ライフサイエンスコーパス: keratoplasty

1 g to 20/25 with over-refraction (P = .006 vs keratoplasty).

2 al allografts after corneal transplantation (keratoplasty).

3 had performed fewer grafts (<100 registered keratoplasties).

4 0.30 logMAR (Snellen >=20/40) after tertiary keratoplasty.

5 llograft rejection after corneal penetrating keratoplasty.

6 orneal melt required therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty.

7 ase the pool of corneal tissue available for keratoplasty.

8 =20/80, corneal perforation, or the need for keratoplasty.

9 nd unscrolling in the eye during endothelial keratoplasty.

10 a whole corneal graft button unsuitable for keratoplasty.

11 dingly and only 1 patient needed penetrating keratoplasty.

12 descemetopexy and a few ended in penetrating keratoplasty.

13 d to analyze risk factors for glaucoma after keratoplasty.

14 ion and 3 eventually received an endothelial keratoplasty.

15 ignificantly with a poor visual outcome from keratoplasty.

16 spread and growing acceptance of endothelial keratoplasty.

17 atoconus eyes and in the planning of corneal keratoplasty.

18 educed when compared to standard penetrating keratoplasty.

19 stpone penetrating or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

20 tained after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

21 No eyes required subsequent penetrating keratoplasty.

22 ell keratoplasty (DSAEK) or even penetrating keratoplasty.

23 Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

24 lete visual rehabilitation after endothelial keratoplasty.

25 ovascularization after high-risk penetrating keratoplasty.

26 ter Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

27 ting for penetrating or endothelial lamellar keratoplasty.

28 ual acuity before and after PROSE fitting or keratoplasty.

29 ve for performing laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty.

30 ase, and 1 patient who underwent penetrating keratoplasty.

31 atoplasty have begun to supplant penetrating keratoplasty.

32 o Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

33 ctasia was better and more rapid compared to keratoplasty.

34 nd 2), risk factors associated with repeated keratoplasty.

35 rease in CCT) or intervention by endothelial keratoplasty.

36 endothelial dystrophy undergoing a first eye keratoplasty.

37 izing the postoperative outcome of pediatric keratoplasty.

38 factors associated with the risk of repeated keratoplasty.

39 al coherence tomography (i-OCT) in pediatric keratoplasty.

40 ,829 EK procedures were followed by repeated keratoplasty.

41 e associated with increased risk of repeated keratoplasty.

42 ith progression to corneal melting requiring keratoplasty.

43 EK volumes had a decreased risk of repeated keratoplasty.

44 ), a conventional microscope was used during keratoplasty.

45 us keratitis before performing a therapeutic keratoplasty.

46 l dystrophy who underwent posterior lamellar keratoplasty.

47 llograft acceptance after posterior lamellar keratoplasty.

48 d for corneal tissue preparation in lamellar keratoplasty.

49 tion or the need for therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty.

50 ould be the procedure of choice in high-risk keratoplasties.

51 ) underwent penetrating or anterior lamellar keratoplasty, 10 of whom (20%) underwent repeat procedur

52 ent Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (1255 eyes [94.4%] for Fuchs endothelial co

53 y-eight eyes of 38 patients with penetrating keratoplasty (15 eyes with corneal graft rejection, 23 e

54 or Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: 40 clear, 23 actively rejecting, 24 reject

55 transplantation register, 13 920 penetrating keratoplasties, 858 deep anterior lamellar keratoplastie

56 ty was the most common diagnosis for primary keratoplasty (89.1%).

57 Experienced surgeons (>100 registered keratoplasties) achieved significantly better survival o

58 Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty after failed PK combines greater wound stab

59 (PK), 37 (35.2%) underwent anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALK), 22 (21.0%) underwent lamellar cornea

60 icle will review indications for endothelial keratoplasty, along with the current evidence for Descem

61 ur patients underwent subsequent penetrating keratoplasty and 3 underwent repeat DSAEK.

62 after combined Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and cataract surgery (triple DMEK).

63 mising graft clarity in combined endothelial keratoplasty and cataract surgery.

64 r Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet's membrane endothelial keratop

65 The incidence of elevation of IOP after keratoplasty and development of glaucoma are significant

66 oth Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and DMEK, it is likely both procedures will

67 Fuchs dystrophy eyes undergoing endothelial keratoplasty and participants with healthy corneas were

68 orneoscleral donor rim fungal cultures after keratoplasty and to report clinical outcomes of grafts w

69 Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and UT-DSAEK did not differ significantly i

70 For bullous keratoplasty and/or corneal edema, 8.6% and 22% of graft

71 ired tarsorrhaphy, 5.8% required penetrating keratoplasty, and 1 eye was enucleated.

72 phy, 6 patients (15.4%) required penetrating keratoplasty, and 1 patient required enucleation.

73 9 months after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, and 71 fellow eyes were enrolled and assig

74 ore keratoplasty, vitrectomy associated with keratoplasty, and filtering surgery associated with kera

75 more rapidly in the PROSE cohort compared to keratoplasty, and mean visual acuity was significantly b

76 ury, severe symblepharon, SLET combined with keratoplasty, and postoperative loss of transplants (P <

77 heir incomplete resolution after endothelial keratoplasty, and understanding the onset of these may h

78 l perforation and/or therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty; and time to re-epithelialization.

79 ndothelial dystrophy (FED) required repeated keratoplasty at 1 and 8 years of follow-up, respectively

80 a, 8.6% and 22% of grafts underwent repeated keratoplasty at 1 and 8 years, respectively.

81 atients who underwent deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty at a tertiary eye care center for advanced

82 or younger who underwent primary penetrating keratoplasty at Department of Ophthalmology, Federal Uni

83 a that were evaluated for PROSE or underwent keratoplasty at our institution.

84 d with microbial keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty at the National Taiwan University Hospital

85 h the repeat expansion (55.3%) had undergone keratoplasty at the time of recruitment, compared with 1

86 or younger who underwent primary penetrating keratoplasty at Wills Eye Hospital Cornea Service betwee

87 terior segment-related (eg, post-penetrating keratoplasty), bleb-associated, glaucoma drainage device

88 Penetrating keratoplasty can commonly restore vision in corneal blin

89 A total of 3414 keratoplasty cases were included in the statistical anal

90 ng the course of the trial, the landscape of keratoplasty changed due to the rise of Descemet Membran

91 rs previously had increased risk of repeated keratoplasty compared to those who graduated within 10 y

92 rd of perforation or therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty compared with placebo after controlling for

93 During penetrating keratoplasty, concomitant intraoperative procedures were

94 related publications by using the key words 'keratoplasty', 'corneal transplantation' or 'keratoprost

95 keratoplasty (EK), or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) between 1999 and 2012.

96 Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) has emerged as a viable alternative

97 ient was treated with deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in both eyes with uncomplicated outc

98 long-term outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) performed after Descemet stripping a

99 he outcomes of a 9-mm deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) with removal of the deep stroma limi

100 penetrating (PKP) or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK).

101 mplication rate after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK).

102 g keratoplasties, 858 deep anterior lamellar keratoplasties (DALKs), and 2287 endokeratoplasties perf

103 Penetrating keratoplasty (date range, 1992-2013), ALK (date range, 2

104 Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty decreases and ultrathin DSAEK increases pos

105 oscopy that was performed before penetrating keratoplasty demonstrated an acellular zone with a hyper

106 The prognosis of keratoplasty differs markedly when performed for therape

107 etry following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED

108 nd outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for the surgical treatment of cornea

109 e longevity of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts in terms of endothelial survi

110 recent years, Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has gained interest as it eliminates

111 rm outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in eyes that had previously undergon

112 results after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in eyes with corneal endothelial dis

113 t two cases of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) in patients with existing scleral-fi

114 tcomes after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in pseudophakic patients with the ou

115 nd outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in the Netherlands.

116 transition to Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery via improved efficiency of t

117 ex (DEC) was retrieved during DM endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery.

118 outcomes of a Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) technique that could increase the av

119 uncomplicated Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), and 5 eyes of 5 patients with KC al

120 s transit to Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), eye banks have risen to the challen

121 In Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), lamellar splitting of the Descemet

122 ve cases after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), we extended the analysis in this st

123 who underwent Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

124 episodes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

125 al tissues for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

126 to the rise of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK).

127 e suitable for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

128 s (IOLs) after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

129 The average citation count per keratoplasty documents was 9.34.

130 in Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) f

131 ent Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and the relationship between these

132 Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for isolated endothelial dysfunctio

133 ter Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in cases of visually significant st

134 ing Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) is independent of donor cornea pres

135 escemet stripping automated endothelial cell keratoplasty (DSAEK) or even penetrating keratoplasty.

136 of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) using imported donor corneas.

137 ing Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) using intraoperative optical cohere

138 t Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), tissue preparation and tissue tran

139 ent Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).

140 was Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK, n = 135).

141 ter Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasties (DSAEKs).

142 cuity after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) ranged from 20/34 to 20/66 at 9 mont

143 ity following Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK).

144 ty-six eyes of 35 children underwent primary keratoplasty during the study period.

145 arios were considered, including endothelial keratoplasty (EK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK); amp

146 es aged >=65 years who underwent endothelial keratoplasty (EK) procedures.

147 a penetrating keratoplasty (PK), endothelial keratoplasty (EK), or deep anterior lamellar keratoplast

148 thickness (CCT) and vision after endothelial keratoplasty (EK).

149 mately 60% of patients with keratoconus post-keratoplasty experience doubling of the visual angle fol

150 not a factor in survival of most penetrating keratoplasties for endothelial disease.

151 ic characteristics of patients who underwent keratoplasty for AK were compared with those who did not

152 were compared with those undergoing optical keratoplasty for baseline characteristics, management de

153 ear-old man undergoing his first endothelial keratoplasty for bilateral Fuchs endothelial dystrophy.

154 The probability of undergoing repeated keratoplasty for different indications was estimated usi

155 All consecutive patients undergoing first keratoplasty for FED and PBK between 1998 and 2014 were

156 30 eyes at least two years after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic indications.

157 After penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, graft biomech

158 come measures were 1) occurrence of repeated keratoplasty for the overall cohort as well as stratifie

159 corneal ectasia while 37 patients underwent keratoplasty for the same indication.

160 long-term graft survival following pediatric keratoplasty for various indications.

161 emaining 24 patients (48%) underwent optical keratoplasty for visual rehabilitation.

162 mplanted DMEK (Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty) graft 4 weeks after initial transplantatio

163 he parameters evaluated were indications for keratoplasty, graft survival, and postoperative visual a

164 Eyes in the keratoplasty group had more severe ectasia than eyes in

165 Thirty-seven (80.4%) patients in the keratoplasty group initially were misdiagnosed as having

166 Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty had superior visual acuity results compared

167 Suboptimal visual acuity after endothelial keratoplasty has been attributed to increased anterior c

168 ned by a need for endothelial or penetrating keratoplasty, has not been investigated.

169 In these patients, selective keratoplasties have replaced penetrating keratoplasty to

170 past decade, anterior and posterior lamellar keratoplasty have begun to supplant penetrating keratopl

171 ore likely to fail compared with endothelial keratoplasty (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.08-2.41; P = 0.02) adj

172 tion is necessary for deciding which type of keratoplasty (i.e., deep anterior lamellar or penetratin

173 ohort, Snellen acuity was 20/28 (P = .108 vs keratoplasty), improving to 20/25 with over-refraction (

174 first 6 months (re-bubbling in 15, secondary keratoplasty in 11).

175 f Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in many complex endothelial keratoplasty sc

176 plasty techniques especially the endothelial keratoplasty in the last decade.

177 toplasty and Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty in their management.

178 ce of elevated IOP requiring treatment after keratoplasty in univariate analysis but not in multivari

179 tabase for risk factors associated with post-keratoplasty infection identified an increased risk of p

180 tures, associated with a higher rate of post keratoplasty infection, is seen in endothelial keratopla

181 is significantly impaired but improves after keratoplasty, irrespective of the technique.

182 from donor tissues processed for endothelial keratoplasty is a growing concern, prompting analysis of

183 Although pediatric penetrating keratoplasty is challenging, successful transplantation

184 ter Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty is greater with longer PT, the effect of PT

185 mpt before a complex surgical procedure like keratoplasty is offered.

186 of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty is similar across donor cornea preservation

187 Human corneal transplantation (keratoplasty) is typically considered to have superior s

188 nts with xeroderma pigmentosum who underwent keratoplasty (lamellar/full-thickness) for corneal invol

189 Infectious keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty leads to a high graft failure rate.

190 However, Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty may be more challenging in the management o

191 cceptance of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty, may alter the indications for Descemet's s

192 KPro exchange (n = 8), penetrating keratoplasty (n = 1), or evisceration (n = 2) were perfo

193 cell transplantation (n = 26), and lamellar keratoplasty (n = 14).

194 t-cataract surgery (n = 6), post-penetrating keratoplasty (n = 2), and post-trabeculectomy (n = 2).

195 ry (n = 4), and occurrence after penetrating keratoplasty (n = 2).

196 perforate or require therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (odds ratio: 6.27; 95% CI: 2.73-14.40; P <

197 Documents related to penetrating keratoplasty only have been decreased, whereas the docum

198 ine eyes (96 corneal grafts post penetrating keratoplasty or Descemet stripping automated endothelial

199 ce of LSCD (OR 0.137, P = .004) and need for keratoplasty (OR 0.093, P = .003) favored alloSLET over

200 m endothelial health after PK or endothelial keratoplasty, or both, warrants further study with more

201 ually required cataract surgery, endothelial keratoplasty, or penetrating keratoplasty, respectively.

202 is study affirms an advantage of endothelial keratoplasty over PK with respect to patient-reported ou

203 Patients requiring keratoplasty owing to corneal melting might benefit from

204 us 59 (41.8%) patients who did not require a keratoplasty (P < 0.001).

205 014) and concurrent operation during primary keratoplasty (P = .049) were independent prognostic fact

206 On the other hand, age of primary keratoplasty (P = .626) and operation before or after pr

207 .626) and operation before or after primary keratoplasty (P = .800 and P = .104, respectively) were

208 ith a history of glaucoma before penetrating keratoplasty, particularly with prior glaucoma surgery (

209 odds ratios of a poor visual outcome in all keratoplasty patients.

210 Medicare patients) was analyzed for rate of keratoplasty performed for FECD (International Classific

211 A total of 5115 keratoplasties (PK = 2390; EK = 2725) were identified.

212 All penetrating keratoplasties (PK) performed at the Singapore National

213 rd ratio [HR], 1.56; P < 0.001), penetrating keratoplasty (PK) (adjusted HR, 1.12 vs. ALK and 1.10 vs

214 rneal blindness caused by failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and inability to accurately assess vis

215 ve perforation and conversion to penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and the percentage of patients, post r

216 thelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED)

217 total of 24.1% were converted to penetrating keratoplasty (PK) intraoperatively.

218 Penetrating keratoplasty (PK) ranks among the oldest and most common

219 orty-four eyes (41.9%) underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK), 37 (35.2%) underwent anterior lamella

220 keratoconus who had undergone a penetrating keratoplasty (PK), endothelial keratoplasty (EK), or dee

221 ors of microbial keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

222 leading to late graft failure in penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

223 0; 0.37%) that were converted to penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

224 n keratoconic patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

225 ndothelial keratoplasty (EK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK); amphotericin B, voriconazole, caspofu

226 ration necessitating therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) or evisceration.

227 and conventional management with penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) when indicated in managing keratoconu

228 Twenty-three eyes underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) with an average of 2.0 +/- 1.3 grafts

229 taract surgery in patients after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).

230 atients that underwent pediatric penetrating keratoplasty (PPK) for herpes simplex virus (HSV) kerati

231 these 50 patients, 26 (52%) had therapeutic keratoplasty, predominantly for corneal perforation.

232 ce of elevated IOP requiring treatment after keratoplasty: preoperative glaucoma or IOP >20 mmHg (adj

233 ) approach, adapted from routine endothelial keratoplasty procedure for corneal transplantation in hu

234 tions of the Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty procedure have also served to crystallize t

235 om a previous Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty procedure or cut from a whole corneal graft

236 kely to be positive for fungi in endothelial keratoplasty-processed eyes (1.14%) than for other uses

237 (P = .002) and a nominal association of the keratoplasty proportion with triplet repeat number (P =

238 ed with the Krachmer grade of FECD severity, keratoplasty proportion, and central corneal thickness i

239 strates that Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty provides better and faster visual outcomes

240 The total keratoplasty publication counts had been increased from

241 After keratoplasty, quality of life was correlated with uncorr

242 Consecutive donor corneas and keratoplasty recipients at a single tertiary referral ce

243 A bibliometric filter was used to capture keratoplasty related publications by using the key words

244 failure and 26 (21.49%) in the setting of a keratoplasty related to poor visual performance of the i

245 All of the keratoplasty research articles, letters, case reports, r

246 ry, endothelial keratoplasty, or penetrating keratoplasty, respectively.

247 of cases of anterior and posterior lamellar keratoplasty, respectively.

248 Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty results in less posterior corneal HOA compa

249 ial keratoplasty in many complex endothelial keratoplasty scenarios.

250 Where possible, keratoplasty should be delayed until such time as the ey

251 was consistent with shorter-term endothelial keratoplasty studies and was distinct from the biexponen

252 opathy using a tissue-engineered endothelial keratoplasty (TE-EK) approach, adapted from routine endo

253 There is a growing interest to the lamellar keratoplasty techniques especially the endothelial kerat

254 In comparison with earlier endothelial keratoplasty techniques, DMEK may consistently give high

255 orneal transplantation using human cadaveric keratoplasty techniques.

256 During lamellar keratoplasty, the iOCT data provided information that al

257 ermine whether eyebank-processed endothelial keratoplasty tissue is at higher risk of contamination t

258 ratoplasty infection, is seen in endothelial keratoplasty tissue vs other uses at the time of transpl

259 ive keratoplasties have replaced penetrating keratoplasty to treat corneal decompensation and glaucom

260 r Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, to a procedure reserved for complex endoth

261 tion or the need for therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK) within 3 months.

262 and/or the need for therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK).

263 the need to undergo therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK).

264 rate of perforation; therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK); and other adverse events.

265 f eyes with bullous keratopathy, endothelial keratoplasty under a previously failed PK provided bette

266 perative diagnosis, filtering surgery before keratoplasty, vitrectomy associated with keratoplasty, a

267 results in tissue processed for endothelial keratoplasty vs unprocessed tissue.

268 Conclusions and Relevance: In 2014, keratoplasty was 1.9 times more likely in US Medicare fe

269 iciaries who obtained medical care for FECD, keratoplasty was 1.9 times more likely in white than Afr

270 The mean age at the time of primary keratoplasty was 24.6 +/- 39.9 months.

271 overall probability of receiving a repeated keratoplasty was 6.1% at 6 months, 7.6% at 1 year, 14.3%

272 re for all eyes with Fuchs' dystrophy before keratoplasty was 72 +/- 11 (n = 63) and did not differ b

273 group 2), and in cases in which penetrating keratoplasty was associated with vitrectomy (57 eyes, gr

274 ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and i-OCT and keratoplasty was commenced under i-OCT microscope.

275 vascularization developing after penetrating keratoplasty was found between treatment groups and plac

276 ing Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty was high irrespective of PT.

277 The probability of repeated keratoplasty was highest for procedures performed for pr

278 Keratoplasty was more commonly required in cases (47.82%

279 In this way, the indication for keratoplasty was more than halved in our keratoconus pop

280 Conversion to penetrating keratoplasty was necessary in 1 case (1.1%).

281 No conversion to penetrating keratoplasty was necessary.

282 Keratoplasty was performed in 21 of 36 eyes (58%), 9 the

283 Re-keratoplasty was required in 2 eyes (9%).

284 tachment requiring either rebubble or repeat keratoplasty) was 10.0% in F-DMEK and 65.5% in M-DMEK (P

285 tachment requiring either rebubble or repeat keratoplasty) was 10.0% in F-DMEK and 65.5% in M-DMEK (p

286 Successful RB-PDAT (avoidance of therapeutic keratoplasty) was achieved in 72% of the cases, with an

287 Multiple therapeutic penetrating keratoplasties were required to eradicate the infection.

288 going a therapeutic, rather than an optical, keratoplasty were associated significantly with a poor v

289 s associated with increased risk of repeated keratoplasty were black (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.29; 95% co

290 Patients undergoing therapeutic keratoplasty were compared with those undergoing optical

291 hildren <=16 years of age undergoing planned keratoplasty were divided into 2 groups and compared reg

292 whereas the documents related to endothelial keratoplasty were increased in the last decade.

293 The corneal buttons retrieved during keratoplasty were processed for histology.

294 lasty, and filtering surgery associated with keratoplasty were significantly associated with a higher

295 The rate of air injection and repeat keratoplasty were similar in DMEK and DSEK after the lea

296 Lamellar keratoplasty, when indicated, should be the procedure of

297 l results comparable to those of penetrating keratoplasty, while sparing a healthy endothelial graft.

298 has resulted in the necessity of performing keratoplasty with imported donor corneas.

299 Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with random assignment of a donor cornea wi

300 aocular lenses in the setting of endothelial keratoplasty with variable results.