コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 is at the forefront of innovation in modern liver transplantation.
2 , dose-escalation, Phase I clinical trial in liver transplantation.
3 orse prognosis for recipient and graft after liver transplantation.
4 e to disease progression and 26 proceeded to liver transplantation.
5 adverse health outcomes following pediatric liver transplantation.
6 in an in situ and ex situ model of rat donor liver transplantation.
7 DO donors are underutilized in pediatric liver transplantation.
8 tion of organoids for tissue engineering and liver transplantation.
9 C locus are less likely to suffer TCMR after liver transplantation.
10 tial therapy for PTLD arising after renal or liver transplantation.
11 6 genotypes on liver graft fat content after liver transplantation.
12 machine perfusion (NMP) and after orthotopic liver transplantation.
13 would benefit from earlier consideration of liver transplantation.
14 henomenon also occurs following living donor liver transplantation.
15 llowed by simultaneous donor bone marrow and liver transplantation.
16 ciated with a reduced incidence of AKI after liver transplantation.
17 achieve optimal outcomes in uDCD kidney and liver transplantation.
18 agnosis of liver disease or having undergone liver transplantation.
19 ely ill men with cirrhosis undergoing urgent liver transplantation.
20 s recently become the leading indication for liver transplantation.
21 E in reducing the incidence of NAS after DCD liver transplantation.
22 enal safety of MRI with gadolinium following liver transplantation.
23 those patients most likely to die or require liver transplantation.
24 One patient (0.005%) underwent liver transplantation.
25 ELS is rarely used in the setting of liver transplantation.
26 ntly reported in children who have undergone liver transplantation.
27 ry cholangitis (PBC) frequently recurs after liver transplantation.
28 tation Society consensus meeting on NAFLD in liver transplantation.
29 ies are necessary to facilitate a successful liver transplantation.
30 f the screened population actually underwent liver transplantation.
31 with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis is liver transplantation.
32 osure and immune-mediated graft injury after liver transplantation.
33 bly made its way into decision making within liver transplantation.
34 ve therapies, such as surgical resection and liver transplantation.
35 es include surgical resection, ablation, and liver transplantation.
36 Most (93%) had undergone renal or liver transplantation.
37 scontinuation of immunosuppression following liver transplantation.
38 er disease and assessing liver health before liver transplantation.
39 rence to immunosuppressive medications after liver transplantation.
40 in chronic ductular scarring, necessitating liver transplantation.
41 s to limit the lives of patients who require liver transplantation.
42 MGB1 oxidation states in human IRI following liver transplantation.
43 had the strongest association in kidney and liver transplantation.
44 and is the second most common indication for liver transplantation.
45 for the use of organs from elderly donors in liver transplantation.
46 he benchmark values observed in standard DBD liver transplantation.
47 plantation but there is no clear evidence in liver transplantation.
48 clinical outcomes, particularly surrounding liver transplantation.
49 survival comparable to other indications for liver transplantation.
50 NSBB in patients with cirrhosis referred for liver transplantation.
54 , history of hepatocellular carcinoma and/or liver transplantation (7.74 [3.82-15.69], P < 10(-3) ),
55 ng data from the adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A2ALL) study, which represents th
56 substantial reduction in organ donation and liver transplantation activity across the 3 countries wi
57 nited Kingdom and resumption of living donor liver transplantation activity in India toward the end o
60 hs of follow-up 11 patients (9.7%) underwent liver transplantation and 17 (15.1%) died (13 deaths wer
62 -LLS requires expertise in both living donor liver transplantation and advanced laparoscopic liver su
64 crobiome in determining graft function after liver transplantation and demonstrate the benefits of an
65 rejection (subTCMR) is commonly found after liver transplantation and has a good short-term prognosi
66 men, malignancies, and advances in pediatric liver transplantation and liver transplant anesthesia.
67 sely monitor these patients lifelong despite liver transplantation and maintain multidisciplinary wor
68 e components of metabolic syndrome following liver transplantation and provide practical stepwise gui
70 ifferent for deceased donor and living donor liver transplantation and varied between centers within
72 and biochemical markers of cholestasis after liver transplantation are associated with PBC recurrence
73 e competing risk regressions (deceased donor liver transplantation as the competing risk) to detect d
74 and competing risk regression analyses (with liver transplantation as the competing risk) to estimate
75 tosis in a liver graft is mandatory prior to liver transplantation, as the risk of graft failure incr
77 1,118 patients who underwent evaluation for liver transplantation at the six Veterans Affairs' trans
80 blation therapy for presumed HCC followed by liver transplantation between January 2011 and December
81 rrhosis, who were referred and evaluated for liver transplantation between January and June 2012 were
82 is not a standard procedure for living donor liver transplantation but is safe and reproducible in th
83 e sole criterion for delisting a patient for liver transplantation, but rather should be considered o
84 tases of a digestive origin underwent hybrid liver transplantation by pure laparoscopic total hepatec
86 ive treatment for biliary tract cancers, and liver transplantation can be curative in selected patien
87 report by Galante A and colleagues regarding liver transplantation carried out in a patient with deng
88 ly associated with survival for 1 year after liver transplantation CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of dat
90 n 20 Gy (dose-dependent, both p<0.0001); for liver transplantation, dactinomycin (3.8, 1.3-11.3) and
91 acted geographic disparity in deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) across donation service are
93 of ex situ machine preservation in clinical liver transplantation, describing the most important tec
94 tageous to protect from HCC recurrence after liver transplantation, despite extended tumor criteria.
95 echnical aspects of living donor (LD) domino liver transplantation (DLT) in maple syrup urine disease
97 , HCV variants escaping nAb responses during liver transplantation exhibited a significantly higher r
99 datory to properly evaluate the candidate to liver transplantation for alcoholic liver diseases and s
101 dy was to investigate tumor recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
103 A cohort of 43 children who had undergone liver transplantation for nonautoimmune liver disease at
109 care costs, including impact on the need for liver transplantation, for which nonalcoholic steatohepa
110 001), which strongly associated with reduced liver transplantation-free survival (log-rank P < .001).
111 successfully vaccinated infant who underwent liver transplantation from an donor positive for antibod
119 t of NASH and the clinical practice in fatty liver transplantation, highlights its limitations and op
120 es of adult patients receiving en-bloc heart-liver transplantation (HLTx), describe technical aspects
123 sease that is the leading cause of pediatric liver transplantation, however, the mechanism of disease
124 the upper limit of normal) at 6 months after liver transplantation (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.16-2.76; P =
125 e cohort study assessing outcomes after cDCD liver transplantation in 1 Swiss (HOPE) and 6 French (NR
126 iewed all published court opinions involving liver transplantation in 2 legal databases (Lexis Nexus
130 death (DCD) allografts on outcomes following liver transplantation in fulminant hepatic failure (FHF)
131 f acute liver failure, resulting in death or liver transplantation in more than one third of patients
134 is the main cause of acute liver failure and liver transplantation in several Western countries.
138 heart transplantation versus combined heart-liver transplantation in these patients, a multidiscipli
139 This removes one of the last barriers to liver transplantation in this challenging cohort of reci
141 cause of acute liver failure (ALF) requiring liver transplantation in USA and its frequency is increa
142 Compared with delayed transplantation, early liver transplantation increased survival times in all si
151 Overall, the 1-year survival rate following liver transplantation is lower than that seen in patient
154 owever, there is increasing evidence that if liver transplantation is performed in selected patients
155 disease in children; however, unlike adults liver transplantation is rarely required as treatment.
156 The principle in right lobe living donor liver transplantation is to use "near-perfect" grafts to
157 n determining graft outcomes in living donor liver transplantation, its impact in deceased donor live
159 underwent total hepatectomy and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) by left lateral segment gra
161 nd Europe; however, the data on living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for ALD remain sparse.
163 We studied outcomes following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) post-PVTT downstaging (DS)
164 , 1.79; 95% CI, 1.36-2.36; P < .001), age at liver transplantation <60 years (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.02-
167 ous recovery (NSR): Seven patients underwent liver transplantation (LT) and one patient died before L
168 c factors of primary graft dysfunction after liver transplantation (LT) are available, it remains dif
172 cation, era, and time period ("epoch") after liver transplantation (LT) could have implications for s
176 nce of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) after liver transplantation (LT) for graft and patient surviva
177 apy has altered the frequency and outcome of liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis C virus (HCV).
179 ng/mL is associated with poor outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma
180 benefit of sirolimus in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma
181 tases (i-CRLM) BACKGROUND:: A renaissance of liver transplantation (LT) for i-CRLM has been recently
185 usoidal endothelial cell (SEC) injury during liver transplantation (LT) has been previously addressed
186 giocarcinoma (iCCA) is a contraindication to liver transplantation (LT) in most centers worldwide.
187 ational policy granting priority listing for liver transplantation (LT) in patients who achieved down
190 CC) is an increasingly common indication for liver transplantation (LT) in the United States and in m
194 m use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) after liver transplantation (LT) is associated with nephrotoxi
198 ith cirrhosis and portal hypertension, prior liver transplantation (LT) or severe extra-hepatic manif
199 her liver diseases, but the effect of age on liver transplantation (LT) outcomes in this population a
203 e prevalence and patterns of liver injury in liver transplantation (LT) recipients with COVID-19 are
207 dysbiosis and its rate of recovery following liver transplantation (LT) remains incompletely understo
209 m glycomic signature in the first week after liver transplantation (LT) that is associated with graft
210 e is a paucity of data on the outcome of DCD liver transplantation (LT) utilizing livers with macrost
211 during immunosuppression (IS) withdrawal in liver transplantation (LT) was associated with acute rej
212 patocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurring after liver transplantation (LT) when HCC is unsuitable for su
213 n effective technique for arterialization in liver transplantation (LT) when the native recipient art
215 ity in patients with cirrhosis evaluated for liver transplantation (LT), longer hospital and intensiv
216 ecome one of the most common indications for liver transplantation (LT), particularly in candidates o
237 patients (89% female) with PBC who underwent liver transplantation (mean age, 54 +/- 9 years) from Fe
242 n-making and organ allocation for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and was previously upgraded
251 ntation and six patients (13%) had undergone liver transplantation or combined liver and kidney trans
252 itage was associated with increased risks of liver transplantation or PSC-related death compared with
256 y-eight thousand two hundred sixty-one adult liver transplantations, performed between 2000 and 2017
262 ocol liver biopsies (PB) following pediatric liver transplantation remains mostly uncharacterized, ye
263 rmacological approaches are ineffective, and liver transplantation represents the only curative optio
264 ere are increasing reports of combined heart-liver transplantation resulting from advanced liver dise
265 levels in plasma from patients who underwent liver transplantation revealed a significantly positive
267 apy for patients with HCC who are listed for liver transplantation should be determined with consider
268 ients are good candidates for LR and salvage liver transplantation should be encouraged in eligible p
269 findings of disparities in accessibility of liver transplantation showed worse outcomes following li
271 summarizes the results of the International Liver Transplantation Society consensus meeting on NAFLD
272 h Joint Annual Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society in association with Europe
273 Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by liver transplantation substantially increases the surviv
274 age at the time of diagnosis with PBC or at liver transplantation, tacrolimus use, and biochemical m
275 t risk factor of liver graft steatosis after liver transplantation that is additive to the effects of
277 Conclusion: Among patients who underwent liver transplantation, the presence of any exonic missen
280 orth American Working Group on Sarcopenia in Liver Transplantation to use evidence from the medical l
281 ty of 20 previously described biomarkers for liver transplantation tolerance in a cohort of 17 liver
282 he predictive strength of SENP6 and FEM1C in liver transplantation tolerance, there are also risks in
283 comes in 623 primary right lobe living donor liver transplantations, using grafts with (Group A; 10%-
284 out hepatocellular carcinoma who were on the liver transplantation waitlist at 9 centers in the Unite
285 irrhotic liver disease, as an indication for liver transplantation, was associated with lower risk of
286 x pancreas, liver, and rectal surgeries, and liver transplantation were analyzed over a 3-year period
290 rative period in patients who have undergone liver transplantation, which will be used as a reference
291 teatotic grafts can be successfully used for liver transplantation with careful recipient selection.
292 he acceptance and improve the outcomes after liver transplantation with high-grade steatotic livers.
294 m 81 patients who underwent HCC resection or liver transplantation, with curative intent, were used.
295 el graft protective strategy in the field of liver transplantation, with remarkable ongoing research
297 x above 1.7 (HR 1.22; 95% CI 1.09-1.35), and liver transplantation within 30 days of listing (HR 0.89
300 recipients, offspring to parent living donor liver transplantation yields inferior long-term graft an