ライフサイエンスコーパス: judgment

1 identity of that stimulus (a discrimination judgment).

2 the final result as compared to investigator judgment.

3 mproves a computational model of human moral judgment.

4 ommitting to a final decision and confidence judgment.

5 nce as assessed by stable isotopes or expert judgment.

6 xibility in treatment according to physician judgment.

7 reatment as determined by the investigators' judgment.

8 bination with emergency department physician judgment.

9 ypes and grading criteria prone to arbitrary judgment.

10 erious alternative based on collective human judgment.

11 tle asks how even unintended harms influence judgment.

12 was titrated as necessary based on clinical judgment.

13 ception task after observing a predecessor's judgment.

14 al corticosteroids according to best medical judgment.

15 tial diversity in what has been called moral judgment.

16 he prospects of dual-process models of moral judgment.

17 varied with individual differences in moral judgment.

18 integrates auditory features for perceptual judgments.

19 lectively associated with associative memory judgments.

20 inst the primacy of emotion in driving moral judgments.

21 t serve as the rational foundations of moral judgments.

22 factors into consideration when making moral judgments.

23 an internal trajectory from human perceptual judgments.

24 by using a structured series of qualitative judgments.

25 rresponds with lower observer intentionality judgments.

26 tations underlying older adults' recognition judgments.

27 information that undermines past choices and judgments.

28 ated by speed and can best account for human judgments.

29 time, emotion certainly is involved in moral judgments.

30 rocessing that accurately predict perceptual judgments.

31 ivity accompanying periodicity in perceptual judgments.

32 e source, content, and consequences of moral judgments.

33 cism remains about the rationality of social judgments.

34 o account for higher-level, relative/ordinal judgments.

35 cal basis of individual differences in moral judgments.

36 ue underlying our ability to make fine depth judgments.

37 nfidence judgments and subjective 'remember' judgments.

38 ess information determined severity of moral judgments.

39 nisms for refining individual and collective judgments.

40 tion, observers made large errors in heading judgments.

41 val reproduction and duration discrimination judgments.

42 ness, which may underlie fast attractiveness judgments.

43 or the short-term adaptability of perceptual judgments.

44 ow accurately each model predicted the human judgments.

45 to each trial, participants made prospective judgments.

46 is effect was even more pronounced for other-judgments.

47 gments, moral wrongness judgments, and blame judgments.

48 ilability of evidence and made the following judgments: 1) strong recommendations for long-term oxyge

49 matical area, strongly influences numerosity judgments, (2) perceived area influences perceived numbe

50 nal version of the same dilemma with a moral judgment, a policy preference, or an economic choice.

51 These decisions constitute a judgment about the relative danger and benefits of those

52 accuracy is limited by patient's subjective judgment about their clarity of vision.

53 ence in detection, and more specifically, in judgments about absence.

54 Participants provided value judgments about consumer goods in the presence of online

55 rns collected while observers made aesthetic judgments about images from one aesthetic domain.

56 wo experiments, human volunteers made binary judgments about images of either a body or a scene.

57 of cases and raters in order to assure fair judgments about operative competency and fair comparison

58 Regression analysis revealed that judgments about risks and benefits were the strongest pr

59 differentiate between more and less to make judgments about social relationships, territories, and f

60 ent to an object, can we manipulate people's judgments about that agent's attention?

61 aling aspects of a visual target can improve judgments about that target, relative to invalid cues [5

62 This often enables them to make faster judgments about the appearance of the scene than they co

63 We hypothesized that judgments about the effort spent on a task will be influ

64 est measures of psychosomatic understanding, judgments about the possibility of psychosomatic events,

65 judgments about what is fair are essentially judgments about the social meaning of the distributive a

66 investigators to make covariate-by-covariate judgments about the validity of the IV design.

67 e structures that allow us to make efficient judgments about the world without the cost of memorizing

68 ces in permissible consumption-interpersonal judgments about what is acceptable (or not) for others t

69 e argue and present evidence that children's judgments about what is fair are essentially judgments a

70 Key to judgments about within-study bias and indirectness is th

71 g sliding were strongly related to roughness judgment accuracy.

72 iment, groups whose members could make moral judgments achieved greater cooperation than groups with

73 and ensure consistency in the practitioner's judgment across complex scenarios.

74 0.04-0.09; p < 0.01) compared with physician judgment alone.

75 Our results demonstrate that existing judgments alter the neural representation of information

76 of estimating their facial similarity (human judgment and a facial recognition algorithm), we show th

77 Combining physician judgment and biomarker models improved performance (area

78 The science of judgment and decision making involves three interrelated

79 eak to be the basis of any substantive moral judgment and do not fit with the idea that morality is c

80 to test the hypothesis that adding clinical judgment and electrocardiogram findings to the European

81 ned and what actually happened requires good judgment and humility in making claims.

82 , but can also substantially influence moral judgment and reasoning.

83 nical profile, in association with physician judgment and shared decision-making, is sufficient to co

84 ol for confounders identified using clinical judgment and statistical criteria.

85 r tests for RTI in combination with clinical judgment and traditional methods can be bewildering give

86 social cognition has established that social judgments and behavior are guided by attitudes and stere

87 of conscious awareness) in generating moral judgments and decisions.

88 Behavioral judgments and deep neural networks categorized images ma

89 ode information from faces to support social judgments and facilitate interactions with others.

90 ulti-arm trials varies substantially, making judgments and interpretation difficult.

91 peech and its role in both shaping perceiver judgments and perpetuating inequality during the briefes

92 outcomes; and choice, or how people combine judgments and preferences to reach a decision.

93 cess signal detection analysis of confidence judgments and subjective 'remember' judgments.

94 could help staff move away from rigid binary judgments and train them to adopt formal carer roles tha

95 tative predictions in studies of human moral judgment, and distinguish it from alternative models.

96 tion to escalation and the need for clinical judgment, and the intermittent nature of recording.

97 tes shared moral cognition, not shared moral judgment, and therefore, May's attempt to defeat general

98 y predictive of deficits in reading, spatial judgment, and visual exploration.

99 ffect our ability to make optimal decisions, judgments, and actions in real-world dynamic environment

100 evaluations, norm judgments, moral wrongness judgments, and blame judgments.

101 ation strength on the accuracy of perceptual judgments, and can be readily applied to other sensory a

102 ess information for different types of moral judgments, and individual differences in the extent to w

103 es of the extent of framing effects on moral judgments, and then we argue that framing effects would

104 higher estimations of exerted effort in self-judgments, and this effect was even more pronounced for

105 components recruited during reading, spatial judgments, and visual exploration.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

106 bout the causal influence of affect on moral judgment are overblown.

107 inding supports the proposal that confidence judgments are based on multiple sources of information,

108 mains an open question whether metacognitive judgments are based on the same information as first-ord

109 mechanical forces acting on an object, their judgments are biased by another person gazing at the obj

110 ovide mechanistic insight into how aesthetic judgments are formed, while advocating for deeper collab

111 Humans perceptual judgments are imprecise, as repeated exposures to the sa

112 wever, it is for closer sounds that accurate judgments are needed to guide rapid motor responses to a

113 Morality has two key features: (1) moral judgments are not solely determined by what your group t

114 ned by what your group thinks, and (2) moral judgments are often applied to members of other groups a

115 Confidence judgments are typically less informative about one's acc

116 , 0.72; 95% CI, 0.69-0.75), as did physician judgment (area under the curve, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74-0.82)

117 ensure that animals could not make frequency judgments based on magnitude.

118 ertainty: there is a place for well-informed judgments, based on understanding of underlying processe

119 o all Xs, indicating that display uniformity judgments benefitted from the emergent features of Diamo

120 ns prompted by the name "superoxide" and the judgment bias based on the claimed theoretical specific

121 We did not find any judgment bias in the positive condition.

122 emotional contagion in ravens by applying a judgment bias paradigm to assess emotional valence.

123 isconfirming opinions to alter confidence in judgments, but adequate use when opinions are confirmato

124 endently; overall strength of evidence (SOE) judgment by group.

125 Learning is known to improve perceptual judgments by filtering external noise and task-irrelevan

126 wever, such liability depends in part on lay judgments by jurors: when physicians use AI systems, in

127 certainty considerations to assess how human judgment calls impact data results through data and mode

128 ment, and the performance of global clinical judgment can be similar to that of clinical probability

129 y far less favorable across a range of trait judgments compared to controls, but also are associated

130 In both types of judgment, computational modelling revealed that reward i

131 We show that adults spontaneously make moral judgments consistent with the logic of universalization,

132 al surface reliefs, against which observers' judgments could be compared.

133 ell as the accuracy and precision of heading judgments, depended on the speed of object motion.

134 These judgments differ in their typical objects, the informati

135 that perceived area (based on psychophysical judgments) differs from true area (i.e., a precise pixel

136 stable dose, as per the treating physician's judgment; discontinuation because of adverse events that

137 The changes in distance judgments during blind pulling in 0 g compared to 1 g su

138 operties can account for human object motion judgments during self-motion.

139 ated and visual areas facilitates perceptual judgments during training.

140 dary, predicted participants' overt category judgments, emerged shortly after stimulus onset, and cou

141 g, planning, linguistic communication, moral judgment, etc.

142 cally and empirically, four classes of moral judgment: evaluations, norm judgments, moral wrongness j

143 At the center of this research are moral judgments-evaluative judgments that a perceiver makes in

144 raming effects would cause trouble for moral judgments even if his estimates were correct.

145 n's duties to provide care based on clinical judgment, evidence, and ethics.

146 ively little impact on accuracy of roughness judgments except when pressing on surfaces in the coarse

147 tric functions were measured for size visual judgments (Exp.

148 We found that lower-level, absolute judgments failed to account for higher-level, relative/o

149 Transplant centers use their best clinical judgment for determining "too sick," but it is unclear h

150 n, capturing the pattern of human typicality judgments for a broad range of abstract semantic relatio

151 of complex systems concepts, and subjective judgment from the reviewers relating to which concepts f

152 these new advances; but do human and machine judgments fundamentally diverge?

153 indicated a consistent pattern of motivated judgment: hate crime perceptions were directly biased by

154 ains of individuals can revise their initial judgment in a visual perception task after observing a p

155 alization, and report comparable patterns of judgment in children.

156 OCT scans improved by qualitative judgment in patients who underwent surgery compared with

157 s updated their initial value and confidence judgments in a Bayesian fashion, taking into account bot

158 del best captured human search decisions and judgments in both domains, and could simulate realistic

159 object motion signals to human object motion judgments in environments with monocular, binocular, and

160 experiments on how humans assign confidence judgments in real-world situations.

161 ng the hands has a detrimental effect on TOJ judgments in sighted but not in early blind people.

162 because they affect only a minority of moral judgments in small ways.

163 sing audio-visual (AV) timing and confidence judgments, in conjunction with electroencephalography (E

164 e orientations, striking aspects of absolute judgments, including the correlation and forward/backwar

165 While confidence judgments indicated that participants were sensitive to

166 nfection determined on the basis of clinical judgment, infection from any cause, and infection-relate

167 s through collective integration of people's judgments into group decisions, a phenomenon known as th

168 The second, where a binary judgment is applied to the combined percept, is learned

169 Although clinical judgment is critical, older adults should not be exclude

170 ions, autoimmunity, and cancer, yet clinical judgment is often based on the reactivity to a restricte

171 The uncertainty in effort judgments is further aggravated when there is no direct

172 icle's call to end reliance on acceptability judgments is premature.

173 a stimulus is present or absent (a detection judgment) is qualitatively distinct from being confident

174 ity organs, which has relied on experiential judgment, is better understood at the individual level.

175 ompleteness; is mostly specific to aesthetic judgments; is stronger for male participants; is specifi

176 tivity to correlate with animals' perceptual judgments (Jaramillo and Zador, 2011; Bizley et al., 201

177 occur due to errors in visual perception and judgment leading to misinterpretation of anatomy.

178 In the second, a binary judgment, learned in a supervised way, is applied to the

179 isual target selection is specific to visual judgments made on the basis of saliency and may not play

180 nsistently viewed as a disorder of reasoning/judgment manifest by total insanity and/or the state of

181 e describe two such models of suprathreshold judgments, maximum likelihood difference scaling and max

182 Clinical judgment may be used to make this assessment, but relati

183 the proposal that one purpose of confidence judgments may be to learn about performance for future e

184 mative accounts, and suggest that confidence judgments might be based on point estimates of the relev

185 classes of moral judgment: evaluations, norm judgments, moral wrongness judgments, and blame judgment

186 ted away from mania as a primary disorder of judgment, new approaches were needed to understand the e

187 sults suggest machine models can improve the judgment of a human pool but highlight the importance of

188 rom substantial to almost perfect except for judgment of distant metastases based on the PSMA Reporti

189 d the neural mechanisms underlying aesthetic judgment of dynamic landscapes, and compared the neural

190 li, with few studies examining the aesthetic judgment of dynamic stimuli.

191 g an expression matching task, requiring the judgment of emotional congruence between sequentially pr

192 s assessed by stable isotopes and the expert judgment of hydrogeologists using site-specific data.

193 nked with the compelling goal of providing a judgment of liking, beauty, perfection, or similar.

194 signaling questions to facilitate structured judgment of ROB, which was defined to occur when shortco

195 Research has suggested that tactile judgment of speed is influenced by physical properties o

196 as been limited to considering the aesthetic judgment of static stimuli, with few studies examining t

197 del is a quick accurate tool to aid clinical judgment of the risk of seizures in critically ill patie

198 ecision support tool, when combined with the judgment of trained emergency personnel, would help to i

199 ed two types of report: confidence (explicit judgment of trust about their performance) and wagering

200 g the dilution effect may lead to misleading judgments of crucial energy-saving policy tools, as well

201 Much of this work is focused on judgments of discrimination, and there is a large litera

202 l loss is associated with increased auditory judgments of distance and room size.

203 ere commonly activated both in the aesthetic judgments of dynamic and static landscapes.

204 the neural mechanisms between the aesthetic judgments of dynamic landscapes and static ones.

205 and hippocampus were found in the aesthetic judgments of dynamic landscapes.

206 The methods used for obtaining absolute judgments of egocentric distance included verbal reports

207 limate and conflict, based on the structured judgments of experts from diverse disciplines.

208 As in prior research, judgments of inefficient actions were biased toward effi

209 deo of an incident results in lower observer judgments of intentionality than dash cam video of the s

210 However, fusion did not predict aesthetic judgments of intervals in Westerners, or in Amazonians,

211 Participants made judgments of learning prior to cued-recall tests (JOLs;

212 Methods: To determine potential jurors' judgments of liability, we conducted an online experimen

213 and has distinct downstream consequences for judgments of moral character.

214 od for restoring justice-also generalizes to judgments of more severe crimes: participants allocate m

215 s that individuals can provide metacognitive judgments of pain and extends research on confidence in

216 Moral psychology suggests that judgments of robot responsibility will hinge on perceive

217 ve forced choice tasks to examine perceptual judgments of sound location as a function of digit magni

218 amentally reflect the trained, logic-enabled judgments of systematic experts, future designs for such

219 nction, confidence effects were enhanced for judgments of target absence compared to judgments of tar

220 Participants' judgments of target conspicuity, however, showed that Di

221 for judgments of target absence compared to judgments of target presence.

222 s around reservoir size estimates-as well as judgments of the ability of therapeutic interventions to

223 Participants' judgments of the attentional state of the faces was sign

224 ver, non-threshold visual judgments, such as judgments of the magnitude of differences between visual

225 o favorable and unfavorable options requires judgments of the relative value of the options, a proces

226 Moreover, asset allocators' judgments of the team's competence were more strongly co

227 xperiment 1, participants made forced-choice judgments of which of two tactile distances felt bigger,

228 diverse beliefs and behaviors by forbidding judgment on foreign societal codes of conduct.

229 provided pain ratings followed by confidence judgments on continuous visual analogue scales.

230 were scanned while they performed aesthetic judgments on dynamic landscapes and matched static ones.

231 ubjects are universally biased to base their judgments on number as opposed to the alternatives.

232 Surprisingly, confidence judgments on trials with no detection report are influen

233 amusics and 26 matched controls made tension judgments on Western (familiar) and Indian (unfamiliar)

234 the three core elements of decision making: judgment, or how people predict the outcomes that will f

235 vioral dataset, comprising more than 500,000 judgments over 10,000 natural images from ten object cat

236 To make good judgments people gather information.

237 when shown the first) and feeling-of-knowing judgments prior to recognition tests (FOK; predicted lik

238 t and cognitive biases involved in the human judgment process.

239 measures may arise uniquely from deliberate judgment processes.

240 omputer simulations showed that the speed of judgment propagation decayed exponentially with the soci

241 that renders possible the stringent study of judgment propagation.

242 d leadership beliefs, that is, when clinical judgment proved incorrect, males described as forceful b

243 Truth judgments reflect inferences drawn from three types of i

244 lities, participant's choices and evaluative judgments reflected a reliable preference for conformity

245 1) or equality judgments regarding perceived blur (Exps.

246 patients and to disperse myths and misguided judgments regarding the disease and its treatment.

247 ot benefit memory, it increased JOLs and FOK judgments relative to accuracy (Experiments 1 & 2) and i

248 Mature moral judgments rely on the consideration of a perpetrator's m

249 provide a case study of high-level cognitive judgments relying on default implicit representations of

250 nowledge, they are even more responsive when judgments require the use of available person-knowledge.

251 Confidence judgments revealed that attentional trust boosting, and

252 However, speed judgments seem to reflect an integration of speed-depend

253 creening intervals are unknown, and clinical judgment should be used to determine frequency.

254 areness and thinking as yet another critical judgment skill they bring to their patients' bedsides an

255 t (taxing pattern separation) and a location judgment (source memory).

256 mulation, balance-of-evidence for confidence judgments, sparse coding, contextual reinstatement, and

257 e passive, is undermined by an acceptability-judgment study of this construction.

258 Following each item judgment, subjects were asked to indicate the quadrant i

259 other well-characterized mechanisms of moral judgment, such as outcome-based and rule-based thinking,

260 There are, however, non-threshold visual judgments, such as judgments of the magnitude of differe

261 vidual participants' personal attractiveness judgments, suggesting that already early perceptual repr

262 ipants performed an audiovisual simultaneity judgment task including various AV-VA asynchronies and u

263 after completing 1 h of a speeded time-order judgment task of two successive frequency-modulated swee

264 eighteen participants performed a typicality judgment task with written words drawn from sixteen diff

265 the participants' performance in a semantic judgment task, indicating the importance of this higher-

266 Using a temporal order judgment task, we here tested the hypothesis that alpha

267 eir perceived dimensions using a Line Length Judgment task.

268 sory binding as assessed with a simultaneity judgment task.

269 me windows while participants performed size judgment tasks in either an illusory or neutral context.

270 The situational judgment test and personality profiles were administered

271 Situational judgment tests, personality profiles, structured intervi

272 l space as assessed by perceptual similarity judgment tests.

273 this research are moral judgments-evaluative judgments that a perceiver makes in response to a moral

274 o investigate when, how, and why people make judgments that are consistent with utilitarianism.

275 and perceived immorality are among the core judgments that can drive Muslim radicalization, right-wi

276 tor may introduce unique effects on observer judgment, this research establishes an empirical platfor

277 s the selective use of evidence when forming judgments, thus limiting subjectivity in the process.

278 Consensus seeking - abandoning one's own judgment to align with a group majority - is a fundament

279 hat can be used in conjunction with clinical judgment to improve the care of children with suspected

280 should be used in conjunction with clinical judgment to make a diagnosis.(C) RSNA, 2020.

281 oembolism on the basis of the investigator's judgment to receive either rivaroxaban or enoxaparin.

282 incorporating community feedback and expert judgment to select articles for target audiences and to

283 nd humans performed a tactile temporal order judgment (TOJ) task, either with the hands uncrossed or

284 al heuristics, we view social perceptions as judgment tools and assert that perceptions are ecologica

285 acity of both stereotypes and base rates, as judgment tools, can be determined solely by accuracy res

286 oment participants provided their confidence judgments varied across conditions, thereby changing the

287 A combination of expert rules and expert judgment was applied by blinded operators to identify po

288 However, when ordinal judgment was used to retrospectively decode memory repre

289 he extent to which rewards influenced effort judgments was associated with conservative world-views,

290 e role that reasoning quality plays in moral judgments, we review literature that he did not mention

291 In AD, inadequate confidence judgments were accompanied by poor wagering performance,

292 avity levels, the verbal reports of distance judgments were accurate for targets located between 0.6

293 Results show that participants' judgments were biased towards believing they were in the

294 elevant knowledge (study 2), when creativity judgments were elicited retrospectively (study 3), and a

295 Visual size judgments were predicted by vowel formant F1 in combinat

296 Visual shape judgments were, however, predicted by formants F2 and F3

297 riance in participants' object dissimilarity judgments when compared with other computational models

298 sets the stage for a broader theory of moral judgment, which the coming decades may bring forth.

299 of where to look are informed by perceptual judgments, which locate objects of current value or inte

300 concept can also hinder more detailed memory judgments, which may involve differentiating between clo