コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 potentially more sensitive than conventional lymph node biopsy).
2 is established by serological methods and/or lymph node biopsy.
3 osis is established by serologic methods and lymph node biopsy.
4 efficacy of axillary dissection and sentinel lymph node biopsy.
5 LND in the primary setting or after sentinel lymph node biopsy.
6 LND in the primary setting or after sentinel lymph node biopsy.
7 d decreased false-negative rates in sentinel lymph node biopsy.
8 ve and avoid unnecessary and costly axillary lymph node biopsy.
9 a partial mastectomy with axillary sentinal lymph node biopsy.
10 He underwent an excisional lymph node biopsy.
11 mpectomy with seed localization and sentinel lymph node biopsy.
12 biopsy, and partial mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy.
13 tinal lymphoma was followed by DLBCL after a lymph node biopsy.
14 vant radiotherapy and the timing of sentinel lymph node biopsy.
15 ery, the patient had undergone a mediastinal lymph node biopsy.
16 houlder than patients who underwent sentinel-lymph-node biopsy.
17 Ci dose of I methylene blue dye for sentinel lymph node biopsies.
18 tein expression in CD4 T cells obtained from lymph node biopsies.
19 s were identified on laparoscopic mesenteric lymph nodes biopsies.
20 75 (74%) had no axillary biopsy or sentinel lymph node biopsy; 26 (26%) had undergone ALND; and 38 (
21 ft-tissue abscess procedures 48% (34/71) and lymph node biopsies 67% (10/15) (P < 0.01) were most oft
22 We found that in fresh Hodgkin's disease lymph node biopsies, a subset of HRS cells express a sub
23 er EBV-infected B-cell line, isolated from a lymph node biopsy after kidney transplantation, is pheno
24 axillary staging was noninferior to sentinel-lymph-node biopsy after a median follow-up of 6 years.
25 nt chemotherapy could safely permit sentinel lymph node biopsy alone when the index node has been suc
27 alignant lymphocytes and lymphoma cells from lymph node biopsies and were expressed at significant le
28 eons in a standardized technique of sentinel lymph node biopsy and to educate those same surgeons in
29 examination and, where appropriate, sentinel lymph node biopsy) and can include surgery, checkpoint i
30 nts underwent lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy, and 10 had a positive axillary lymph
32 t intraoperative lymphatic mapping, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and inguinal femoral lymphadenectomy.
34 repair, partial mastectomy without sentinel lymph node biopsy, and partial mastectomy with sentinel
36 (T4b) cutaneous melanoma; negative sentinel lymph node biopsy; and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology G
37 plications for the potential use of sentinel lymph node biopsy as an alternative to axillary dissecti
39 Available evidence for the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy as it applies to conjunctival melanoma
40 tudied highly purified CD4 and CD8 TILs from lymph node biopsies at diagnosis in treatment-naive pati
41 to select appropriate patients for sentinel lymph node biopsy based on multiple prognostic factors,
43 when selecting patients to undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy but did not reach consensus on imaging
44 the indications and techniques for sentinel-lymph-node biopsy, but also lymph-node sampling, axillar
48 inical trials will evaluate whether sentinel-lymph-node biopsy can be avoided altogether in selected
50 and activation status of Tfh and B cells in lymph node biopsies collected in the different stages of
52 lysis and histological examination of serial lymph node biopsies confirmed depletion of the CD3+ T ce
54 h an increased number of Ki-67(+) T cells in lymph node biopsies, consistent with an early antiviral
55 bidity and diagnostic delays associated with lymph node biopsy could be avoided if noninvasive imagin
57 propriate selection of patients for sentinel lymph node biopsy, especially among patients with thin m
59 nts who underwent thyroidectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy for papillary thyroid cancer were accr
61 or staging has now been replaced by sentinel-lymph-node biopsy for patients with clinically negative
63 ocked assay was applied to pretreatment FFPE lymph node biopsies from an independent cohort of 110 pa
65 a variety of sources used as controls, nor 3 lymph node biopsies from patients with B-cell lymphomas,
67 clinical lymphedema: 8 (8%) in the sentinel lymph node biopsy group and 7 (37%) in the axillary lymp
68 approach to patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsies has increased the complexity of axil
72 udies in the past 2 years regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy have been concerned with identifying f
74 uggested that these new methods for sentinel lymph node biopsy have clinical potential but give high
75 Although details of methods for sentinel lymph node biopsy have yet to be standardised, this tech
76 decision about whether to perform a sentinel lymph node biopsy in 16% of patients (67 of 420 patients
78 r of surgeons capable of performing sentinel lymph node biopsy in a standardized fashion with a high
79 lateral prophylactic mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy in older women increased during the st
80 ASCO 2017 guideline for the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early-stage breast ca
81 e efficacy of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in predicting prognosis, reducing the
83 f axillary surgery as compared with sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with clinically node-negat
84 It is now well established that sentinel lymph node biopsy is a powerful test to predict prognosi
95 d resistance mutations in blood and inguinal lymph node biopsies obtained from 10 HIV-infected subjec
96 istence and HIV-specific T cell responses in lymph node biopsies obtained from 14 individuals who ini
98 s, it seems reasonable to recommend sentinel lymph node biopsy or at least strict regional lymph node
99 e, it may be reasonable to consider sentinel lymph node biopsy or close nodal surveillance and follow
100 erefore be reasonable to consider a sentinel lymph node biopsy or strict regional lymph node surveill
101 es, such as intraoperative imaging, sentinel lymph-node biopsy or the use of artificial intelligence,
102 with histologic findings from bone marrow or lymph node biopsy performed within 6 wk of PET/CT and wi
103 ssigned women with breast cancer to sentinel-lymph-node biopsy plus axillary dissection or sentinel-l
104 ctomy (PM), partial mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy (PM SLNB), laparoscopic cholecystectom
105 mally invasive surgical staging and sentinel-lymph-node biopsy provides a low morbidity alternative t
106 ymph-node dissection, the role of 'sentinel' lymph-node biopsy, radiobiology and radiotherapy fractio
108 characteristics, trends in usage of sentinel lymph node biopsy, rates of local and distant recurrence
109 Exercise and physical activity and sentinel lymph node biopsy reduce risk, and overweight and obesit
112 of melanoma (16%) after a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy result was similar to that in previous
115 served, CAR T cells were readily detected in lymph node biopsy samples from sites of original disease
119 There was a higher proportion of sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNB) performed by high-volume surg
121 ode assessment (ALNA) consisting of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone if sentinel lymph nodes (
122 rding to axillary surgery approach: sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone, SLNB+RLNR, axillary lymp
123 concerting lymphedema rates in both sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary lymph node dissect
124 TAD involves TLN biopsy (TLNB) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and was recently introduced as
125 stectomy with axillary staging with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and/or ALND and had 1 to 2 posi
126 ents with melanoma are selected for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) based on their risk of a positi
128 edure, was performed and after NAC, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) combined with excision of the m
133 the sensitivity and specificity of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) frozen section (FS) examination
136 ical setting for the application of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the management of cutaneous
137 recommended against routine use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in this population; however, re
143 inically localized T1 melanoma, yet sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is controversial in this popula
148 men 18 years or older who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissecti
149 800 sec/mm(2)), followed by either sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissecti
150 nal lymph node evaluation by either sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or complete lymph node dissecti
151 th cT1-4N1-3M0 disease treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or targeted axillary dissection
153 ith lower- and higher-than-expected sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) positivity rates and whether ho
156 nce rates of patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using radiocolloid guidance alo
158 axillary evaluation, categorized as sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), axillary lymph node dissection
159 pediatric melanoma database, using sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), from 1992 to 2006, identified
160 l less invasive procedures, such as sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), marking axillary lymph node wi
161 , including wide local excision and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), should follow National Compreh
162 biopsy results underwent subsequent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), which yielded negative finding
163 bservation and among subgroups with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)-negative and SLNB-positive find
167 ences from a Bouin's-fixed paraffin-embedded lymph node biopsy specimen obtained in 1960 from an adul
170 after the second protein boost, we obtained lymph node biopsy specimens and quantified the frequency
171 al RNA or DNA could be detected in colon and lymph node biopsy specimens collected 13 months after ch
172 We analyzed GC size and shape in excisional lymph node biopsy specimens from 14 patients with CVID+A
173 oarrays to profile gene expression in serial lymph node biopsy specimens obtained before and after tr
174 xpression of SIV Gag was readily detected in lymph node biopsy specimens taken at 3 weeks postimmuniz
178 microarrays of paraffin-embedded, diagnostic lymph node biopsies taken from 59 FL patients who lived
179 unique cross-sectional analysis of inguinal lymph node biopsies taken prior to antiretroviral therap
181 view to assess three techniques for sentinel lymph node biopsy that are not radioisotope dependent or
185 mmunohistochemical analyses of tissue from a lymph node biopsy; the tissue morphology and antigen exp
187 ively, in concert with pre- and on-treatment lymph node biopsies to assess retinoblastoma protein (Rb
190 spective, multicenter cohort study (Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy vs Lymphadenectomy for Intermediate- a
203 women with invasive carcinoma and a positive lymph node biopsy when compared to those with in-situ ca
204 ty-six participants (83%) underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, whereas 14 (12%) underwent axillary l
207 and radiologically normal axilla is sentinel lymph node biopsy with a radioisotope and blue dye (dual
208 ture DC were significantly reduced in day +5 lymph node biopsies, with complete repopulation by 30 da
209 noma in an era of increasing use of sentinel lymph node biopsy without CLND and should be considered