戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 x5/6(-/-) mouse mandibular arch (prospective lower jaw).
2 verexpressing Mmp13 in NCM shortens the duck lower jaw.
3 erized by the evolutionary innovation of the lower jaw.
4 ncluding the braincase, scapulocoracoid, and lower jaw.
5 ve to previously unexpressed inputs from the lower jaw.
6 ns in both jaws, and a dermal element in the lower jaw.
7  might negatively regulate Hh signals in the lower jaw.
8 pecifically, mesodermal Tbx1, in shaping the lower jaw.
9 effects on both the length and height of the lower jaw.
10 lls form the distal skeletal elements of the lower jaw.
11 ional and replacement teeth in the upper and lower jaws.
12 on of bone development between the upper and lower jaws.
13 olar, canine, and incisor teeth in upper and lower jaws.
14 hewing through their bony attachments to the lower jaw(2).
15 luded (28 from the upper jaw and 39 from the lower jaw; 25 central incisors, 22 lateral incisors, and
16 th of the retroarticular (RA) process of the lower jaw, a change predicted to increase speed of jaw r
17  of the hindlimb skeleton and absence of the lower jaw (agnathia).
18           Their highly specialized mandible (lower jaw) allows high-frequency sounds to be transmitte
19 subsequent formation of aberrant bone in the lower jaw along with proximal-distal duplications.
20 an ocean), which possesses the largest known lower jaw among Triassic sauropterygians.
21 ing narrow, elongated snouts, underdeveloped lower jaw and a high incidence of cleft palate.
22 der characterised by underdevelopment of the lower jaw and associated with cleft palate.
23 pecifies ventral pharyngeal cartilage of the lower jaw and bapx1 specifies the jaw joint.
24  replacement in basal therian mammals and on lower jaw and basicranial morphology.
25      The evolution of a single-dentary-boned lower jaw and its secondary craniomandibular articulatio
26 t the representations of the hand and of the lower jaw and neck are strongly interconnected.
27 dibular nerve, and the representation of the lower jaw and neck region, innervated by the second and
28               Overlap of the hand and of the lower jaw and neck representations and of their horizont
29 lacks connections with the hand and with the lower jaw and neck representations, but the representati
30 migratory cranial neural crest specifies the lower jaw and other ventral arch fates.
31  of sucker (suc) disrupts development of the lower jaw and other ventral cartilages in pharyngeal seg
32          Although the body scales, fin rays, lower jaw and palate are comparable to those in more pri
33  is reduced early in development the ventral lower jaw and supporting structures are reduced in size
34                             Second, both the lower jaw and tongue skeleton display an organisation wh
35 ologies, having a short, broad skull, robust lower jaw, and a dentition with relatively few teeth tha
36 receptive fields of the mystacial vibrissae, lower jaw, and glaborous snout.
37 of the glaborous snout, mystacial vibrissae, lower jaw, and oral cavity (the rostrum).
38 of the first pharyngeal arch, from which the lower jaw arises.
39                                 Although the lower jaw barrel subfield (LJBSF) is a likely source of
40 ircular impressions created by the upper and lower jaws, bearing some similarity to fossil traces int
41 al axonal projections that cross the forepaw/lower jaw border as compared to projections remaining wi
42  of neurons in layer II/III near the forepaw/lower jaw border in rat somatosensory cortex, comparing
43 orepaw and lower jaw representation (forepaw/lower jaw border,(1) FP/LJ border) in SI of adult rats,
44 e for adaptive variation in the shape of the lower jaw both within and among genera of Lake Malawi ci
45 ndividual vibrissa and microvibrissae in the lower jaw but not from trident whiskers.
46 vertebrate prey as well as shortening of the lower jaw, but it is not correlated with a reduction in
47 lly the mechanical coupling of the upper and lower jaw by the postorbital ligament.
48 f Ednra1 leads to fusions between upper- and lower-jaw cartilages, whereas the combined loss of Ednra
49 osed mouth, (ii) opening the mouth until the lower jaw contacted the sea surface, which created a cur
50 on and position of the teeth in the upper or lower jaw could not be determined with certainty; even t
51 tional system that affects the kinematics of lower jaw depression--the opercular four-bar linkage app
52                           Both the upper and lower jaws develop from cranial neural crest cells (CNCC
53                                              Lower jaw development is a complex process in which mult
54 ablishment of a 'mandibular identity' during lower jaw development requires both Ednra-dependent and
55 mandibular arch domain that is conducive for lower jaw development, including the initiation of tongu
56 ors that functionally separate the upper and lower jaws during development.
57  in relation to the skeletal elements of the lower jaw elements.
58 ted by the pre-operative cyst size and upper/lower jaw except gender (p = 0.037, female > male) an
59 onasal organ (VNO), nasal cavity, forebrain, lower jaw, eyelids and pinnae.
60 per jaw development, while Dlx5/6 confer the lower jaw fate.
61  excessive bone degradation of the upper and lower jaws followed by development of fibrous tissue mas
62 lx6-Hand2 signaling pathway is necessary for lower jaw formation and that ectopic expression of Edn1
63  that they play partially redundant roles in lower-jaw formation and development of the jaw joint.
64 Ednra) to promote ventral skeletal fates and lower-jaw formation.
65 reviously known only from isolated teeth and lower jaw fragments recovered from the Cretaceous and Pa
66 nes--the 'Dlx code' that specifies upper and lower jaw identity in mammals and teleosts--is a primiti
67 ween the upper and power jaws that keeps the lower jaw in a forward position, thus improving the Clas
68  mesenchymal survival and development of the lower jaw in the mandibular epithelium.
69  approach, we explore the diversification of lower jaws in early bony fishes, a major contributor to
70 ible, accompanied by fusion of the upper and lower jaws in the hinge region.
71  the proximal-distal patterning of the mouse lower jaw, in part through establishing a negative-feedb
72                 The mandibular canal enables lower jaw innervation through the passage of the inferio
73 -) results in homeotic transformation of the lower jaw into upper jaw.
74              The most proximal region of the lower jaw is derived from second arch (r4) NC.
75                                          The lower jaw is derived from the mandibular process of the
76 om Dlx-5; Dlx-6 double mutants, in which the lower jaw is transformed to an upper jaw.
77 ccurate localisation of mandibular canals in lower jaws is important in dental implantology, in which
78  stem cells (PDLSC) from upper (u-PDLSC) and lower jaw (l-PDLSC) contribute to the enhanced wound hea
79    The dataset includes images from both Q3 (lower jaw left side) and Q4 (lower right side) regions e
80 d homeosis of the upper jaw structure into a lower jaw-like structure.
81 lan including leaf-shaped teeth, a beak-like lower jaw, long, gracile limbs, and a quadrupedal stance
82 ten flexible along their length, whereas the lower jaw (mandible) is usually a rigid structure formed
83                           Acquisition of the lower jaw (mandible) was evolutionarily important for ja
84             Accuracy was slightly higher for lower jaw (mandibular) molars.
85 al hearing (such as pan-bone thinning of the lower jaws, mandibular fat pads, and isolation of the ea
86 of the splanchnic mesoderm that produces the lower jaw muscles and SHF of vertebrates.
87  details of the representations of the hand, lower jaw, neck, and face in area 3b of normal macaque m
88 he anterior to middle region of the upper or lower jaw of a large, osteologically mature individual.
89 presence of an ameloblastoma neoplasm in the lower jaw of a specimen referred to the derived non-hadr
90 odel of large-scale bone regeneration in the lower jaw of adult zebrafish, we show that chondrocytes
91               Morphometric reanalysis of the lower jaw of Jeholornis further supports a generalized m
92 ces in horizontal skeletal parameters in the lower jaw only, while other readings were similar.
93 t to have permitted greater mobility of each lower jaw, or hemimandible(6,7).
94                               Defects in the lower jaw, or mandible, occur commonly either as isolate
95 1 is necessary and sufficient to mediate the lower jaw patterning mechanism for Ednra in zebrafish.
96 considered the differences between upper and lower jaw PDLSC (u-PDLSC and l-PDLSC, respectively).
97      The specimen includes partial upper and lower jaws, pharyngeal elements, a pectoral fin and scal
98 rate kinematic chain as well as the quadrate-lower jaw-postorbital ligament-braincase-quadrate kinema
99 ignaling pathway establishes the identity of lower jaw progenitor cells by regulating expression of n
100  had a cleft palate and abnormalities of the lower jaw, raising the possibility that they might serve
101                        The in vivo zebrafish lower jaw regeneration model reveals that NHFs enhance b
102 action on in vitro wound healing and in vivo lower jaw regeneration of zebrafish.
103 e located the border between the forepaw and lower jaw representation (forepaw/lower jaw border,(1) F
104 ons may form one basis for expansions of the lower jaw representation into that of the hand when peri
105 e located the border between the forepaw and lower jaw representation of SI in vivo, and used whole c
106 cation of the border between the forepaw and lower jaw representations in rat S1 was determined elect
107 rt segment of the border between the forepaw-lower jaw representations in rat S1 was mapped using sta
108  close to the border between the forepaw and lower jaw representations.
109 (+)/Sox9(+) progenitors within the mammalian lower jaw requires FGF signaling.
110 tion, like in other dinosaurs, its snout and lower jaw show large cranial fenestrae.
111                      Most significantly, the lower jaw shows evidence for neurovasculature that is al
112 ned loss of Ednra1 and Ednra2 eliminates the lower jaw, similar to edn1-/- mutants.
113 observed in most of the neural crest-derived lower jaw skeleton and surrounding connective tissues.
114                                          The lower jaw skeleton is derived from cephalic neural crest
115 s) of the mandibular adductor muscles on the lower jaw skeleton.
116                    The representation of the lower jaw skin consisting of chin vibrissae and microvib
117 ctions, microelectrodes were used to map the lower jaw skin surface representation in SI, and electro
118 igate LJBSF organization, a nomenclature for lower jaw skin surface was developed, cytochrome oxidase
119                            We show that most lower jaw structures in Ednra(-/-) embryos undergo a hom
120 e defects include homeotic transformation of lower jaw structures into upper jaw-like structures, sug
121 he CNCCs partly transformed the upper jaw to lower jaw structures, but the molecular mechanisms regul
122 Ednra), which are required for patterning of lower jaw structures.
123 and syngnathia (bony fusion of the upper and lower jaws) that results from changes in BMP4 and FGF8 g
124 tes skeletal development of the hindlimb and lower jaw through discrete populations of cells that giv
125 r activity and heightened sensitivity of the lower jaw to Sox9 expression reduction.
126 mutants exhibit a homeotic transformation of lower jaws to upper jaws.
127                 Morphological changes to the lower jaw were detected at 96 hpf in response to 1 mug/L
128 on in which the upper jaw is larger than the lower jaw) were randomly selected and assigned to one of
129  and closing lever mechanisms of the cichlid lower jaw, which have traditionally been used to describ
130  with nearly complete cranium and associated lower jaws with in situ dentitions.

 
Page Top