戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ns was seen both in animals trained under an intraoral acquisition procedure and those trained with b
2                 This phenotype also includes intraoral adhesions due to the absence of the oral perid
3 f flavorings and detergents and their higher intraoral alkalinity are strongly implicated as the caus
4 nely employed in various medical fields, its intraoral application for the assessment of tissue perfu
5                                              Intraoral autogenous bone also does not appear to signif
6 ovine bone (n=3 sites), DFDBA (n=2 sites) or intraoral autologous bone (n=1 site).
7  study indicate that bovine bone, DFDBA, and intraoral autologous bone do not promote extraction sock
8                                              Intraoral autologous bone, xenogenic bone, and DFDBA app
9                                           An intraoral biopsy is necessary to confirm a definitive di
10  in each hemisphere, and were implanted with intraoral cannulae.
11                                      Because intraoral capsaicin is reported to reduce the perceived
12 stribution of brainstem neurons activated by intraoral carbonated water.
13                          For determining the intraoral carrier state of patients with periodontitis,
14  neurons in the mediodorsal thalamus process intraoral chemosensory signals.
15 ct representation of unimodal and multimodal intraoral chemosensory signals.
16 e gustatory cortex are broadly responsive to intraoral chemosensory stimuli, exhibiting time-varying
17 due to FRP or administration of multifaceted intraoral chlorhexidine treatments ora combination of bo
18 w of medical history and close monitoring of intraoral conditions are critical for patients with a hi
19 shell were optogenetically stimulated during intraoral delivery of a taste cue signaling delayed coca
20  thalamus of behaving female rats during the intraoral delivery of individual odors, individual taste
21 ry cortex of behaving female rats during the intraoral delivery of individual odors, individual taste
22 st that DenTAl may be a promising device for intraoral delivery of small-molecule drugs applicable to
23               Recently, we developed a novel intraoral denture system for rodent research.
24 -dimensional (3D) printing, we fabricated an intraoral device for rats with universal fit.
25  positive airway pressure (CPAP) machines or intraoral devices.
26 ic cochineal for the first time; cold sweat, intraoral discomfort, respiratory distress, and urticari
27 ach of 25 subjects was used to determine the intraoral distribution of A. actinomycetemcomitans clone
28 ironmentally sensitive carrier for on-demand intraoral drug delivery.
29 al missile entry points, 7 (38.9%) displayed intraoral entry points, and 3 (16.7%) displayed pericran
30 articipants enrolled in this 3-arm crossover intraoral ETW simulation and wore their own partial dent
31 iterature, demonstrate the need for thorough intraoral examination and investigation of any unexplain
32 on gentle palpation were generated by direct intraoral examination by a blinded examiner unaware of t
33                            Using genetic and intraoral examination data from 386 children and 706 adu
34                                              Intraoral examination determined hypodontia of right sec
35                                              Intraoral examination revealed a thick biotype with an a
36                                          The intraoral examination was remarkable for numerous painle
37                                              Intraoral examinations to assess oral health were perfor
38                                Surprisingly, intraoral feeding also was dramatically reduced after th
39 he neurologically intact controls, decreased intraoral food intake and had elevated plasma glucose in
40  vivo were subjected to different periods of intraoral function.
41 ghly statistically significant reductions in intraoral halimeter values versus baseline (all P<0.001)
42                             Baseline average intraoral halimeter values were 45.91 and 41.75 for the
43 ndent on integration between the implant and intraoral hard/soft tissue.
44 surgical complications can arise: infection, intraoral hemorrhage, wound dehiscence, postoperative pa
45  used, such as preoperative mouth rinses and intraoral high-volume evacuation, dental treatment is no
46 itioning occurs using taste delivery through intraoral (I/O) infusions.
47                         In this project, the intraoral images were submitted to a Convolutional Neura
48                                              Intraoral immunization also induced IgA and IgG antibody
49 en a single conditioning trial consisting of intraoral infusion of 5 ml 0.15% sodium-saccharin follow
50 en a single conditioning trial consisting of intraoral infusion of 5-ml 0.15% sodium-saccharin follow
51  taste reactivity (TR) was videotaped during intraoral infusion of 7 ml of either quinine (3 mm) or d
52 al activation of the IL-NAcSh pathway during intraoral infusion of devalued sucrose inhibited aversiv
53 reased the number of FLI-neurons elicited by intraoral infusion of quinine compared with water-stimul
54 of the solitary tract (NST) activated by the intraoral infusion of quinine using Fos immunohistochemi
55 am-vagotomized rats rejected all of the test intraoral infusion of sucrose.
56     One week after surgery, rats received an intraoral infusion of sucrose.
57       Following recovery, their responses to intraoral infusions (0.23ml in 1min) of dH2O, sucrose (1
58 esponses recorded myographically during 15-s intraoral infusions and during 45-s post-infusion period
59                          Specifically, brief intraoral infusions of a cocaine-predictive flavored sac
60                            A series of brief intraoral infusions of flavored diet was delivered to fe
61 f dopamine signaling after CTA is similar to intraoral infusions of innately aversive quinine and con
62                                Here, we made intraoral infusions of sucrose and measured how dopamine
63              Here, naive rats received brief intraoral infusions of sucrose and quinine paired with c
64 tioned taste aversion (CTA) against sucrose, intraoral infusions of sucrose induce c-Fos-like immunor
65 ere correlated with the oromotor response to intraoral infusions.
66  burns, but only 8 guidelines (50%) included intraoral injuries and fractures.
67 d the IL neuronal ensemble responsiveness to intraoral innately rewarding (sucrose) versus aversive (
68                  In this study, we show that intraoral inoculation of mice with Porphyromonas gingiva
69 roach were de-epithelialized using either an intraoral (IO group) or an extraoral (EO group) method.
70                                              Intraoral laser therapy demonstrated no significant adva
71 d osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a rare intraoral lesion that occurs in patients undergoing long
72  30 patients) of those assessed, followed by intraoral lesions (16 of 22 patients [73%]), angular che
73 ght source served as a complete platform for intraoral light delivery achieving complete tumor respon
74 DT, a lack of robust enabling technology for intraoral light delivery has limited its broader impleme
75 dvances in 3D printing, we have developed an intraoral light delivery system consisting of modular 3D
76 rogel is a promising candidate for on-demand intraoral localized drug delivery.
77                                              Intraoral manifestations of MMP feature the formation of
78 putative periodontopathogens at 3 minutes of intraoral manipulation was determined in 42 patients wit
79 s may colonize membranes within 3 minutes of intraoral manipulation.
80 ary for taste aversions conditioned with the intraoral method but not for those conditioned using bot
81                                 Although the intraoral method may provide several practical advantage
82 its resistance to pathogenic colonization of intraoral microbes such as Streptococcaceae and Veillone
83 dor (conditioned stimulus, [CS]) paired with intraoral milk infusions (unconditioned stimulus, [US])
84                                           An intraoral model placing enamel pieces onto teeth was use
85                                              Intraoral MT (including or excluding external head and n
86 l reconstruction and esthetic improvement of intraoral mucosa and perioral skin tissues.
87  to brief noxious heat during quiet wake and intraoral NaCl ingestion.
88                                              Intraoral observation revealed a 9x4-mm area of exposed
89 dy has examined the single-unit responses to intraoral odorant presentation.
90 pithelium significantly reduced responses to intraoral odorants but not to tastants.
91                                              Intraoral optical scanning was obtained to quantify the
92 nt finding that can occur because of various intraoral or extraoral etiologies.
93 d bone or bone that can be probed through an intraoral or extraoral fistula in the maxillofacial regi
94 s (CLN) were compared with those found after intraoral or subcutaneous (in the neck) administration o
95            Mandibular torus (MT) is a common intraoral osseous outgrowth located on the lingual surfa
96                                              Intraoral PBMT is limited to treating distal oral mucosa
97 ere calculated from digitalized standardized intraoral periapical radiographs obtained from natural t
98 raphic alveolar bone loss (ABL), measured on intraoral periapical radiographs with a modified Schei r
99  and marginal bone levels using standardized intraoral periapical radiographs.
100 sly) every 28 days, followed by rebiopsy and intraoral photographs at each visit.
101                                 Standardized intraoral photographs from 28 gingival recession defects
102 ntal anomalies by training a DNN model using intraoral photographs from the largest international coh
103 ction was collected through dental charting, intraoral photographs taken with a DSLR camera (Nikon D5
104                                 Standardized intraoral photographs were obtained to assess facial ker
105 dard clinical measurements, radiographs, and intraoral photographs were taken over prescribed time po
106 re identified from in-person dental exams or intraoral photographs, and case-control differences were
107                                              Intraoral photographs, study models, and a gingival biop
108 tified from in-person dental examinations or intraoral photographs.
109 ent, we aimed to assess the effectiveness of intraoral photography for diagnosing gingival recession
110 ithms to detect keratinized gingiva based on intraoral photos and evaluate the ability of networks to
111 garding medical histories, dental histories, intraoral photos, probing depths (PD), calculated clinic
112 ed for dental AI datasets containing images (intraoral photos, scans, radiographs, etc.) using releva
113                        The association of an intraoral piercing with localized periodontitis is not w
114                                              Intraoral plasma cell granuloma is exceedingly rare, alt
115      Patients with chronic periodontitis and intraoral Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) and T
116 me-resolved expansion rate was combined with intraoral pressure recordings to calculate the instantan
117 e 1 describes the non-surgical management of intraoral psoriasiform lesions and the use of a free gin
118 oral pharmacology, we examined the effect of intraoral quinine administration on nucleus accumbens do
119 decreases in the number of gapes elicited by intraoral quinine stimulation that recovered, but only s
120 l outcome was assessed based on clinical and intraoral radiographic examinations at the recalls after
121                                              Intraoral radiographs (IRs) provide a two-dimensional vi
122 fects when comparing efficacy of CBCT versus intraoral radiographs (IRs).
123 of the present investigation were to analyze intraoral radiographs and to study 1) the distribution o
124  alveolar crestal height (ACH) measures from intraoral radiographs and tooth loss and 2) Centers for
125                                              Intraoral radiographs had the highest findability score
126       Alveolar bone levels were studied from intraoral radiographs of 24 non-hospitalized patients wi
127 tomy (OVX) (n = 6) or sham-operation (n = 6) intraoral radiographs were made at 4-month intervals and
128                                              Intraoral radiographs were taken at baseline and 12 to 1
129                                    Magnified intraoral radiographs were used to assess the distance b
130  relative to the implant platform on digital intraoral radiographs, taken at the time of prosthesis i
131 that most dentists identify as trabeculae on intraoral radiographs.
132                                     Although intraoral radiography suggested bone fill at the defect
133                                              Intraoral sarcoidosis was confirmed by histologic findin
134 ce every 3 to 4 months without recurrence of intraoral sarcoidosis.
135 iles and registration of DICOM files with an intraoral scan or Standard Tessellation Language (STL) f
136                                              Intraoral scan was performed directly on the UCLP models
137 earning model trained on a data set of 4,000 intraoral scanned data annotated by experienced human ex
138 ual teeth and the gingiva in the 3-dimension intraoral scanned mesh data.
139 -dimensional (3D) facial scanner (FS) and an intraoral scanner (IOS) in capturing the nasolabial regi
140 hildren aged 3 to 9 months using a validated intraoral scanner (Trios 4, 3Shape).
141         Tooth position was obtained using an intraoral scanner and files were compared in metrology s
142  technique to assess tooth mobility based on intraoral scanner measurements provided reliable data in
143                                              Intraoral scanners (IOSs) have emerged as a cornerstone
144 as comparable when using Affinis and the two intraoral scanners CEREC Omnicam and Trios 3.
145  using conventional impression materials and intraoral scanners in vivo.
146                                              Intraoral scanning was performed using CEREC Omnicam (CO
147                    Digital color analysis of intraoral scans has demonstrated a range of performance
148 formance of restorations fabricated based on intraoral scans has proven to be comparable to those obt
149 icacy of interpreting the color metrics from intraoral scans to objectively differentiate between hea
150 d the use of color measurements from digital intraoral scans to objectively identify healthy versus i
151    Clinical examinations were performed, and intraoral scans were obtained at baseline, 3 and 6 month
152            For precise tooth segmentation in intraoral scans, essential for orthodontic applications,
153                                              Intraoral scans, obtained before and after gingivitis tr
154 ypically considered a dermatologic disorder, intraoral signs of neurofibromatosis occur quite commonl
155 recovery of C. dubliniensis from subgingival intraoral sites and confirms the presence of Candida spe
156        Samples were taken from the following intraoral sites in 35 patients with untreated chronic pe
157  shapeable hydrogel tissue expander (HTE) in intraoral sites that had undergone previous expansion an
158                The mean mucosal pH for seven intraoral sites was higher in the transplant group (P=0.
159 isms are consistently isolated from the same intraoral sites, yet S. gordonii fails to be excluded an
160 re examined in two human volunteers using an intraoral stent containing retrievable enamel chips.
161                              The piercing of intraoral structures to accommodate different types of j
162 provided input to the representations of the intraoral structures.
163 ely correlated with behavioral reactivity to intraoral sucrose and predicted home cage sucrose prefer
164                                 In contrast, intraoral sucrose and suckling did not increase hindpaw
165 digastric muscle contractions in response to intraoral sucrose infusions.
166                     Following CTA formation, intraoral sucrose suppressed the activity of ventral teg
167                                      Pairing intraoral sucrose with malaise via injection of lithium
168  the effects of paroxetine on EMGgg using an intraoral surface electrode during eupnea or room air br
169                               Using a custom intraoral surface electrode to record genioglossal activ
170           OBJECTIVES/METHODS: Using a custom intraoral surface electrode to record pharyngeal dilator
171                               Using a custom intraoral surface electrode to record pharyngeal dilator
172 e-dependent manner, suggesting its use as an intraoral surface-decontamination strategy.
173 liva is simple and contains pathogens of all intraoral surfaces.
174 ncouraging early healing in more challenging intraoral surgical procedures.
175 There are limited reports on the outcomes of intraoral surgical therapy in patients with HIV, such as
176                                              Intraoral, throat and facial swellings, but no systemic
177 n against diverse wet and dynamically moving intraoral tissues, and extended drug delivery of clobeta
178 neural networks to decode various aspects of intraoral tongue deformation from cortical activity duri
179 study demonstrated a possible application of intraoral ultrasonography for assessment of gingival inf
180 edicine-containing patches and adhesives for intraoral use have led to a new approach for topical ane
181                 It is an approved drug whose intraoral use is an unlabeled indication.
182                                              Intraoral use of ultrasonic scalers may generate aerosol
183 gingival specimens and optimized for in vivo intraoral use.
184 ented with daily use (20 min) of a removable intraoral vibrational device (AcceleDent; OrthoAccel Tec
185  quantify three-dimensional (3D) patterns of intraoral waterflows in vivo.
186  food into the mouth are well described, how intraoral waterflows manage to deposit food at the esoph
187  hypoplastic pitted amelogenesis imperfecta, intraoral wounds, gingivitis and periodontal disease, gi
188 wild-type mice exhibited complete closure of intraoral wounds, while IL-1R1(-/-) animals had only par
189 ntal changes in dentition were analyzed with intraoral X-rays with the use of DIGORA System 2.1.

 
Page Top