ライフサイエンスコーパス: kissing loop

1 ion of the MMLV dimerization initiation site kissing loop.

2 that were fluorescently labelled in and near kissing loops.

3 d-swapping mechanism resulting in quaternary kissing loops.

4 ostars whose interactions are programmed via kissing loops.

5 lar and intermolecular A-minor interactions, kissing loops, an unusual A-A helix and other interactio

6 structure assembled from common elements, a kissing loop and two three-way junctions.

7 two classes of tertiary interactions, namely kissing loops and a pseudoknot.

8 esolution revealing structural parameters of kissing-loop and crossover motifs, which are used to imp

9 By monitoring the folding of the aptamer, kissing loop, and riboswitch expression platform, we est

10 nal self-assembly of tiles based on branched kissing loops, and show that tiles inserted into a trans

11 uent motifs, such as kissing loops, branched kissing loops, and T-junctions, that resemble natural RN

12 details of their constituent motifs, such as kissing loops, branched kissing loops, and T-junctions,

13 n that the Tar-Tar(*) complex, an archetypal kissing loop, can form without Mg(2+), so long as high c

14 In contrast sequences involved in forming a kissing loop complex are not absolutely required, but ar

15 ormation of an extended duplex rather than a kissing loop complex because the short stems are not sta

16 igating higher-order structures, such as the kissing loop complex established by the dimerization ini

17 The degree of cation accumulation around the kissing loop complex was also inversely proportional to

18 two other RNAs, an adenine riboswitch and a kissing loop complex, become more stable by 2-3 kcal/mol

19 m-loop interface to allow the formation of a kissing loop complex.

20 it requires as much force to break the MMLV kissing-loop complex as is required to unfold an 11-bp R

21 op interface is critical in the formation of kissing loop complexes and that in the absence of Mg(2+)

22 Kissing loop complexes are loop-loop complexes where two

23 Our results show that although kissing loop complexes form more readily in the presence

24 rived from the ColE1 plasmid to associate as kissing loop complexes in the presence and absence of di

25 in the unusual stability of other retroviral kissing-loop complexes such as the HIV dimerization site

26 The cationic uptake by kissing loops depends on the number of basepairs between

27 To prevent the kissing loop dimer forming we changed the complementary

28 is exposed, and the genome is competent for kissing loop dimerization and packaging into assembling

29 interactions such as intermolecular RNA-RNA kissing loop dimerization, RNA-protein binding, and intr

30 we use to construct a Markov state model for kissing-loop dissociation.

31 ly as an unstructured spacer to position the kissing-loop elements.

32 Readily reversible kissing loop formation combined with slow cleavage of th

33 However, we showed that kissing loop formation improves ligand binding efficienc

34 An RNA kissing loop from the Moloney murine leukemia virus (MML

35 A long-range, 5-nucleotide, base-pairing kissing loop interaction between the 3'BTE and a 5'UTR s

36 Recognition of the substrate involves a kissing loop interaction between the substrate and the c

37 To analyze the role of the kissing loop interaction in the riboswitch regulatory me

38 We found that the kissing loop interaction is not essential for ligand bin

39 Escherichia coli btuB riboswitch contains a kissing loop interaction that is in close proximity to t

40 tion have an upstream stem-loop that forms a kissing loop interaction with the apical loop of SL2, im

41 Using this system, we determine that the kissing-loop interaction between 5BSL3.2 and 3' SL2 is r

42 ransferred to the 5' end via a long-distance kissing-loop interaction between sequences in the 3'CITE

43 bilizes an unusual long-range intramolecular kissing-loop interaction that controls mRNA expression.

44 o engages in a stable, long-distance RNA-RNA kissing-loop interaction with a 12-bp 5'-coding-region h

45 contains an apical loop capable of forming a kissing-loop interaction with a 5' proximal hairpin and

46 Most 3'CITEs participate in a long-distance kissing-loop interaction with a 5' proximal hairpin to d

47 the PEMV PTE that engages in a long-distance kissing-loop interaction with a coding sequence hairpin

48 or eIF4F complex and to engage in an RNA-RNA kissing-loop interaction with a hairpin loop located at

49 The resulting kissing-loop interaction, common in tick-borne flaviviru

50 iform is not an absolute requirement for the kissing-loop interaction, suggesting a model in which tr

51 iation has been proposed to occur through a "kissing-loop" interaction involving a specific RNA stem-

52 In contrast, a 'kissing loop' interaction between the terminal loop of S

53 The presence of the 'kissing loop' interaction inhibited the formation of SL9

54 ating for the absence of naturally occurring kissing-loop interactions.

55 involves the fast formation of an unstable "kissing" loop intermediate, followed by a slower convers

56 the fast formation of an unstable extended "kissing" loop intermediate, followed by a slower strand

57 igomerization-enabled cryo-EM via installing kissing loops)-involves installing kissing-loop sequence

58 A kissing loop is a highly stable complex formed by loop-l

59 We also found that the kissing loop is unnecessary for this coencapsidation or

60 ubstrate stem loop I (SLI)-stem loop V (SLV) kissing loop junction of the Varkud Satellite ribozyme h

61 to analyze the binding and dynamics of this kissing loop junction.

62 t allows RNA dimerization via intermolecular kissing loop (KL) base pairing.

63 nucleocapsid (NC) to the hinge region of the kissing-loop (KL) dimer formed by stemloop 1 (SL1) can h

64 complementary sequences to form a metastable kissing-loop (KL) dimer.

65 sociated with the disruption of a long-range kissing-loop (KL) interaction is substantially decreased

66 e two subunits are connected by two distinct kissing-loop (KL) interactions that are essential for po

67 d that SARS-CoV RNA dimers assemble through 'kissing' loop-loop interactions.

68 is implicated in dimer initiation through a kissing-loop mechanism.

69 ranscriptional expression possibly through a kissing loop model bridging TRX 3'- and 5'-UTRs through

70 he basis of the palindromic nature of SL1, a kissing loop model has been proposed.

71 indromic nature of the apical loop of SL1, a kissing loop model has been proposed.

72 In the kissing loop model, dimerisation results from base-pairi

73 These results fully support the kissing-loop model and may provide a framework for syste

74 The kissing-loop model implicates interactions between palin

75 ed through an artificially designed branched kissing-loop motif, involving Watson-Crick base pairing

76 ation that in some aspects is similar to the kissing loops of the human immunodeficiency virus.

77 ribozyme core via three tertiary contacts: a kissing loop (P14), a metal core-receptor interaction, a

78 and therefore differs significantly from the kissing loop palindromes utilized to initiate dimerizati

79 ked helices; these are interconnected by two kissing loop pseudoknots that wrap around the catalytic

80 Finally, we show that both the poly(U) and kissing-loop RNA elements can function outside of their

81 The kissing-loop sequence at end of L3, postulated to functi

82 nstalling kissing loops)-involves installing kissing-loop sequences onto the functionally nonessentia

83 ection pathway resembles that of an isolated kissing loop similar to P14, and the rate along the indu

84 alter the observed counterion specificity in kissing loop stability.

85 ed metastable configuration consisting of a "kissing loop" stabilized by flanking helical domains; th

86 slated region (3'UTR), the ribosome-binding, kissing-loop T-shaped structure (kl-TSS) and eukaryotic

87 EMV) 3' translational enhancer, known as the kissing-loop T-shaped structure (kl-TSS), binds to 40S s

88 tifunctional element is designated a kl-TSS (kissing-loop T-shaped structure) to distinguish it from

89 B coding region, 5BSL3.2, forms a functional kissing-loop tertiary structure with part of the 3' NTR,

90 These oligomers self-associate to form a kissing loop that thermally rearranges into a more stabl