ライフサイエンスコーパス: local excision

1 The third underwent local excision.

2 rs in the US, is typically treated with wide local excision.

3 ted to HPV16 or HPV18, in women treated with local excision.

4 ervation, through nonoperative management or local excision.

5 t tumor resection, proctectomy, or transanal local excision.

6 9 Gy, for a total dose of 54 Gy) followed by local excision.

7 ents for women with DCIS treated by complete local excision.

8 ategies are needed to improve the outcome of local excision.

9 hs, 8 (28%) occurred more than 5 years after local excision.

10 and significantly expand the indications for local excision.

11 patients (97%) evaluated by SNLBx underwent local excision.

12 ean age of 63 years (range 44-90), underwent local excision.

13 osis and are effectively treated with narrow local excision (1-cm radius).

14 Eighteen patients underwent a wide local excision, 12 with a paraffin section and 6 with a

15 9 patients (58%) diagnosed by CNBx underwent local excision; 194 of 199 patients (97%) evaluated by S

16 k of metastases and are treated with a wider local excision (2-3 cm).

17 ry breast cancer who were scheduled for wide local excision after triple assessment.

18 Of these, 52 patients were treated by local excision alone and 47 patients by local excision p

19 T2 and T3 cancers treated by local excision alone are associated with unacceptably hi

20 Organ-preservation alternatives are local excision alone for very early tumors, chemoradiati

21 ates were 72% and 66%, respectively, for the local excision alone group and 90% and 74%, respectively

22 However, local excision alone is associated with a high risk of l

23 e is much controversy as to whether complete local excision alone is sufficient.

24 Sphincter-sparing local excision and adjuvant radiation is well tolerated

25 cure with sphincter preservation after wide local excision and external-beam irradiation.

26 h unilateral DCIS who were eligible for wide local excision and had a diagnostic mammogram within 3 m

27 d unilateral DCIS who were eligible for wide local excision and had a diagnostic mammogram within 3 m

28 ratio [OR] = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.63); more local excision and less radical surgery (OR = 0.76; 95%

29 a (thickness 1-4 mm) center on the issues of local excision and management of regional lymph nodes.

30 endocavitary irradiation and 86% after wide local excision and radiotherapy.

31 endocavitary irradiation and 88% after wide local excision and radiotherapy.

32 ve surgical treatment for CM, including wide local excision and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), sh

33 efore this presentation, he underwent a wide local excision and sentinel node biopsy for an acral mel

34 She undergoes a wide local excision and sentinel node biopsy.

35 This study included 7378 local excisions and 36,116 major resections.

36 the subsequent 6 months, he underwent serial local excisions and topical diphencyprone treatment.

37 s for utilizing FGS: (1) debulking, (2) wide local excision, and (3) whole organ excision.

38 rgery, 18 patients (6%) underwent additional local excision, and 39 patients (14%) underwent total me

39 Local excision appears to be an effective alternative tr

40 in patients with DCIS who were treated with local excision are imperfect.

41 T2 adenocarcinomas of the rectum treated by local excision as definitive surgery between 1969 to 199

42 Surgery consisted of primary local excision, as well as dissection for patients with

43 ch as the prostate, where unnecessarily wide local excisions can result in significant deterioration

44 e pathological examination was performed and local excision carried out in all three cases.

45 The annual rate of transanal local excisions decreased for all stages.

46 Treatments include endoscopic and surgical local excision, downstaging preoperative radiotherapy an

47 Local excision (endoscopic or surgical) was compared wit

48 th endocavitary irradiation (n = 20) or wide local excision followed by external-beam irradiation (n

49 e survival after esophagectomy compared with local excision for all cases [hazard ratio (HR) 1.57, 95

50 Local excision for cT1N0 esophageal cancer has increased

51 Local excision for early colorectal cancer was oncologic

52 utcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and local excision for patients with stage T2N0 rectal cance

53 Local excision for rectal cancer is appealing for its lo

54 t chemoradiation for all patients undergoing local excision for T2 tumors, and for T1 tumors with hig

55 and pT2 rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent local excision from 1997 through mid-2006.

56 Local excision has become an attractive alternative for

57 ncomplete nodal staging, patients undergoing local excision have favorable survival, particularly in

58 ductal carcinoma in situ treated by complete local excision; however, there is little evidence for th

59 Margins of wide local excisions in breast conserving surgery are tested

60 The proportion of patients undergoing local excision increased from 12% in 1998 to 50% in 2012

61 Local excision is an organ-preserving treatment alternat

62 jority of patients (21 of 25, 84%) underwent local excision (LE) (P < 0.0001).

63 Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after a local excision (LE) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)

64 Given the morbidity associated with TME, local excision (LE) for early-stage rectal cancer has be

65 urrent recommendations regarding the size of local excision (LE) margins for Merkel cell carcinoma (M

66 Determine rates of local excision (LE) over time, and test the hypothesis t

67 Local excision margin size and adjuvant radiotherapy.

68 Recent studies suggest local excision may be acceptable treatment of T1 adenoca

69 at neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by local excision might be considered as an organ-preservin

70 linical T1N0 esophageal cancer who underwent local excision (n = 1625) or esophagectomy (n = 3255).

71 adiation, or surgery (proctectomy, transanal local excision, no tumor resection).

72 After local excision of a primary breast cancer, we conclude t

73 ly tumors, chemoradiation followed by either local excision of a small tumor remnant or, when there i

74 ctomy with complete mesocolic excision and a local excision of both facial nodules were performed.

75 A radical wide local excision of carefully selected early-stage tumours

76 lateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after local excision of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remain

77 seful basis for management of patients after local excision of early CRC.

78 Local excision of early rectal cancer, even in the ideal

79 or systemic treatment with glucocorticoids, local excision of solitary lesions, radiotherapy, and ch

80 Local excision of T1 and T2 colon cancer was associated

81 SIONS The long-term risk of recurrence after local excision of T1 and T2 rectal cancers is substantia

82 efine the role of adjuvant irradiation after local excision of T1 and T2 rectal cancers.

83 Local excision of T1 rectal cancer did not affect CSS (H

84 Exploratory data suggest local excision of T1-2 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant t

85 d on an outpatient basis at the time of wide local excision of the melanoma, with little morbidity.

86 operations were individualized and included local excision of the tumor and suprapancreatic bile duc

87 After local excision of the tumour (1 cm margin) and an axilla

88 re and then 1, 2, 4, and 6 months after wide local excision of thick primary cutaneous melanoma and s

89 ol and recurrence-free survival rates in the local excision only group.

90 Management typically involves complete local excision or debulking.

91 surgeon consultation and then underwent wide local excision or mastectomy.

92 Additional local excision or total mesorectal excision was performe

93 after esophagectomy compared with 2.8% after local excision (P < 0.001).

94 d by local excision alone and 47 patients by local excision plus adjuvant irradiation.

95 Patients who underwent local excision reported more major bowel dysfunction (10

96 rising from his left shoulder underwent wide local excision, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and lymph no

97 Local excision should be reserved for low-risk cancers i

98 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy and local excision showed oncological equivalence to major r

99 er, when primary breast cancer is treated by local excision supported by systemic therapy appropriate

100 ques, complex anal fistulas, diverticulitis, local excision techniques for rectal neoplasms, surgical

101 logical advances have enabled endoscopic and local excision techniques to be applied in the treatment

102 regarding the need for patient selection for local excision, the specific criteria vary among centers

103 For patients whose initial surgery was local excision, those diagnosed before surgery by CNBx h

104 ival was significantly better following wide local excision vs abdominoperineal resection (P = .04),

105 Local excision was approached transanally by removing fu

106 Local excision was performed after preoperative chemorad

107 performed in 58 out of 84 (69%) patients and local excision was performed in 26 (31%) patients.

108 Overall, the term "local" excision was abandoned and replaced with the desc

109 from patients undergoing mastectomy or wide local excision, we demonstrate the performance of OCME a

110 s, patients with T1 rectal cancer treated by local excision were observed to have a 3- to 5-fold high

111 uorescence surgery for tumor debulking, wide local excision, whole-organ resection, and peritoneal me

112 The study's findings suggest that local excision with 5-mm margins for T1a melanoma may no

113 ic disease, these individuals should undergo local excision with a 2-cm margin and intraoperative lym

114 tients who are most likely to undergo a wide local excision with adequate (>10 mm) tumor-free margins

115 A wide local excision with margin control remains the mainstay

116 Wide local excision with negative pathologic margins is the t

117 ients with T1 or T2 rectal cancers underwent local excision with or without adjuvant irradiation at M

118 he long-term outcomes of patients undergoing local excision with or without pelvic irradiation were e

119 imaging, who had primary surgical treatment (local excision with SN biopsy).

120 al disease; 37% were staged concordant after local excision, with excess missing data (60%).

121 h unilateral DCIS who were eligible for wide local excision (WLE) and had a diagnostic mammogram with

122 postoperative radiation (RT) following wide local excision (WLE) and sentinel node biopsy.

123 urgery compared with those treated with wide local excision (WLE) are limited.

124 dverse prognostic features treated with wide local excision (WLE) at a single institution between 199

125 and April 2016 who were candidates for wide local excision (WLE) based on conventional imaging and c

126 hat Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) and wide local excision (WLE) can both be used.

127 Wide local excision (WLE) is a common surgical intervention f

128 Currently, wide local excision (WLE) is the standard of care.

129 ies included Mohs microsurgery (31.1%), wide local excision (WLE) with paraffin section control (21.7

130 udy compared the incidence of ITM after wide local excision (WLE), WLE plus SLND (SLND), or WLE plus

131 ents with cT1N0 esophageal cancer undergoing local excision would have lower survival compared with e