ライフサイエンスコーパス: mandible

1 th) to 60% (OSCC in the alveolar part of the mandible).

2 for the maxilla and 94.9% (SD 15.6%) for the mandible.

3 c tumour with a strong preponderance for the mandible.

4 expressing epithelial cells in the embryonic mandible.

5 (51% vs. 8%, P = 4 x 10(-62)) but not in the mandible.

6 F mutations are predominant in tumors of the mandible.

7 giant keratocystic odontogenic tumor of the mandible.

8 nge, 0.7-3.3 cm), occurring primarily in the mandible.

9 and craniofacial abnormalities such as small mandible.

10 c forces clinically modify the growth of the mandible.

11 109 patients with 280 implants placed in the mandible.

12 rus based on a single, relatively incomplete mandible.

13 we identify at least four distinct types of mandible.

14 and BIC among the groups in the maxilla and mandible.

15 ental implant placed in posterior maxilla or mandible.

16 Four implants were placed in each edentulous mandible.

17 less peri-implant bone loss in the posterior mandible.

18 ding craniofacial dysmorphology with a small mandible.

19 major forces affecting the form of the human mandible.

20 and periodontal and implant surgeries in the mandible.

21 ng potential of osseous defects in the human mandible.

22 rly cap stages, and severe hypoplasia of the mandible.

23 l plate perforation for IIP in the posterior mandible.

24 gual nerve and perform safe surgeries in the mandible.

25 nd distal surfaces or the maxilla versus the mandible.

26 e implants were submerged on one side of the mandible.

27 technique was planned for both areas in the mandible.

28 the proximal aboral region of the developing mandible.

29 length) placed in the premolar region of the mandible.

30 chondrogenesis in the proximal region of the mandible.

31 een the alveolar process and the body of the mandible.

32 AF V600E mutations in both UAM and AM of the mandible.

33 on in conventional ameloblastoma (AM) of the mandible.

34 domain results in partial duplication of the mandible.

35 bmarginally around first molars at the right mandible.

36 ium also partially restored outgrowth of the mandible.

37 growth located on the lingual surface of the mandible.

38 rs ago for a tooth from the Irhoud 3 hominin mandible.

39 ciated Le Fort fracture or a fracture of the mandible.

40 t appears in the archived CBCT images of the mandible.

41 into bone and connective tissue to form the mandible.

42 ured aggregates or in developing whole mouse mandibles.

43 etaphyseal dysplasia, including hyperostotic mandibles.

44 ative taxonomic analyses of isolated hominin mandibles.

45 equired for normal metamorphic growth of the mandibles.

46 implant after 2 months of healing in minipig mandibles.

47 0.0001) were evident in Ddr1(-/-) versus WT mandibles.

48 xes itself permanently to a substrate by its mandibles.

49 ch of the fossil record for dogs consists of mandibles.

50 classifies 99.5% of the modern dog and wolf mandibles.

51 rphology and "Boltcutters", with short, wide mandibles.

52 ed symphyseal outlines from 180 recent human mandibles (90 male, 90 female) representing nine geograp

53 In the mandible, 94% of UAMs (29/31, including 8/8 luminal, 6/8

54 ng for an immediate implant in the posterior mandible, a CT scan taken before tooth extraction can be

55 on masticatory function elsewhere along the mandible, a phenomenon likely to characterize the evolut

56 However, only 4 of 26 Ust'-Polui fossil mandibles, a Russian Arctic site occupied from 250BCE to

57 malities, including undergrowth of the lower mandible, accompanied in some individuals by cranial asy

58 dentified as dogs and none of the 20 Ivolgin mandibles, an Iron Age site in southern Russia, were ide

59 elf elevation that may result from the small mandible and a failure of lowering the tongue.

60 pmental defects, including hypoplasia of the mandible and asymmetric fusion of ribs to the sternum.

61 rate capabilities of the ITOP by fabricating mandible and calvarial bone, cartilage and skeletal musc

62 pecific enhancer also leads to a hypoplastic mandible and cleft palate formation in mice.

63 bsence of all but the most distal tip of the mandible and complete absence of the inner, middle and e

64 the face and cranium affected, including the mandible and frontal and nasal bones.

65 hell ants captured other arthropods between mandible and horn in a manner that could only be achieve

66 er facial skeletons from measurements of the mandible and linear mental spine to clivus.

67 Both mandible and long-bone BMSCs differentiated into osteobl

68 We established a protocol for rat mandible and long-bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC) isolat

69 ucent areas and marked bony expansion in the mandible and maxilla, with sparing of the mandibular con

70 ignificantly different (P >0.05) between C3H mandible and maxilla.

71 bnormal fusion between the palatal shelf and mandible and preventing palatal shelf elevation.

72 measurements in the posterior region of the mandible and provide adequate visualization of the mandi

73 which increased the height and width of the mandible and reduced the diameters of foramina.

74 ts with an extraoral incision lateral to the mandible and reflection of the masseter muscle.

75 e placed in the anterior maxilla or anterior mandible and restored with fixed restorations.

76 fluenced the evolutionary acquisition of the mandible and secondary palate.

77 occupation at Mezzena, we analysed the human mandible and several cranial fragments from the site usi

78 he masticatory-functional hypothesis for the mandible and suggesting population continuity among farm

79 , a fibrocartilaginous structure between the mandible and temporal bone, is implicated in temporomand

80 alveolar process compared to the body of the mandible and that the bone anabolic activity is greater

81 haracterized by bilateral enlargement of the mandible and the maxilla that presents with varying degr

82 d from physical obstruction by the malformed mandible and tongue.

83 reduced expression of Endothelin1 (EDN1) in mandible and transcription factors that are critical for

84 or maintaining the dorsal innervation of the mandible and underlines the dorsal canaliculi sensorial

85 Three of the Ust'-Polui mandibles and 8 of the Ivolgin mandibles were identified

86 hereas Has2(f/f);Osr2-Cre fetuses had normal mandibles and delayed palatal shelf elevation.

87 (for example, antlers, horns, tail feathers, mandibles and dewlaps), show that the giant sperm of som

88 for the function of dorsoventrally expanded mandibles and elaborate horns.

89 Mandibles and gingival tissues were collected 3 or 15 da

90 arts of early oxyporines, including enlarged mandibles and greatly enlarged apical labial palpomeres

91 tentorial bars and superlinguae between the mandibles and hypopharynx, reinforcing an alliance betwe

92 smotic mini-pumps were implanted in animals, mandibles and tibiae were isolated, and multinucleated c

93 l bone/bone-marrow-derived MSCs (OMSCs) from mandibles and verified their MSC characteristics by sing

94 f-reported pain measures, the arch location (mandible), and number of treated sites (>=3 teeth) (P <

95 iscovered HSC-like cells in postnatal murine mandible, and benchmarked them with donor-matched, mesod

96 splay a round skull, hypoplastic maxilla and mandible, and cleft palate resulting from a failure of p

97 present a virtual reconstruction of the OH 7 mandible, and compare it to other early Homo fossils.

98 erus, sternebra, vertebrae, ribs, calvarium, mandible, and incisor.

99 lly in the ventral part of the skull and the mandible, and rostrally positioned hyoid.

100 eatures are two characters: the dentary-only mandible, and the tribosphenic molar with its triangulat

101 diameter) and placed on the cortex near the mandible angle with a titanium screw.

102 The minute larval mandibles appear to act in a manner that is analogous to

103 impact, while those in the juvenile hominin mandible are consistent with a blow to the face.

104 ic structures are absent, but the tongue and mandible are relatively developed in the conditional mut

105 gn neoplasm which develops in the maxilla or mandible, arising from the dental lamina or basal cells

106 tion of dentary bone in the oral side of the mandible at the expense of tongue formation.

107 However, can fossil canid mandibles be reliably identified as dogs or wolves?

108 "Gammas", "Alphas" which express large, long mandibles, "Betas" which have long mandibles with differ

109 Mandible BMSC cultures formed more colonies, suggesting

110 However, mandible BMSCs demonstrated augmented alkaline phosphata

111 portantly, upon implantation into nude mice, mandible BMSCs formed 70% larger bone nodules containing

112 teogenic potential and augmented capacity of mandible BMSCs to induce bone formation in vitro and in

113 f the study, BV/TV%, proximal femur and hemi-mandible bone mineral content and bone mineral density,

114 entified specific defects in incisor, molar, mandible, bone, and root development and late stage enam

115 he whale by the current created by the lower mandible breaking the surface of the water.

116 indicates that the mutation does not affect mandible, but causes premature fusion of the premaxilla-

117 en shown to stimulate new bone growth on rat mandibles, but much of the bone is lost over time.

118 ults in defects in formation of the proximal mandible by shifting expression of Fgf8, Bmp4 and their

119 anical, and biomolecular assays and repaired mandibles by radiographic and histological assays.

120 He received a facial allograft, including mandible, cheeks, lips, and chin, in November 2009.

121 was significantly greater (P = 0.05) in the mandible compared to the maxilla.

122 The mandibles comprise a long, fused, and nearly edentulous

123 Immunohistochemistry of rat mandibles confirmed localization of GPR68 in the enamel

124 ivo effect, we employed a Sprague-Dawley rat mandible defect model utilizing 1 microg (optimal) or 0.

125 Hyp mandibles demonstrated expanded alveolar bone with accum

126 Finally, adult mandible development is considered in light of the gnath

127 ts the interconnection of palate, tongue and mandible development.

128 tor-beta (TGF-beta) signaling is crucial for mandible development.

129 ating the fate of CNC cells during tooth and mandible development.

130 senchymal cell survival and outgrowth of the mandible during development.

131 revealed that the adhesion of the tongue and mandible expressed the epithelial markers E-Cad and P63.

132 1 FFE sequence that can directly assess both mandible fractures and IAN damage.

133 Fifteen patients suffering from unilateral mandible fractures involving the inferior alveolar nerve

134 A late Middle Pleistocene mandible from Baishiya Karst Cave (BKC) on the Tibetan P

135 Villmoare et al. report on a hominin mandible from the Ledi-Geraru research area, Ethiopia, w

136 d micro-computed tomography (mu-CT) scans of mandibles, from eight myrmecophagous species with reduce

137 y, which in turn leads to an abnormal palate-mandible fusion and prevents palatal shelf elevation.

138 rvation of the diagnostically important OH 7 mandible has hindered attempts to compare this specimen

139 CNC-derived cells in the proximal region of mandible have a cell intrinsic requirement for TGF-beta

140 mice we found that the neural crest-derived mandible heals with neural crest-derived skeletal stem c

141 ort differences in the mechanisms underlying mandible homeostasis and the pathophysiology of diseases

142 ion, including fully penetrant cleft palate, mandible hypoplasia and deficits in cranial base ossific

143 Here we report a Denisovan mandible, identified by ancient protein analysis(9,10),

144 Predation risk predators had mandibles impaired to prevent killing.

145 aberrant fusion between the palate shelf and mandible in addition to severely deformed palatal shelve

146 the disconnection of the middle ear from the mandible in crown mammals.

147 and basal osseous dimensions of the anterior mandible in healthy individuals and evaluate potential c

148 apical bone and the anatomy of the posterior mandible in the area of the anticipated extraction site.

149 The results demonstrate that the mandible, in contrast to the cranium, significantly refl

150 t of which is homeotic transformation of the mandible into a maxilla-like structure.

151 t the time of implant placement in posterior mandible is a potential surgical complication, and prese

152 pled with a distinctive appearance where the mandible is enlarged and the maxilla is foreshortened.

153 During its development, the majority of the mandible is formed through intramembranous ossification

154 urprisingly we found that the Riparo Mezzena mandible is not from a Neanderthal but belonged to an an

155 not evolve as rapidly as the cranium and the mandible is not reliable for identifying early dog fossi

156 The upper mandible is relatively deep and short with a straight cu

157 The reconstructed mandible is remarkably primitive, with a long and narrow

158 with a straight cutting edge, and the lower mandible is strengthened and upturned.

159 Integral to the development of the mandible is the signaling interplay between Fgf8 and Bmp

160 mastication, but its role in patterning the mandible is unknown.

161 that our analysis of Australopithecus sediba mandibles is flawed and that specimen LD 350-1 cannot be

162 gion of BA1, which gives rise to most of the mandible, is dependent upon an optimal level of bone mor

163 berries that GJB, which has blunt spatulate mandibles, is otherwise unable to exploit.

164 +/- 0.13 mm, whereas in edentulous posterior mandibles it was 2.52 +/- 0.32 mm.

165 e maxilla was 1.3 +/- 0.4 mm, whereas in the mandible, it was 1.5 +/- 0.5 mm (P = 0.164).

166 e maxilla was 2.5 +/- 1.3 mm, whereas in the mandible, it was 1.6 +/- 0.4 mm (P = 0.006).

167 e maxilla was 2.7 +/- 0.8 mm, whereas in the mandible, it was 1.7 +/- 0.4 mm (P <0.001).

168 e maxilla was 6.5 +/- 2.5 mm, whereas in the mandible, it was 4.8 +/- 1.3 mm (P = 0.017).

169 involved in RNA metabolism, plays a role in mandible, laryngeal, and limb morphogenesis.

170 hin protrusion, we documented alterations of mandible length in mice with modified Edar funtion.

171 Cranial (mandible, maxilla, parietal, and frontal) bones and ulna

172 ges, as all have a modified piercing-sucking mandible-maxillary complex that allows them to drain flu

173 Previous studies have suggested that the mandible may be more influenced by mechanical loading th

174 Our results demonstrate that the mandible may not evolve as rapidly as the cranium and th

175 Mandibles (MB) and maxillae possess unique metabolic and

176 ty, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.94-0.98]), retrognathia (mandible measuring <9 cm from the angle of the jaw to th

177 haracterized by absence or hypoplasia of the mandible, microstomia, hypoglossia/aglossia, and variabl

178 ped and characterized a novel ex vivo murine mandible model of inflammatory bone destruction.

179 inflammation over mouse calvaria and in rat mandible models.

180 employed to analyse chewing biomechanics and mandible morphology to, firstly, establish the variation

181 st gene expression as well as atrophy in the mandible muscles of its ant host, but it is unknown how

182 cases were located in the posterior region: mandible (n = 12/14; 86%) and maxilla (n = 2/14; 14%).

183 d that the origins of the larger, dysmorphic mandible observed in adult Ts1Rhr mice develop from larg

184 Defects in the lower jaw, or mandible, occur commonly either as isolated malformation

185 LMF implants were inserted in the edentulous mandible of 24 patients.

186 ection (osteomyelitis) was identified in the mandible of a 275-million-year-old captorhinid eureptile

187 ure of four implants placed in the posterior mandible of a 48-year-old female patient.

188 ntal implants were placed in the maxilla and mandible of a patient who smoked.

189 g loss of soft tissue, bone and tooth in the mandible of a rabbit.

190 agmentary remains of an associated skull and mandible of Clevosaurus hadroprodon sp. nov., a new taxo

191 of gene expression were also observed in the mandible of Ctip2(-/-) mice: expression of the ameloblas

192 The teeth and mandible of Dmp1-KO/D213A-Tg mice were compared with tho

193 ation defects were surgically created in the mandibles of 40 rats.

194 PFDs were surgically created in the mandibles of 80 rats.

195 We demonstrate that the head capsule and mandibles of haidomyrmecines are uniquely integrated as

196 Replicate samples were implanted into the mandibles of host Yucatan mini-pigs and grown for 3 or 6

197 es from analyses of items collected from the mandibles of laden ant foragers in the field.

198 rmed bilaterally into multirooted sockets in mandibles of mini-pigs.

199 examples of exaggerated traits, such as the mandibles of stag beetles (Lucanidae), the claspers of p

200 cally in the bone sections obtained from the mandibles of the rats.

201 , willingness to engage in trophallaxis, and mandible opening were affected by both hunger and ethano

202 Inebriated bees were more likely to exhibit mandible opening, which may represent a form of aggressi

203 and less likely to antennate and to display mandible opening.

204 opulations derived from regions of the fetal mandible or calvaria that do not undergo endochondral os

205 ement (expansion) is planned in the anterior mandible or involving the maxillary premolars.

206 Here, we utilize an established ex vivo mandible organ culture model to model these complex inte

207 initiation and development, defects in early mandible patterning and altered expression of key patter

208 at ALK5 regulates tooth initiation and early mandible patterning through a pathway independent of Tgf

209 implant surface in the anterior maxillae or mandible (premolar-premolar) and 52 carefully selected c

210 and observations for Australopithecus sediba mandibles presented are incorrect or are not included in

211 g from the gingival mucosa of the maxilla or mandible, presenting in neonates.

212 Rehbachiella kinnekullensis [3] and isolated mandibles preserved as small carbonaceous fossils [4-6]

213 known fossil 'ape', represented by a partial mandible preserving dental features that place it with '

214 k length and initial hyoid distance from the mandible prior to the swallow.

215 ived signaling controls morphogenesis of the mandible remains elusive.

216 s, we over-expressed in the developing chick mandible, replication-competent retroviruses carrying tr

217 he regeneration of large bone defects in the mandible require a preclinical model that accurately rec

218 y fusion between the maxilla and hypoplastic mandible, resembling the bony syngnathia syndrome in hum

219 that was bound by Smad1/5 in the developing mandible, revealing direct Smad-mediated regulation.

220 e placed at 4 sites in each dog: maxilla and mandible, right and left.

221 s was also evaluated radiographically in the mandible samples of each group.

222 igand (RANKL) activation was analyzed in the mandible samples stereologically.

223 , some robust specimens, such as the partial mandibles Sangiran 5 and Sangiran 6a, were formerly vari

224 Short implants in the posterior area of the mandible seem to be preferable to vertical augmentation

225 ero-posterior relation of the maxilla to the mandible) seem to be the skeletal subspaces that receive

226 overall evaluated sites, nor the maxilla or mandible separately.

227 e treated with scaling and root planing, and mandible sides were randomly selected to receive three w

228 All Has2(f/f);Hand2-Cre pups showed reduced mandible size and about 50% of them had cleft palate wit

229 Wnt1-Cre fetuses showed dramatically reduced mandible size and complete failure of palatal shelf elev

230 loci (QTL) exhibiting imprinting effects on mandible size and shape traits in a large F(3) populatio

231 We discovered a total of 51 QTL affecting mandible size and shape, 6 of which exhibited difference

232 showed that only one of these QTL (affecting mandible size) exhibited a pattern consistent with true

233 asts and the dentin or into the pulp core of mandible slices and subsequently cultured for up to 10 d

234 0 days after the initiation of the study and mandible specimens were subjected for morphometric analy

235 pecies exhibit a linear relationship between mandible stiffness and volume, as expected in isometric

236 are usually associated with fractures of the mandible, temporal bone or other facial bones.

237 ty is greater in the alveolar process of the mandible than in the maxilla.

238 The surface activity was greater in the C3H mandible than in the maxilla.

239 in males, and more often encountered in the mandible than maxilla, it affects mostly canines.

240 rers having consistently longer and narrower mandibles than agriculturalists.

241 al expansion of jawbones, more pronounced in mandibles than in maxillae.

242 Mice lacking Nog in NCCs have an enlarged mandible that results from increased cell proliferation

243 mong living and extinct ants and scythe-like mandibles that extend high above the head, both demonstr

244 specially affecting pre-maxilla, nasal bone, mandible, tibia, and clavicle.

245 thanized, and intracardiac blood samples and mandible tissues were obtained for biochemical and histo

246 of the study, intracardiac blood samples and mandible tissues were obtained for histologic, biochemic

247 al models of Afar and date the LD 350-1 Homo mandible to 2.80 to 2.75 Ma.

248 We determine the mandible to be at least 160 thousand years old through U

249 ory stress among agriculturalists causes the mandible to grow and develop differently.

250 r basis of ACS as a homeotic transformation (mandible to maxilla) in humans.

251 a form of benthic skim feeding by using its mandible to probe for and obtain prey.

252 fect, is characterized by bony fusion of the mandible to the maxilla.

253 new multitissue model of composite hemiface/mandible/tongue allograft containing lymphoid and vascul

254 role of different components of the hemiface/mandible/tongue allograft on induction and maintenance o

255 Treated hemiface/mandible/tongue allotransplants survived up to 385 days,

256 (BM) compartment, and histology for hemiface/mandible/tongue architecture.

257 Twenty-two composite hemiface/mandible/tongue transplantations were performed in three

258 (n=8)-allograft rejection controls-hemiface/mandible/tongue transplants performed across major histo

259 nd2 is sufficient for upper jaw (maxilla)-to-mandible transformation by regulating the expression of

260 is proposed based on the four corners of the mandible (two angles and two canines): class I (lateral)

261 ers on the computed apparent bone density in mandible under normal chewing and biting forces.

262 ification whereas the proximal region of the mandible undergoes endochondral ossification.

263 tress, and strain regimes in the cranium and mandible, understanding the relative importance of these

264 or Islet1, resulting in a distally truncated mandible via unbalanced cell apoptosis and decreased cel

265 Here, we hypothesized that rat mandible vs. long-bone marrow-derived cells possess diff

266 M2 in relation to the inferior border of the mandible was also determined at 24 weeks.

267 Each side of the mandible was randomly assigned for implantation at day 0

268 rest mesenchyme destined to form bone in the mandible was transplanted from quail to duck.

269 e buccal cortical plate thickness in dentate mandibles was 2.76 +/- 0.13 mm, whereas in edentulous po

270 Acquisition of the lower jaw (mandible) was evolutionarily important for jawed vertebr

271 Focusing on the mandible, we observed that cellular hypertrophy and hype

272 The odds of M3 impaction in the mandible were 57.58% (95% CI: 43.3% to 68.3%, P < 0.0001

273 Slices of mandible were cultured for 14 days in the presence or ab

274 hy patients needing surgery in the posterior mandible were enrolled in this observational study (grou

275 feeding modules, the pulp of 4 molars on the mandible were exposed, and meal duration was measured fo

276 Specimens from the mandible were processed for morphometric and microcomput

277 At termination, animals were sacrificed, and mandibles were collected for microcomputed tomography (m

278 Mandibles were histologically examined for quantificatio

279 he Ust'-Polui mandibles and 8 of the Ivolgin mandibles were identified as wolves.

280 KR/J (AKR) control mice were sacrificed, and mandibles were prepared for stereomicroscopy and histolo

281 eks after bioreactor implantation, the ovine mandibles were repaired with the autologous bony tissue

282 red for surgical procedures in the posterior mandible when there is risk of injury to the IAN.

283 t in primates, hard food eaters have stiffer mandibles when compared to those that rely on softer die

284 grates toward a Shh-expressing region in the mandible, where the tooth placode will initiate.

285 and CT were significantly longer than in the mandible, whereas for the JE, no statistically significa

286 r phenotype is likely due to hyperostosis of mandibles, which distinguishes Ank (KI/KI) mice from the

287 ted regurgitation pellets to recover lemming mandibles, which were used to infer prey species and siz

288 a rigid body with the cycling motion of the mandible, while the posterior section of the tongue undu

289 first molecular evidence of a two-segmented mandible with a subcoxal segment in insects.

290 or restoring atrophic posterior areas of the mandible with dental implants and compare these procedur

291 was to describe the anatomy in the posterior mandible with respect to the inferior alveolar nerve (IA

292 we report the discovery of a partial hominin mandible with teeth from the Ledi-Geraru research area,

293 rge, long mandibles, "Betas" which have long mandibles with different morphology and "Boltcutters", w

294 e neural crest transformed the maxillae into mandibles with duplicated Meckel's cartilage, which resu

295 Treating control mandibles with exogenous BMP4 recapitulated the capacity

296 Harvested mandibles with implanted TB constructs were fixed in for

297 cantly greater mRC and CRC than teeth in the mandible (with the lower anterior [fifth sextant] showin

298 g was found at buccal furcation sites in the mandible, with a kappa-coefficient of 0.52, and buccal f

299 partially decoupled between the cranium and mandible, with cranial evolution more strongly driven by

300 st jaws, whilst omnivores have the strongest mandibles within the order Primates.