コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ly nuclear during infections with dengue and measles virus.
2 t were acutely or persistently infected with measles virus.
3 links into the prefusion F protein trimer of measles virus.
4 ikelihood of importation and transmission of measles virus.
5 ups of individuals who are not immune to the measles virus.
6 the avidity of antibodies were measured for measles virus.
7 ate of the X domain of phosphoprotein (P) of measles virus.
8 rization of currently circulating strains of measles viruses.
10 Our aim was to assess population immunity to measles virus after a mass vaccination campaign in a reg
11 rains of patients persistently infected with measles virus, although the precise role of ADAR during
13 les is a highly contagious disease caused by measles virus and is one of the most devastating infecti
14 ous disease that results from infection with measles virus and is still responsible for more than 100
16 and LGP2 variants unable to be recognized by measles virus and parainfluenza virus 5 (PIV5) V protein
23 virus, human parainfluenza virus type 3, and measles virus, and highly lethal emerging pathogens such
24 d residues in the V proteins of Nipah virus, measles virus, and mumps virus also abolishes MDA5 inter
26 antiretroviral therapy (HAART), exposure to measles virus, and revaccination among children infected
27 implications for pathogens, such as HIV and measles virus, and tumors that evade the immune response
28 , respectively, had seroprotective levels of measles virus antibodies; 100.0% and 99.6%, respectively
30 e MV schedule was associated with protective measles virus antibody levels at 24 months of age in nea
34 since 1963 resulted in a decrease in average measles virus antibody titers among plasma donors, which
39 efense against various RNA viruses including measles virus; as such, many viruses have evolved strate
40 ph node and spleen cells with UV-inactivated measles virus at various time points after infection, ga
41 e predicted potential interface areas of the measles virus attachment protein hemagglutinin to begin
42 either one of three escalating doses of the measles-virus-based candidate vaccine (low dose [1.5 x 1
44 dose (n=12), or the high dose (n=12) of the measles-virus-based candidate vaccine, or Priorix (n=6),
47 ination and were likely exposed to wild-type measles virus, but none were reported to have had clinic
48 operty for infection of the brain.IMPORTANCE Measles virus can invade the central nervous system (CNS
49 Europe, and the USA show the ease with which measles virus can re-enter communities if high levels of
50 omplex, central nervous system (CNS)-adapted measles virus can spread outside the CNS within an infec
51 he characterization of mechanisms underlying measles virus clinical disease has been hampered by the
54 h antibodies to HIV-1 also had antibodies to measles virus, compared with 568 (71%) of 796 children w
58 hat hsp70-dependent stimulation of Edmonston measles virus (Ed MeV) transcription caused an increased
62 to the membrane interaction data of HRC4, a measles virus entry inhibitor peptide, revealing its inc
63 ddress whether preassembly reflects a unique measles virus entry strategy, we characterized the prote
67 sease virus, a paramyxovirus and relative of measles virus, forms dimers that assemble into pseudotet
68 TA cards for the detection and genotyping of measles virus from clinical samples has not been evaluat
72 demonstrate aptazyme-dependent regulation of measles virus fusion protein expression, translating int
73 protein-deficient (C-protein-knockout [CKO]) measles viruses generated about 10 times more DI-RNAs th
74 project to date, revealing novel aspects of measles virus genetics and providing new insights into t
75 ons that could be homologous to those in the measles virus H attachment glycoprotein known to be invo
77 sly shown that attenuated vaccine strains of measles virus have potent antitumor activity against gli
78 lobular heads to the tetrameric stalk of the measles virus hemagglutinin (H), we asked whether and ho
80 two Sindbis virus DNA vaccines encoding the measles virus hemagglutinin (pMSIN-H) and fusion protein
81 which areas of Bacillus anthracis toxins and measles virus hemagglutinin protein interact with their
82 loops, the association of nectin-4 with the measles virus hemagglutinin requires only the BC and FG
83 solved structure of the globular head of the measles virus hemagglutinin suggests that this differenc
84 ine measles virus (vac2) and for a wild-type measles virus (IC323) as early as passage 1 after virus
85 learly define the molecular determinants for measles virus IFN evasion and validate specific targets
89 antiapoptotic host factor in the context of measles virus infection and suggest that the antiapoptot
94 male who developed focal, chronic persistent measles virus infection of the brain following interfero
96 y the events underlying acute and persistent measles virus infection, we performed a global transcrip
101 ls infected with vesicular stomatitis virus, measles virus, influenza A virus, and Nyamanini virus, w
102 virus, Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, measles virus, influenza A virus, reovirus, vesicular st
104 ve investigated the steps governing entry of measles virus into SLAMF1-positive cells and identified
105 pidemiology of international importations of measles virus into the United States during the postelim
106 evolution of new MeV subgenotypes.IMPORTANCE Measles virus is a paradigmatic RNA virus, as the antige
113 27 complete genomes from H1 and D8 genotype measles viruses isolated from outbreak cases, we estimat
114 virus, varicella-zoster virus, mumps virus, measles virus, lyssavirus, herpes simplex viruses 1 and
116 -PCR (RT-PCR) method specific for genotype A measles virus (MeV) (MeVA RT-quantitative PCR [RT-qPCR])
117 human parainfluenza virus type-3 (HPIV3) and measles virus (MeV) are a substantial health threat.
125 ldwide that have caused localized outbreaks, measles virus (MeV) has regained importance as a pathoge
126 on after infection of susceptible cells with measles virus (MeV) have often reported greater IFN synt
127 these animal models) than wt MeV.IMPORTANCE Measles virus (MeV) infection can be severe in immunocom
136 n both intact and trypsin-cleaved sedimented measles virus (MeV) nucleocapsids under ultra-fast magic
137 of loosely assembled tetramers from purified measles virus (MeV) particles and cells transiently expr
139 ons of chemokine CXCL10 in 288 patients with measles virus (MeV) primary infection and 16 patients wi
140 argets of infection, and these cells traffic measles virus (MeV) to lymph nodes for amplification and
143 ented negative-strand RNA viruses, including measles virus (MeV), a member of the Paramyxoviridae fam
146 ganization of functional fusion complexes of measles virus (MeV), an archetype of the paramyxovirus f
149 (NiV), human parainfluenza virus 3 (HPIV3), measles virus (MeV), mumps virus (MuV), and respiratory
150 iverse Paramyxovirus L proteins derived from measles virus (MeV), Nipah virus (NiV), and respiratory
156 t is increasingly difficult to differentiate measles viruses (MeVs) relating to certain outbreaks on
157 za virus type 2, parainfluenza virus type 5, measles virus, mumps virus, Hendra virus, and Nipah viru
158 ARS/MERS), human enteroviruses/rhinoviruses, measles virus, mumps virus, Hepatitis A-E Virus, Chikung
160 ail of the F proteins of the paramyxoviruses measles virus, mumps virus, Newcastle disease virus, hum
161 ortions of the samples were seropositive for measles virus, mumps virus, or rubella virus antibodies,
162 many medically important viruses, including measles virus, mumps virus, parainfluenza viruses, respi
163 en extended to predict genes for 12 viruses: measles virus, mumps virus, rubella virus, respiratory s
165 versely, PKR amplifies IFN-beta induction by measles virus (MV) and inhibits virus protein synthesis.
170 mma interferon (IFN-gamma) for survival of a measles virus (MV) challenge; however, the direct role o
171 nfirmed in our Treg-sensitive mouse model of measles virus (MV) CNS infection, in which we observed m
175 etion of its G glycoprotein and encoding the measles virus (MV) fusion (F) and hemagglutinin (H) enve
179 e scheme potential, we engineered infectious measles virus (MV) genomic cDNAs with a vaccine strain b
183 s (NDV) hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) and measles virus (MV) hemagglutinin (H) proteins reside ent
184 s virus replicon-based DNA vaccines encoding measles virus (MV) hemagglutinin (H, pMSIN-H) or both he
186 between the remarkable genetic stability of measles virus (MV) in the field and the high mutation ra
191 ies of primate models suggest that wild-type measles virus (MV) infects immune cells located in the a
198 SSPE brain plasma cell clones recognized the measles virus (MV) nucleocapsid protein, confirming that
199 ype [WT]) recombinant Moraten vaccine strain measles virus (MV) or isogenic knockout mutants deficien
203 which measures immunoglobulin G (IgG) to all measles virus (MV) proteins, and the plaque reduction ne
204 the clinical manifestations and kinetics of measles virus (MV) replication in MV-vaccinated and unva
205 mouse central nervous system (CNS) neurons, measles virus (MV) spreads in the absence of hallmark vi
209 70-kDa heat shock protein (hsp72) increases measles virus (MV) transcription and genome replication.
211 re we report that in the cotton rat model of measles virus (MV) vaccination passively transferred MV-
215 pounds specifically preventing fusion of the measles virus (MV) with target cells at IC(50) values of
217 virus (VSV-FH), which is superior to that of measles virus (MV), in different cancer cell lines.
218 that specifically prevent fusion induced by measles virus (MV), most likely by interfering with conf
220 other paramyxoviruses, Sendai virus (SV) and measles virus (MV), or the TM domain of the unrelated gl
227 iple neurotropic viral infections, including measles virus (MV); however, the downstream pathways thr
231 ial from many neurotropic RNA viruses (e.g., measles virus [MV], West Nile virus [WNV], Sindbis virus
233 n HCV vaccine, we engineered two recombinant measles viruses (MVs) expressing structural proteins fro
234 we tested the effect of ADAR1 deficiency on measles virus (MVvac strain) growth and virus-induced ce
235 inding sites of several pathogens, including measles virus, Neisseria gonorrhea, and human herpesviru
237 d-type infection stimulates higher levels of measles-virus-neutralizing antibodies (mnAbs) than does
239 from 3 patients with PD and determined that measles virus nucleocapsid protein (MVNP) was expressed
240 ed a recently developed approach to assemble measles virus nucleocapsid-like particles on specific se
241 nsically disordered C-terminal domain of the measles virus nucleoprotein (N(TAIL)) and the X domain (
242 nsically disordered C-terminal domain of the measles virus nucleoprotein (N(TAIL)) were cyanylated at
244 sing either live viruses (dengue, mumps, and measles viruses) or nucleic acid material (Nipah and chi
249 sociated with high levels of IgG antibody to measles virus (P=.09) but low levels of IgG antibody to
253 rsus MMR-unrelated febrile seizures) and the measles virus receptor CD46 (rs1318653: P = 9.6 x 10(-11
255 ation factories in infected cells.IMPORTANCE Measles virus remains a pathogen of significant global c
261 Our results indicate that CD133-targeted measles viruses selectively eliminate CD133(+) cells fro
265 decrease in the concentration and avidity of measles virus-specific neutralizing antibodies, compared
268 In summary, EGFRvIII-retargeted oncolytic measles virus strains have comparable therapeutic effica
269 nfluenza virus, modest for VSV, and mild for measles virus, suggesting a greater role for viruses tha
270 erestingly, l-ddBCNAs also inhibit wild type measles virus syncytia formation with a TCID(50) of 7.5
271 e synthesized alone and also linked with the measles virus T cell epitope to produce a chimeric pepti
272 hough similar numbers of influenza virus and measles virus tetramer-positive cells were generated by
274 nisms used by morbilliviruses, including the measles virus, to promote massive amplification within t
275 he Americas successfully interrupted endemic measles virus transmission 8 years after setting a regio
277 emain an important strategy for interrupting measles virus transmission in the European Region, altho
280 formation was used to generate a recombinant measles virus unable to antagonize STAT1 function (STAT1
283 thic effects than the wild type, implicating measles virus V protein as an inhibitor of cell death.
284 ins that copurify with ectopically expressed measles virus V protein has revealed interactions with D
285 y conserved C-terminal zinc finger domain of measles virus V protein is both necessary and sufficient
287 independent rescue events both for a vaccine measles virus (vac2) and for a wild-type measles virus (
290 susceptible to viruses, including the YF and measles virus vaccine strains, in the absence or presenc
291 macaques were immunized and boosted with the measles virus-vectored chikungunya vaccine or sham-vacci
293 ication of the enveloped Ebola, Marburg, and measles viruses was inhibited with Rab9 siRNA, although
294 ynthetic or natural dsRNAs or infection with measles virus, we observed increased mRNA but decreased
296 escribe the rescue and characterization of a measles virus with a specific mutation in the stalk regi
299 athogenic myxoviruses (influenza A virus and measles virus) with comparable replication kinetics, we
300 erological evidence of exposure to wild-type measles virus without a reported history of measles.