ライフサイエンスコーパス: lower limit

1 per limit without a commensurate increase of lower limit.

2 0.21 if the Spo(2) was above the acceptable lower limit.

3 e limits, whereas biotic interactions create lower limits.

4 Karimui) and 123 m (Karkar Island) for lower limits.

5 es may create divergent range patterns along lower limits.

6 rence) for both endpoints, then superiority (lower limit 95% CI >0%) if non-inferiority was achieved.

7 hierarchical fashion, first non-inferiority (lower limit 95% CI greater than -10% for group differenc

8 signal acquisition and (iii) outliers in the lower limit and margin events in the upper limit of the

9 om lakes and reservoirs, where the upper and lower limits are respectively the 5th and 95th confidenc

10 However, 2,6-DBA was estimated as a lower limit due to breakthrough from polyurethane foam t

11 These values may be lower limit estimates of the fraction of the oil that wa

12 ntial with the catalytic rate constant and a lower-limit estimation of these parameters.

13 During storage JF bread presented lower limiting firmness potential.

14 or 2, which are far exceeded by the accepted lower limit for hydrazine (10 ppb) set by the US EPA.

15 48 h at room temperature, thus providing the lower limit for inversion barrier of configuration of 27

16 ase and supports the notion that there is no lower limit for LDL-C.

17 h REL, and diacetyl levels were close to the lower limit for occupational exposures.

18 In the two groups, the default lower limit for oxygen saturation as measured by pulse o

19 However, the lower limit for pathological expansions is unknown (the

20 rtial second turn, suggesting the b10 is the lower limit for stable helical conformations in b ions.

21 To establish a lower limit for successful adoptive T-cell therapy, we c

22 this turbulent convective length scale is a lower limit for the energy-carrying length scales in the

23 r grains, their elemental composition, and a lower limit for the ISD flux at Saturn.

24 s fourth assessment report (AR4)-providing a lower limit for the isolated GHG contribution-may have l

25 These results suggest a lower limit for the pore diameter in nanostructured elec

26 conclude that at the air-water interface, a lower limit for the rate constant is k = 1.2 x 10(-9) cm

27 Lower limits for the very high formation and dissociatio

28 insufficient to inhibit signaling, setting a lower-limit for the threshold level of Axin in the major

29 R range, 2.99-23.85; 95% confidence interval lower limit, >1); there were significant declines over t

30 Indeed, 21% had values below the lower limit observed in the term-born adults and 6% had

31 The lower limit of (13)C NMR detection under our experimenta

32 riority (ie, meeting the prespecified 90% CI lower limit of 0.8) was then confirmed in stage 2, with

33 Yeast eccDNAs ranged from an arbitrary lower limit of 1 kb up to 38 kb and covered 23% of the g

34 ~50 cells for statistical reasons, but at a lower limit of 1 receptor- and 1 reference-cell, specifi

35 s, respectively (absolute difference, -1.6%; lower limit of 1-sided 95% confidence interval, -10.7%;

36 part-time patching group (difference, 5.4%; lower limit of 1-sided exact 95% confidence interval, 2.

37 tion of cholesterol concentration provided a lower limit of 100 mM for their dissociation constant.

38 We reinvestigated the proposed lower limit of 2 microm for the diameters of neuronal so

39 A conservative estimate places a lower limit of 345 +/- 70 PgC year(-1) on the cycling fl

40 1.7% in controls (absolute difference -0.6%; lower limit of 95% confidence interval [CI]: -9.3%; p =

41 From these data, we find a lower limit of [Formula: see text]% of the carbon atoms

42 ive slope that was more negative than the 5% lower limit of aging), 18% simulated normal eyes were st

43 optimal arterial blood pressure (ABPopt) and lower limit of autoregulation (LLA).

44 en mean arterial blood pressure is below the lower limit of autoregulation, cerebral oximetry index a

45 n cerebral saturation >15%) and explored the lower limit of cerebral autoregulation at patient and po

46 The lower limit of cerebral autoregulation varied substantia

47 ormly without excess of saliva describes the lower limit of chewing frequency, scaling approximately

48 cessful quantitative analysis, which has its lower limit of chromatographic resolution Rs at some min

49 for high coherence) and random networks (the lower limit of coherence).

50 ng via SERS is used for greater accuracy and lower limit of detection (0.1 ppb) for quantitative dete

51 a wide range of concentration detection, and lower limit of detection (0.186 microM) than NiO nanoshe

52 a wide linear response range (7.5-300 muM); lower limit of detection (0.66 muM), excellent limit of

53 The lower limit of detection (1.2 ng/L) as well as cutoff co

54 d not oriented) were compared highlighting a lower limit of detection (5pg/ml) for the not oriented i

55 pg mL(-1)), reproducibility (R(2)=0.96), and lower limit of detection (98 pg/mL) first in purified sa

56 owever, tumor growth data are limited by the lower limit of detection (i.e., a measurable lesion) and

57 g parameter with analyte concentration), and lower limit of detection (i.e., minimum detectable conce

58 The 95% lower limit of detection (LLOD) for Aptima HCV on dried

59 The protein and peptide assay showed a lower limit of detection (LLOD) of 200 fM and 460 fM res

60 Our results show that the lower limit of detection (LLOD) of the colorimetric and

61 ntitative measurements, and sensitivity with lower limit of detection (LLOD) values of 7.2 pM (=90 pg

62 emonstrated excellent reproducibility at the lower limit of detection (LLOD).

63 inear from 50 to 1.2 x 10(4) cells/mL with a lower limit of detection (LLOQ) of 50 cells/mL.

64 her assay sensitivity and at least a 10-fold lower limit of detection (LOD) as compared to hydrated p

65 The lower limit of detection (LOD) for LPS was found to be 0

66 The lower limit of detection (LOD) measures the potential of

67 showed a response from 0.1 to 1000 ng/mL and lower limit of detection (LOD) of 0.03 ng/mL of CysC, wi

68 ns owing to better detection sensitivity and lower limit of detection (LOD) than colorimetric detecti

69 e PA immunoassay provided approximately 143x lower limit of detection (LOD) than observed with the go

70 e signal, similar or better reproducibility, lower limit of detection (LOD), and the possibility of w

71 the sample but at a concentration below the lower limit of detection (LOD), or is present in the sam

72 earity, lower limit of quantification (LOQ), lower limit of detection (LOD), precision, accuracy, rec

73 rsive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) was below the lower limit of detection (LOD).

74 ion of the membrane components resulted in a lower limit of detection (~1.6 microM) than previous rep

75 d BP biosensor showed both high sensitivity (lower limit of detection 10ng/ml) and selectivity toward

76 ad in semen was undetectable in both plasma (lower limit of detection [LLD] <12 copies per mL) and ce

77 el dengue immunoassay, we observed a 15-fold lower limit of detection and 4-fold higher fluorescence

78 Patients with total IgA levels below the lower limit of detection and IgG against tissue transglu

79 dence-filtering automatically determined the lower limit of detection based on the strength of the Pp

80 ument demonstrated an approximately 100-fold lower limit of detection compared to current automated m

81 1% (w/w), or 50 ng, OSCS in heparin and the lower limit of detection estimated at approximately 0.20

82 exchange extraction process, we improved the lower limit of detection for most of the apelin peptides

83 ed if they had 2 or more VLs measured with a lower limit of detection of <=50 copies/mL.

84 The AIF method achieved a lower limit of detection of 0.85 ng muL(-1) and a lower

85 linear response range of 0.005-50 nM, and a lower limit of detection of 1.9 pM (S/N = 3), with a hig

86 m 6 countries across 5 continents, showing a lower limit of detection of 10 genomic copies per reacti

87 an detect glucose from 10 muM to 9 mM with a lower limit of detection of 10 muM.

88 Defining a lower limit of detection of 1000 copies/ml when includin

89 The sensors were found to have a lower limit of detection of 368 nM hydrogen peroxide.

90 assay exhibited a linearity of 7 logs with a lower limit of detection of 6.0 x 10(2) copies of molecu

91 The median lower limit of detection of all peptides was 71.5 amol/m

92 The lower limit of detection of both assays for all targets

93 sing performance in terms of sensitivity and lower limit of detection of the MOSPR biosensor with res

94 The sequential format had a 4- to 10-fold lower limit of detection than the premix format, dependi

95 The lower limit of detection was 1 mug/L (130 pmol/L).

96 The lower limit of detection was 10(3) CFU/mL.

97 The lower limit of detection was 10(3) genome copies per sam

98 m 2(-1) to 2(4) HAU/50 mul was found and the lower limit of detection was 2(-1) HAU/50 mul.

99 The lower limit of detection was 30pM Substance P (SP, 2pg/5

100 The lower limit of detection was 40 genomes/PCR; the sensiti

101 The lower limit of detection was 64 parasites/ml.

102 Using serial dilutions, the lower limit of detection was determined to be 1 CFU/mul.

103 The lower limit of detection was further improved from 0.4 t

104 dition, freebase guanidination allowed for a lower limit of detection when combined with another deri

105 d BP biosensor showed both high sensitivity (lower limit of detection ~10ng/ml) and selectivity towar

106 ignificant increase in sensitivity (that is, lower limit of detection).

107 Plasma viremia (lower limit of detection, <2 copies/mL), T-cell activati

108 This way, a higher sensitivity and lower limit of detection, compared to those of conventio

109 Taking into account the lower limit of detection, the fluorescence sensing repor

110 With a 700 zmol (420 000 copies) lower limit of detection, this trace-sensitive technolog

111 The low-coverage sensor has a lower limit of detection, wider optimal AC frequency ran

112 o give faster detection and in practice also lower limit of detection.

113 eted (discovery) proteomics with ca. 25 amol lower limit of detection.

114 d by a factor of ~2, which is coupled with a lower limit of detection.

115 most analytical techniques is to reduce the lower limit of detection; however, it is sometimes neces

116 The lower limit of differentiation and detection were 0.1% (

117 cortical electric fields reach 0.8 V/m, the lower limit of effectiveness in animal studies.

118 ur purpose was to define a clinically useful lower limit of injected dose for (68)Ga-prostate-specifi

119 sal curve under shifting and rescaling and a lower limit of intrinsic noise for any mean expression l

120 nly E(0), Ru, and CDL being quantified and a lower limit of k(0) being reported; e.g., k(0) >/= 9 cm

121 h odds ratios for FEV1 and FVC less than the lower limit of normal (LLN) (defined as a z-score < -1.6

122 tipinhole SPECT/CT system and determined the lower limit of normal (LLN) SPECT-derived HMR and the co

123 1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) under the lower limit of normal (LLN), excluding individuals with

124 onchodilation FEV1/FVC ratio of at least the lower limit of normal and FVC of <80% predicted) using m

125 d thresholds (0.75 to 0.65) or less than the lower limit of normal as defined by Global Lung Initiati

126 consistent in models of COPD defined as per lower limit of normal criteria.

127 Reaction time and K values were below the lower limit of normal in 43.8% of the population consist

128 COPD was defined as FEV(1)/FVC less than the lower limit of normal in individuals under 50 years of a

129 rmed after adjustments using the mean and 5% lower limit of normal rates of aging, respectively.

130 ricans had substantially lower predicted and lower limit of normal values for FVC and FEV1 than those

131 s may provide more appropriate predicted and lower limit of normal values, enabling more accurate dia

132 creases in hemoglobin level to less than the lower limit of normal were more frequent in group 1 (42.

133 ) subjects had a CD4 count </=441 cells/muL (lower limit of normal) and 11 (55%) had a CD4 count less

134 ) subjects had a CD8 count </=125 cells/muL (lower limit of normal).

135 ity (FVC) of less than 70% and less than the lower limit of normal, and FEV1 of less than 80% of the

136 FEV(1)/forced vital capacity ratio below the lower limit of normal, asthma as wheeze or medication us

137 Patients also had calcium at the lower limit of normal, high alkaline phosphatase, and hi

138 r VWF ristocetin cofactor activity below the lower limit of normal, whereas 36% had normal VWF levels

139 erence equations for the predicted value and lower limit of normal.

140 ronchodilator spirometric (FEV1 /FVC) ratio <lower limit of normal.

141 We defined COPD as FEV1:FVC less than the lower limit of normal.

142 a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC less than the lower limit of normal.

143 ses were not accounted for, thereby posing a lower limit of particle sizes and limiting the accuracy

144 ven by this concept, this study examines the lower limit of perimetric sensitivity for reliable testi

145 Failure to defend the lower limit of plasma triglyceride levels was associated

146 correlation between the growth mode and the lower limit of precursor ions in the steady state of a s

147 te than surface diffusion by controlling the lower limit of precursor ions in the steady state.

148 All patients achieved HCV RNA below lower limit of quantification (<12 IU/mL) by end of trea

149 the aqueous VEGF concentrations to below the lower limit of quantification (<4 pg/mL) in all patients

150 dictive value (NPV) of HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantification (<LLOQ) at EOT for SVR12 w

151 ction and decision limit (0.008-0.070mg/kg), lower limit of quantification (0.02-0.2mg/kg), detection

152 ts with HCV RNA concentrations less than the lower limit of quantification (COBAS TaqMan HCV test, ve

153 py (SVR12), defined as HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantification (either target detected un

154 rm 2 with vRVR, defined as HCV RNA below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) from treatment week

155 Target DNA could be detected with the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1.0 nM with a re

156 half-life (t(1/2app)) and estimated time to lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of long-acting inje

157 herent optimal hybridization conditions, the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was obtained as 148

158 istent viremia on ART is generally below the lower limit of quantification (LOQ) of current FDA-clear

159 The lower limit of quantification (LOQ) of MC-LR by SERS on

160 The selectivity, linearity, lower limit of quantification (LOQ), lower limit of dete

161 rimary endpoint was HCV viral load below the lower limit of quantification 12 weeks after completion

162 the aqueous humor were suppressed below the lower limit of quantification after intravitreal afliber

163 achieve titres equal to or greater than the lower limit of quantification at months 6 (57% [n=93/163

164 end point was SVR12 (HCV RNA level below the lower limit of quantification at posttreatment week 12).

165 y-three percent had HCV RNA levels below the lower limit of quantification at week 4.

166 inical matrices, (ii) assay sensitivity with lower limit of quantification goal of single-digit ng/ml

167 n CSF that accounted for censoring below the lower limit of quantification had similar findings, alth

168 itative gelatin species determination with a lower limit of quantification of 0.05%.

169 quantification over a 5 log(10) range with a lower limit of quantification of 0.1 picomoles.

170 rity over a range of 0.65-821 mBq/mL, with a lower limit of quantification of 0.65 mBq/mL (correspond

171 The assay had a lower limit of quantification of 0.8 ng/mL and a linear

172 The LAM-ELISA had a lower limit of quantification of 15 pg/mL LAM, correspon

173 d EMA guidelines for assay validation with a lower limit of quantification of 2.5 ng/mL for the ERAs,

174 limit of detection of 0.85 ng muL(-1) and a lower limit of quantification of 2.54 ng muL(-1).

175 The final method has a lower limit of quantification of 20 ng/mL (ca. 350 pM) a

176 The lower limit of quantification of the HIV RNA assays was

177 IV RNA concentration in CSF greater than the lower limit of quantification over time included increas

178 ive hSBA titres equal to or greater than the lower limit of quantification to each test strain, compa

179 mean duration of VEGF suppression below the lower limit of quantification was >71 +/- 18 days.

180 The lower limit of quantification was 10 ng/mL.

181 he VEGF concentration recovered to above the lower limit of quantification was 55 days in 1 patient a

182 The lower limit of quantification was 94 and 90 amol for dG-

183 44, hSBA titres equal to or greater than the lower limit of quantification were shown in 37% (n=18/49

184 ), while C3-epi-25(OH)D3 (above versus below lower limit of quantification) was positively associated

185 RNA concentrations lower than 43 IU/mL (the lower limit of quantification).

186 mputed measures include; limit of detection, lower limit of quantification, linearity, carry-over, pa

187 stem was validated by testing the linearity (lower limit of quantification, LLOQ, 0.25-10 nM and uppe

188 t of variation (CV) was less than 15% at the lower limit of quantification.

189 41 patients had levels of HBV DNA below the lower limit of quantification.

190 ge RBT estimates often fell below the marker lower limit of quantification.

191 (11.6%) CSF specimens were greater than the lower limit of quantification.

192 Plasma JDTic levels were below the lower limit of quantitation (0.1 nM) in all subjects.

193 ad an AR-13503 concentration higher than the lower limit of quantitation (0.11 ng/mL).

194 ho had an hSBA titer at least as high as the lower limit of quantitation (1:8 or 1:16) for all 4 stra

195 Extraction recovery was >/=87.9% at both the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) and the upper limit o

196 A lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) at 0.2 ng/mL with 50

197 The LC-MS/MS assay showed lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) at 5 mug/mL for mAb-A

198 2 pM (=90 pg/mL) and 4.5 pM (=210 pg/mL) and lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) values of 24 pM (=300

199 tiple-reaction-monitoring (MRM) mode, with a lower limit of quantitation at 1.00 nM.

200 se at 12 weeks (SVR12; HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantitation at 12 weeks after the end of

201 asma AR-13324 concentrations higher than the lower limit of quantitation at any time point in any sub

202 d to the NBOMe concentration with an average lower limit of quantitation of 0.01 mg/mL for both of th

203 The assay is sensitive (lower limit of quantitation of 0.05 microM), selective,

204 nd accuracy (97-118%) for all analytes and a lower limit of quantitation of 1 pg injected onto the co

205 s/ml (HHV-6) to 191 copies/ml (BKV), and the lower limit of quantitation ranged from 442 internationa

206 ntage of patients with viral loads below the lower limit of quantitation rose from 29% in 1999 to 72%

207 12 eyes (58%) had ketorolac levels above the lower limit of quantitation.

208 We now aim to establish the lower limit of radioactivity that can be administered to

209 e with cerebral perfusion pressure less than lower limit of reactivity was associated with unfavorabl

210 essure below (%cerebral perfusion pressure < lower limit of reactivity), above (%cerebral perfusion p

211 e (odds ratio %cerebral perfusion pressure < lower limit of reactivity, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06; p <

212 The lower limit of reliable quantification of the assay was

213 Therefore, the lower limit of sensitivity for the substrate is limited

214 l, whereas others continue growing until the lower limit of soil-available water.

215 We determined the imaging sensitivity (lower limit of T cell detection) of each reporter using

216 The lower limit of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval was -

217 p (absolute risk difference 15.9%, one-sided lower limit of the 95% CI -2.1%; p(non-inferiority)=0.00

218 n (absolute risk difference 17.8%, one-sided lower limit of the 95% CI 0.4%; p(non-inferiority)=0.005

219 of solithromycin was to be concluded if the lower limit of the 95% CI for the between-group differen

220 Noninferiority was defined as the lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference in success

221 eved, superiority was to be concluded if the lower limit of the 95% CI was greater than 0%.

222 Noninferiority was defined by the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the d

223 Noninferiority required the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the d

224 Noninferiority was to be declared if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) on the d

225 ia (HGG) was defined as IgG levels below the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for age.

226 Noninferiority was considered met if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for between-g

227 Noninferiority would be shown if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the betwe

228 ference, -0.17 hours per 24 hours; one-sided lower limit of the 95% confidence interval, -0.45 hours;

229 values for both the effect estimate and the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval.

230 the end of therapy (SVR12) (based on a -11% lower limit of the 95% lower confidence interval for the

231 fficacy were considered significant when the lower limit of the 96.2% CI around the point estimate wa

232 s, data were considered significant when the lower limit of the 96.2% CI was greater than 0%.

233 Within each age stratum, the lower limit of the 98.3% confidence interval for the day

234 ntage points (95% CI, -9.6 to 6.5), thus the lower limit of the CI exceeds the noninferiority margin

235 Noninferiority of EGP-437 was defined if the lower limit of the confidence interval (CI) for the diff

236 gh this mechanism is ill constrained, as the lower limit of the electron energy distribution, or low-

237 This lower limit, parametrized by the lower limit of the electron momentum - pmin - is critica

238 repancies arise for metabolites far from the lower limit of the mass scan range, due to the weaker co

239 metry (FEV1:FVC >/=0.70 and an FVC above the lower limit of the normal range after bronchodilator use

240 Cone density was reduced to 70% of the lower limit of the normal range at the foveal center (78

241 r more, and had NCC concentrations above the lower limit of the normal reference range (>/=0.8 mumol/

242 hich is retained at a significantly extended lower limit of the operation window from conventional 0

243 number of available sites on the seed if the lower limit of the steady state is below a critical valu

244 rity of ceftaroline fosamil was defined as a lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the difference i

245 e non-inferior to that of active yaws if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the difference i

246 Non-inferiority was concluded if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the treatment di

247 CT-P13 was non-inferior to infliximab if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the treatment di

248 between the two groups and was shown if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI was greater than -12

249 eriod; noninferiority was established if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval was

250 eriod; noninferiority was established if the lower limit of the two-sided 97.5% confidence interval w

251 otyledons, whereas YABBY seemed to be at the lower limit of their sensitivity.

252 We hypothesized that targeting the lower limit of this range would improve outcomes in pati

253 able low moduli from 1 to 100 kPa, below the lower limit of traditional elastomers; moreover, the sol

254 investigated to obtain high sensitivity and lower limits of analyte detection (LoD).

255 the block co-oligomers, useful to study the lower limits of block copolymer phase segregation in det

256 anded dynamic ranges (0.09-136.56 ng L(-1)), lower limits of detection (0.007 +/- 0.001 ng L(-1)), an

257 and cyclic voltammetry transduction, showing lower limits of detection (0.24 ng mL(-1), S/N = 3) for

258 Lower limits of detection (2-20 ng/mL) were obtained usi

259 The lower limits of detection (at 1% quenching) vary with th

260 mpared with 4,4'-o-BBV, 2-fold reductions in lower limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ)

261 al-to-noise ratio was improved, resulting in lower limits of detection and improved identification at

262 The assay lower limits of detection for HRP2, pan LDH, P. vivax LD

263 Lower limits of detection may be further achieved if the

264 ted high sensitivity and applicability, with lower limits of detection of 12CFUmL(-1) in broth sample

265 s compared to the antibody based assay, with lower limits of detection of 3.54 x 10(7) and 1.34 x 10(

266 ve detection of different NS1 serotypes with lower limits of detection within the clinically relevant

267 -intensive and offers higher sensitivity and lower limits of detection would find great significance

268 The advantages of faster scan rates, lower limits of detection, and synchronous precursor sel

269 d 2.5 were calculated to establish upper and lower limits of normal.

270 Reference values (lower limits of normality) were as follows: 6-segment RV

271 The quantitative exploration of the lower limits of Pt cocatalyst loading reported here, and

272 dy spiked into monkey and human serum, where lower limits of quantification (LLOQ) of 0.78 and 1.56 n

273 with variable limits of detection (LOD) and lower limits of quantification (LLOQ).

274 The lower limits of quantification (LLOQs) for these analyte

275 re of the single-molecule regime to achieved lower limits of quantification (LOQ).

276 n of DHEA, E2, and T with 10, 10, and 5 fmol lower limits of quantification and linear ranges to 1 pm

277 The lower limits of quantification for E2, T, and DHT were 0

278 Lower limits of quantification were determined at or clo

279 us week, PrEP drugs were detected (above the lower limits of quantification) more frequently in women

280 The lower limits of quantitation were 3.8 and 2.7 mg/L for k

281 asensitive p24 assay (Simoa; Quanterix) with lower limits of quantitation.

282 inal segmentation schemes in which upper and lower limits of the heart were determined from CT and th

283 g variation from sample to sample, and has a lower-limit of 84 MW m(-2)K(-1), taking into considerati

284 orders of magnitude, from ~10(8) cm(-2) to a lower-limit of ~10(4) cm(-2) for 1.5 um thick Ge layer.

285 pound, Raman spectroscopy is shown to have a lower limit-of-detection and less day-to-day variability

286 ion rates, we determine a spatially variable lower limit on adaptive rRNA:protein allocation and henc

287 containing 0.8 bar of N(2), like today, the lower limit on the CO(2) mixing ratio is ~0.23.

288 A lower limit on the electromigration rate is calculated f

289 the stretch-bend cross peak, we determined a lower limit on the lifetime of this complex of 480 femto

290 Instead, the user must provide a lower limit on the probability of isotopologues of inter

291 We obtain a lower limit on the rate of this intramolecular electron

292 pore germination kinetics as well as setting lower limits on the size of the GR-GerD complex in the s

293 This lower limit, parametrized by the lower limit of the elec

294 total interaction energy was variable, with lower limits ranging from 11% to 50%.

295 change in either TER or the ratio of TER to lower-limit TER after the last cycle of treatment (P > 0

296 formation of the salt on the surface with a lower limit to the reaction probability of gamma > 10(-6

297 Lower limits were also evaluated and limits of detection

298 ests (with climatically determined upper and lower limits) whose distributional shifts are well chara

299 ased on gene deletions only and represents a lower limit, yet the variation is already in a similar r

300 iotic interactions most often occurred along lower limits, yet there were trophic differences.