コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 workup of patients with oral, pharyngeal, or laryngeal cancer.
2 functional preservation in locally advanced laryngeal cancer.
3 ible with IMRT and IGRT for locally advanced laryngeal cancer.
4 tration or extralaryngeal spread of advanced laryngeal cancer.
5 modify smoking and drinking odds ratios for laryngeal cancer.
6 essity for initial laryngectomy for advanced laryngeal cancer.
7 yngectomy for patients with locally advanced laryngeal cancer.
8 o identify primary and recurrent early stage laryngeal cancer.
9 t white-light endoscopy for the detection of laryngeal cancer.
10 asopharynx cancer, other pharynx cancer, and laryngeal cancer.
11 -preservation strategies in the treatment of laryngeal cancer.
12 enerally lower than those of oral cavity and laryngeal cancers.
13 studies (1981-2006) of oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers (6,772 cases and 8,375 controls) in th
16 benefit in local tumor control for advanced laryngeal cancers, a significant gain in regional contro
18 s for many head and neck cancers, especially laryngeal cancers, allow for multiple treatment options.
19 nduction schedules to patients with advanced laryngeal cancer allows greater organ preservation witho
23 or upfront laryngectomy in the management of laryngeal cancer are a functionless larynx and extralary
27 older than 18 years who were diagnosed with laryngeal cancer between January 1, 1986, and December 3
28 tients with hypopharyngeal, oral cavity, and laryngeal cancers, but not for those with oropharyngeal
29 esolution 3D model of molecular marked whole laryngeal cancer by optimizing the currently available t
30 chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer can achieve high rates of organ preserv
31 y alone in selected patients with T2-4, N0-1 laryngeal cancer can provide durable disease remission a
32 8 oro-/hypopharyngeal cancer (OHPs), and 193 laryngeal cancer cases] were available for analysis.
33 5; the Rhein-Neckar Larynx Study, a study of laryngeal cancer conducted in 1998-2000; and a lung canc
34 est risk associated with smoking observed in laryngeal cancer (current smoker hazard ratio [HR], 9.36
35 utcomes among patients having oral-cavity or laryngeal cancers even when standard disease staging was
36 underwent salvage laryngectomy for recurrent laryngeal cancer from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2
37 reated docetaxel-resistant DRHEp2 from human laryngeal cancer HEp2 and investigated the roles of mito
41 Larynx preservation in advanced, resectable laryngeal cancer may be achieved using induction chemoth
43 ith histologically proven pancreatic cancer, laryngeal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, prostate c
44 pattern was positively associated only with laryngeal cancer (odds ratio = 2.12, 95% confidence inte
45 mprised 45 patients investigated for primary laryngeal cancer or recurrence-residue in which CT was c
54 ttes/day varied, indicating that the greater laryngeal cancer risk derived from differential cigarett
56 IR and SMR were estimated among survivors of laryngeal cancer (SIR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.68-1.83]; inciden
57 son-years) among men, and among survivors of laryngeal cancer (SIR, 2.48 [95% CI, 2.27-2.72]; inciden
58 ; 95% confidence interval (CI): 11.3, 27.4], laryngeal cancer (SMR = 8.1; 95% CI: 3.5, 16.0), liver c
59 methylation, we for the first time identify laryngeal cancer subtypes with distinct prognostic outco
60 fold conditions or postoperative recovery of laryngeal cancer surgeries, are common causes of dysphon
61 nderstand how patients who were treated with laryngeal cancer surgery think about this later on and w
63 objectives were to study the sensitivity of laryngeal cancer to platinum-based chemotherapy alone an
65 herapy alone may cure selected patients with laryngeal cancer, warranting further prospective investi
69 ore individuals affected by lung, throat, or laryngeal cancer, yielded a maximum heterogeneity LOD sc