コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 amotrigine) and without proapoptotic action (levetiracetam).
2 were 25 mg/kg for valproate and 40 mg/kg for levetiracetam.
3 this effect was stronger under the intake of levetiracetam.
4 Most WWE were taking lamotrigine and/or levetiracetam.
5 tic protein targeted by the antiseizure drug levetiracetam.
6 d to valproate and 254 randomly allocated to levetiracetam.
7 ission was superior with valproate than with levetiracetam.
8 gnancy, and baseline dose of lamotrigine and levetiracetam.
9 reference after treatment with phenytoin and levetiracetam.
10 nt total synthesis of the antiepileptic drug levetiracetam.
11 ontrol and tolerability with lamotrigine and levetiracetam.
12 e noninducing anticonvulsants lamotrigine or levetiracetam.
13 her patients were switched to lamotrigine or levetiracetam.
14 nteraction is associated with gabapentin and levetiracetam.
15 107 (42%) participants randomly assigned to levetiracetam.
16 at have received the anti-seizure medication Levetiracetam.
17 ric disorders associated with topiramate and levetiracetam.
18 motrigine, -0.20 (0.02) mug/L/mg (P < .001); levetiracetam, -0.06 (0.03) mug/L/mg (P = .01); oxcarbaz
19 Lamotrigine (2.31% in 4195 pregnancies) and levetiracetam (1.77% in 817 pregnancies) were associated
20 or lamotrigine, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.60-0.99) for levetiracetam, 1.40 (95% CI, 1.19-1.64) for valproic aci
21 or lamotrigine, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.80-1.15) for levetiracetam, 1.40 (95% CI, 1.23-1.59) for valproic aci
22 /L/mg to 6.85 mug/L/mg; P < .001), 36.8% for levetiracetam (11.33 mug/L/mg to 7.16 mug/L/mg; P < .001
23 rk (valproate: 793 offspring; lamotrigine or levetiracetam: 1157 offspring), 1416 in Norway, and 2355
25 175 (38%) patients were randomly assigned to levetiracetam, 142 (31%) to fosphenyltoin, and 145 (31%)
27 re enrolled and randomly assigned to receive levetiracetam (145 patients), fosphenytoin (118), or val
29 ed were lamotrigine 1.5 mg/kg twice per day, levetiracetam 20 mg/kg twice per day, and zonisamide 2.5
32 th epilepsy with reading-induced seizures on levetiracetam (3,000 mg/day) continued to experience rea
33 ay (valproate: 169 offspring; lamotrigine or levetiracetam: 344 offspring), and found no increased ri
34 rk (valproate: 259 offspring; lamotrigine or levetiracetam: 389 offspring) and 513 in Norway (valproa
35 -generated randomisation schedule to receive levetiracetam (40 mg/kg over 5 min) or phenytoin (20 mg/
36 minutes occurred in 68 patients assigned to levetiracetam (47%; 95% credible interval, 39 to 55), 53
37 rigine 50 mg (morning) and 100 mg (evening), levetiracetam 500 mg twice per day, and zonisamide 100 m
38 tamethylene-linked levetiracetam-huprine and levetiracetam-(6-chloro)tacrine hybrids to hit amyloid,
39 identified as the specific binding site for levetiracetam, a second generation antiepileptic drug.
40 e most prescribed antiepileptic medications, levetiracetam, acts by binding a protein of uncertain mo
41 lamotrigine (AHR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.95-1.47), levetiracetam (AHR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.77-2.14), carbamazep
45 1.458) compared with 1.222 (1.110-1.283) for levetiracetam and 1.232 (1.112, 1.307) for zonisamide at
46 ticipants were randomly allocated to receive levetiracetam and 260 participants to receive valproate.
49 other than valproic acid, the combination of levetiracetam and lamotrigine demonstrated a lower risk
50 r all epilepsy types, among first-line ASMs, levetiracetam and lamotrigine were superior to oxcarbaze
51 features of two common anti-epileptic drugs (levetiracetam and lamotrigine) in an integrated manner.
52 ; and the ESETT study compared fosphenytoin, levetiracetam and sodium valproate in adults and childre
54 ntenance doses were 500 mg twice per day for levetiracetam and valproate, and for children aged 5-12
56 ical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of levetiracetam and zonisamide compared with lamotrigine i
57 s designed to assess non-inferiority of both levetiracetam and zonisamide to lamotrigine for the prim
58 mised, open-label, controlled trial compared levetiracetam and zonisamide with lamotrigine as first-l
60 otrigine, 144 (44%) participants who started levetiracetam, and 146 (45%) participants who started zo
61 lation, 312 patients (57.5%) were prescribed levetiracetam, and 231 (42.5%) were prescribed lamotrigi
62 igine, 320 participants randomly assigned to levetiracetam, and 315 participants randomly assigned to
66 xposure to AEDs (carbamazepine, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and sodium valproate) was defined using r
68 recently been reawakened by the licensing of levetiracetam as a potentially major new antiepileptic d
70 ectiveness research study suggest the use of levetiracetam as initial alternative monotherapy in fema
72 n, treatment with the atypical antiepileptic levetiracetam at a low dose shown previously to improve
73 he drug molecules, such as Carbamazepine and Levetiracetam attached sulfonimidoyl fluorides are also
76 nally exposed to valproate vs lamotrigine or levetiracetam, but no difference in CM risk was observed
77 nd lamotrigine are first-line therapy, while levetiracetam can be also considered if there is no hist
78 al exposure to monotherapy with lamotrigine, levetiracetam, carbamazepin, oxcarbazepine, gapapentin,
79 as designed to assess the non-inferiority of levetiracetam compared with valproate for the primary ou
80 ical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of levetiracetam compared with valproate in participants wi
81 the UK; however, some evidence suggests that levetiracetam could be an effective and safer alternativ
85 e antiseizure medications, valproic acid and levetiracetam, did not improve behavior or prevent neuro
86 osure to (1) valproate or (2) lamotrigine or levetiracetam during the spermatogenic risk window (deri
89 ficacy outcome was met in those treated with levetiracetam for 52% (95% credible interval 41-62) of c
91 red the efficacy and safety of phenytoin and levetiracetam for second-line management of paediatric c
92 of three intravenous anticonvulsive agents - levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, and valproate - in children
93 status epilepticus, the anticonvulsant drugs levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, and valproate each led to s
94 SETT) we compared the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, and valproate in establishe
95 shed status epilepticus respond similarly to levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, and valproate, with treatme
97 gher risk in the valproate vs lamotrigine or levetiracetam group (pooled adjusted HR, 1.50; 95% CI: 1
98 was 35 min (IQR 20 to not assessable) in the levetiracetam group and 45 min (24 to not assessable) in
99 was terminated in 106 (70%) children in the levetiracetam group and in 86 (64%) in the phenytoin gro
100 nytoin group and more deaths occurred in the levetiracetam group than in the other groups, but these
101 By using a low dose of the antiepileptic levetiracetam hippocampal activation in aMCI was reduced
102 sion was superior with lamotrigine than both levetiracetam (HR 1.32 [97.5% CI 1.05 to 1.66]) and zoni
103 SV2A is the target of the antiepileptic drug levetiracetam, human blocking studies have characterized
104 ynthesized a series of heptamethylene-linked levetiracetam-huprine and levetiracetam-(6-chloro)tacrin
106 c drugs (topiramate, lacosamide, pregabalin, levetiracetam), hypothermia, magnesium, pyridoxine, immu
107 e primary outcome, in prespecified analysis, levetiracetam improved performance on spatial memory and
108 2.5%) exposed to valproate vs lamotrigine or levetiracetam in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, respective
112 motrigine (LTG) 0.31 (-0.38 to 1.00) p=0.38; levetiracetam (LEV) 1.00 (0.16 to 1.84) p=0.02; sodium v
119 le protein SV2A is the brain binding site of levetiracetam (LEV), a new antiepileptic drug with a uni
120 ied as the binding site of the antiepileptic levetiracetam (LEV), making it an interesting therapeuti
122 interneurons and suggest that the action of levetiracetam may be due largely to effects on a subset
124 peridol (N = 8-15), xanomeline (N = 8-13) or levetiracetam (N = 6-15) and were subsequently tested fo
126 nown to have antipsychotic activity, but not levetiracetam, normalized the SRM behavior to control le
128 ent failure (TF) among patients who received levetiracetam or lamotrigine as initial monotherapy.
130 Against Epilepsy criteria and who initiated levetiracetam or lamotrigine as initial monotherapy.
131 zepine or phenytoin to the noninducing drugs levetiracetam or lamotrigine produces rapid and clinical
132 cing neuronal excitability either by feeding Levetiracetam or silencing of neurons in the involved ci
133 e randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either levetiracetam or valproate, using a minimisation program
134 These findings do not support the use of levetiracetam or zonisamide as first-line treatments for
136 s post-SE, animals received sodium selenate, levetiracetam, or vehicle subcutaneousinfusion continuou
139 g systematic with rescue TDM of lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, brivaracetam,
140 This decrease in functioning was evident for levetiracetam (PE, -18.9 [95% CI, -26.8 to -10.9]; P < .
141 lex with FDA-approved antiseizure medication levetiracetam; PET imaging tracer UCB-J; experimental an
142 of TF compared with other combinations with levetiracetam plus other ASM (adjusted HR, 2.41; 95% CI,
144 hieved similar rates of seizure freedom, but levetiracetam remained superior to lamotrigine and oxcar
145 e ASMs achieved similar seizure freedom, but levetiracetam remained superior to lamotrigine and oxcar
147 Flunarizine (RoM, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26-0.81), levetiracetam (RoM, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.30-0.72), riboflavin
148 ), valproate (RoM, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.49-0.72), levetiracetam (RoM, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50-0.77), and cinnar
149 es and comparative ease of administration of levetiracetam, suggest it could be an appropriate altern
152 ents such as topiramate, disodium valproate, levetiracetam, the antihistamine cyproheptadine, and the
153 our drugs (warfarin, tacrolimus, digoxin and levetiracetam) through an ex vivo perfusion assay and th
154 trast, the new AEDs gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zo
155 s: the EcLiPSE and ConSEPT studies, compared levetiracetam to phenytoin in children; and the ESETT st
156 ition of the SV2A-binding antiepileptic drug levetiracetam to the medium inhibited the galactose-depe
157 dent response over time, with phenobarbital, levetiracetam, topiramate and adrenocorticotropic hormon
158 ong participants with epileptiform activity, levetiracetam treatment improved performance on the Stro
161 amazepine and greater use of lamotrigine and levetiracetam was associated with a 39% decline in preva
164 t IGE syndromes, the higher effectiveness of levetiracetam was confirmed only in patients with juveni
170 azepine for seizure freedom (P < 0.001), and levetiracetam was superior to lamotrigine and oxcarbazep
173 o either (1) valproate or (2) lamotrigine or levetiracetam were identified and followed-up until 12 y
175 d broad-spectrum ASMs, such as valproate and levetiracetam, were more effective for individuals with
176 HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.40-4.06) and exposure to levetiracetam with anxiety (aHR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.26-3.72
178 isorders in children of women with epilepsy: levetiracetam with carbamazepine: 8-year cumulative inci
180 abel, randomised controlled trial to compare levetiracetam with valproate as first-line treatment for