コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 rge size and compositional complexity of the kinetochore.
2 m for Ctf3c and Cnn1-Wip1 recruitment to the kinetochore.
3 centromere to the microtubule-binding outer kinetochore.
4 cture of an unexpected plasticity to build a kinetochore.
5 lity but virtually the entire centromere and kinetochore.
6 ckpoint or recruitment of Mad2 at unattached kinetochores.
7 population of the kinase is also detected at kinetochores.
8 ephosphorylation of a checkpoint scaffold at kinetochores.
9 es of PP1 and PP2A are strongly inhibited at kinetochores.
10 for Aurora B recruitment to centromeres and kinetochores.
11 nvestigating the function of their divergent kinetochores.
12 g the checkpoint signal at properly attached kinetochores.
13 bias of microtubule growth toward individual kinetochores.
14 e chromosomes by attaching to macromolecular kinetochores.
15 assembly checkpoint signaling at unattached kinetochores.
16 achment of microtubules to the outer face of kinetochores.
17 le-directed forces on still-connected sister kinetochores.
18 s between 1) centrosomes, 2) centrosomes and kinetochores, 3) centrosomes and chromosome arms, and 4)
20 and the Rod-ZW10-Zwilch (RZZ) complex, whose kinetochore accumulation has been shown to antagonize mi
22 udes dynein-mediated removal of the RZZ from kinetochores and consequently delays the formation of st
23 -responsive period when MPS1 can localize to kinetochores and enables a response to late-stage spindl
25 s dispensable for Ska complex recruitment to kinetochores and for generation of kinetochore-microtubu
26 for both PCH-2's localization to unattached kinetochores and its enrichment in germline precursor ce
27 demonstrate that LSH is enriched at meiotic kinetochores and its targeted deletion induces centromer
28 find that CDK1-CCNB1 localizes to unattached kinetochores and like MPS1 is lost from these structures
29 d 2) regulating the binding strength between kinetochores and microtubules such that correct attachme
30 the strengths of centrosomes' attraction to kinetochores and repulsion from the chromosome arms have
31 tical role in regulating attachments between kinetochores and spindle microtubules during mitosis.
32 e maintenance of cohesion, the regulation of kinetochores and the assembly of specialized chromatin,
33 demands efficient capture of microtubules by kinetochores and their conversion to stable bioriented a
35 with Sli15, recruits Ipl1-Sli15 to the inner kinetochore, and promotes chromosome bi-orientation, ind
36 tions in Polo expression and activity at the kinetochores, and disclosed a new in vivo function for U
37 nosoma brucei, the proteins that make up the kinetochore are highly divergent; the inner kinetochore
38 occurs when key structural components of the kinetochore are lost and centromere structure is changed
39 his suggests that Aurora B substrates at the kinetochore are not phosphorylated by centromere-localiz
41 cture of the chromosomal region within which kinetochores are embedded, as well as the restructuring
47 ution of functional Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinetochore assemblies from recombinantly expressed prot
50 sion of satellite RNAs, thus ensuring proper kinetochore assembly and faithful chromosome segregation
57 l analyses identify a Ctf19c(CCAN)-dependent kinetochore assembly pathway that is dispensable for mit
58 he first functional insights into CCAN-based kinetochore assembly pathways that function independentl
60 e report that MIWI deficiency alters meiotic kinetochore assembly, significantly increases chromosome
61 n is required for the SAC beyond its role in kinetochore assembly, suggesting that kinetochore enrich
67 es and has been implicated in establishing a kinetochore-associated pool of Aurora B kinase, a chromo
68 the composition of centromeric chromatin and kinetochores at distinct cell-cycle stages, revealing ex
69 iring, recombination, and the orientation of kinetochore attachment to microtubules in meiosis I.
70 plicated in correcting erroneous microtubule-kinetochore attachments, is essential for Ndc80 degradat
72 nuclear pore so that it can be recruited to kinetochores before nuclear envelope breakdown to mainta
73 e microtubule-binding interface of the human kinetochore behaves like a flexible "lawn" despite being
77 s at CEN chromatin contributes to defects in kinetochore biorientation and chromosomal instability (C
79 centromeres in M. sympodialis as 3-5-kb long kinetochore-bound regions that span an AT-rich core and
81 the recruitment of Mad1-C-Mad2 to unattached kinetochores but also on its binding to Megator/Tpr at n
84 mplex (NPC) by binding an acidic face of the kinetochore checkpoint protein, MAD1, where it coordinat
87 izes to the microtubule-proximal edge of the kinetochore cluster during anaphase based on single-part
90 ct networks and query for interactors of the kinetochore complex as well as conserved proteins involv
95 raction between spindle microtubules and the kinetochore complex that assembles on centromere DNA is
100 ects improper attachments by phosphorylating kinetochore components and so releasing aberrant kinetoc
101 melanogaster, mutation or knockdown of many kinetochore components cause neurites to overgrow and pr
102 lation, rather than phosphorylation of other kinetochore components, was responsible for this dissoci
104 hanism by which meiotic cells modulate their kinetochore composition through regulated Ndc80 degradat
105 kinetochore are highly divergent; the inner kinetochore comprises at least 20 distinct and essential
106 y increase alpha-tubulin detyrosination near kinetochores compromised efficient error correction, wit
110 cally interacts with components of the inner kinetochore constitutive centromere-associated network (
115 ore protein KKIP5 in an Aurora B kinase- and kinetochore-dependent, but ATM/ATR-independent manner.
117 his clustering is similar in yeast and human kinetochores despite significant differences in their ce
118 kinetics of Bub1, BubR1, and BuGZ loading to kinetochores differ, with BuGZ localizing prior to BubR1
120 irement in mediating chromosome segregation, kinetochores display remarkable plasticity in their stru
121 th kinase activities one another in an inter-kinetochore distance-dependent manner, indicating a posi
125 onsistently, ectopic targeting of SET to the kinetochores during metaphase hyperactivates Aurora B vi
128 for binding to the major microtubule-binding kinetochore element Ndc80c, suggesting a direct competit
129 ole in kinetochore assembly, suggesting that kinetochore enrichment of Aurora B promotes the phosphor
131 trates that Aurora B-dependent regulation of kinetochores extends beyond altering microtubule attachm
133 t acetylated histone H3 (AcH3), base J and a kinetochore factor co-localise in each chromosome at onl
134 lathrin localizes to the mitotic spindle and kinetochore fiber microtubule bundles, the mechanisms by
138 re, we use microneedles to pull on mammalian kinetochore-fibers and probe how sustained force regulat
149 omeres define the chromosomal position where kinetochores form to link the chromosome to microtubules
150 oocytes exhibit centromere fusions, ectopic kinetochore formation and abnormal exchange of chromatin
161 study reveals an oocyte-specific function of kinetochores in acentrosomal spindle bipolarization in m
162 s, and that CCNB1 is recruited to unattached kinetochores in an MPS1-dependent fashion through intera
164 abilizes Bub3 and promotes Bub3 loading onto kinetochores in early mitosis, which, in turn, facilitat
166 his ensures that both NPCs in interphase and kinetochores in mitosis can generate anaphase inhibitors
167 a protein known for recruitment of dynein to kinetochores in mitosis, as a key factor required for dy
169 The human TOG protein, chTOG, localizes to kinetochores independent of microtubules by interacting
170 upregulated factors including Prc1 supports kinetochore-independent pathways for spindle bipolarizat
171 ns female meiosis, anaphase is mediated by a kinetochore-independent pushing mechanism with microtubu
176 emporal regulation of phosphorylation at the kinetochore is essential for accurate chromosome alignme
177 major microtubule-binding activities in the kinetochore is mediated by the conserved Ndc80 complex (
180 localises to an expanded region of the outer kinetochore, known as the corona, where it scaffolds the
181 rising to identify transcripts of structural kinetochore (KT) proteins and regulatory chromosome pass
185 as a GLEBS domain, which is required for its kinetochore localization as well, presumably mediated th
186 3 pathway in maintaining the balance between kinetochore localization of Ipl1 and PP1, a balance that
187 ease from NPCs and that this is required for kinetochore localization of Mad1-C-Mad2 and robust SAC s
188 a series of mutants to demonstrate that BuGZ kinetochore localization requires only its core GLEBS do
190 pletion of Bub3 results in reduced levels of kinetochore-localized Ipl1 and concomitant massive chrom
191 mic regulation of MPS1 catalytic activity by kinetochore-localized PP2A-B56 is thus critical for cont
192 s low-tension attachments by phosphorylating kinetochores, low-tension attachments are intrinsically
195 o-PLK4 (pPLK4) is cleaved and distributed to kinetochores (metaphase and anaphase), spindle midzone/c
199 s kinetochore substrates to correct improper kinetochore-microtubule (KT-MT) attachments, whereas ten
200 indle length fluctuations can occur when the kinetochore-microtubule attachment lifetime is long.
201 ate that Hec1 tail phosphorylation regulates kinetochore-microtubule attachment stability independent
204 microtubules to establish force-transducing kinetochore-microtubule attachments and 2) regulating th
206 romotes Dam1c oligomerization to ensure that kinetochore-microtubule attachments are stabilized as ki
208 itment to kinetochores and for generation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments in human cells.
209 fer to reveal the architecture of individual kinetochore-microtubule attachments in human cells.
210 o protect centromeric cohesion and stabilise kinetochore-microtubule attachments in yeast and mouse m
212 occur at mitotic entry, the establishment of kinetochore-microtubule attachments leads to spatial chr
213 o and evicted from these regions to regulate kinetochore-microtubule attachments remains unclear.
214 crotubule dynamics but accumulates erroneous kinetochore-microtubule attachments that are not destabi
215 efective chromosome congression and aberrant kinetochore-microtubule attachments which in turn promot
216 on destabilizes astral microtubules, but not kinetochore-microtubule attachments, and chromosome alig
217 (PP1), which silences the SAC and stabilizes kinetochore-microtubule attachments, how these distinct
218 c MCAK to discriminate correct vs. incorrect kinetochore-microtubule attachments, thereby promoting m
221 e, we report that the evolutionarily ancient kinetochore-microtubule coupling machine, the KMN (Knl1/
223 n motors provide the molecular forces at the kinetochore-microtubule interface and along the spindle
224 les is strongly influenced by factors at the kinetochore-microtubule interface such as Fin1 and Dam1,
226 focused on the dynamics and organization of kinetochore microtubules, that is, on the region between
227 mains tethered to centrosomes by lengthening kinetochore microtubules, which are under tension, sugge
228 flexible ImageJ2/Fiji pipelines to quantify kinetochore misalignment at metaphase plates as well as
229 ing the attachment of the mitotic spindle to kinetochores, mitotic exit, cytokinesis, licensing of DN
231 ired to turn off the checkpoint, and how the kinetochore monitors microtubule numbers, are not known
233 for Bub1 and BubR1 interaction with Bub3 and kinetochores, much less is known regarding BuGZ's requir
235 composition and assembly of CenH3-deficient kinetochores of Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths).
236 Accurate chromosome segregation requires kinetochores on duplicated chromatids to biorient by att
239 c assembly and unanticipated similarities in kinetochore organization between yeast and vertebrates.
246 The nanoscale protein architecture of the kinetochore plays an integral role in specifying the mec
247 ird pool resides ~20 nm outside of the inner kinetochore protein CENP-C in early mitosis and does not
248 permissive to the binding of one copy of the kinetochore protein CENP-C while still retaining a close
250 est by modulating the abundance of the outer kinetochore protein KKIP5 in an Aurora B kinase- and kin
252 rmined by the number of 'MELT' motifs in the kinetochore protein Spc105/KNL1 and their Bub3-Bub1 bind
255 d has arrived at a 'parts list' of dozens of kinetochore proteins organized into subcomplexes, the pa
258 of Aurora B kinase from inner centromeres to kinetochore proximal centromeres and the core of chromos
259 Haspin phosphorylation of histone H3, and a kinetochore-proximal outer centromere pool is recruited
260 Chemical inhibition of CLK1 impairs inner kinetochore recruitment and compromises cell-cycle progr
261 , which, in turn, facilitates Bub1 and BubR1 kinetochore recruitment and spindle assembly checkpoint
264 how that Aurora B and Bub1 at the centromere/kinetochore regulate both kinase activities one another
266 c slippage involves reduction of MAD2 at the kinetochores, resulting in a progressive weakening of SA
268 es and molecular motors connect the poles to kinetochores, specialized protein assemblies on the cent
269 f the CPC decreases in response to the inter-kinetochore stretch that accompanies the formation of bi
272 r results suggest the stoichiometry of outer kinetochore submodules is strongly influenced by factors
276 a macromolecular protein complex called the kinetochore sustains the connection between chromosomes
277 mete formation through meiosis requires that kinetochores take on new functions that impact homolog p
279 e at the interface of the chromosome and the kinetochore that connects to spindle microtubules in mit
280 the CENP-H/I/K complex cause dysfunction of kinetochore that leads to chromosome mis-segregation and
281 SCs incorporate more CENP-A, making stronger kinetochores that capture more spindle microtubules and
282 ique, intrinsic error correction activity to kinetochores that ensures accurate chromosome segregatio
283 We suggest that prior to its assembly at the kinetochore, the Ndc80 complex interchanges between bent
284 to Megator/Tpr restores Mad1 accumulation at kinetochores, the fidelity of chromosome segregation, an
285 osis and meiosis are dictated in part by the kinetochores, the structures on chromosomes that attach
286 p-T links centromeric Cenp-ANuc to the outer kinetochore through its HFD and N-terminal Ndc80-binding
288 osome segregation in mitosis requires sister kinetochores to bind to microtubules from opposite spind
289 ll adapt to the changing number of signaling kinetochores to enable the SAC to approximate switch-lik
290 e proposed to function as collars that allow kinetochores to processively track the plus-end tips of
292 Local phosphatase regulation is needed at kinetochores to silence the mitotic checkpoint (a.k.a. s
293 regation depends on the proper attachment of kinetochores to spindle microtubules before anaphase ons
294 nd conversion, the ill-understood ability of kinetochores to transit from lateral microtubule attachm
297 Bub3 and its binding partners are loaded to kinetochores, we carried out size-exclusion chromatograp
299 calization of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) to kinetochores, which antagonizes Ipl1-mediated phosphoryl
300 Thus, the signaling activity of unattached kinetochores will adapt to the changing number of signal