コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 re 20-25 deg.C higher than the corresponding mesophile.
2 s of Bacteria, including microbes related to mesophiles.
3 egrees C, roughly the thermal death point of mesophiles.
4 arison with genes of other psychrophiles and mesophiles.
5 s of higher contact trace when compared with mesophiles.
6 rmophiles, and neither hyperthermophiles nor mesophiles.
7 thermophiles when compared to proteins from mesophiles.
8 ratures which rapidly denature proteins from mesophiles.
9 Here, we addressed this issue in mesophiles.
10 done on the mechanism of protein splicing in mesophiles.
11 ructure and of function in biomolecules from mesophiles.
12 andard motifs evident in all homologues from mesophiles.
13 ted deiodinases (IYDs) from humans and other mesophiles.
14 bial growth remained low at around 3-log for mesophiles, 4.5-log for yeasts and molds and 2-log for e
15 e thermophile Moorella thermoacetica and the mesophile Acetobacterium woodii, two acetogenic bacteria
16 approximately 29 known to occur in bacterial mesophiles and 24 to 31 known to occur in the archaeal h
17 s in A. cellulolyticus orthologs compared to mesophiles and inverse preferences for G and A at the fi
18 led to significantly lower counts of aerobic mesophiles and psychrotrophic bacteria in anchovy muscle
19 ain differences in properties of proteins in mesophiles and thermophiles, and the likely structural a
22 f helix-rich proteins found in thermophiles, mesophiles, and organisms that flourish near 0 degrees C
24 he psychrophile Bacillus globisporus and the mesophile Bacillus subtilis have been solved and compare
25 silico mutants of adenylate kinase from the mesophile Bacillus subtilis were generated, and their mo
27 ch a study with our model protein HPr from a mesophile, Bacillus subtilis, and a thermophile, Bacillu
28 Alternatively, organisms that evolved as mesophiles but later recolonized a hot environment (Ther
30 ein fragments that cooperatively function in mesophiles can be aided by the use of thermophilic enzym
32 thermophile Pyrococcus furiosus (Pf) and the mesophile Clostridium pasteurianum (Cp) are monitored vi
33 ermophile Pyrococcus furiosus (RdPf) and the mesophile Clostridium pasteurianum (RdCp) has been studi
34 his structure with its counterparts from the mesophiles Clostridium symbiosum and Escherichia coli ha
35 r and more sensitive to antimycin A than the mesophile control, Chlamydomonas raudensis SAG 49.72.
36 primary difference between CYP175A1 and its mesophile counterparts is the investment of charged resi
38 lar or lower microbial counts (total aerobic mesophiles, enterobacteriaceae, and yeasts/moulds) while
39 olding for two ribonucleases H, one from the mesophile Escherichia coli and one from the thermophile
42 rs was compared for RNA polymerases from the mesophile Escherichia coli and the thermophile Thermus a
43 hilic bacterium Thermus thermophilus and the mesophile Escherichia coli demonstrate a dramatic and su
44 e-adapted bacterial species such as SS9, the mesophile Escherichia coli did not regulate its fatty ac
46 the thermophile Thermus thermophilus and the mesophile Escherichia coli revealed that the thermostabi
48 opropylmalate dehydrogenase (IPMDH) from the mesophiles Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium h
55 binant (r) archaeal histones (rHFoB from the mesophile Methanobacterium formicicum, and rHMfA, rHMfB,
56 recombinant archaeal histone rHFoB, from the mesophile Methanobacterium formicicum, has been determin
57 rthermophile Methanothermus fervidus and the mesophile Methanobacterium formicicum, respectively, hav
58 ed for three archael histones: hFoB from the mesophile Methanobacterium formicicum; hMfB from the the
60 ted methanogenic members of the Archaea: the mesophile Methanococcus voltae (Mv), the thermophile M.
61 ted methanogenic members of the Archaea (the mesophile Methanococcus voltae (MVO), the thermopile Met
62 e Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus and the mesophile Methanococcus voltae have been solved to resol
64 ent of class II xylose isomerases (XIs) from mesophiles, moderate thermophiles, and hyperthermophiles
65 results observed for other psychrophiles and mesophiles, only clpB and hsp33 were upregulated at low
71 two features which differ significantly from mesophile proteins; (1) an unusually large proportion of
75 three dominant strategies within the vibrio: mesophiles, psychrophiles and apparently generalist broa
77 ly adapted to cold temperatures stressful to mesophiles since little differential gene expression was
80 to a greater extent in thermophiles than in mesophiles, suggesting that helical interaction based on
81 ermal optimum increases with temperature for mesophiles (temperature optima [Formula: see text]C), bu
84 previously reported for CPS from an enteric mesophile, the kinetic properties of the arginine-specif
85 to obtain recombinant proteins derived from mesophiles, the production of thermoacidophilic proteins
86 rved in all proteins, but in the case of the mesophile/thermophile comparison there is a directional
87 easing stability during the progression from mesophile to psychrophile, there is not a strict correla
88 iles use a mechanism similar to that used by mesophiles to deal with the large number of abasic sites
90 logenetic trees because they outcompeted the mesophiles when they adapted to lower temperatures, poss
91 pon folding is lower in thermophiles than in mesophiles, whereas the loss in entropy upon folding is
92 antly more favorable in thermophiles than in mesophiles, whereas the maximal stability temperature it