コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 matic drugs (DMARDs) (either methotrexate or leflunomide).
2 ture and DDX21 occupancy changes prompted by leflunomide.
3 ations of A77 1726, the active metabolite of leflunomide.
4 ients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with leflunomide.
5 disrupted with increasing concentrations of leflunomide.
6 brogated by treatment of Jurkat T cells with leflunomide.
7 the in vivo immunosuppressive activities of leflunomide.
8 educing agents did not reverse the effect of leflunomide.
9 s an Src protein tyrosine kinase, p56lck, by leflunomide.
10 ved in the Z form during the ring opening of leflunomide.
11 e reversed the antiproliferative activity of leflunomide.
12 The active metabolite of leflunomide.
13 pendent antigen responses were suppressed by leflunomide.
14 eritis have responded to the immunomodulator leflunomide.
15 were switched from mycophenolate mofetil to leflunomide.
16 and treated with varying doses of FK778 and leflunomide.
17 kg to cohorts or animals receiving FK778 and leflunomide.
19 oup of allograft recipients was treated with leflunomide (10 mg/kg/24 hr/orally) and cyclosporine (5
21 the immunosuppressive activities of low-dose leflunomide (15 mg/kg/day) and partially antagonized the
22 Our data demonstrate that the ability of leflunomide (25-100 microM) to inhibit MLC and CTLL-4 ce
26 lanted with hamster hearts were treated with leflunomide (5 mg/kg/day by gavage) for 14-21 days and C
28 agonized the immunosuppressive activities of leflunomide (5, 15, and 35 mg/kg/day) in the allotranspl
29 r hearts were treated for 50 or 75 days with leflunomide (5, 15, and 35 mg/kg/day; gavage) alone or i
30 ins Clinical Compound Library and identified leflunomide, a dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitor wi
33 A77 1726 (LEF) is the active metabolite of leflunomide, a recently approved immunosuppressive agent
34 vities reported for the active metabolite of leflunomide, A77 1726, are inhibition of tyrosine phosph
37 fied for the immunosuppressive metabolite of leflunomide, A77 1726: inhibition of dihydroorotate dehy
44 levels of A77 1726, the active metabolite of leflunomide, after a single treatment of leflunomide (5,
45 monstrated equivalent inhibitory activity of leflunomide against multi-drug-resistant CMV isolates.
47 roven NK virus nephropathy (BKN) with either leflunomide alone (n=17) or leflunomide plus a course of
51 estricted to TNF-induced activation, because leflunomide also inhibited NF-kappa B activation induced
54 Data generated by these studies distinguish leflunomide among immunosuppressants as uniquely capable
58 phenyl)-7(t-butyl)pyrazol(3,4-d)pyramide and leflunomide, an Src kinase inhibitor, suppressed both UV
61 e basis, we have investigated the effects of leflunomide and A771726 on the activity of purified reco
62 ate inhibition of MLC by the combinations of leflunomide and brequinar sodium or mycophenolic acid.
63 at a brief treatment with the combination of leflunomide and CsA profoundly modifies the humoral xeno
66 The combination of two immunosuppressants, leflunomide and cyclosporin A (CsA), completely inhibits
67 ecipients were administered a combination of leflunomide and cyclosporine (10 mg/kg/24 hr and 5 mg/kg
70 igated the effect of two immunosuppressants, leflunomide and cyclosporine, on the spleen of rats with
77 milar capacity to detect greater efficacy of leflunomide and methotrexate versus placebo in this clin
79 rse effects, pharmacokinetic measurements of leflunomide and methotrexate, and clinical response by A
84 important differences between methotrexate, leflunomide and sulfasalazine monotherapies; early disea
86 rheumatoid arthritis or multiple sclerosis (leflunomide and teriflunomide) and have been investigate
88 ate pregnancy outcomes in women who received leflunomide and were treated with cholestyramine during
90 108 pregnant women with RA not treated with leflunomide, and 78 healthy pregnant women were enrolled
92 esented showing that dehydroepiandrosterone, leflunomide, and methotrexate are effective in treating
93 bolites, such as methotrexate, azathioprine, leflunomide, and mycophenolate, are often used as altern
94 g synthetic DMARDs (limited to methotrexate, leflunomide, and sulfasalazine) or among anti-tumor necr
96 ive concentration, and selectivity index for Leflunomide are 39.7+/-6.9, 11.3+/-2.8, and 3.8+/-0.8 mi
98 sed in a stepwise fashion, ciprofloxacin and leflunomide are effective and safe treatments for BK vir
102 as an adverse event in patients treated with leflunomide between November 1998 and January 2000.
104 ammatory stimuli, including TNF, but whether leflunomide blocks NF-kappa B activation is not known.
106 eatment of a human T cell line (Jurkat) with leflunomide blocks TNF-mediated NF-kappa B activation in
108 previous biochemical studies indicated that leflunomide can inhibit src-family tyrosine kinase activ
109 2 with 5-fluorouracil or the DHODH inhibitor leflunomide caused regressions of multiple colorectal xe
113 umatoid arthritis (RA) who were treated with leflunomide during pregnancy (95.3% of whom received cho
114 d new disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (leflunomide, etanercept, and infliximab) in their choice
118 ntrast to currently approved anti-CMV drugs, leflunomide exerts no inhibitory effect on the accumulat
121 were no significant differences between the leflunomide-exposed and non-leflunomide-exposed RA group
122 ants in both the leflunomide-exposed and non-leflunomide-exposed RA groups were born smaller and earl
124 ed risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes due to leflunomide exposure among women who undergo cholestyram
126 e form of tacrolimus (MR-4), a new analog of leflunomide (FK 778), and several novel compounds (PG 49
130 d including the adjunctive use of cidofovir, leflunomide, fluoroquinolones, and intravenous immunoglo
134 15-deoxyspergulin, mycophenolate mofetil, or leflunomide from day 0, 7, or 14 until day of graft remo
135 iscriminate further the action on T cells of leflunomide from other immunosuppressive agents, we perf
136 dition of exogenous uridine, suggesting that leflunomide functions as a pyrimidine synthesis inhibito
139 milar in both treatment groups (23.1% in the leflunomide group and 24.8% in the placebo group), as we
140 = 179 +/- 19 nM), while the parent compound, leflunomide, had no inhibitory effect at concentrations
142 itionally described an FDA approved prodrug, leflunomide (IC(50), 6.8 microM), that seems to be a PXR
143 625 copies/mL, and patients were switched to leflunomide if BK viral load did not decrease after 2 mo
144 of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) with leflunomide impacts nucleotide pools by reducing pyrimid
147 ested that the immunosuppressive efficacy of leflunomide in vivo is related to inhibition of DHO-DHas
148 Exposure of patient-derived colonoids to leflunomide increased cell survival, polarity, and trans
149 tosis (XIAP); incubation of these cells with leflunomide increased levels of phosphorylated AKT and X
150 1, and the immunosuppressive small-molecule leflunomide, induced intestinal immunotolerance and redu
152 itial in vitro experiments demonstrated that leflunomide inhibited B cell antibody production by decr
159 hat the experimental immunosuppressive agent leflunomide inhibits production of cytomegalovirus by in
160 100 microM), and support the hypothesis that leflunomide inhibits pyrimidine synthesis in T cells.
162 gest that A77 1726, the active metabolite of leflunomide, inhibits the activity of JAK1 and JAK3.
163 sformation of antirheumatic fluorescent drug leflunomide into its active metabolite teriflunomide thr
173 enzymatic assays, however, demonstrate that leflunomide is an inhibitor of several protein tyrosine
174 he in vivo mechanism of immunosuppression by leflunomide is complex and is affected by at least the f
176 iseases in MRL/MpJ-lpr/lpr (lpr/lpr) mice by leflunomide is not accompanied by reduced PyN concentrat
177 roorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH), for example leflunomide, led to an almost complete abrogation of neu
180 safety data comparing methotrexate (MTX) and leflunomide (LEF) monotherapy, in combination with biolo
181 effects of the immunosuppressants FK506 and leflunomide (Lef) on the survival of hamster hearts and
182 this study was to investigate the effect of Leflunomide (Lef), alone or in combination with a subopt
183 orted previously that the immunosuppressant, leflunomide (Lef), can prevent allogeneic and xenogeneic
184 o novel agents, 15-deoxyspergualin (DSG) and leflunomide (LEF), with reported anti-B-cell and/or anti
185 nd, randomized, controlled trials have shown leflunomide (LEF; 20 mg/day, loading dose 100 mg x 3 day
187 ated with cyclosporine (CsA, 10 mg/kg p.o.), leflunomide (LFM, 20 mg/kg p.o.), or rapamycin (RPM, 6 m
188 ty in vivo lends support to the promise that leflunomide may be effective for clinical islet transpla
189 olony formation demonstrated dose-dependent, leflunomide-mediated inhibition of EC proliferation.
190 eceptor (Pgr) signalling strongly suppressed leflunomide-mediated neural crest effects in zebrafish.
191 res were employed for the rational design of leflunomide metabolite (LFM) analogs with a high likelih
193 anti-Fas-resistant NALM-6-UM1 cells with the leflunomide metabolite analog alpha-cyano-beta-methyl-be
195 disease processes led us to hypothesize that leflunomide might act directly upon the endothelial cell
198 ouble-blind clinical trial to receive either leflunomide (n = 18) or methotrexate (n = 21) therapy fo
199 t analysis and immunohistochemical staining, leflunomide neither interferes with transcription of imm
204 d in patients treated with ciprofloxacin and leflunomide (P<0.001) with only a small reduction in imm
205 ng the different methods, in patients taking leflunomide, placebo, and methotrexate, respectively, we
206 BKN) with either leflunomide alone (n=17) or leflunomide plus a course of cidofovir (n=9) and followe
207 Immunosuppression with the combination of leflunomide plus CsA completely prevents xenograft rejec
210 suggest that the primary mechanism by which leflunomide prevents autoimmune and lymphoproliferative
211 ended our previous work and demonstrate that leflunomide prevents T cell progression induced by phyto
212 Previous in vitro studies have revealed that leflunomide primarily inhibits interleukin-2-stimulated
216 ies with LPS activated B cells revealed that leflunomide retained its inhibitory activity when added
220 During metabolic reaction, absorption of leflunomide split into two bands resembling absorption s
221 he pyrimidine biosynthetic enzyme DHODH with leflunomide substantially impaired CRC liver metastatic
222 Switching from mycophenolate mofetil to leflunomide successfully cleared verrucae vulgares and m
223 dies, FTY720 (or tacrolimus), everolimus and leflunomide suppressed indirect activation of T cells, e
226 e of LPS-stimulated B cells we observed that leflunomide targets two different stages in cell cycle t
227 easured by IRE was significantly better with leflunomide than with methotrexate over 4 months of ther
230 l load and higher viral load at the start of leflunomide therapy were associated with failure to supp
231 s replication in vitro and closely monitored leflunomide therapy with specifically targeted blood lev
232 uorescence spectra reveal slow conversion of leflunomide to E and Z forms of teriflunomide in aqueous
233 ive metabolite of the anti-inflammatory drug leflunomide to the target cavities of the P. falciparum
237 duction of multiple clinical CMV isolates in leflunomide-treated human fibroblasts and endothelial ce
238 restored proliferation and IgM secretion to leflunomide-treated LPS-stimulated B cells, as determine
241 ntified drugs that increased cell viability; leflunomide (used to treat patients with inflammatory co
242 ent signal cascade components suggested that leflunomide was acting on a common component required fo
243 e agents, we performed kinetic studies where leflunomide was added either after the initiation of mix
244 0.001), and treatment with ciprofloxacin and leflunomide was associated with improved eGFR (P<0.001).
250 er than MTX (azathioprine, cyclosporine, and leflunomide) were also associated with an increased risk
251 F] receptor) and a global immunosuppressant (leflunomide) were performed to determine their relative
252 h the de novo pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor leflunomide, which is not toxic to the mice, and which d
253 ysed metabolism of the immunomodulatory drug leflunomide, which likewise undergoes redox-mediated Kem