148 uality of visual after cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

149 ied CTR, and in-the-bag single-piece AcrySof intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

150 eated using FLACS, capsular tension ring and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

151 rowing number of patients undergoing premium intraocular lens (IOL) implantations, patient expectatio

152 nation with monofocal, multifocal, and toric intraocular lens (IOL) implants.

153 PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To implant an appropriate intraocular lens (IOL) in a child, we must measure the e

154 Calculating the most accurate power of the intraocular lens (IOL) is a critical factor in optimizin

155 An intraocular lens (IOL) is implanted into residual lens t

156 uare-edge (SE) polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) intraocular lens (IOL) modification in comparison with a

157 Three cases of hydrophilic intraocular lens (IOL) opacification confined to the pup

158 been overwhelmed by the influx of multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) options in recent years, with clo

159 ataracts at age 1-7 months to either primary intraocular lens (IOL) or contact lens correction.

160 t bilateral cataract surgery with or without intraocular lens (IOL) placement at age 7 to 24 months w

161 t bilateral cataract surgery with or without intraocular lens (IOL) placement during IATS enrollment

162 unilateral cataract surgery with or without intraocular lens (IOL) placement during the IATS enrollm

163 refraction predicted by each formula for the intraocular lens (IOL) power actually implanted.

164 the accuracy and reproducibility of the VRF intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formula with we

165 organized system to quantify the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas, metho

166 Intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations are less accur

167 sented here aims to optimize the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations in patients af

168 aract surgery is influenced by the choice of intraocular lens (IOL) power formula and the accuracy of

169 s approaches have been developed to estimate intraocular lens (IOL) power in eyes postrefractive surg

170 meters respond to cycloplegia, and therefore intraocular lens (IOL) power measurements calculated by

171 nd ocular surface conditions, calculation of intraocular lens (IOL) power, delineation of anterior ch

172 functional outcomes after combined iris and intraocular lens (IOL) repair in aniridia patients.

173 dary objective is the stable placement of an intraocular lens (IOL) selected for best refractive outc

174 The intraocular lens (IOL) selection process for patients re

175 treous humors), the capsular tissue, and the intraocular lens (IOL) surfaces of normal eyes after lon

176 The future of intraocular lens (IOL) technology has already begun with

177 A multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) was implanted in 84.3% of eyes; 1

178 from younger age, follow-up time and type of intraocular lens (IOL) were associated with risk of PCO,

179 aft endothelial failure implanted with toric intraocular lens (IOL) who was treated with Descemet str

180 optic position of glued transscleral fixated intraocular lens (IOL) with optical coherence tomography

181 ication and the contemporary implantation of intraocular lens (IOL) within the capsular bag represent

182 ee patients (27%) later received a secondary intraocular lens (IOL), and 1 patient underwent an IOL e

183 treated vs fellow eye, contact lens (CL) vs intraocular lens (IOL), visual acuity (VA) outcome, and

184 formance after implantation of a quadrifocal intraocular lens (IOL).

185 and the implant of a FineVision(R) trifocal intraocular lens (IOL).

186 tients implanted with a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL).

187 ion cataract extraction plus insertion of an intraocular lens (IOL).

188 in the posterior chamber and in front of the intraocular lens (IOL).

189 n of newly developed diffractive quadrifocal intraocular lens (IOL).

190 ely to receive either a single-piece acrylic intraocular lens (IOL; SA60AT; Alcon Laboratories, Fort

191 associated with the implantation of foldable intraocular lenses (IOL) in the ciliary sulcus.

192 tachment, corneal decompensation, dislocated intraocular lens [IOL]).

193 nd treatment modality (contact lens [CL] vs. intraocular lens [IOL]).

194 intraocular lens, 1.43 for anterior chamber intraocular lens [IOL], 2.83 for aphakic eyes; P < 0.001

195 ce of and risk factors for calcifications of intraocular lenses (IOLs) after Descemet membrane endoth

196 al outcome of patients with misaligned toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) after operative realignment, w

197 Because toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) are available, the current sta

198 One-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) are not indicated for sulcus f

199 Ultraviolet-blocking intraocular lenses (IOLs) are used routinely in cataract

200 This article provides an overview of intraocular lenses (IOLs) currently used in cataract sur

201 harms associated with implantation of toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) during cataract surgery.

202 months of 2 diffractive (non-toric) trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) in a large series of patients.

203 evidence of the use of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs) in patients who have previousl

204 The technological advancement of intraocular lenses (IOLs) in recent years has increased

205 s simulation with that obtained through real intraocular lenses (IOLs) tested on the same eyes has no

206 more from aberration correction with custom intraocular lenses (IOLs) than normal cataractous eyes d

207 Wavelength dependence of diffractive intraocular lenses (IOLs) was recognized in vitro but no

208 geon groups and different types of implanted intraocular lenses (IOLs) were assessed, adjusting for a

209 Four brands of toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) were reported in these studies

210 antages of blue light (400-480 nm) filtering intraocular lenses (IOLs) when compared with the ultravi

211 Intraocular lenses (IOLs) with plate-haptic, c-loop hapt

212 troduction of phacoemulsification and use of intraocular lenses (IOLs), both very controversial when

213 Recent literature suggests that modern intraocular lenses (IOLs), particularly hydrophilic or h

214 esia, capsular management, type and power of intraocular lenses (IOLs), sutured IOLs, and risk of sub

215 yes of 91 patients with monofocal, non-toric intraocular lenses (IOLs).

216 difference between blue-blocking and neutral intraocular lenses (IOLs).

217 the use of high refractive index square-edge intraocular lenses (IOLs).

218 ing the patient satisfaction with multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).

219 patients receiving newer advanced technology intraocular lenses (IOLs).

220 g ametropia after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).

221 Eyes were randomized to either 1- or 3-piece intraocular lenses (IOLs).

222 r unilateral cataract and that implanting an intraocular lens is not associated with adherence.

223 with bilateral emmetropic bifocal multifocal intraocular lens, it provided better vision at intermedi

224 ld be considered for additional power at the intraocular lens level.

225 predictability and visual quality of phakic intraocular lenses make them invaluable for the correcti

226 A multifocal intraocular lens (MFIOL) allows for spectacle independen

227 ), silicone oil removal (n = 16), dislocated intraocular lens (n = 10), submacular hemorrhage (n = 7)

228 tion and implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens (n = 33) using prestripped donor tissue

229 The intraocular lenses of the same make were discontinued at

230 Intraocular lens opacifications such as glistenings rare

231 this complication when evaluating secondary intraocular lens options.

232 e likely than those with an anterior chamber intraocular lens or who were aphakic.

233 trate the superior visual outcomes of phakic intraocular lenses over other refractive surgeries in pa

234 rventions related to the phacoemulsification/intraocular lens pathway occurred in the 2-year study pe

235 er clarity on billing Medicare for a premium intraocular lens patient's return to the operating room

236 acement of an iris-sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL) before pars plana vitrectomy an

237 nts with a scleral-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL), 2 patients with a PCIOL, and 1

238 1), but not in eyes with a posterior chamber intraocular lens (PCIOL).

239 the incidence and pathophysiology of phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) associated cataracts, surgical i

240 Phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) implantation has been used to co

241 he accumulating peer-reviewed data of phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) implantation in the pediatric po

242 ed the long-term outcomes of the ZB5M phakic intraocular lens (PIOL).

243 in refractive lens exchange (RLE) vs. phakic intraocular lens (pIOL).

244 tion of 2 types of rigid iris-fixated phakic intraocular lenses (pIOLs) for the treatment of myopia a

245 my (odds ratio [OR] 1.8, P = .03) and sulcus intraocular lens placement (OR 1.65, P = .03) during cat

246 Intraocular lens placement does not prevent the early de

247 reflect the increased tolerance for primary intraocular lens placement in the pediatric cohort.

248 ndergone previous vitrectomy and complicated intraocular lens placement or were aphakic.

249 plant and underwent phacoemulsification with intraocular lens placement.

250 photorefractive keratectomy, and refractive intraocular lens placement.

251 a, iris, and natural lens preoperatively and intraocular lens postoperatively.

252 0.001 diopters [D]; P = .933), or calculated intraocular lens power (0.011 D; P = .609).

253 corneal power, and corresponding theoretical intraocular lens power calculated using the Sanders-Retz

254 This may generate errors in intraocular lens power calculation when using the Gaussi

255 o earlier than 3 months post SB surgery, and intraocular lens power calculation with a fourth-generat

256 Newer methods to address errors in intraocular lens power calculations after keratorefracti

257 is review article, we provide an overview of intraocular lens power determination after corneal refra

258 Anticipating the correct intraocular lens power for a patient undergoing cataract

259 effective lens position and the shape of the intraocular lens power prediction curve more accurately.

260 rating this correction preoperatively in the intraocular lens power selection.

261 Intraocular lens power value in diopters and the magnitu

262 rneal power, cylinder, and the corresponding intraocular lens power, which was calculated using the S

263 al serous chorioretinopathy in 1.4% of eyes; intraocular lens reflections in 0.9% of eyes; blue field

264 without implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens (refractive lens exchange).

265 implanted bilaterally with either monofocal intraocular lenses, refractive MIOLs, diffractive MIOLs,

266 Intraocular lens removal was performed for 6 of 7 patien

267 illary implantation of the Artisan iris-claw intraocular lens (RPICIOL) in several aphakic conditions

268 ants responding "never" to question 1 of the Intraocular Lens Satisfaction questionnaire (regarding f

269 These findings may guide intraocular lens selection for individual patients seeki

270 During cataract surgery, intraocular lens selection in these patients is importan

271 th existing scleral-fixated and iris-fixated intraocular lenses (sf-IOL and if-IOL, respectively).

272 The isolates from the patients and the intraocular lens solution revealed matching patterns sim

273 Implantation of a single-piece-acrylic intraocular lens (SPA-IOL) in the ciliary sulcus during

274 ular opacification, epiretinal membrane, and intraocular lens subluxation.

275 domized chart review of eyes with subluxated intraocular lenses that underwent iris suture fixation a

276 th the development of advanced technology in intraocular lenses, the combined treatment of cataract a

277 To compare the outcomes after toric intraocular lens (tIOL) or peripheral corneal relaxing i

278 as an alternative to transsclerally sutured intraocular lenses to correct aphakia in pediatric patie

279 be induced in eyes implanted with adjustable intraocular lenses to enhance near vision.

280 the surgery, technique of cataract surgery, intraocular lens type, method of antibiotic prophylaxis,

281 ogels in soft contact lens, wound dressings, intraocular lens, vitreous substitutes, vitreous drug re

282 xtraction and randomization to receipt of an intraocular lens vs being left aphakic for the first 5 y

283 he anterior chamber of the posterior chamber intraocular lens was observed (0.18%).

284 In delayed-onset cases, the intraocular lens was removed or exchanged in 19 of 26 ca

285 Monovision with bilateral bifocal multifocal intraocular lens was safe and provided satisfactory visi

286 The intraocular lens was stable and centered at the last fol

287 However, the intraocular lens was successfully captured because of a

288 traoperative complications occurred, and the intraocular lens was successfully placed in the capsular

289 Iris suture fixation of subluxated intraocular lenses was efficacious for the eyes included

290 eceiving bilateral implantation of the study intraocular lens were analysed.

291 nterior chamber fluid and/or vitreous and/or intraocular lens were submitted for microbiological eval

292 Intraocular lenses were also associated with an increase

293 Intraocular lenses were associated with visual outcomes

294 Most (93.55%) intraocular lenses were stable and centered at the final

295 ateral implantation of a bifocal diffractive intraocular lens with monovision.

296 Intraocular lenses with 0 SA on average best match corne

297 Intraocular lenses with negative spherical aberration (S

298 anatomy and may allow custom-designed phakic intraocular lenses with proper sizing.

299 nge with bilateral implantation of the ZMB00 intraocular lens, with the dominant eye and nondominant

300 Blue light-filter intraocular lenses, with their possible advantage of mac