ライフサイエンスコーパス: laboratory mouse

1 and transcriptome data now available for the laboratory mouse.

2 ystem, a community database resource for the laboratory mouse.

3 te a definitive set of information about the laboratory mouse.

4 ource for gene expression information in the laboratory mouse.

5 ource of gene expression information for the laboratory mouse.

6 variety of additional information about the laboratory mouse.

7 y, polymorphism and molecular data about the laboratory mouse.

8 genomic and phenotypic information about the laboratory mouse.

9 effort to produce a dense genetic map of the laboratory mouse.

10 athered from the studies performed using the laboratory mouse.

11 y used model organism for human disease, the laboratory mouse.

12 genomic, genetic and biological data on the laboratory mouse.

13 ication of phenotype-associated genes in the laboratory mouse.

14 netic, genomic and biological data about the laboratory mouse.

15 the primary community data resource for the laboratory mouse.

16 d for their inability to infect cells of the laboratory mouse.

17 ry community model organism database for the laboratory mouse.

18 utors to natural phenotypic variation in the laboratory mouse.

19 s the known genetic variation present in the laboratory mouse.

20 ontaneous copy number variation (CNV) in the laboratory mouse.

21 ropathy represents a founder mutation in the laboratory mouse.

22 on the genetics, genomics and biology of the laboratory mouse.

23 , a model organism database resource for the laboratory mouse.

24 ) is the community database resource for the laboratory mouse, a key model organism for interpreting

25 ent of a community database resource for the laboratory mouse, a key model organism for interpreting

26 ity model organism database resource for the laboratory mouse, a premier animal model for the study o

27 genomic and phenotypic information about the laboratory mouse, a primary animal model for studying hu

28 genomic and phenotypic information about the laboratory mouse, a primary animal model for studying hu

29 mmunity model organism knowledgebase for the laboratory mouse, a widely used animal model for compara

30 ryonic stem cells from the 129 strain of the laboratory mouse and mostly crossed to non-129 strains.

31 ely 30-40%) compared with that in the common laboratory mouse and rat ( approximately 1-3%) and may p

32 us and H. bilis infections are widespread in laboratory mouse and rat colonies.

33 oth similarities and differences between the laboratory mouse and rat were observed.

34 ry community model organism database for the laboratory mouse and serves as the source for key biolog

35 he community model organism database for the laboratory mouse and the authoritative source for phenot

36 the vocal behavior of two model species: the laboratory mouse and the zebra finch.

37 te a definitive set of information about the laboratory mouse and to build and implement the data and

38 s to explore the phylogenetic history of the laboratory mouse and to examine the functional consequen

39 hypothesis that common inbred strains of the laboratory mouse are derived from a limited ancestral ge

40 for cancer genetics researchers who use the laboratory mouse as a model system for understanding hum

41 se, is designed to facilitate the use of the laboratory mouse as a model system for understanding hum

42 Amino acids implicated previously in laboratory mouse attenuation generally did not vary amon

43 m for detecting genetic contamination in the laboratory mouse based on assaying single-nucleotide pol

44 d a high-resolution map of the origin of the laboratory mouse by generating 25,400 phylogenetic trees

45 e provide complete 3D reconstructions of the laboratory mouse chondrocranium from embryonic day (E) 1

46 Laboratory mouse colonies are repeatedly rederived in ge

47 t microbiome differed significantly from its laboratory mouse counterpart and was transferred to and

48 However, the genetic mechanism of laboratory mouse domestication remains unknown due to la

49 hough these pathways are best studied in the laboratory mouse, emerging evidence points to unique mec

50 tis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster and the laboratory mouse, exist for the Foxo family of transcrip

51 g exposure of mice to the MLVs restricted by laboratory mouse Fv1, and suggests a mechanism for Fv1 r

52 hat matches patients' clinical phenotypes to laboratory mouse gene knockouts, we were able to strongl

53 a chance occurrence, we surveyed the Jackson Laboratory Mouse Genome Database for knockout mouse stra

54 hile all 31 P-MLV ERVs map to the 95% of the laboratory mouse genome derived from P-MLV-infected M. m

55 wild mice and are embedded in the 5% of the laboratory mouse genome derived from the Asian Mus muscu

56 The amount of variation found in the inbred laboratory mouse genome has increased to 71 M SNPs and 1

57 A dense map of genetic variation in the laboratory mouse genome will provide insights into the e

58 ent species for > 25 million years, but that laboratory-mouse gut microbiota (LGM) strains of these a

59 For many years the laboratory mouse has been used as the standard model for

60 erm motility and ATP production and that the laboratory mouse has comparatively low values in these t

61 The laboratory mouse has emerged as a primary model organism

62 Here we show that standard laboratory mouse husbandry has profound effects on the i

63 cteristics data to facilitate the use of the laboratory mouse in translational research for human hea

64 ogenetic origin of the genome of most extant laboratory mouse inbred strains.

65 The laboratory mouse is a premier genetic model for understa

66 hology of cancer in different strains of the laboratory mouse is critical to developing and using mou

67 The laboratory mouse is increasingly a subject for visual sy

68 or genome editing become widely adopted, the laboratory mouse is more important than ever as a model

69 The laboratory mouse is one of the most powerful tools for b

70 The laboratory mouse is the most widely used mammalian model

71 The laboratory mouse is the premier animal model for studyin

72 The laboratory mouse is the premier animal model for studyin

73 The laboratory mouse is the premier model system for studies

74 The laboratory mouse is the primary mammalian species used f

75 The laboratory mouse is the workhorse of immunology, used as

76 The genome of the laboratory mouse is thought to be a mosaic of regions wi

77 he community model organism database for the laboratory mouse, is designed to facilitate the use of t

78 e paucity of chronic infection models in the laboratory mouse, LDV infection may be useful for explor

79 is heterogeneity is not captured by standard laboratory mouse lines.

80 Although extensively characterized using the laboratory mouse, little is known about clonal selection

81 nfections in vivo in the context of a common laboratory mouse model (Mus musculus).

82 med to be part of the telogen phase, using a laboratory mouse model and newly developed techniques fo

83 The laboratory mouse model of Lyme disease has revealed that

84 ild mouse-derived microbiota as standard for laboratory mouse models will improve the reproducibility

85 eases are difficult to study in conventional laboratory mouse models, which display a very limited nu

86 The 15 laboratory mouse Mtvs are each present in multiple strai

87 Most laboratory mouse Mtvs predate inbred strain origins and

88 d with the published sequence for the common laboratory mouse Mus musculus domesticus strain C57BL/6J

89 probe the properties of threat escape in the laboratory mouse Mus musculus.

90 Y chromosome) of the C57BL/6J strain of the laboratory mouse Mus musculus.

91 ns the pseudoautosomal boundary (PAB) in the laboratory mouse (Mus musculus domesticus, C57BL/6) such

92 ally well-characterized model organisms, the laboratory mouse, Mus musculus, and the fruit fly, Droso

93 Laboratory mouse, Mus musculus, is one of the most impor

94 midbrain auditory response properties of the laboratory mouse, Mus musculus.

95 Thus, a laboratory mouse (NIH Swiss) X-receptor conferred suscep

96 Yet, the laboratory mouse, obtained after decades of human-driven

97 ength genomic DNA of the recently identified laboratory mouse papillomavirus 1 (MusPV1) was synthesiz

98 to the corresponding regions in prototypical laboratory mouse polytropic proviruses, but the wild mou

99 In contrast to humans, the laboratory mouse possesses long telomeres and, even in e

100 The laboratory mouse provides a model to study pathogenesis.

101 The laboratory mouse provides an ideal model to study aging

102 The laboratory mouse serves as an important model system for

103 The laboratory mouse shares the majority of its protein-codi

104 ol, we sought an outbred and immunocompetent laboratory mouse strain in which persistent papillomas c

105 ing molecule MR1, this population is rare in laboratory mouse strains ( approximately 0.1% in lymphoi

106 ze the distribution of both proviruses in 48 laboratory mouse strains and 46 wild-derived strains.

107 havior and responses to neuroactive drugs in laboratory mouse strains and may help to explain individ

108 tly expands the catalogue of fully sequenced laboratory mouse strains and now contains several exampl

109 es Project generated genome sequences for 17 laboratory mouse strains and rich catalogues of variants

110 Most inbred laboratory mouse strains are deficient in Mx1, but conge

111 Most inbred laboratory mouse strains are known to have originated fr

112 /CD2 family haplotype is found in many other laboratory mouse strains but only causes autoimmunity in

113 Laboratory mouse strains carry endogenous copies of the

114 The commonly used conventional laboratory mouse strains do not respond robustly to SAgs

115 Most laboratory mouse strains including C57BL/6J do not produ

116 Our current knowledge of TEs in laboratory mouse strains is limited primarily to those p

117 ole-genome shotgun sequence traces from four laboratory mouse strains mapped against the reference C5

118 tion of recombination in the sequences of 15 laboratory mouse strains sequenced by Perlegen Sciences.

119 Furthermore, SIRPalpha polymorphism in laboratory mouse strains significantly affects the exten

120 million individual sequence traces from four laboratory mouse strains to the C57BL/6J reference genom

121 referentially segregate to the polar body in laboratory mouse strains when the fusion centromeres are

122 Most laboratory mouse strains, including C57BL/6J, carry nons

123 enome genotype imputations for 100 classical laboratory mouse strains, using a novel method.

124 a genetic cross was carried out between two laboratory mouse strains.

125 effort to sequence the genomes of the common laboratory mouse strains.

126 r complicated by striking variations between laboratory mouse strains.

127 ls is due to the extremely long telomeres in laboratory mouse strains.

128 a closely related wild relative to standard laboratory mouse strains.

129 arrying out EMPReSS protocols on four inbred laboratory mouse strains.

130 Laboratory mouse studies are paramount for understanding

131 this methodology to data about genes in the laboratory mouse that are formally represented in the Mo

132 ruses that cause persistent infection in the laboratory mouse-the most well-developed tool for studyi

133 However, the reliance on the laboratory mouse to identify viable therapies for the hu

134 to reconstruct a phylogenetic history of the laboratory mouse using Wagner parsimony analysis.

135 We did this because the laboratory mouse viruses derive directly from specific E

136 e measured from 1,938 neurons from the adult laboratory mouse visual cortex, morphological properties

137 The laboratory mouse was domesticated from the wild house mo

138 The effective assessment of laboratory mouse welfare is a fundamental legal and mora

139 alid, reliable and practicable indicators of laboratory mouse welfare using the Delphi consultation t

140 nd integrates expression information for the laboratory mouse, with a particular emphasis on mouse de

141 To describe the subspecies origins of laboratory mouse XP-MLV ERVs and their coevolutionary tr

142 1 receptors, including the X-MLV-restricting laboratory mouse Xpr1(n) and a novel M. m. castaneus all

143 lign with the two mutations that disable the laboratory mouse XPR1.