1 implications for our understanding of human
masticatory adaptation.
2 rfaces topology as well as the wide range of
masticatory and anatomical characteristics amongst breed
3 We compared
masticatory and appendicular muscles responses to microg
4 glimpses into the transition from the dual (
masticatory and auditory) to the single auditory functio
5 ncreased energy demands along with decreased
masticatory and digestive capacities is hypothesized to
6 Masticatory and esophagus striated muscles (ESM) share a
7 udy compared the effects of SOD1 mutation on
masticatory and limb muscles from disease onset to death
8 iles of three putative muscle classes, limb,
masticatory,
and extraocular muscle (EOM), in adult mice
9 This is despite
masticatory apparatus resemblances that have made anteat
10 Rodents are characterised by a distinctive
masticatory apparatus which includes a single pair of en
11 The evolving hominid
masticatory apparatus--traceable to a Late Miocene, chim
12 ey have been associated with a sophisticated
masticatory apparatus.
13 rior vault, many of which are related to the
masticatory apparatus.
14 n future studies into the functioning of the
masticatory apparatus.
15 Variation in the
masticatory behavior of hunter-gatherer and agricultural
16 tified similarities in the porcine and human
masticatory behaviors and discal properties.
17 cies and durations of manual, ingestive, and
masticatory behaviors from more than 1400 observations o
18 w-muscle reorganization, feeding ecology and
masticatory behaviour(7,12-17).
19 Facial form responded to either climate or
masticatory conditions, although the primary factor was
20 prospective restoration damage under typical
masticatory conditions.
21 The neurobiological mechanisms of
masticatory control have been investigated in animal mod
22 A virtual reconstruction of the
masticatory cycle in the Late Jurassic Priacodon showed
23 The yaw-dominated
masticatory cycle of primates, ungulates and other bunod
24 ng (contact-load-slide-liftoff, simulating a
masticatory cycle), as compared with uni-axial loading,
25 red pork steak hydrolysed with bromelain for
masticatory dysfunction people were evaluated.
26 (0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2% w/w) was evaluated for
masticatory dysfunction people.
27 land of these mice led to hyposalivation and
masticatory dysfunction.
28 ng elicited a similar response, indicating a
masticatory effect on the gingiva.
29 as a statistically significant difference in
masticatory efficiency between groups (P = 0.006).
30 Although the energetic efficiency of
masticatory effort is fundamental in understanding the e
31 y in detail the jaw movements and associated
masticatory electromyographic activity occurring during
32 11 left-sided chewing cycles and associated
masticatory electromyographic activity were sampled from
33 oclimate (temperature and precipitation) and
masticatory factors (infratemporal space) were tested co
34 study analyzes the effects of bioclimate and
masticatory factors on the regional variability of human
35 efits, it appears that selection for smaller
masticatory features in Homo would have been initially m
36 by dental restorations: Clinical variables (
masticatory force and cuspal curvature) identify closely
37 nearly 2 million (a 13% reduction) and total
masticatory force required would have declined by 15%.
38 chews per year by another 5%, and decreased
masticatory force requirements by an additional 12%.
39 evel of dental wear is consistent with a low
masticatory force, in a time when the norm was a high am
40 seous autogenous transplant is influenced by
masticatory forces and the resulting stress on the titan
41 aordinary ability of sound enamel to outlive
masticatory forces at minimal failure rates.
42 The low
masticatory forces help explain Naia's small jaws and cr
43 The removal of
masticatory forces in periostin-null mice rescue the per
44 ting such regions are not designed to resist
masticatory forces.
45 these restorations are subjected to greater
masticatory forces.
46 Using three-dimensional data to quantify
masticatory form in ontogenetic samples representing 21
47 (T1), at 110 days (T2) and after 6 months of
masticatory function (T3).
48 st that fusion imposes unique constraints on
masticatory function elsewhere along the mandible, a phe
49 ly endangering tooth longevity and impairing
masticatory function.
50 gnathic pathologies, tooth loss, and loss of
masticatory function.
51 three membrane bones directly involved with
masticatory function: (1) as nodules on the dorso-caudal
52 tion from hunting to farming, supporting the
masticatory-
functional hypothesis for the mandible and s
53 ignificantly impairs speech, swallowing, and
masticatory functions.
54 Similarly, there were no differences between
masticatory (
gingiva and palate) and other mucosa (P >0.
55 of modern traits through time and an ongoing
masticatory gracilization process.
56 ve been postulated, such as genetic factors,
masticatory hyperfunction, trauma, and continued growth,
57 Masticatory hypermuscularity resulted in significantly a
58 late elevation is temporally associated with
masticatory jaw movement.
59 These findings support the hypothesis that
masticatory jaw movements contain sex-specific features.
60 on, and secretion and can be classified into
masticatory,
lining, and specialized mucosa that are kno
61 to examining PDLs that supported teeth under
masticatory loading and eruptive forces, 2 additional me
62 Masticatory loading involves the opposing tooth sliding
63 of monolithic ceramic crowns under simulated
masticatory loading.
64 process, experienced low peak strain for all
masticatory loads considered, suggesting such regions ar
65 Masticatory loads were simulated using pulleys, and stra
66 of hard objects that required powerful peak
masticatory loads.
67 factors are expressed in salivary glands and
masticatory mucosa (tongue) at different expression leve
68 In the oral cavity,
masticatory mucosa covers the hard palate and gingiva.
69 The epithelium of
masticatory mucosa is relatively thick compared to other
70 hemorrhagic, fibrous enlargement of the oral
masticatory mucosa.
71 ion of lining mucosa into an epithelium with
masticatory mucosa/ skin-specific characteristics.
72 The role of
masticatory muscle activation on pain in temporomandibul
73 (ChTB) binding were examined for trigeminal
masticatory muscle and cutaneous afferent neurons.
74 nd the effect of an adrenergic activation on
masticatory muscle blood flow under various conditions.
75 mMyBP-C is localized not only within the
masticatory muscle fibers, but also at or near their cel
76 This study tested the hypothesis that
masticatory muscle forces exerted during static biting a
77 Masticatory muscle forces influence craniofacial morphol
78 e findings emphasize the important role that
masticatory muscle function plays in the ontogeny of the
79 utoantibodies have been found, especially in
masticatory muscle myositis.
80 g recognized by the autoantibodies in canine
masticatory muscle myositis.
81 .e., chewing bubble gum for 6 min) increases
masticatory muscle pain in patients, but not in asymptom
82 Because chewing-induced
masticatory muscle pain was significantly greater in fem
83 To test this relationship, we compared
masticatory muscle size and craniofacial dimensions in m
84 The findings support a causal role for
masticatory muscle tension in TMJD pain.
85 panel study examined the relationships among
masticatory muscle tension, emotional distress, and TMJD
86 This study indicated that both the
masticatory muscles and mandibular growth could contribu
87 In contrast,
masticatory muscles are considerably smaller in both mod
88 Powerful
masticatory muscles are found in most primates, includin
89 Understanding why
masticatory muscles are less affected by ALS could lead
90 Central nervous system organization of
masticatory muscles determines the magnitude of joint an
91 l situations such as critical care myopathy,
masticatory muscles do not lose mass.
92 oading in microgravity prevents atrophy, but
masticatory muscles have a different set point that mimi
93 This indicates that
masticatory muscles have a higher resistance to ALS-rela
94 ts show that the morphology of the skull and
masticatory muscles have allowed squirrels to specialise
95 oon after ALS-like phenotype appear, whereas
masticatory muscles maintain their volume and function i
96 r analysis showed that, unlike limb muscles,
masticatory muscles retain their normal structure and ce
97 nuclei and no muscle fibre-type switching in
masticatory muscles.
98 ), which are essential for muscle repair, in
masticatory muscles.
99 ore nuanced insights into the functioning of
masticatory muscles.
100 e for the rhythmic activation of lingual and
masticatory muscles.
101 tions in individual muscle fibres and entire
masticatory muscles.
102 ay contribute to stiffness regulation of the
masticatory muscles.
103 ces in 287 genes between EOM and limb and/or
masticatory muscles.
104 jacent salivary glands, bone, dentition, and
masticatory musculature and apparatus.
105 The
masticatory musculature of rodents has evolved to enable
106 he temporomandibular joint and/or associated
masticatory musculature.
107 g canines and evidence of highly specialized
masticatory musculature.
108 osin binding protein-C family, which we call
masticatory myosin binding protein-C (mMyBP-C).
109 udy evaluates the effect of periodontitis on
masticatory performance and quality of life index.
110 Both the
masticatory performance and quality of life indicators s
111 rting structures has negative effects on the
masticatory performance and quality of life.
112 linical examinations, bite force recordings,
masticatory performance measurements, and two 24-hour di
113 The
masticatory performance was evaluated through continuous
114 ndependent samples (P <0.05) to evaluate the
masticatory performance, and the Mann-Whitney U test was
115 socio-demographic and masticatory variables (
masticatory performance, bite force, number of posterior
116 Masticatory sequences were divided into processing and s
117 These findings suggest that
masticatory soft palate movement is diminished during in
118 oral candidiasis, dental caries, dysgeusia,
masticatory/
speech impairment, and oropharyngeal dysphag
119 Masticatory stimulation in controls resulted in a signif
120 ting conditions followed by collection under
masticatory stimulation induced by the chewing of parafi
121 ganic protective components in saliva during
masticatory stimulation suggests its potential value as
122 llected from 60 subjects under conditions of
masticatory stimulation, flow rates were recorded, and m
123 including the fenestrated rostrum, transmits
masticatory strains.
124 e results support notions that a decrease in
masticatory stress among agriculturalists causes the man
125 ermal adaptation, while no relationship with
masticatory stress was found.
126 However,
masticatory stress was identified as an equally signific
127 ew by planar symmetric divisions, respond to
masticatory stresses, and promote wound healing, whereas
128 in its modifications for phoresy but has the
masticatory system and other parts of the gnathosoma wel
129 facial ontogeny at 1.9 my, or to changes in
masticatory system loading associated with diet.
130 males, with no history of muscle pain in the
masticatory system participated in this study.
131 in understanding the evolution of the human
masticatory system, nothing is known currently about the
132 The development of an efficient
masticatory system-culminating in the tribosphenic appar
133 acquisition of functional innovations in the
masticatory system.
134 ibute to abnormal tooth wear and pain in the
masticatory system.
135 s them to function optimally during specific
masticatory tasks.
136 = 2.31, [95% CI: 1.40-3.82]) and functional
masticatory units <5 (HR = 2.40 [95% CI 1.55-3.73]).
137 The number of teeth and functional
masticatory units <5 were recorded.
138 flammation, >10 missing teeth and functional
masticatory units <5.
139 gated the influence of socio-demographic and
masticatory variables (masticatory performance, bite for
140 Income, education, and the
masticatory variables were not related to diet quality.