戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  motor; and 0.14 (0.09, 0.20), p < 0.001 for language development.
2 e fasciculus were associated with expressive language development.
3 programmes are at improving young children's language development.
4 f representations across languages and about language development.
5  vastly heterogeneous, particularly in early language development.
6 nctional implications for future hearing and language development.
7 on factor tightly associated with speech and language development.
8 r many aspects of perception, cognition, and language development.
9 ole gene to date firmly linked to speech and language development.
10 nterest, and are considered a key element in language development.
11 n of linguistic representations, that is, in language development.
12  stimuli may be one risk factor for atypical language development.
13 NTNAP2 as enriched in circuits important for language development.
14 urther investigations of normal and aberrant language development.
15 wed the most promise in improving children's language development.
16  transcription factor involved in speech and language development.
17 ed from a functional imaging study of normal language development.
18  in improving auditory skills and speech and language development.
19 y help towards the improvement of children's language development.
20  of ways, which likely differentially impact language development.
21 areas important for social communication and language development.
22  have a positive association with children's language development.
23 ion of shared awareness and in turn supports language development.
24 etween 33 and 37 weeks gestation had delayed language development across the 2-year follow-up, as mea
25 on of pediatric hearing loss is critical for language development and academic achievement.
26 ally affecting children, leading to delay in language development and communication.
27  peak asymmetries in regions associated with language development and functional lateralization betwe
28 re visits are associated with improved child language development and increased home literacy activit
29 hanisms underlying individual differences in language development and lead to more effective educatio
30 n dorsal pathways associated with expressive language development and long-term language ability, nam
31 ay be important in the early course of child language development and may also serve to illuminate ou
32 g not only provides a framework for studying language development and object knowledge in constrained
33 iated protein-like 2 (CNTNAP2) in aspects of language development and performance.
34 assumptions about autistic persons and their language development and use.
35 velopment, -11.4 (95% CI, -15.3 to -7.5) for language development, and -7.3 (95% CI, -10.6 to -3.9) f
36  caregiver-reported child HIV testing, child language development, and child attention.
37 uospatial memory, long-term episodic memory, language development, and global development at 10 and 1
38  school-aged children ages 5-7, with typical language development, and investigated prosodic percepti
39  (E2), which is associated with human speech-language development, and is abundant in both NCM and hu
40  impact that the programme has on children's language development, and not all home visiting programm
41 mes including physical growth, cognitive and language development, and socioemotional development.
42 ee scales (non-verbal cognitive development, language development, and total parent report composite
43 egard to academic achievement and speech and language development are important considerations, espec
44  of these streams during atypical speech and language development are lacking.
45 cess, or the disadvantages of having delayed language development, are not well explored.
46                          Primary outcome was language development, as measured by the Bayley Scales o
47 rest given atypical brain lateralization and language development associated with the disorder.
48 ed, standardised assessment of cognitive and language development at 24-27 months of age.
49 e PARCA-R to assess children's cognitive and language development at age 24-27 months.
50 peractivity disorder symptoms, and motor and language development at ages 1.5, 3, and 5 years.
51  about the impact of institutionalization on language development at the level of brain and behavior.
52 e surgery and had at least 5 years of normal language development before the onset of seizures.
53 gnition, executive and psychomotor function, language development, behavior, scholastic achievement,
54 is, in turn, changes the trajectory of child language development between 6 and 18 mo of age.
55                                              Language development builds on speech perception, with e
56 associated with improved CDI total gestures (language development) but was significantly adversely as
57 /THEM2 genes play an important role in human language development, but probably through different cer
58 ects of the intervention on child expressive language development (coefficient = 0.89, 95% CI [0.18,
59 s gestational age) show poorer cognitive and language development compared with their term-born peers
60 al = 18.62-130.39) and MYO7A with speech and language development delay attributable to hearing loss
61 d failed to gain significant milestones; (2) language development had been minimal or absent; (3) 10
62 nance is not implicated in all cases of poor language development (i.e. ASD and SLI-history groups),
63  quantitative benchmark to assess children's language development, I propose a formal analysis that c
64 natal MNP had a positive effect on motor and language development in Bangladeshi children.
65              The neuromagnetic signatures of language development in healthy children may be used as
66 utations of the FOXP2 gene impair speech and language development in humans and shRNA-mediated suppre
67 duce songs in a manner reminiscent of spoken language development in humans.
68 n the brain open a new window for studies of language development in humans.
69 ts suggest parallels with certain aspects of language development in humans.
70 ciated with impaired brain growth and slower language development in infants with transposition of th
71 home environment is important for children's language development in the early years.
72 breastfeeding for some aspects of memory and language development in the first 2 y of life, with sign
73 on (hearing aids) that can facilitate spoken language development in young children with severe to pr
74 atal maternal depressive symptoms may impact language development in young children.
75                                  Theories of language development-informed largely by studies of West
76 motor regions significantly predicted future language development into the third year of life, more t
77                  We studied whether infants' language development is altered by prenatal exposure to
78 al mood after birth is associated with early language development is important given opportunities of
79 ngually deafened children with CIs, for whom language development is ongoing.
80           Due to wide variability of typical language development, it has been historically difficult
81 the identification of universal processes in language development, language use, and language breakdo
82 with persistent OME the effect on speech and language development of immediate surgery (ventilation-t
83 ve the potential to positively influence the language development of the child.
84 mutations in this gene have severely delayed language development, often accompanied by intellectual
85 l, and multidimensional assessment of spoken language development over a 3-year period in children wh
86 aising concerns about its negative impact on language development, particularly vocabulary.
87                             To promote early language development, play with electronic toys should b
88 utcomes-children's immunisations, accidents, language development, positive and negative social behav
89 traints in adulthood emerges as a product of language-development processes that are driven by the in
90 g-related outcomes, but its association with language development remains unclear.
91 s were used, reporting on varying domains of language development rendering comparisons across progra
92 ffect size of 0.42 and 0.47 on cognitive and language development, respectively, whereas nutrition by
93    Primary outcomes were child cognitive and language development (score on the Bayley Scales of Infa
94 ren born by C-section showed lower motor and language development scores during specific age windows
95                                        Early language development sets the stage for a lifetime of co
96  differ significantly in global development, language development, short-term visuospatial memory, or
97 onfidence interval]: 0.23, 0.40, P < 0.001), language development (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.37,
98 ate implications for understanding normative language development, the evolutionary basis and physiol
99 partum depressive episode is associated with language development, this association has not been inve
100               However, some have argued that language development unfolds similarly across environmen
101 nduct a 5-year longitudinal investigation of language development using functional magnetic resonance
102                                   Pre-school language development was assessed at 2 years.
103 talogs) and because their hearing and spoken language development was particularly vulnerable to redu
104 trial outcomes: Gross motor, fine motor, and language development were assessed using the Malawi Deve
105 y outcomes including cognitive and receptive language development (with the Bayley Scales of Infant D
106 dently associated with adverse cognitive and language development, with accentuated associations obse
107 ng DHA status was positively associated with language development yet negatively associated with the

 
Page Top