ライフサイエンスコーパス: living alone

1 o walk at discharge, older age, obesity, and living alone.

2 onal attainment (lower, medium, higher), and living alone.

3 ation and care home transition were in those living alone.

4 follow up (4.94, 1.91-12.78; p=0.0013), and living alone (1.32, 1.10-1.59; p=0.0031).

5 r participants living alone versus those not living alone (1.60 [1.46-1.75]) than for those with fewe

6 te was among men 85 years and older who were living alone (123 per 1000 per year).

7 s; 96% were white; 62% were female; 32% were living alone; 38% had an annual income less than $20,000

8 , disabled women were much more likely to be living alone (45.4% vs 16.8%, P<.001) and much less like

9 In multivariable analysis, living alone, alcohol abuse, perception of medical care

10 the ORs were 1.48 (95% CI, 1.23 to 1.78) for living alone and 1.44 (95% CI, 1.17 to 1.78) for women n

11 nts of the social environment (i.e. widowed, living alone) and prediabetes.

12 ars, 36.6% having a university degree, 35.6% living alone, and 71.4% diagnosed with advanced HNC with

13 alcohol consumption, smoking, provider role, living alone, and education).

14 of age) who were lonely, digitally excluded, living alone, and living below the poverty line and prov

15 seases, dissatisfaction with social support, living alone, and lower income and education were associ

16 However, older adults living alone (aOR: 2.57, 95% CI 1.34-4.94), residing dis

17 Women, unmarried men, and individuals living alone are at higher risk for mental stress-induce

18 g limited by illness, adverse mental health, living alone, basic accommodation, lack of car ownership

19 surgery and survived to discharge, 30% were living alone before admission and 70% were living with o

20 Living alone before the stroke was not significantly ass

21 95% CI, 0 to 0.17; P = .03) for patients not living alone but did not increase quality of life overal

22 ainst a decline in mental health among women living alone but not among women living with a spouse.

23 n monitoring the wellness of elderly persons living alone by unobtrusively monitoring their daily act

24 veness was significantly better for patients living alone (CDCM dominated, with lower costs and more

25 he workforce compared with being within, and living alone compared with living with a partner were al

26 terioration was significantly less for those living alone compared with those living with spouses (od

27 y three levels of social isolation (based on living alone, contact with family or friends, and group

28 h care and social services professionals how living alone creates barriers to the access and use of s

29 esistant gonococci included: marital status, living alone, duration of sex work, and clinic site.

30 : 1.10-1.87), after adjustment for age, sex, living alone, education, lifestyle, cardiovascular risk

31 ls including the set of variables (age, sex, living alone, education, smoking status, pulmonary funct

32 er PC scores were associated with older age, living alone, FEV1 less than 70% of predicted, distresse

33 Five variables (excluding living alone, from the SSV) provided good prediction for

34 women with severe impairment, however, those living alone had a greater decline in Instrumental ADL,

35 Compared with cohabiting women, those living alone had higher ORs of slow (1.26 [95% CI, 1.08

36 rbid conditions, and health behaviors, women living alone had lower risk of decline in mental health

37 AGE Study, socially isolated patients (those living alone) had significantly higher median levels of

38 Living alone (hazard ratio 7.62, 95% CI 3.94-14.71), thr

39 rvival was significantly decreased among men living alone (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 1.48; 95% CI,

40 older age, income less than $5,000 per year, living alone, history of hip fracture, and history of st

41 s were inversely associated with placement), living alone (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.49-2.02), 1 or more de

42 CI, 2.47-2.53), and a greater likelihood of living alone (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.76-1.80) and being unm

43 Both living alone (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.07-1.32) and low socia

44 g the highest level of independence, such as living alone in an apartment or house.

45 The potential role of living alone in either facilitating or hampering access

46 sionals' perspectives, findings suggest that living alone is a social determinant of health among pat

47 In all age groups among men, living alone is significantly associated with reduced CM

48 riate associations with cardiac events: sex, living alone, low ejection fraction (<0.35), length of h

49 (OR: 2.57) and married women (OR: 3.18), or living alone (male OR: 2.25 and female OR: 2.72, respect

50 However, living alone may have high risks.

51 aged at least 65 years (n = 149 of 232), 56% living alone (n = 135 of 240), 79% women (n = 190 of 240

52 being confined to bed (odds ratio, 8.2) and living alone (odds ratio, 2.3); the risk of death was re

53 However, the influence of living alone on experiences generally considered to be b

54 on-fatal events or by the type of isolation (living alone or having few social contacts).

55 among individuals with low education, those living alone or in a care home, or those without a close

56 Individuals with lower education, living alone or in a care home, or without a close relat

57 Serbian women and persons living alone or in small family units were more prone to

58 or age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, living alone or not, education, income, employment statu

59 LUSIONAdherence to AET was lower among women living alone or unemployed than cohabiting or employed w

60 Therefore, living alone or with co-residents with multimorbidity po

61 ty, or physical function compared with women living alone or with nonspouse others.

62 age I disease was also increased among women living alone (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.28).

63 ications (odds ratio [OR]=0.89 [0.83-0.97]), living alone (OR=2.78 [1.09-7.09]), heart transplantatio

64 Living in crowded households, living alone, or lacking access to outdoor facilities ma

65 63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-5.92; living alone, OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.07-5.38; and each 10-y

66 hough women were more likely to be nonwhite, living alone (p < 0.001), and unmarried (p < 0.001); the

67 Whether social support mitigates the risk of living alone, particularly when facing a sudden change i

68 vel, with low disposable income, or who were living alone (patients with HPV-positive OPSCC, 68%-71%;

69 in social participation were associated with living alone, poorer kidney function, lower perceived si

70 r-status job (RR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.09-1.41]), living alone (RR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.10-1.39]), and having

71 anied by a rise in the prevalence of seniors living alone, the availability of social capital within

72 nosis were significantly increased among men living alone versus men living with a partner (stage II

73 tic factors, CMM-specific survival among men living alone versus men living with a partner remained s

74 for heterogeneity, p=0.002) for participants living alone versus those not living alone (1.60 [1.46-1

75 rving patients with cognitive impairment and living alone vs counterparts living with others.

76 In the meta-analysis, living alone was associated with higher levels of loneli

77 A change from coresidence to living alone was associated with increased risk of finan

78 ercentages of residents in poverty and males living alone were associated with 26%-27% and 12% higher

79 basic and vocational educational levels, and living alone were associated with use of antidepressants

80 This study evaluated whether elderly women living alone were less likely to experience functional d

81 Living in the North, living alone, White British ethnicity, lower inward migr

82 s for systematic unmet needs of older adults living alone with cognitive impairment for essential hea

83 cific factors that made serving older adults living alone with cognitive impairment more challenging

84 reased concerns when caring for older adults living alone with cognitive impairment, such as isolatio

85 to address the unique needs of older adults living alone with cognitive impairment.

86 Sixty-four older adults living alone with depressive symptoms were recruited bet

87 ter diversity and richness relative to those living alone, with the greatest diversity among couples

88 Life-years lost associated with living alone worsened between periods (-1.48 years [-1.5