コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 h block, 18 left bundle branch block, and 12 intraventricular conduction delay).
2 in selected patients (low ejection fraction, intraventricular conduction delay).
3 ents with poor left ventricular function and intraventricular conduction delay.
4 for an ICD who also have symptomatic HF and intraventricular conduction delay.
5 therapy for patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay.
6 s in patients with heart failure who have an intraventricular conduction delay.
7 have moderate-to-severe heart failure and an intraventricular conduction delay.
8 tile function in heart failure patients with intraventricular conduction delay.
9 ents with advanced chronic heart failure and intraventricular conduction delays.
10 in about 70% of HF patients with left-sided intraventricular conduction delay, a fact that would exp
11 patients with a left bundle branch block or intraventricular conduction delay and a class I or class
12 of death in these patients who also have an intraventricular conduction delay and are treated with C
13 for patients with advanced heart failure and intraventricular conduction delays and ventricular dyssy
14 atients with symptomatic heart failure (HF), intraventricular conduction delay, and malignant ventric
15 n resulting from left bundle-branch block or intraventricular conduction delay but not right bundle-b
16 ong patients with advanced heart failure and intraventricular conduction delays, but the cost effecti
17 tients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and intraventricular conduction delay by resynchronizing con
18 zed that the magnitude and location of basal intraventricular conduction delay critically influences
19 (LBBB; including right bundle branch block, intraventricular conduction delay) did not have clinical
20 bundle branch block (HR=1.01, P=0.975), and intraventricular conduction delay (HR=1.31, P=0.172).
21 ns who also have CHF, LV dysfunction, and an intraventricular conduction delay, ICD therapy is less c
24 Patients were classified as having LBBB or intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) as assessed by
25 block (RBBB) in 48 patients, and nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) was present in
26 ure patients with narrow QRS and nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (NICD) display a relat
27 mong Medicare-aged patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (NICD) versus right bu
28 Over half the affected cohort (28/52) had intraventricular conduction delay, or incomplete right b
29 icular ejection fraction of 35% or less, and intraventricular conduction delays (QRS > 120 ms), altho
30 c imaging could be a more specific marker of intraventricular conduction delay rather than the surrog
31 en applied to children and young adults with intraventricular conduction delay, such as bundle branch
32 of patients with left bundle branch block or intraventricular conduction delay treated with cardiac r
33 with advanced chronic heart failure (HF) and intraventricular conduction delay treated with optimal p
35 ficant factors, left bundle-branch block and intraventricular conduction delay were associated with a