戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  castration-resistant disease that is highly metastatic.
2 icated in multiple processes associated with metastatic aggressiveness including immune evasion, coll
3 rolled patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic anaplastic thyroid carcinoma in a phase II co
4  for MRI-guided radiotherapy with respect to metastatic and primary liver cancers.
5  two isogenic canine OS cell lines, POS (low metastatic) and HMPOS (highly metastatic), under normoxi
6 st palliative care to minimize the impact of metastatic bone disease on physical functioning.
7                                              Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is an extremely recalcitr
8                       ERBB2 levels spiked in metastatic breast cancer between 10.0 and 4.0 months pre
9 r the treatment of hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer following antiestrogen therapy.
10 ral tumor implantation technique in a murine metastatic breast cancer model (E0771) coupled with anti
11 andomly assigned patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuz
12 mal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer represents a major milestone in
13 mal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer who had received <=2 chemothera
14 mal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer who have disease progression af
15 mal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer with prior clinical benefit fro
16 1) mutations occur frequently in ER-positive metastatic breast cancer, and confer clinical resistance
17 represents a potential therapeutic target in metastatic breast cancer, as its histone-binding capabil
18 avily pretreated patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, including those with brain met
19 ated efficacy in patients with BRCA-positive metastatic breast cancer.
20  than two previous lines of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.
21 efore CT in most participants with bone-only metastatic breast cancer.
22 breast cancers from two patient cohorts (149 metastatic breast cancers, 63 untreated primary tumors,
23 ecruitment and activation were impaired, and metastatic burden was increased in E2 (-/-)mice.
24  as follows: septic shock, 7.27 (7.19-7.35); metastatic cancer and acute leukemia (Hierarchical Condi
25  CBFbeta can determine the plasticity of the metastatic cancer cell phenotype, suggesting that its re
26 the genes that control the transmigration of metastatic cancer cells across the BBB, offering new tar
27             S100A4 regulates the motility of metastatic cancer cells by binding to non-muscle (NM) my
28       In fact, the majority of patients with metastatic cancer develop a debilitating muscle-wasting
29 re becoming more pertinent, as patients with metastatic cancer have extended overall survival because
30  that promote metabolic adaptations to drive metastatic cancer remain unclear.
31 daptation of the multi-cellular ecosystem of metastatic cancer shapes clinical outcomes.
32   Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a highly metastatic cancer that is consistently associated with E
33 lasma-derived cell-free DNA and eight frozen metastatic cancer tissues collected during rapid autopsy
34 mic therapy may be used to treat advanced or metastatic cancer using the same indications and combina
35                                           In metastatic cancer, the degree of heterogeneity of the tu
36    Besides applications to wound healing and metastatic cancer, these studies are relevant for tissue
37  further reveals the disruptive reality that metastatic cancers are tremendously complex and individu
38      We identified 40 genes overexpressed in metastatic cancers from patients reporting high pain (n
39 tinctions suggest a strategy for eradicating metastatic cancers in which initial therapy, by reducing
40 ecently been implicated in accelerating bone metastatic cancers, such as acute myelogenous leukemia a
41 omising results for the treatment of certain metastatic cancers.
42         We posit that melanoma cells acquire metastatic capability by adopting an embryonic-like phen
43 cts on tumor growth, and strongly suppressed metastatic capacity in vivo.
44 erts preneoplastic lesions into invasive and metastatic carcinomas.
45 SERPINB5 and CSTB enhanced late steps in the metastatic cascade by elevating invadopodia formation an
46 out of IQGAP1 to investigate its role in the metastatic cascade of both melanoma and breast cancer ce
47  and arrest during the earliest phase of the metastatic cascade, the trafficking of immune cells duri
48 s, with a prevalence over 60% in a cohort of metastatic cases and 25% in a cohort comprising predomin
49  small primary PanNETs (<3 cm), including 32 metastatic cases and 55 nonmetastatic cases after a 5-ye
50 g, 67 for biochemical recurrence, and 23 for metastatic castration-resistant PCa.
51 primary prostate cancer differ from those of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
52 erica, and there are no curative options for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
53 ethods: Safety and survival of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and live
54  obtained from 294 patients with progressing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer taken pr
55 candidates for clinical translation to treat metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
56 d with treatment failure and poor outcome in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
57  (TAT) is an emerging treatment modality for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
58 SMA-617 was administered to patients who had metastatic castration-resistant prostate carcinoma and w
59 ods: We studied 5 patients with localized or metastatic ccRCC in a microdosing regimen, after the adm
60               Twist1 is a known regulator of metastatic cell behaviors but not directly targetable.
61  retroviral element RNAs were upregulated in metastatic cells and detected extracellularly.
62 ion of global transcriptomic changes in rare metastatic cells during seeding using single-cell RNA se
63 ); Pdx-1 Cre (KPC) mice, and KPC- Liver/Lung metastatic cells were used to evaluate the CSC, EMT (epi
64  parental, circulating tumor cells, and lung metastatic cells.
65 s versus taxol or DDM; and 5) attenuation of metastatic characteristics in treated cancer cells.
66 hat systemic Akt1 deletion maintains the pro-metastatic cluster within primary tumors but ablates pro
67 ibitors significantly delay tumor growth and metastatic colonization and reverse neuroendocrine featu
68  generated by tumor cell clusters supporting metastatic colonization.
69 ningfully improves survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer compared with doublets + be
70 strated that highly activated fibroblasts in metastatic colorectal cancer increase tissue stiffness a
71 n an application to real data collected from metastatic colorectal cancer tumors, more associations b
72 rgical modalities of stage II/III rectal and metastatic colorectal cancer.
73 ain microenvironment, thereby inducing brain metastatic competence.
74 ctal cancer (CRC) cohort, among which 70 had metastatic CRC (mCRC).
75 undred six patients with BRAF(V600E)-mutated metastatic CRC previously treated with one or two regime
76 a-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging of 10 patients with metastatic CRC to assess metastasis avidity.
77 at genomic and transcriptional features from metastatic CRPC biopsies prior to treatment would be pre
78 ngs, treatment, and outcome of patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma to the vitreous.
79 57-year-old kidney transplant recipient with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC).
80  result in differential impacts on the ccRCC metastatic destinations of VHL-wt ccRCC cells under diff
81 rd systemic therapy (69% M1a; 43% M1b/c) for metastatic disease (153/382, 40%).
82 was alive with metastases, and 6 had died of metastatic disease (including 2 patients who declined ad
83 ocalization (n = 225/388, 58%), or restaging metastatic disease (M1) before or during systemic therap
84 lso been implicated in tumor progression and metastatic disease and have thus become an attractive th
85 ease at diagnosis; 38 of 103 (37%) developed metastatic disease at a median of 5.9 months (interquart
86          Seventeen of 103 (16%) patients had metastatic disease at diagnosis; 38 of 103 (37%) develop
87 f circulating melanoma cells and reduced the metastatic disease burden in patient-derived xenografts
88 ts who experience relapse after treatment of metastatic disease but worse compared with those who hav
89             Among the patients who developed metastatic disease during neoadjuvant treatment, median
90                                Patients with metastatic disease had OS rates of 77.8% and 22.2% at 1-
91 drive the progression of primary melanoma to metastatic disease have been studied extensively, the ea
92 ogrammed regulatory elements commissioned in metastatic disease hijack latent developmental programs,
93                          Six patients showed metastatic disease in the central nervous system.
94 e suggesting that the effect of P-AscH(-) on metastatic disease is mediated by hydrogen peroxide.
95            Further, studies on resection for metastatic disease to the lung were systematically revie
96          USBR for SB-NETs in the presence of metastatic disease was associated with better patient-or
97  with LGT tumors, including 15 patients with metastatic disease, 1 patient with suspected local relap
98          For patients with advanced-stage or metastatic disease, comprehensive genomic profiling has
99  chondrosarcoma; for locally advanced and/or metastatic disease, no known effective systemic therapy
100  isoforms is a promising approach to address metastatic disease, one that may be readily combined wit
101 atients after diagnosis of colorectal cancer metastatic disease, yet how RAS-ERK signaling regulates
102 t worse compared with those who have de-novo metastatic disease.
103 on of primary tumors and are ineffective for metastatic disease.
104  to identify a distant primary malignancy or metastatic disease.
105 lular transformation, disease progression to metastatic disease.
106 is sculpted differentially by primary versus metastatic disease.
107 dow associates with high risk for subsequent metastatic disease.
108 up to two previous lines of chemotherapy for metastatic disease.
109 rimary tumours, ~50% of patients progress to metastatic disease.
110 ltaNp63 in established tumors is crucial for metastatic dissemination in breast cancer.
111 oskeleton reorganization, cell motility, and metastatic dissemination.
112  activity, emergence of chemoresistance, and metastatic dissemination.
113 R1 elicited a robust anti-tumour and/or anti-metastatic effect.
114 EMT), VAL exerts potent pro-invasive and pro-metastatic effects through directly binding to Vimentin
115 HIF-1alpha expression levels are elevated in metastatic estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and TNBC cli
116                            PSMA SUV(max) and metastatic findings were compared with prostate-specific
117 context, we also determine that IQGAP1's pro-metastatic functions are dependent on multiple domains a
118 monotherapy as 2 L chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic gastric cancer and a third received doublets.
119 nd-line (2 L) chemotherapies for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer have shown improved survival b
120 rall survival in patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer.
121 g progression-free survival in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
122 le mRNA construct to vaccinate patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancer.RESULTSThe vaccine wa
123  that BCL11A sustains TNBC cell invasion and metastatic growth by repressing MBNL1-directed splicing
124 ry mediators of mammary engraftment and lung metastatic growth in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC
125 red as a novel therapeutic approach to treat metastatic hormone-naive and castration-resistant prosta
126 een shown to play a detrimental role in many metastatic human cancers, including melanoma and other n
127 for detection of metastases in patients with metastatic ILC.
128  scientifically, as the stochastic nature of metastatic lesion formation introduces complexity for bo
129 eiter et al. assess genetic diversity across metastatic lesions and identify a tight selective bottle
130 topic thyroid tumors compared with pulmonary metastatic lesions by 79% +/- 23 (standard deviation; P
131 ed on the longitudinal measurements of liver metastatic lesions from 599 mCRC patients.
132 ptors and tumor-infiltrating immune cells in metastatic lesions with or without ER mutations.
133 nts showed high tracer uptake in primary and metastatic lesions with T/M, T/B, and T/I ranging from 5
134 with a controlled primary malignancy and 1-5 metastatic lesions, with all metastases amenable to ster
135 n objective response with regression of bone metastatic lesions.
136 as used to compare atypical haemangiomas and metastatic lesions.
137 n (SRFA) for very large (>=8 cm) primary and metastatic liver tumors with curative treatment intent.
138 viously showed that PLG was able to identify metastatic LNs in animal models.
139            A 43-year-old female patient with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma, who harbored KIF5B-RET f
140 es in mouse models of mammary tumours and of metastatic lung cancer, as well as during fluorescence-g
141 nt; one patient assigned amiloride died from metastatic lung cancer, one patient assigned riluzole di
142  find that E-cadherin expression persists in metastatic lung nodules and circulating tumor cells (CTC
143  of MTA2 in IKK2/NF-kappaB-driven primary-to-metastatic lung tumor progression.
144 ssues were compared with primary INS and INS-metastatic lymph nodes, revealing more than 3,000 genes
145 e treatments are available for patients with metastatic MCC.
146 /2, which has been approved for treatment of metastatic melanoma and anaplastic thyroid cancer in pat
147 e, and that a lineage approach would uncover metastatic melanoma biology.
148                                              Metastatic melanoma carries a poor prognosis despite mod
149                                              Metastatic melanoma is challenging to manage.
150 rotein and mRNA expression in paired primary/metastatic melanoma or colorectal cancer cells than thos
151 th inflammation-attenuating glycoprotein non-metastatic melanoma protein B (GPNMB) signaling in human
152         Despite the advent of immunotherapy, metastatic melanoma represents an aggressive tumor type
153 s in the systemic treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma using immune checkpoint and tyrosine
154  may represent a novel therapeutic target in metastatic melanoma, the most lethal form of skin cancer
155 e checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of metastatic melanoma.
156 CI, ipilimumab, in 2011 for the treatment of metastatic melanoma.
157 apy in 10 patients with anti-PD-1-refractory metastatic melanoma.
158  in BRAF(V600) mutation-positive advanced or metastatic melanoma.
159 r patients with advanced-ie, unresectable or metastatic-melanoma.
160 s (aged >=18 years) with locally advanced or metastatic, MET-amplified, EGFR mutation-positive non-sm
161 f IL33 instigated type 2 inflammation in the metastatic microenvironment and mediated recruitment of
162 ge-independent growth and highlights how the metastatic microenvironment restores this malignant prop
163 ces a substantial survival benefit in highly metastatic murine TNBC models poorly responsive to PD-1
164 luster within primary tumors but ablates pro-metastatic neutrophils.
165  their role in the formation of a permissive metastatic niche is unresolved.
166 upon cancer initiation is transformed into a metastatic niche that captures aggressive circulating tu
167 llular matrix (ECM), a critical component of metastatic niches, in metastases to the brain, lungs, li
168 olumes greater than or equal to the smallest metastatic node while 4 normal nodes had SUV > 4.5.
169 69 y; median serum PSA, 3.69 mug/L) with 232 metastatic nodes less than 12 mm in diameter (mean lesio
170    The platform has been applied to advanced metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
171                                Patients with metastatic nonseminomatous GCT (NSGCT) who were evaluate
172 its of toxicity, for palliative treatment of metastatic NSCLC.
173 and chemotherapy in first-line HER2-positive metastatic oesophagogastric cancer is underway.
174 fficacy and safety analysis of patients with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumours harbouring
175 dhood soft-tissue sarcoma, yet patients with metastatic or recurrent disease continue to do poorly, i
176 nti-PD-1) therapy is modest in patients with metastatic or recurrent head and neck squamous cell carc
177 ells from 7 primary, 2 recurrent, and 2 lung metastatic osteosarcoma lesions, 11 major cell clusters
178          Epigen knockdown profoundly reduces metastatic outgrowth and switches clusters from a prolif
179  to lose their cytotoxic ability and promote metastatic outgrowth.
180                          In a mouse model of metastatic ovarian cancer, fluorescently labeled silica,
181                    These lesions progress to metastatic pancreatic cancer with high frequency.
182                  We previously reported that metastatic pancreatic cancers were dependent on the gluc
183 monitoring patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treat
184 borderline resectable, locally advanced, and metastatic; patient condition is also an important consi
185     Our study sheds light on the complicated metastatic pattern in CRC and has great clinical implica
186                        Mutational status and metastatic pattern were correlated with MFS and OS using
187 ssociation of mutational status of MIUC with metastatic pattern, metastasis-free survival (MFS), and
188 vasive urothelial cancer has implications on metastatic pattern, metastasis-free survival, and overal
189 ility profiles and positive outcomes for non-metastatic PC with androgen receptor antagonists, respec
190 , with three or more siblings diagnosed with metastatic PCa, we identified mutations in 31 genes invo
191 els and somatic testing were recommended for metastatic PCA.
192 etermining precisely what differentiates the metastatic phenotype has proven to be more elusive.
193 d transcriptomic changes characteristic of a metastatic phenotype, and inhibition of TRIM37 substanti
194  and animal models confers a less aggressive/metastatic phenotype.
195 ted proteins is responsible for inducing the metastatic phenotype.
196 s), which are necessary for the invasive and metastatic phenotype.
197 ptosis, hence developing more aggressive and metastatic phenotypes.
198 he activity of cabozantinib in patients with metastatic platinum-refractory urothelial carcinoma.
199            miR-431 may be targeted to manage metastatic PNETs.
200 mong cancer cells thus confer differences in metastatic potential as metastasizing cells depend on MC
201 re, the applicability for discriminating the metastatic potential of cancer cells by directly analyzi
202  strategy that is capable of determining the metastatic potential of human cancer cell lines in mouse
203 ancer that has a worse prognosis and greater metastatic potential than the more common pancreatic duc
204 on (based on an in vitro assessment of their metastatic potential) in PANC-1, a PDAC cell line.
205 ations might have gained growth advantage or metastatic potential, as a result of viral integration e
206 ing an U2OS osteosarcoma cell line with high metastatic potential, proven by a xenotransplant in zebr
207 B-231 breast cancer cells that vary in their metastatic potential, we show that 3D refractive index t
208 alter their antioxidant capacity for maximal metastatic potential.
209 GIT or anti-KLRG1 antibodies further reduced metastatic potential.
210  for disease progression, especially for the metastatic process in GC.
211                               Ovarian cancer metastatic progression can be restricted by targeting a
212 s antitumor immune responses and enhance the metastatic progression of cancer.
213 lying mechanisms that drive MCC invasion and metastatic progression.
214 ation, migration, and in the case of cancer, metastatic progression.
215       These cell lines offer a model for CRC metastatic progression; SW480 derived from primary adeno
216                                      To link metastatic propensity to a hypoxia-induced proteotype, w
217 metastatic tumor biopsies from patients with metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma and CRPC-NE, we ident
218 D-CC in a test-retest trial in subjects with metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma.
219 tase activity in the development of advanced metastatic prostate cancer and suggests that blocking SR
220                                       Lethal metastatic prostate cancer seems to arise from a single
221 , such as (177)Lu-PSMA-617, is used to treat metastatic prostate cancer.
222 ts FASN as a potential therapeutic target in metastatic prostate cancer.
223 g pathways has been observed in advanced and metastatic prostate cancers.
224                                              Metastatic prostate carcinoma overexpresses prostate-spe
225 e prognosis of patients with bulky nodal and metastatic PSCC is dismal and new management approaches
226 man breast cancers and independently predict metastatic rather than loco-regional recurrence.
227 th tumor response and disease progression in metastatic RCC treated with vascular endothelial growth
228                     Forty-five patients with metastatic RCC were included.
229                    We enrolled patients with metastatic RCC with no prior checkpoint inhibitor exposu
230 d surrogate endpoints used in trials for non-metastatic rectal cancer.
231  Despite this, the genomic events that drive metastatic recurrence are poorly understood.
232  TWIST1 and PRKD1 expression correlated with metastatic recurrence, particularly in basal breast canc
233  a key function of IL33 in facilitating lung metastatic relapse by modulating the immune microenviron
234                        Eligible patients had metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), endometrial cance
235 nt inhibitors (ICIs) are standard therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
236 acy of atezolizumab in patients with mUC and metastatic renal cell carcinoma, even in tumors that wer
237 ts highlight the novel context-specific, pro-metastatic role of SIRT3 in ovarian cancer.
238  that increase fitness along glucose-replete metastatic routes.
239  chromosome 6, and had the highest number of metastatic samples.
240  of upfront small bowel resection (USBR) for metastatic SB-NET compared to non-operative management (
241  molecular targets for a subset of recurrent/metastatic SDC.
242  an unexpected advantage at initial steps of metastatic seeding, suggesting that Rab27a may alter cel
243                          In the unresectable/metastatic setting, ipilimumab plus nivolumab, nivolumab
244 o had received <=2 chemotherapy lines in the metastatic setting.
245 ransferase 3B (DNMT3B) is induced at distant metastatic sites and mediates epigenetic reprogramming o
246 inal tissue biopsies from the bone and other metastatic sites have been challenging to collect.
247  stage, tumor grade, ER, PR, HER2, number of metastatic sites, and presence of bone-only metastases.
248     In soft microenvironments reminiscent of metastatic sites, breast cancer cells were more resistan
249 d by cancer to promote growth at primary and metastatic sites.
250 ppressor, a class of proteins which inhibits metastatic spread of cancer cells without impact on grow
251  tumor-promoting phenotype that supports the metastatic spread of cancer cells.
252 e tumor-derived pioneers responsible for the metastatic spread of cancer.
253 rostate cancer patients can be attributed to metastatic spread of disease or tumor recurrence after i
254 elated deaths, yet the mechanisms underlying metastatic spread remain poorly understood.
255 aracterized by its aggressive biology, early metastatic spread, and poor survival outcomes.
256  us to interrogate the pattern and timing of metastatic spread.
257 s and explore studies investigating modes of metastatic spread.
258  often presenting with signs and symptoms of metastatic spread.
259 tion (EMT) in lung cancer cells and promoted metastatic spreading.
260 f cellular identity and progression toward a metastatic state.
261  effect, adjusting for age, cancer type, and metastatic status.
262 stemic treatment for progressive advanced or metastatic STS who had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Grou
263                                              Metastatic subclones at autopsy were present in tissue a
264           RNA-Seq results suggested that the metastatic subclones had greater activation of EMT-relat
265 ces between model parameters for primary and metastatic subgroups and that correlation coefficients w
266                                          The metastatic suppressing ability of Zic1 was mediated by r
267 5A, a non-canonical Wnt ligand that drives a metastatic, therapy-resistant phenotype, stabilizes the
268  beta(PV/PV) knock-in (PV) mice that develop metastatic thyroid cancer that most closely resembles FT
269 erogeneous stromal components in primary and metastatic TMEs and discuss emerging strategies to targe
270              Three decades ago, high-risk NB metastatic to bone and bone marrow in children was not c
271 ing outcomes in patients with uveal melanoma metastatic to the liver.
272 th untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer using a block m
273 ur activity of chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.
274 display invasive features and alterations in metastatic tropism when xenografted into mice.
275 cing of cell free DNA (cfDNA) and of matched metastatic tumor biopsies from patients with metastatic
276  host WNT5A significantly reduced peritoneal metastatic tumor burden.
277 entifying and sorting highly tumorigenic and metastatic tumor cells from a heterogeneous cell populat
278 tored in lung neutrophils are transported to metastatic tumor cells through a macropinocytosis-lysoso
279 tes and mediates epigenetic reprogramming of metastatic tumor cells.
280 senting cells (APC), and abrogates local and metastatic tumor growth by a T-cell-related effect.
281              Analysis of matched primary and metastatic tumor samples supports a unidirectional, line
282               Here, we compared primary with metastatic tumors and found that the nuclei of tumor cel
283                             Many primary and metastatic tumors express high levels of DeltaNp63, whil
284     Integration of BKPyV in both primary and metastatic tumors followed the mechanism of microhomolog
285                                              Metastatic tumors that have become resistant to androgen
286 and non-irradiated distant tumors, including metastatic tumors, when adrenergic stress or signaling t
287  tumors, including drug-resistant tumors and metastatic tumors.
288                                     However, metastatic tumour cells are exposed to highly perfused a
289  may play a key role in the establishment of metastatic tumours.
290                      Therapeutic options for metastatic UM are limited, with clinical trials having l
291 ines, POS (low metastatic) and HMPOS (highly metastatic), under normoxia and hypoxia.
292 us ipilimumab (CaboNivoIpi) in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and other genitour
293 ntify the patients with previously untreated metastatic urothelial carcinoma who benefit from treatme
294 with heavily pretreated, platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma with measurable disease
295 d 18 years or older with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, from 221 sites in 35 co
296 d progression-free survival in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma.
297 ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.
298                                              Metastatic uveal melanoma has poor overall survival (OS)
299 mab plus ipilimumab demonstrates activity in metastatic uveal melanoma, with deep and sustained confi
300 line: HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.10-2.51, P = .016; metastatic vs resectable or borderline: HR, 2.50; 95% CI

 
Page Top