ライフサイエンスコーパス: linear energy transfer

1 s because of their short range and very high linear energy transfer.

2 air DNA double-strand breaks compared to low linear energy transfer.

3 The mechanism(s) by which high-linear energy transfer a particles, like those emitted b

4 A single, high linear energy transfer alpha particle can kill a target

5 minated cancer therapy because of their high linear energy transfer and localized absorbed dose profi

6 ttractive treatment strategy due to the high linear energy transfer and short path length of alpha-ra

7 electron emitters such as (125)I have a high linear energy transfer and short range of emission (<10

8 Alpha-particle emitters have a high linear energy transfer and short range, offering the pot

9 ctive treatment strategy because of the high-linear-energy transfer and short pathlength of alpha-rad

10 the short pathlength (50-80 microm) and high linear energy transfer ( approximately 100 keV/microm) o

11 candidates for radioimmunotherapy: (a) high linear energy transfer; (b) short path lengths (50-80 mi

12 Since 211 At emits alpha-particles of high linear energy transfer, but with a range of a few cell d

13 in vitro angiogenesis was inhibited by high linear energy transfer carbon ion irradiation even at su

14 Measurements of the low-LET (linear energy transfer) component obtained from the ther

15 n such as (56)Fe ions, which due to its high linear energy transfer (high-LET) characteristics deposi

16 break (DSB) clusters are a hallmark of high-linear energy transfer (high-LET) radiation and are asso

17 restrial in origin and characterized by high linear energy transfer (high-LET), which causes more sev

18 show that even low doses (0.1-1 Gy) of high linear energy transfer ionizing radiation induce cluster

19 The mutagenic effect of low linear energy transfer ionizing radiation is reduced for

20 High-linear energy transfer ionizing radiation, derived from

21 Si, Ti and Fe ions), covering wide ranges of linear energy transfer (LET) (0.22-181 keV/um) and dose

22 exposure to 0.5 Gy Fe ion (600 MeV/nucleon, Linear Energy Transfer (LET) = 175 keV/mum).

23 nsformed cells with low doses of either high linear energy transfer (LET) alpha-particles or low-LET

24 variable, with dependence on factors such as linear energy transfer (LET) and dose.

25 studies has made understanding the effect of linear energy transfer (LET) difficult.

26 Linear energy transfer (LET) has been scored from energy

27 Low linear energy transfer (LET) ionizing radiation (IR) is

28 High-linear energy transfer (LET) IR (such as high energy cha

29 at targeting micrometastases due to the low linear energy transfer (LET) properties of high-energy b

30 biological advantages of low-energy and high-linear energy transfer (LET) protons present within the

31 High linear energy transfer (LET) radiation from space heavy

32 h DSB repair proteins following low and high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation in human fibrobla

33 nding of the radiobiological effects of high-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation is essential for

34 Exposure to high-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation occurs in a varie

35 ed effects (NTE) occur for low doses of high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation, leading to devia

36 have been performed predominantly using high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation, or high doses of

37 udies have largely been performed using high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation, such as alpha-pa

38 ellular clusters was used to investigate low linear energy transfer (LET) radiation-induced bystander

39 The linear energy transfer (LET) spectrum, absorbed dose and

40 Using low linear energy transfer (LET) X-rays to generate simple b

41 gy imparted per unit mass of the target, and linear energy transfer (LET), a measure of the mean ener

42 G immediately before and after 2 or 6 Gy low linear energy transfer (LET), high dose-rate irradiation

43 ical solution for particle range, energy and linear energy transfer (LET).

44 the absorbed (physical) dose and the proton linear energy transfer (LET).

45 ed particles of increasing atomic number and linear energy transfer (LET).

46 targeting micrometastases because of the low-linear-energy-transfer (LET) properties of high-energy b

47 in making risk estimates for low dose, high linear-energy-transfer (LET) radiation exposure.

48 acteristics (long physical half-life and low linear-energy-transfer [LET] radiative emissions).

49 olorectal cancer (CRC) after exposure to low linear energy transfer (low-LET) radiation such as gamma

50 with either 1,2,4, or 8 alpha particles at a linear energy transfer of 90 keV/microm consistent with

51 The linear energy transfer of alpha particles is several hun

52 ffect on isolated cells due to the high LET (linear energy transfer) of alpha-particles.

53 a(-) particles and Auger electrons with high linear energy transfer, potentially enhancing cytotoxici

54 he greater biological damage induced by high linear energy transfer radiation (e.g. charged particles

55 y fundamental radiobiological ideas, such as linear energy transfer, relative biological effectivenes

56 of the radiation dose, dose equivalent, and linear energy transfer spectra.

57 the same physical dose across a radiotherapy linear energy transfer spectrum.

58 uclide (225)Ac (half-life, 9.92 d) is a high-linear-energy-transfer treatment approach effective for

59 diation (e.g. charged particles) than by low linear energy transfer X- or gamma-rays.