コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 seven-TM protein structure for retinal-based light sensitivity.
2 in bipolar cells dynamically control retinal light sensitivity.
3 rements in TOC1 gene dosage clearly enhanced light sensitivity.
4 s to produce similar shifts in ganglion cell light sensitivity.
5 100-fold shift in the threshold for far-red light sensitivity.
6 ith performance on a clinical test measuring light sensitivity.
7 iral titers were more effective at restoring light sensitivity.
8 ular surface pain who reported no or minimal light sensitivity.
9 ics but did cause a significant reduction in light sensitivity.
10 f G-protein-coupled receptors with ambiguous light sensitivity.
11 orted symptoms and association with measured light sensitivity.
12 we designed high-photocurrent ChRs with high light sensitivity.
13 sulting in plants with dramatically enhanced light sensitivity.
14 nd demonstrate that its truncation causes UV light sensitivity.
15 photoreceptors with outer-segment discs and light sensitivity.
16 50-fold, resulting in a >10-fold decrease in light sensitivity.
17 ow on- and off-latencies, and relatively low light sensitivity.
18 sulting in plants with dramatically enhanced light sensitivity.
19 ponse to light, positive masking, has normal light sensitivity.
20 t the expense of a moderate reduction in rod light-sensitivity.
21 tions 10-fold higher than required to impart light-sensitivity.
22 er time than players without these symptoms: light sensitivity (16.0 vs 3.0 days, P = .001), emotiona
23 oral patterns explained the most variance in light sensitivity (48%) and the least variance in vomiti
24 es favorable for optogenetics including high light sensitivity, a broad, red-shifted activation spect
25 ent demonstrated in navigational ability and light sensitivity among 3 groups of subjects with RPE65
27 phosphodiesterase (LAPD) with complementary light sensitivity and catalytic activity by recombining
29 (a proxy for cell size) and IR, and between light sensitivity and IR, with larger and more sensitive
31 nd higher input resistance, yet showed lower light sensitivity and lower maximal light responses than
32 this study is responsible for increasing the light sensitivity and operational range of rod bipolar c
33 Here we report a mechanism that controls the light sensitivity and operational range of rod-driven bi
34 congenital amaurosis (LCA) in which retinal light sensitivity and optomotor responses are partially
35 hodopsin actuator, CheRiff, which shows high light sensitivity and rapid kinetics and is spectrally o
36 ide-mediated photocurrents that maintain the light sensitivity and reversible, step-like kinetic stab
38 mediated by viral gene therapy, can restore light sensitivity and some vision to mice blind from out
42 the electroretinogram was normal in terms of light sensitivity and waveform, but the light threshold
43 t ocular discomfort (focusing on burning and light sensitivity) and consider querying about depressio
45 n vision), in 99% for ocular symptoms (pain, light sensitivity, and discomfort), and in 95% for dryne
46 s also resulted in leaf chlorosis, increased light sensitivity, and dwarfism due to decreased levels
48 ates under high light intensities, increased light sensitivity, and lower PSII efficiency, without af
49 hereas patients with symptoms of irritation, light sensitivity, and pain revealed a specific increase
50 utant shows: (i) slower growth rates, higher light sensitivity, and reduced amounts of PS I; (ii) a r
51 s to use existing neuronal tissue to restore light sensitivity, and to augment existing strategies to
54 n, with ChR2-EYFP and Arch-ER2 demonstrating light sensitivity approaching that of in utero or virall
56 eneral increase in IC, pain, irritation, and light sensitivity are associated with increased IC in th
58 -year-old child had nearly the same level of light sensitivity as that in age-matched normal-sighted
62 e than a 2 log(10)(cd.s/m(2)) improvement in light sensitivity at 1 year and subsequent available fol
63 ted chronic ocular surface pain symptoms and light sensitivity at least most of the time over 1 week.
66 t topical products induce severe irritation, light-sensitivity, burning, scaling, and inflammation.
67 slowing of visual processing would increase light sensitivity but should also reduce movement respon
70 re is an adaptation increasing photoreceptor light sensitivity by facilitating the diffusion of the s
71 emotely administered survey, measurements of light sensitivity by light dosimetry and by text message
72 synaptic lateral inhibition to ganglion cell light sensitivity by measuring the effects of surround i
73 ow-luminance visual acuity (P = 0.0151), and light sensitivity (central 3 degrees and 9 degrees ; P =
74 led theoretical ChR2 variants with augmented light sensitivity (ChR2+), red-shifted spectral sensitiv
75 nical visual assessment, were used to assess light sensitivity, contrast sensitivity and spatial acui
76 hotosensitive activity of OVB-organoids, and light sensitivities could be reset after transient photo
77 atically, accounting for a major part of the light-sensitivity difference between rods and cones in d
78 roperties do not contribute to the intrinsic light sensitivity differences between rods and cones.
81 r evidence that the mutation mainly enhances light sensitivity downstream of phytochrome A (phyA) and
82 t RP patients demonstrated possible improved light sensitivity during the initial months of follow-up
83 rhodopsins (ChRs) whose current strength and light sensitivity enable minimally invasive neuronal cir
84 of these findings varied with the degree of light sensitivity except that lower overall light sensit
86 account for the persistence of the increased light sensitivity following retinal dopamine depletion.
87 ready published by Medeiros et al. combining light sensitivities from SAP and retinal thickness from
89 ings suggest that evolution of stomatal blue-light sensitivity helped modern ferns exploit the shady
90 n improve azobenzene performance in terms of light sensitivity (higher molar extinction coefficient),
94 tructures are molecularly designed to induce light sensitivity in excitable cells without gene modifi
96 s of constitutive skin color and ultraviolet light sensitivity in relation to risk of cutaneous malig
97 prolonged dark adaptation leads to increased light sensitivity in rods by dissociating RGS9-1 from R9
98 ed expression of a ChR2 variant with greater light sensitivity in SGNs reduced the amount of light re
100 improvements in mean mobility and full-field light sensitivity in the injected eye by day 30 that per
101 low luminance deficit, contrast sensitivity, light sensitivity in the macula, and rod-mediated dark a
102 light entrainment and seasonal variations in light sensitivity in the mammalian circadian clock are i
103 Relative to HFA, the tablet overestimated light sensitivity in the nasal field while underestimati
104 hotoreceptors, is widely assumed to regulate light sensitivity in the rod outer segment through inter
106 conceptual design strategies for installing light sensitivities into the immune signaling network an
112 RH1 and RH2 visual pigments with the optimum light sensitivities (lambdamax) at 478 nm and 485 nm, re
113 maintain physiological rhythmicity; (3) weak light sensitivity leads to the reduction of circadian fl
114 y, the data indicate that sex differences in light sensitivity might play a key role for ensuring the
115 rate that zTrpa1b/ligand pairing offers high light sensitivity, millisecond-scale response latency in
116 ted Arabidopsis plants with greatly enhanced light sensitivity, mutants variably altered in Pfr-to-Pr
118 as having achromatopsia presented with mild light sensitivity, nonspecific otitis media, and mild de
120 protoporphyrin IX dramatically increased the light sensitivity of both TRPA1 and TRPV1 via generation
122 esent study also highlights the differential light sensitivity of cry1 and cry2 in controlling hypoco
123 n is explained by natural alleles that alter light sensitivity of GI, specifically in the evening, an
125 nnels expressed by ipRGCs, which reduces the light sensitivity of M2-M6 ipRGCs in the neonatal retina
128 investigate the extreme slow growth rate and light sensitivity of Paulinella, which are key to photos
130 receptor co-action mechanism to sustain blue light sensitivity of plants under the broad spectra of s
131 t for future research aimed at enhancing the light sensitivity of residual cones to restore vision in
134 s effects, 67RuvC constructs suppress the UV light sensitivity of ruvA, ruvAB and ruvABC mutant strai
135 at the photopigment underlying the intrinsic light sensitivity of SCN-projecting RGCs has an absorpti
136 This response pattern paralleled the blue light sensitivity of stomatal opening in the two leaf su
137 of the SST-SSTR1 system in the regulation of light sensitivity of the central clock in the SCN at dus
143 e examined light signaling by exploiting the light sensitivity of the Neurospora biological clock, sp
145 on and amacrine cells without destroying the light sensitivity of the retina by maximally activating
146 sitive detection of GFP while preserving the light sensitivity of the retina, and can be used to obta
150 Melanopsin is the photopigment that confers light sensitivity on intrinsically photosensitive retina
151 Brief application of AAQ bestows prolonged light sensitivity on multiple types of retinal neurons,
152 Photoswitch compounds such as DENAQ confer light-sensitivity on endogenous neuronal ion channels, e
153 Here we describe a method for bestowing light sensitivity onto endogenous ion channels that does
156 c approaches have been limited by either low light sensitivity or slow kinetics, and lack adaptation
157 llular Mg2+ has no significant effect on the light sensitivity or the kinetics of the photoresponse.
158 Dry eye patients reported more frequent light sensitivity (OR = 15.0, 95% CI = 6.3-35.7) and spo
159 , dry eye patients experienced more frequent light sensitivity (OR = 9.2, 95% CI = 2.0-41.7), but les
160 ing (OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 1.74-5.73, P < .001), light sensitivity (OR: 2.59, 95% CI: 1.48-4.55, P = .001
161 luminance VA, low-luminance deficit, mesopic light sensitivity), or rods (scotopic light sensitivity,
162 59.7% reduction in marked to severe daytime light sensitivity (P < 0.0001), a 41.5% reduction in mar
163 1.5% reduction in marked to severe nighttime light sensitivity (P < 0.0001), a 53.1% reduction in mar
165 e mechanisms will maximize a photoreceptor's light sensitivity range and therefore may be common in o
170 ion could overcome nearly all of the loss of light sensitivity resulting from the biochemical blockad
171 esopic light sensitivity), or rods (scotopic light sensitivity, rod-mediated dark adaptation [RMDA]).
175 ications, and newer issues such as Transient Light Sensitivity Syndrome are safety concerns of flap c
176 ons of femtosecond lasers included transient light-sensitivity syndrome, rainbow glare, opaque bubble
178 coherence tomography, color vision testing, light sensitivity testing, and electroretinograms (retin
180 t length on the basis of circadian rhythm of light sensitivity that is set from dusk, early flowering
181 ocurrents, red-shifted spectrum, and extreme light sensitivity) that have created new opportunities i
182 included two symptom questions (dryness and light sensitivity) that inquired about frequency and int
185 ons and clinical measures such as full-field light sensitivity threshold for white, red, and blue col
187 n between maximum pupillary constriction and light sensitivity thresholds corroborates the introducti
189 ular pattern of axonal connections, enhances light sensitivity through the principle of neural superp
196 onstrate the utility of TULIPs by conferring light sensitivity to functionally distinct components of
197 er with earlier studies linking variation in light sensitivity to photoreceptor genes, our work sugge
198 r vision restoration aim to confer intrinsic light sensitivity to retinal ganglion cells when photore
199 e cells as a possible strategy for imparting light sensitivity to retinas lacking rods and cones.
200 by RetGC activating proteins (GCAPs) imparts light sensitivity to rods and cones by producing cyclic
205 ed by gene therapy, we related the degree of light sensitivity to the level of remaining photorecepto
206 etic small molecule photoswitch, can restore light sensitivity to the retina and behavioral responses
208 and symptoms of hyperacusis (sensitivity to light, sensitivity to noise) tended to cluster together
209 e assays, we further show that JB253 bestows light sensitivity upon rodent and human pancreatic beta
211 cuity, mesopic contrast sensitivity, mesopic light sensitivity, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivi
212 light sensitivity except that lower overall light sensitivity was associated with lower ranked sensi
216 125A mutant, which exhibited slow growth and light sensitivity, was used to isolate suppressor strain
217 constitutive skin color and skin ultraviolet light sensitivity were assessed by colorimetry and minim
218 -retinaldehyde and the recovery rate for rod light sensitivity were faster in FATP4-deficient mice th
219 Somewhat surprisingly, dark current and light sensitivity were normal in individual rods (record
222 ese two changes may be of importance for dim light sensitivity, which is consistent with our proposal
223 nged red illumination reduces Chrimson's red light sensitivity, which is reflected by a blue shift of