戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 st that HLA typing is a useful screen before lumbar puncture.
2 had not received antibiotic treatment before lumbar puncture.
3                          ICP was measured by lumbar puncture.
4  neurological examination, venipuncture, and lumbar puncture.
5 ) underwent CT of the head before undergoing lumbar puncture.
6 ography (CT) of the head before performing a lumbar puncture.
7 s selecting relatively low-risk patients for lumbar puncture.
8 onoamine diet for a minimum of 3 days before lumbar puncture.
9  subsample of participants also consented to lumbar puncture.
10 d a neuropsychological (NP) assessment and a lumbar puncture.
11  by CT scan of the head possibly followed by lumbar puncture.
12 in patients with thrombocytopenia undergoing lumbar puncture.
13 hy subjects and NT1 patients was obtained by lumbar puncture.
14 ation and 100% required acetazolamide and/or lumbar puncture.
15 g additional clinical investigations such as lumbar puncture.
16 al alternation test (MAT), venipuncture, and lumbar puncture.
17 s a superior option for patients who require lumbar puncture.
18 n proposed to lower complication rates after lumbar puncture.
19 ts to undergo magnetic resonance imaging and lumbar puncture.
20 nts thought to be CNS negative by diagnostic lumbar puncture.
21 use of intravenous (IV) fluid bolus prior to lumbar puncture.
22 with the most common adverse event following lumbar puncture.
23                         CSF was tested after lumbar puncture.
24                  Coagulopathy at the time of lumbar puncture.
25 ural 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and lumbar puncture.
26 pathy may deter physicians from performing a lumbar puncture.
27  reduction, and aiding in the performance of lumbar punctures.
28  variant B, DNA in all of 3 patients who had lumbar punctures.
29 sease Research Center completed four or more lumbar punctures.
30                Of the 53 (35%) who underwent lumbar puncture, 22 (42%) had documented abnormal cerebr
31 (29%) at-risk patients received a diagnostic lumbar puncture; 24 (23 women, 17 Hispanic or Latino) we
32           Of the 77 patients who underwent a lumbar puncture, 27 were excluded secondary to a history
33 g 98 symptomatic patients with no documented lumbar puncture (65%), 12 (12%) were treated for and/or
34 roup was more likely to receive an indicated lumbar puncture (86% vs 32%, p<0.001), and more likely t
35                                  By means of lumbar puncture, a single dose of 0.5 mL of gadopentetat
36                                              Lumbar puncture after eight days showed an increased lev
37  bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) following lumbar puncture alleviates early- and late-phase neuropa
38 tine lumbar punctures with the timing of the lumbar puncture alternating between 2 and 6 hours to cap
39 on-making regarding select vs routine use of lumbar puncture among infants classified as being at low
40 rospinal fluid white-cell count on the first lumbar puncture among patients who presented with mening
41 M requires cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through lumbar puncture-an invasive sample collection method, an
42 amples were obtained 2 weeks apart, first by lumbar puncture and 2 weeks later from an external ventr
43 CNS disease; 25 subjects (35.2%) required >1 lumbar puncture and 8 (11.3%) required ventriculostomies
44 l mean age 36.5 years, SD = 8.7) underwent a lumbar puncture and a cognitive battery prior to ART ini
45 ell as in patients with negative findings at lumbar puncture and at clinical or MR imaging follow-up
46 erior chest wall mass was nondiagnostic, and lumbar puncture and bone marrow biopsies were negative.
47                                              Lumbar puncture and cerebral imaging, especially if seru
48  M(+) and 11 M(-) participants who underwent lumbar puncture and compared the findings to PiB-PET and
49 records of patients who had CSFP measured by lumbar puncture and data to calculate BMI at the Mayo Cl
50 registries to identify persons who underwent lumbar puncture and had cerebrospinal fluid analysis (Ja
51  cognitive impairment assessed with baseline lumbar puncture and longitudinal structural magnetic res
52                Patients with CIS underwent a lumbar puncture and magnetic resonance imaging scan with
53 Initiative study, who had undergone baseline lumbar puncture and magnetic resonance imaging.
54                           Results of a prior lumbar puncture and temporal artery biopsy from an outsi
55            Both groups underwent a follow-up lumbar puncture and were followed until complete recover
56 BR-tau measures are reproducible in repeated lumbar punctures and can be used to distinguish CBD from
57                                     Repeated lumbar punctures and corticosteroid therapy led to impro
58 l angiography use were associated with fewer lumbar punctures and higher detection of unruptured intr
59 decide how far diagnostic procedures such as lumbar punctures and immunotherapies should go in unclea
60 ation carriers and ten non-carriers) who had lumbar punctures and venepunctures, mutation carriers ha
61             Consenting participants also had lumbar punctures and venepunctures.
62  in the emergency department, performance of lumbar puncture, and administration of antibiotics.
63 am or continuous video electroencephalogram, lumbar puncture, and genetic testing may be considered i
64 ated with simultaneous ICP, assessed through lumbar puncture, and IOP measurements when supine, sitti
65 gnitive PCC) underwent clinical examination, lumbar puncture, and venipuncture >=3 months after COVID
66 rial infections are unlikely to benefit from lumbar puncture, antibiotics, or hospitalization, yet th
67 ved effective antimicrobial therapy prior to lumbar puncture are excluded, the CSF Gram stain is 92%
68 tic populations with low plasma CrAg titers, lumbar punctures are likely unnecessary as administratio
69              Routine blood tests and routine lumbar punctures are usually unnecessary, and the risks
70 r catheter, subdural screw, epidural sensor, lumbar puncture, are associated with an increased risk o
71 with suspected or confirmed LF who underwent lumbar puncture as part of their routine clinical manage
72 en appropriate, the time between imaging and lumbar puncture assessments.
73 20:30, and 22:00; 37 RLS and 36 controls had lumbar puncture at 21:30.
74                                 We performed lumbar puncture at 3-5 time points in human immunodefici
75 her was cognitively healthy at 79 years, and lumbar puncture at 76 years showed normal levels of amyl
76 spinal anesthesia and patients scheduled for lumbar puncture at a university medical center were elig
77 itted with CNS symptoms or signs requiring a lumbar puncture at Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Laos.
78                      The effect of traumatic lumbar puncture at the time of initial diagnostic workup
79       INTERPRETATION: Among patients who had lumbar puncture, atraumatic needles were associated with
80 t with hyperphenylalaninemia, require that a lumbar puncture be performed and that specific metabolit
81 ing to the hospital who had had ESI, 131 had lumbar puncture because of symptoms or signs consistent
82 rom 85 patients with gliomas who underwent a lumbar puncture because they showed neurological signs o
83 edle gauge, patient position, indication for lumbar puncture, bed rest after puncture, or clinician s
84 In CrAg-positive participants, postscreening lumbar puncture before initiating preemptive fluconazole
85 f medical records of 62,468 subjects who had lumbar puncture between 1985 and 2007 at the Mayo Clinic
86 edical records of all patients who underwent lumbar puncture between 1991 and 2007 in the neuro-ophth
87 and duration of follow-up (p=0.27) underwent lumbar puncture between March 23, 2008, and July 16, 201
88 tudy of consecutive patients who underwent 2 lumbar punctures between the beginning of 1995 and the e
89 rs in CSF (cerebrospinal fluid obtained from lumbar puncture) between ZIKV-exposed neonates with/with
90                 All participants underwent 3 lumbar punctures, blood draw, clinical assessment of str
91 ildren in coma or other contraindications to lumbar puncture, both of which lead to under-ascertainme
92 ration may be a risk factor for unsuccessful lumbar punctures, but to our knowledge, no studies have
93 se findings may inform decision-making about lumbar puncture by describing rates in this sample, the
94 ating leukemic blast cells during diagnostic lumbar puncture can adversely affect the treatment outco
95 al suspicion of severe second-stage disease, lumbar puncture can be avoided and fexinidazole can be g
96                       In 35 of the patients, lumbar puncture, clinical assessment, and magnetic reson
97 ncreased (18.8%; 95% CI, 17.7% to 20.3%) and lumbar punctures decreased (-11.1%; 95% CI, -12.0% to -1
98                                  A simulated lumbar puncture demonstrated needle tip visualization th
99               CT cerebral angiography and/or lumbar puncture during the ED encounter.
100 primary outcome was receipt of at least 1 of lumbar puncture, empirical antibiotics, or hospitalizati
101 corticosteroid therapy, opening pressures on lumbar puncture fell an average of 14 cm.
102                               They underwent lumbar puncture for collection of CSF samples, from whic
103        A subset of patients also underwent a lumbar puncture for CSF biomarker analysis.
104 ent, including blood pressure assessment and lumbar puncture for determination of cerebral spinal flu
105 laboratory records from patients receiving a lumbar puncture for evaluation of meningitis.
106 ey are similar in age to patients undergoing lumbar puncture for evaluation of neonatal fever and are
107 t international guidelines recommend routine lumbar punctures for all febrile infants 28 days or youn
108  of diurnal cortisol patterns, and underwent lumbar punctures for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling.
109                                              Lumbar punctures for collection of CSF were performed in
110  acceptable and feasible for patients than a lumbar puncture (for cerebrospinal fluid collection) or
111 binding substances (TABS) in CSF obtained by lumbar puncture from 55 children.
112 altered CSF composition, we obtained CSF via lumbar puncture from patients with myotonic dystrophy ty
113 vational study, CSF samples were obtained by lumbar puncture from patients with video polysomnography
114 condary analyses included risks of traumatic lumbar puncture (&gt;300 x 106 erythrocytes/L after excludi
115           Three of 14 patients who underwent lumbar puncture had malignant cells on CSF cytopathology
116 ents with neurologic toxicity at the time of lumbar puncture had many of the highest concentrations o
117 s cannulation, urethral catheterization, and lumbar puncture has become more accepted.
118                                     However, lumbar punctures have limited availability and may be pe
119 (four [33%]), nausea (three [25%]), and post-lumbar puncture headache (three [25%]).
120 f CSF) may be associated with transient post-lumbar puncture headache, without increasing rates of pe
121  hypotension should not be equated with post-lumbar puncture headaches.
122  if antigen-positive, 4) CRAG screening with lumbar puncture if antigen-positive and either amphoteri
123     Brain imaging should be performed before lumbar puncture if patients present with altered mental
124 lography, blood sampling at days 1, 3, 5 and lumbar puncture, if clinically indicated, for cerebrospi
125 ospinal fluid (CSF) obtained through routine lumbar puncture in 53 patients with suspected or known C
126          Although CRAG screening followed by lumbar puncture in all antigen-positive individuals was
127 , reducing the impact of the side effects of lumbar puncture in clinical practice.
128 raphy has been promoted as an alternative to lumbar puncture in this diagnostic pathway.
129                                 We performed lumbar punctures in 3 patients with this presentation an
130 ing the AMBITION-cm regimen with therapeutic lumbar punctures in routine care during 2022-2023.
131 univariate and multivariable analyses of 338 lumbar punctures in the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer N
132 tic needles and conventional needles for any lumbar puncture indication.
133                          Neonatal and infant lumbar puncture is a commonly performed procedure in eme
134   Treatment studies show that the diagnostic lumbar puncture is a valuable intervention beyond its di
135 hould prompt induction antifungal therapy if lumbar puncture is not feasible.
136 y noncontrast head computed tomography (CT); lumbar puncture is recommended if computed tomography is
137 tiatives for febrile young infants recommend lumbar puncture (LP) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testi
138          CrAg-positive patients were offered lumbar puncture (LP) and treated with antifungals.
139 nfected adult patients undergoing diagnostic lumbar puncture (LP) at a single center between 2011 and
140                                              Lumbar puncture (LP) has become increasingly common for
141 erized tomography (CT) is recommended before lumbar puncture (LP) if mental impairment.
142 uted tomography (CT) scan of the head before lumbar puncture (LP) in adults with community-acquired m
143                                              Lumbar puncture (LP) is an attractive route to deliver d
144           Incidence and microbiology of LOM; lumbar puncture (LP) performance in late-onset sepsis (L
145                          Traumatic or bloody lumbar puncture (LP) reduces the diagnostic value of the
146 tudy of Aging patients who underwent routine lumbar puncture (LP) studies with eye examinations were
147                             Venipuncture and lumbar puncture (LP) were performed.
148  of microglial markers at time of diagnostic lumbar puncture (LP) with different aspects of disease a
149     Whether such patients can safely undergo lumbar puncture (LP) without prophylactic platelet trans
150 ents who were undergoing medically indicated lumbar puncture (LP).
151  diagnosis of encephalitis did not undergo a lumbar puncture (LP).
152 negative cerebrospinal fluid CrAg tests from lumbar punctures (LPs) at the time of CrAg screening.
153          Performing cranial imaging prior to lumbar punctures (LPs) in patients with suspected centra
154 as negative in 11 cases (4%), exclusively in lumbar punctures (LPs) performed less than 4 days after
155 mortality, and guidelines recommend frequent lumbar punctures (LPs) to control ICP.
156 ilical artery catheters (UACs), intubations, lumbar punctures (LPs), and peripheral phlebotomy perfor
157 restricted NPCs using the minimally invasive lumbar puncture method for the treatment of spinal cord
158 e include high temperature and lethargy, and lumbar puncture might reveal pleocytosis.
159  (aged 48-77) from the ALFA cohort with SLE, lumbar puncture (n = 393), and/or structural magnetic re
160  departments, yet traumatic and unsuccessful lumbar punctures occur 30% to 50% of the time.
161                                    Traumatic lumbar punctures occurred more frequently among patients
162 esis of oligoclonal antibody (examination by lumbar puncture of the cerebrospinal fluid).
163  Lewy bodies a mean 3.4 years (SD 2.6) after lumbar puncture, of whom 31 (97%) were a-synuclein posit
164 rebrospinal fluid samples were obtained from lumbar puncture on 21 infants and children without traum
165                                   Success of lumbar puncture on first attempt, failure rate, mean num
166                                              Lumbar puncture opening pressure (LPOP) exceeding 250mmH
167 gns were present and was associated with the lumbar puncture opening pressure and ophthalmological ou
168     Internal validation of associations with lumbar puncture opening pressure and outcome and externa
169 variable clinical syndromes and often normal lumbar puncture opening pressure associated with this di
170  change in intracranial pressure measured by lumbar puncture opening pressure at 12 months, as assess
171                  Secondary outcomes included lumbar puncture opening pressure at 24 months as well as
172                         One-week postflight, lumbar puncture opening pressure was normal, at 19.4 cm
173 che, normal neuroimaging findings, or normal lumbar puncture opening pressure.
174                                              Lumbar puncture opening pressures were low, normal (60-2
175                            Incidence of IIH, lumbar puncture opening pressures, and body mass index.
176 cture during neuraxial procedures, such as a lumbar puncture or spinal anesthesia.
177 ult patients undergoing clinically indicated lumbar punctures or other CSF-related procedures.
178 rocedures (bone marrow aspiration or biopsy, lumbar puncture, or combined procedures) was performed a
179 We directly evaluated associations of 3 post-lumbar puncture outcomes (immediate postprocedural heada
180  probability that any NICU infant received a lumbar puncture (p = .0001) or peripheral phlebotomy (p
181 ded a diagnostic and management algorithm, a lumbar puncture pack, a testing panel, and staff trainin
182                                        After lumbar puncture, participants were assessed clinically f
183 ly 25 children (18.5%) with meningitis had a lumbar puncture performed before death.
184                     Newborns with cCMV and a lumbar puncture performed were included and classified a
185  In children with cerebral malaria who had a lumbar puncture performed, angiopoietin-2 was associated
186                      We analyzed CSF from 17 lumbar punctures performed in 14 liver recipients receiv
187                  The findings of the first 2 lumbar punctures performed on 546 patients with newly di
188                              The low rate of lumbar punctures performed was especially worrying, sugg
189 rs Cohort Study (A5321) underwent concurrent lumbar puncture, phlebotomy, and neurocognitive assessme
190                       In patients undergoing lumbar puncture, platelet transfusion is recommended whe
191  intrathecal injection and an identical sham lumbar puncture procedure, separated by 1 week, in a dou
192                                              Lumbar puncture-related adverse events were observed in
193 ecal delivery of NPCs at lumbar spinal cord (lumbar puncture) represents an important and clinically
194    Intrathecal bpV(phen) infusions through a lumbar puncture rescued dorsal column sensory axons inne
195                    The neurological exam and lumbar puncture results were within normal at that time.
196                                              Lumbar puncture revealed high cerebral spinal fluid (CSF
197                                              Lumbar puncture revealed normal intracranial pressure, a
198 nditions or procedures (Dystonia RR = 121.9, Lumbar Puncture RR = 119.0).
199                                            A lumbar puncture sample did not contain lymphoma cells.
200 derwent amyloid-beta PET with (18)F-AZD4694, lumbar puncture, structural MRI, and genotyping for APOE
201  underwent amyloid-B PET with (18)F-AZD4694, lumbar puncture, structural MRI, and genotyping for APOE
202  permit being enrolled in the blood draw and lumbar puncture studies, respectively, were 92% and 75%.
203  studies of varying risk-benefit profiles (a lumbar puncture study, a drug randomized controlled tria
204 , and nearly half (48%) to a blood draw plus lumbar puncture study.
205 d draw study and 70% for the blood draw plus lumbar puncture study.
206             The most common events were post-lumbar puncture syndrome (3/8 [38%] vs 8/24 [33%]), back
207 e falls, procedural pain, headache, and post lumbar puncture syndrome.
208 Lewy bodies at 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 years after lumbar puncture than participants who were a-synuclein p
209      In a subset of subjects who underwent a lumbar puncture, there was a trend for the perimetry-abn
210 herally inserted central catheter placement; lumbar puncture; thoracentesis; paracentesis; and intuba
211                   The percentage receiving a lumbar puncture, time to appropriate therapy, and functi
212                                              Lumbar puncture to analyze cerebrospinal fluid will rema
213 eviously known as T807) who also underwent a lumbar puncture to assess cerebrospinal fluid levels of
214                  Each participant received a lumbar puncture to collect and quantify CSF levels of TN
215 uded either a blood draw or a blood draw and lumbar puncture to explore older persons' attitudes on t
216 opsychological assessment in parallel with a lumbar puncture to obtain CSF was performed 1.5-7 years
217 urvival rates were assessed from the date of lumbar puncture to the date of diagnosis of any neurodeg
218  Disease Control and Prevention criteria for lumbar puncture underwent standardized history, neurolog
219 gns of IH likely does not require systematic lumbar puncture unless concerning symptoms or papilledem
220                          Mean follow-up from lumbar puncture until the end of the study was 7.1 years
221 ered to the injured cervical spinal cord via lumbar puncture using a mixed population of neuronal-res
222 narios, to grant leeway in 3 of 4 scenarios (lumbar puncture, vaccine, and gene transfer), and to enr
223 ort study, risk of spinal hematoma following lumbar puncture was 0.20% among patients without coagulo
224                     The median (IQR) time to lumbar puncture was 2.0 (1-4.8) hours, and the median ce
225 ples were taken every 30 to 60 minutes and a lumbar puncture was performed 6 hours after the infusion
226                                              Lumbar puncture was performed and cerebrospinal fluid (C
227                                            A lumbar puncture was performed at the bedside.
228                                              Lumbar puncture was performed in 128 laboratory-confirme
229                                              Lumbar puncture was performed in 167 patients to screen
230                                            A lumbar puncture was performed in all participants to mea
231                                              Lumbar puncture was performed on 5958 suspected meningit
232                                            A lumbar puncture was performed, which revealed cloudy cer
233                                              Lumbar puncture was preceded by brain imaging in 61 of 2
234               The mean (SE) interval between lumbar punctures was 2.0 (0.1) years, and the mean (SE)
235 cy by actigraphy in the six nights preceding lumbar punctures, was associated with higher tau (r = 0.
236 ing (MRI), electroencephalography (EEG), and lumbar puncture were done under sedation.
237                Elevated opening pressures on lumbar puncture were followed in seven nonimmunocompromi
238 ) since admission, while cranial imaging and lumbar puncture were performed after 6.3 hours (2.5-31.0
239                          Polysomnography and lumbar puncture were performed in OSA and control groups
240                             Venipuncture and lumbar puncture were performed.
241                 A total of 83 711 individual lumbar punctures were identified among 64 730 persons (5
242                                              Lumbar punctures were performed and assayed for cerebros
243                                              Lumbar punctures were performed at the time of diagnosis
244  were monitored with daily self-ratings, and lumbar punctures were performed during both hypogonadal
245                                              Lumbar punctures were performed in 49 subjects with Alzh
246                                              Lumbar punctures were performed in drug-free subjects wi
247                                              Lumbar punctures were performed in GWI, CFS and control
248                                              Lumbar punctures were performed in the morning after an
249 atory tests, magnetic resonance imaging, and lumbar puncture, were nondiagnostic.
250 sion for patients having elective diagnostic lumbar puncture with a platelet count less than 50 x 109
251 a-analysis to compare patient outcomes after lumbar puncture with atraumatic needles and conventional
252   CNS leukemia (CNS-3 status) or a traumatic lumbar puncture with blast cells at diagnosis and a high
253 and were taking ART and underwent venous and lumbar puncture with measurement of HIV RNA concentratio
254 )-infected Ugandan adults with CM had serial lumbar punctures with measurement of CSF opening pressur
255               CSF was collected from routine lumbar punctures with the timing of the lumbar puncture
256 angiography use increased 6-fold relative to lumbar puncture, with a 33% increase in the detection of
257  on CT, and all three subsequently underwent lumbar puncture, with no evidence of brain herniation on
258                           Patients underwent lumbar puncture within 7 days of clinical assessment.

 
Page Top