ライフサイエンスコーパス: logarithm

1 Logarithm and standard error logarithm odds ratio (OR) w

2 he risk of developing psychiatric disorders [logarithm (base 10) of odds = 7.1].

3 In the multivariate logarithm-binomial regression model adjusted for baselin

4 letter studies on how the parameters in the logarithm conformal mapping control the cloaking effect.

5 d from the first kind and the second kind of logarithm conformal mappings are reduced to 9.779 and 12

6 oprotein cholesterol, each 1 unit of natural logarithm (Ln) triglycerides elevation was associated wi

7 f 0.93 (95% CI 0.89; 0.97) per every natural logarithm (Ln)-nmol/L-unit increase in circulating phyll

8 tion of time; however, EBOV viremia was 0.94 logarithm (log) copies per ml (cp/ml) (P = 0.011) higher

9 Logarithm and standard error logarithm odds ratio (OR) were also used for meta-analys

10 f the aptasensor increased linearly with the logarithm of alpha-syn oligomer concentration in the ran

11 near dependence of emission intensity on the logarithm of analyte (K(+)) concentration was obtained f

12 tereoacuity (mean improvement, 0.14 and 0.14 logarithm of arcsec; P <= 0.001 and P <= 0.001, respecti

13 The logarithm of BA partial pressures correlated significant

14 The sensor response increased linearly with logarithm of concentration of target DNA in the range 1x

15 refers to relating analytical response with logarithm of concentration, fitting such a data set with

16 ssed the relationship between VFQ-25 and the logarithm of contrast sensitivity (logCS), using Spearma

17 erive and validate the combined ITPD/logCAC (logarithm of coronary calcium) scores.

18 nt variation is directly proportional to the logarithm of cTnI concentration between 5.0pgmL(-1) and

19 gnal demonstrated a linear relationship with logarithm of Dam concentration ranging from 0.075 to 30U

20 y between the electrochemical signal and the logarithm of dsDNA-T concentration over the range from 1

21 H (hazard ratio [HR]/SD increment of natural logarithm of fasting hs-GH) was independently associated

22 increased linearly with the increase in the logarithm of HA protein concentration in a dynamic range

23 PBA electrode has a linear dependence on the logarithm of Hb(A1c) concentration ranging from 0.975 to

24 ric (DPV) stripping signal of silver and the logarithm of HER2 concentrations was obtained in the ran

25 he sensor exhibited a linear response versus logarithm of IL-8 concentration from 900 fg/ml to 900 ng

26 s of marked shrinkage during expiration with logarithm of Jacobian determinants less than -0.15 were

27 rity between areas with marked shrinkage and logarithm of Jacobian determinants less than -0.15 were

28 rior dioptric asymmetry, skewed radial axis, logarithm of keratoconus percentage index, index of surf

29 Specifically, we model the logarithm of mean gene counts as sums of smooth function

30 trol group), Delta CDVA +/- SD 0.15 +/- 0.18 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) (P < .

31 y recovery and maintenance were defined as a logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) of 0 (

32 Significant improvement in VA in logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) was ac

33 t-corrected visual acuity change (DeltaBCVA, logarithm of minimal angle of resolution [logMAR]) from

34 ment in UDVA (1.30 +/- 0.49 to 0.87 +/- 0.58 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution [logMAR]; P < .

35 ity decreased from 1.3 preoperatively to 1.6 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution at last follow-

36 he mean age was 34 +/- 14 years and the mean logarithm of minimal angle of resolution of visual acuit

37 The average presenting logarithm of minimal angle of resolution visual acuity w

38 acuity was 1.7 +/- 0.8 and the average final logarithm of minimal angle of resolution visual acuity w

39 best-corrected visual acuity of 2.3 to -0.2 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution.

40 Logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) best-c

41 cuity (VA; mean better-eye VA, 0.43 vs. 0.08 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) and c

42 Excluding eyes with comorbidities, logarithm of minimum angle of resolution BSCVA improved

43 acuity (BCVA) were measured using a standard logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution chart at 3 mete

44 roportion of eyes that improved vision by 10 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution letters.

45 Best-corrected visual acuity in logarithm of minimum angle of resolution units, anterior

46 l acuity (BCVA) was between 0.3 and 1.0 on a logarithm of minimum angle of resolution visual chart.

47 In the CMO group, mean BCVA (in logarithm of minimum angle of resolution) improved modes

48 2 years, mean CDVA improved from 0.62 to 0.4 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution, and median CST

49 nce visual acuity (CDVA) between 0.3 and 1.0 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution.

50 was 1 (IQR, 0-2) and median visual acuity in logarithm of minimum angle of resolutions (n = 34 eyes)

51 naesthesiologists, and obstetricians and the logarithm of MMR, and we explored the correlation for an

52 and the efficacy of oxytocin on the natural logarithm of mode on the probability density function of

53 ignificantly decreased the increased natural logarithm of mode on the probability density function of

54 imum probability (i.e. mode) and the natural logarithm of mode on the probability density function of

55 of neutral facial expression and the natural logarithm of mode on the probability density function of

56 andedness in the 22q13 region [heterogeneity logarithm of odds (HLOD) = 2.18].

57 and stem volume mapped to 11 linkage groups (logarithm of odds (LOD) >/= 2.5), and explained 2.7-18.5

58 (chr15q11-13) and found support for linkage (logarithm of odds (LOD) 2), with a prominent parent-of-o

59 ting heterogeneity in the two sets of cases [logarithm of odds (LOD) = 2.7].

60 howed suggestive linkage in the same region [logarithm of odds (LOD) = 2.80].

61 mosome 1 locus are at increased risk for MS [logarithm of odds (LOD) = 9.8], although the signal weak

62 esulting in 27 linkage groups with a minimum logarithm of odds (LOD) of 8 and maximum recombination f

63 gene locus on chromosome 5q35 with a maximum logarithm of odds (LOD) score of 6.79.

64 er-marker distance of 1.67 cM with a minimum logarithm of odds of 6 and maximum recombination fractio

65 QTL on chromosome 9, named Bglu17 [26.4 cM, logarithm of odds ratio (LOD): 5.4], and 3 suggestive QT

66 chromosome 1q23.3 to 1q24.3 (non-parametric logarithm of odds score 2.9, model-based logarithm of od

67 ntified a single linkage signal with maximum logarithm of odds score 3.01 at 4p16.2-p16.1, correspond

68 se-associated locus on chromosome 4 (maximal logarithm of odds score 4.4 at D4S2971; theta = 0).

69 ric logarithm of odds score 2.9, model-based logarithm of odds score 4.99, theta=0 at D1S2768).

70 gle significant locus on chromosome 16p13.2 (logarithm of odds score 6.5).

71 14.1 was the most significant (heterogeneity logarithm of odds score = 3.38).

72 egion on chromosome 6q12-6q16 (heterogeneity logarithm of odds score = 3.9), under a recessive diseas

73 -megabase recessive locus at 12q21.33 with a logarithm of odds score of 3.92.

74 n on chromosome 17 with a maximum multipoint logarithm of odds score of 6.01.

75 with the affected phenotype, and cumulative logarithm of odds score reached 6.03, establishing linka

76 t EEM was linked to the 6q24 region (maximum logarithm of odds score, 3.64).

77 n 5 (LRP5) gene segregated with the disease (logarithm of odds score, 4.62) but was not observed in m

78 garithm of odds, 3.2), and 70.0 centimorgan (logarithm of odds, 2.1).

79 n, all on chromosome 4, at 46.6 centimorgan (logarithm of odds, 2.3), 57.7 centimorgan (logarithm of

80 (logarithm of odds, 2.3), 57.7 centimorgan (logarithm of odds, 3.2), and 70.0 centimorgan (logarithm

81 the strongest linkage support at 4q35 (LOD [logarithm of odds] score, 3.69), and the GWAS of age at

82 nergy change (DeltaDeltaG) is counted as the logarithm of relative probability of mutant amino acids

83 nce rate ratios (IRR), offset by the natural logarithm of risk periods.

84 n of SCCA shows a linear relationship to the logarithm of SCCA concentration in the range of 5.0 pg m

85 ship between the stripping peak currents and logarithm of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) concentrations

86 The Logarithm of Slope (LOS) kinetic model was used to analy

87 CMRs and natural logarithm of SMRs were pooled by the method of the inver

88 , the explanatory variables also include the logarithm of solute vapor pressure, the solubility param

89 ls fit on 381 eligible subjects, the natural logarithm of SpG-adj maternal BPA concentration was inve

90 tionship between the current intensities and logarithm of ssDNA concentrations in the range from 0.1n

91 at pHs above the indicator pKa (the negative logarithm of the acid dissociation constant).

92 The response obtained is proportional to the logarithm of the concentration of glucose, with a sensit

93 near range (R(2) approximately 98%) with the logarithm of the concentration of the analyte comprising

94 good linear relationship versus the natural logarithm of the concentration of the dopamine.

95 the Nernst equation and proportional to the logarithm of the concentration ratios.

96 The logarithm of the diagnostic odds ratio was 1.89 (95% CI=

97 pressed as sensitivity, specificity, and the logarithm of the diagnostic odds ratio.

98 17.7 and show a linear correlation with the logarithm of the exchange rates.

99 aals interactions can be approximated by the logarithm of the hexadecane/air partitioning coefficient

100 hese potentials are found to change with the logarithm of the ion activity, in complete analogy to io

101 The logarithm of the litter-air equilibrium partitioning coe

102 ECL intensity was linearly dependent on the logarithm of the mercury(II) concentration from 0.2 to 1

103 d with scleral lens wear, from 0.32 +/- 0.37 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) (m

104 ve complications, and pre- and postoperative logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) be

105 ty improved significantly from 1.18 +/- 0.42 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) un

106 We assessed the difference between logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) vi

107 A negative correlation was found between the logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) vi

108 ve corrected visual acuity was 0.48 +/- 0.23 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR), 0

109 spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA; in logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [logMAR] un

110 an BCVA improved in both groups (0.41+/-0.39 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [logMAR] vs

111 /- 0.65 in aphakic children to 0.55 +/- 0.51 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution in pseudoph

112 ability of visual acuity improvement (>/=0.3 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution units impro

113 Mean preinjection logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution visual acui

114 l best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 (0.3 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution) or better

115 l best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 (0.3 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution) or better,

116 The BSCVA was approximately 0.22 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (2

117 ransplants with FED measured on average 0.45 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (9

118 months, with mean VA deteriorating from 0.44 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (r

119 The mean preoperative baseline logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (S

120 standard deviation improved from 0.45+/-0.19 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (S

121 Initial mean (SD) visual acuity was logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) 0.

122 Measurement of habitual VA by median logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) an

123 e suture removal, BSCVA averaged 0.09+/-0.72 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) an

124 Mean BCVA was 0.33+/-0.23 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) an

125 Mean BCVA of the better-seeing eye was 0.32 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) at

126 Median BCVA improved from 0.90 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) be

127 With regard to VA, the MGI's mean was 0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) hi

128 The CDVA improved by an average of 5.0 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) le

129 Baseline vision was 41 and 43 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) le

130 Visual acuity (VA) in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) le

131 , although mean differences were less than 1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) li

132 Visual acuity was 0.18 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) or

133 not understand non-Snellen formats, such as logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) or

134 Twelve eyes had a final VA of 0.4 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) or

135 ences were observed in VA measured using the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) sc

136 s, with a mean increase in VA of 0.26 on the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) sc

137 surgery, mean CDVA improved from 0.48+/-0.45 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) to

138 an BCVA improved from an initial 0.80+/-0.33 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) to

139 ter 2 years, the mean CDVA was 0.20 +/- 0.29 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) un

140 The mean postoperative BCVA was 0.24+/-0.29 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) un

141 The CDVA improved by an average of 5.7 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) un

142 f are defined as change in MacDQoL score per logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) un

143 t was defined as visual acuity (VA) of > 0.3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) un

144 VA improved significantly from 0.47 +/- 0.05 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) un

145 or PK relative to no intervention was -0.613 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) un

146 was 0.52/0.40 (range, -0.08-2.00/-0.18-1.70) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) un

147 len VA and ETDRS BCVA were then converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) un

148 The logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA

149 Mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA

150 Most patients had VA decrease, with logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) va

151 Mean baseline logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA

152 At final follow-up, mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA

153 ficant difference between the groups in POM3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA

154 significant negative correlation between the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) vi

155 calcification, central macular thickness, or logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) vi

156 umber; OR, 1.00-6.30; P < 0.001), and poorer logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) vi

157 The minimum data set included: age, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) vi

158 tive error in diopters, and visual acuity in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) we

159 years) with visual impairment (acuity of the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) wo

160 Mean presenting VA was 0.52 +/- 0.36 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), a

161 e CDVA in the tPRK-CXL group was 0.26+/-0.17 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), a

162 cted visual acuity at baseline was 0.5+/-0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), i

163 worse mean preoperative BCVA (0.55 vs. 0.36 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), P

164 nd at last presentations were 2.2 and 0.0625 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), r

165 Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR), U

166 rrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 1.39+/-0.64 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), w

167 ith treatment relative to baseline were 0.24 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR).

168 rrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 1.11+/-0.59 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR).

169 The noninferiority margin was 0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR).

170 The baseline mean VA equivalent was 0.88 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR).

171 ars of age with optotype VA testing was 0.35 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; op

172 Mean BCVA improved from 1.31 to 1.08 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; P

173 median visual acuity for the cohort was 0.39 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; ra

174 ine in visual acuity from an average of 0.23 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; Sn

175 Mean VA before brolucizumab IVI was 0.426 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; Sn

176 baseline mean visual acuity was 0.6 +/- 0.5 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; Sn

177 sual acuity (BCVA) improved from 0.53+/-0.31 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; Sn

178 Median best-corrected visual acuity was 0.20 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; Sn

179 visual acuity (VA) improved from 0.81+/-0.56 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; Sn

180 eline, mean study eye visual acuity was 0.56 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; st

181 among all 9 eyes improved from 0.69 to 0.37 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (Snellen eq

182 showed worse median VA at presentation (1.00 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR; Sn

183 ual outcomes (12-month median visual acuity, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] 0.

184 Median BCVA was 20/30 (mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] 0.

185 nt improvement in visual acuity at 3 months (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] 0.

186 7% and visual acuity improved significantly (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] 0.

187 ted distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 20/50 (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] 0.

188 ffer between patients undergoing DSAEK (0.35 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] [9

189 n DMEK and UT-DSAEK groups at 3 months (0.15 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] [9

190 confidence limit of the difference was <0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] ma

191 hat UCDVA was better in the toric IOL group (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] me

192 not change significantly (BCVA, 0.77+/-0.62 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] pr

193 visual acuity (BCVA; mean BCVA, 1.22+/-0.81 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] un

194 uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA; measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] un

195 Interval and final visual outcomes (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] vi

196 and the 234 eyes without SD (0.253 +/- 0.14 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] vs

197 = 0.01), VA was similar in both groups (0.32 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] vs

198 ffected eye had worse mean CDVA (1.14+/-0.79 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] vs

199 ovement from presentation to month 6 (-1.102 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] vs

200 rected distance visual acuity [CDVA] </=0.34 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) a

201 ) for decade 1 eyes to be worse (2.05+/-1.29 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) t

202 Working Group criteria), and visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) w

203 ing the visit before being LTFU (0.43+/-0.38 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) w

204 were corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]),

205 to 1 year postconversion for visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]),

206 l visit was 20/60 (range, 20/400-20/25; 0.48 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]),

207 orrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/2000 (2 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]),

208 e visual impairment (<20/200 Snellen or >1.0 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]).

209 corrected visual acuity (BCVA; average, 0.46 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]; 9

210 eyes required no regraft (BSCVA, 0.27+/-0.28 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]; C

211 VA before vitreoretinal surgery (median, 1.8 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]; I

212 Postoperative BCVA (mean, 0.378+/-0.487 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]; S

213 EAD Acuity Chart (Precision Vision) (0.4-1.3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution at 40 cm),

214 ely to yield an improvement of more than 0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution BCVA (OR =

215 oveal avascular zone size was predictive for logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution BCVA with a

216 an change in VA (number of letters read on a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution chart).

217 Mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution initial vs.

218 A mean change in visual acuity of +5.5 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution letters (95

219 Mean VA increased by +5.3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution letters fro

220 ar VA and binocular VA were assessed using a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution number char

221 rvals, the mean improvement in CDVA was 0.07 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution or 3.5 lett

222 y, with a visual acuity decline rate of 0.03 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution per year.

223 ter 24 months, the median BCVA was 1.15 on a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution scale (20/2

224 nimum angle of resolution units to 1.3+/-0.7 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units (P =

225 solution units before surgery to 0.90+/-0.30 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units 12 mo

226 Mean BSCVA improved from 1.27+/-0.44 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units befor

227 asurements were standardized from Snellen to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units for s

228 ificantly improved the BCVAs {from 1.8+/-0.7 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units to 1.

229 confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.12 per 0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units), old

230 corrected visual acuity measured 0.14+/-0.26 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units.

231 size and postoperative visual acuity (VA) in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units.

232 Change in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution VA (mean +/

233 Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution VA and log

234 The mean change in the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution VA at 3 yea

235 gnificant group differences in the change in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution VA before s

236 final VA measurement, the median presenting logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution VA improved

237 perative visual acuity (22% vs. 32% with 0.4 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution vision or w

238 ents in the PDT era demonstrated better mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acui

239 e was associated with poorer vision (rise in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acui

240 The mean (SD) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acui

241 ted for covariates, eyes with ERM had a mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acui

242 Mean preoperative logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acui

243 .5 [1.3] vs. 2.5 [2.8]; P = 0.002) and final logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acui

244 Median (IQR) final logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acui

245 found in best-corrected visual acuity (0.01 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution vs. -0.05 l

246 year were comparable for BCVA (0.57 +/- 0.4 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution vs. 0.45 +/

247 a mean best-corrected visual acuity of 1.13 (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) for surviv

248 diseases) and eyes with reduced vision (<0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) or with lo

249 reoperative BCVA increased from 0.46+/-0.10 (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) to 0.40+/-

250 nce, intermediate, and near visual acuities (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution), with stan

251 eased from -0.84 +/- 0.77 to -1.30 +/- 0.93 (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, P = 0.02).

252 Visual acuity ranged from 0.20 to 0.86 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution.

253 The average preoperative VA was 1.9+/-0.5 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution.

254 st-corrected visual acuity was 0.74 +/- 0.39 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution.

255 of the minimum angle of resolution vs. -0.05 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; P = 0.007)

256 minimum angle of resolution vs. 0.45 +/- 0.4 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; P = 0.136)

257 4 weeks, respectively, and the corresponding logarithm of the minimum angles of resolution (logMAR) V

258 that for the abiotic reduction of NACs, the logarithm of the NACs' rate constants correlate with one

259 l regression: Model 1 based on volume (log) (logarithm of the nodule volume) and FPC1, and Model 2 ba

260 it achieves a query time that scales as the logarithm of the number of records in practice on genomi

261 Other suggestive NPL and logarithm of the odds (LOD) scores were attained from fa

262 t quantitative trait locus on chromosome 11 (logarithm of the odds = 7.4) to a missense mutation in c

263 vidual SNP effect size on PACG calculated as logarithm of the odds ratio (OR).

264 The combined logarithm of the odds score was 3.46.

265 se locus to chromosome 7q21.1-q31.1 (2-point logarithm of the odds score: 4.64; theta=0); in this reg

266 ith a dominant inheritance pattern (combined logarithm of the odds score: 9.5).

267 major loci on chromosomes 1 and 7 with LOD (logarithm of the odds) scores = 6.1 and 8.1, respectivel

268 The natural logarithm of the Olive tail moment (OTM) was plotted for

269 orm displayed a linear relationship with the logarithm of the paraoxon concentrations in the range of

270 s linearly proportional to the change of the logarithm of the primary ion activity is obtained.

271 ux-force relationship, which states that the logarithm of the ratio between the forward and reverse f

272 tive linear correlations between the natural logarithm of the reduction rate constants and DeltarG.

273 antibody conjugation was correlated with the logarithm of the Salmonella typhimurium concentration in

274 y that the longest path also scales with the logarithm of the size of the network but with a larger c

275 ly and numerically that this scales with the logarithm of the size of the network with a coefficient

276 The logarithm of the total probability of a MSA under a stoc

277 Mean decay of the logarithm of the viral load was estimated at 0.076 per d

278 ar range, between peak current intensity and logarithm of TMP concentration between 1.0 x 10(-6) and

279 by fitting a linear relationship between the logarithm of viscosity and the volume fractions of suspe

280 bortion, we used Poisson regression with the logarithm of woman-years at risk as an offset.

281 d in dependence of fluorescence intensity on logarithm of zinc ions concentration in extraordinary wi

282 Standard deviations of logarithms of geometric mean concentrations were compute

283 proach would accumulate evidence in units of logarithms of likelihood ratios (logLR) to a desired lev

284 an HR decrease (HR) before syncope and used logarithms of SV, HR, and TPR ratios to quantify the mul

285 c acid, and a linear correlation between the logarithms of the Diels-Alder rate constants and measure

286 ong linear correlation was found between the logarithms of the stability constants of the Cu complexe

287 ) were separately scanned so that a negative logarithm P-value curve against genome position could be

288 There was no association between logarithm periostin and age or sex, although levels were

289 such that 76% of results agreed within +/-1 logarithm (rS=0.85; P<.0001).

290 d aptamer-biosensor responded linearly, on a logarithm scale, over the concentration range 1 x 10(1)

291 ers, to estimate the associations of natural logarithm transformed creatinine-corrected urinary vanad

292 efined as the difference between the natural logarithm-transformed insulin concentrations of the post

293 The distribution of periostin and logarithm-transformed periostin levels was derived, and

294 (adjusted OR per unit change in mean natural logarithm-transformed ratio of telomere repeat copy numb

295 eride level (RR per 1-SD decrease in natural logarithm-transformed triglyceride level, 1.17 [95% CI,

296 The utility first logarithm transforms and then removes plate/batch/lot ar

297 decreased by - 0.56 mL/min/BSA/year for each logarithm unit increase in baseline uACR, corresponding

298 rcent reduction in the beta coefficient (the logarithm used to calculate the hazard ratio [HR]) was c

299 iables (where c is a constant and composes a logarithm with itself c times).

300 umber that satisfies the law of the iterated logarithm yet exhibits pairwise bias toward repeated val