コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 of the spontaneous nucleation and growth of methane hydrate.
2 reenhouse forcing by the carbon derived from methane hydrate.
3 s cause methane to form ice-like crystals of methane hydrate.
4 tudies of sediments related to a decomposing methane hydrate.
5 from surface sedimentary reservoirs such as methane hydrates.
6 ing the destabilization of 2.5 gigatonnes of methane hydrate (about 0.2 per cent of that required to
8 Our results demonstrate the potential for methane hydrate accumulation in Antarctic sedimentary ba
9 th the Gulf Stream are rapidly destabilizing methane hydrate along a broad swathe of the North Americ
10 ow that the kinetics of methane release from methane hydrate and CO(2) extracted from flue gas strong
12 such as early diagenesis, subsea permafrost, methane hydrates, and underlying thermogenic/ free gas t
18 re presented of the spontaneous formation of methane hydrate at a methane/liquid water interface.
20 on of seawater can accelerate the melting of methane hydrates at depth from timescales of millennia t
21 plicons, metagenomes, and metaproteomes from methane hydrate-bearing sediments under Hydrate Ridge (o
22 greenhouse gas levels, with dissociation of methane hydrates being the most commonly invoked explana
23 ld replace petroleum, the global reserves of methane hydrate (combustible ice) are estimated to be ap
24 ms involved in the formation/dissociation of methane hydrate confined at the nanometer scale are unra
26 herefore, where seafloor fluid expulsion and methane hydrate deposits coincide, the base of the hydra
27 lends strong support to the hypothesis that methane hydrate destabilization contributed to the enigm
31 nic methane as a result of continental-shelf methane hydrate dissociation has been put forward as a p
32 consistent with emission of >3000 Pg C from methane hydrate dissociation or >4400 Pg C for scenarios
33 rocks were the result of destabilization of methane hydrates during deglaciation and concomitant flo
34 that pressure/temperature conditions favour methane hydrate formation down to sediment depths of abo
35 s provide a means to rationalize and predict methane hydrate formation in any porous media from simpl
37 inement effects on nanopore space, synthetic methane hydrates grow under mild conditions (3.5 MPa and
41 The most compelling criticism of the latter 'methane hydrate' hypothesis has been the apparent lack o
44 ards the application of a smart synthesis of methane hydrates in energy-demanding applications (for e
46 assigned a role as water-ice antifreeze and methane hydrate inhibitor which is thought to contribute
47 gy calculations, phase stability of confined methane hydrate is shown to be restricted to a narrower
51 sing; (iii) the release of methane stored in methane hydrates; (iv) the decomposition and oxidation o
52 creased area implies that significantly more methane hydrate lies close to being unstable and hence c
53 upport the notion that degassing of biogenic methane hydrate may have been an important factor in alt
54 estimate of 2.5 gigatonnes of destabilizing methane hydrate may therefore represent only a fraction
55 Unprecedentedly, we were able to isolate methane hydrate (MH) nanocrystals with an sI structure e
59 tribution from old carbon reservoirs (marine methane hydrates, permafrost and methane trapped under i
60 ographic data have been used to suggest that methane hydrates play a significant role in global clima
61 s illuminate how selection between competing methane hydrate polymorphs occurs and might generalize t
65 om seismic imaging, in which the base of the methane hydrate stability zone is frequently identifiabl
67 ure is the thermodynamically stable form for methane hydrate; this is in accord with the results of r
68 and convert hundreds of gigatonnes of frozen methane hydrate trapped below the sea floor into methane
70 ikely to dominate over the known structure I methane hydrate within deep hydrate-bearing sediments un