戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 iven by genetic drift and natural selection (microevolution).
2 cted individuals drive rapid intrahost virus microevolution.
3 f the current literature focuses on cultural microevolution.
4 oevolution and subsequent modifications with microevolution.
5 , and a laboratory for the study of rates of microevolution.
6 c material are essential forces in bacterial microevolution.
7  is a resource for research into prokaryotic microevolution.
8 riable in vivo, suggesting in vivo-dependent microevolution.
9 at reason proved most effective in assessing microevolution.
10 with the language and concepts of gradualist microevolution.
11 ce development through drug pressure-induced microevolution.
12 for new theory connecting macroevolution and microevolution.
13 ought to understand the relationship between microevolution (adaptation), which can be observed both
14 gical time, direction, macroevolution verses microevolution, ageing and the extent of internal as opp
15  from Malawi and Kenya provided evidence for microevolution and clonal replacement in the field.
16 onally, we demonstrate mechanisms of in-host microevolution and exhibit their potential to shape Salm
17  and deep evolution, its macroevolution, its microevolution and finally, the recent effects of human
18 Modern plasmids have evolved through complex microevolution and fusion events into a distinct group o
19 n of scale architecture facilitates both the microevolution and macroevolution of a broad spectrum of
20 ubstantial effort has been made to reconcile microevolution and macroevolution, much work remains to
21 ary thinking can be applied to both cultural microevolution and macroevolution.
22                                   No genomic microevolution and no Legionella resistance to antibioti
23 hat mobile elements are likely to facilitate microevolution and rapid adaptation during infection.
24      Insecticide resistance is a paradigm of microevolution, and insecticides are responsible for the
25  population-genetic style models of cultural microevolution, and the use of phylogenetic methods to r
26 ariants at the hotspots arose via convergent microevolution, appear to be immune-escape variants, and
27          Tumors may follow gradualist paths (microevolution) as well as major shifts in evolutionary
28 sticity in shaping evolutionary patterns: in microevolution, as one of mechanism for maintaining gene
29 for a more in-depth analysis of the scale of microevolution both at the intrapatient and interpatient
30 eigning paradigm in biology is that rates of microevolution can be predicted from estimates of availa
31 rstrain single-nucleotide-polymorphism-based microevolution, contrasting with a rampant within-patien
32                        We find that mosquito microevolution, defined by changes in the genetic struct
33 ield for over 100 years in investigations of microevolution, ecological dynamics, and ecotoxicology.
34  by mutation thus turning these mutants into microevolution endpoints.
35   The emergence of clonal variants caused by microevolution events leading to population heterogeneit
36                              Here, a 10 week microevolution experiment was conducted with a genetical
37 ain the complete process of (i) interpatient microevolution, (ii) intrapatient respiratory variation,
38 e our understanding of MRSA transmission and microevolution in congregate settings.
39  not all, hospitals in the study and undergo microevolution in hospital settings.
40 alid groups in a dendrogram, (iv) identifies microevolution in infecting populations, and (v) is amen
41 he study of natural selection and phenotypic microevolution in prokaryotes.
42  understanding the patterns and processes of microevolution in RNA viruses, little is known about the
43 IV since its emergence, and particularly its microevolution in spatially restricted populations, we e
44 d by in vitro culture and (ii) is capable of microevolution in vitro with the emergence of variants e
45                  Cd24, which did not exhibit microevolution in vitro, was highly variable in vivo, su
46        Our findings suggest that within-host microevolution is rapid and adaptive during natural colo
47 eneous population structure with evidence of microevolution locally in swine production systems, whil
48                     Here, I will discuss why microevolution, macroevolution and developmental biology
49                                              Microevolution may therefore be as important as species
50 have been used to investigate the macro- and microevolution of a broad range of organisms, including
51 high-resolution view of the epidemiology and microevolution of a dominant strain of methicillin-resis
52 s a unique, high-resolution insight into the microevolution of a pioneering human pathogen during its
53                             By investigating microevolution of a subcellular process, we identify new
54                   These observations suggest microevolution of C. neoformans during human infection.
55 n the regulation of upd-like are involved in microevolution of morphological and sex-specific differe
56 ur results showed clear evidence of branched microevolution of MTB in vivo, which led to a diverse ba
57 genome sequencing to investigate within-host microevolution of naturally carried pneumococci in ninet
58  rapid analysis of genetic variations during microevolution of RNA viruses.
59                               To examine the microevolution of S. aureus colonization, we deep sequen
60 t to warmer parts of species' ranges through microevolution of smaller male ornaments.
61                             To elucidate the microevolution of the bacterium during this time period,
62 (M.) onukii and improve understanding of the microevolution of this species.
63 n, yet direct evidence that feeding controls microevolution over extended evolutionary time scales, a
64 ion of key virulence factors through a rapid microevolution pathway involving SigB regulation of key
65                                      On-farm microevolution resulted in enhanced biofilm formation in
66                      Thereafter, the rate of microevolution stalls, recapitulating macroevolutionary
67                                       From a microevolution standpoint, these are subject to positive
68   These findings illustrate a novel model of microevolution that transpires during the span of a sing
69 ty) or between- (developmental plasticity or microevolution, through selection) individual shifts in
70 vide a framework to relate the parameters of microevolution to properties of populations.
71 efore a more effective probe for determining microevolution within a clonal population and substrain
72 were also demonstrated to be able to resolve microevolution within a strain, with the Ca3 probe exhib
73 te between unrelated isolates, and to assess microevolution within a strain.
74 ns support Darwinian and Simpsonian ideas of microevolution within adaptive zones and accelerated evo
75 lection at the genomic level recently driven microevolution within bacterial pathogens of humans?
76        Yet, selection pressures driving DENV microevolution within human hosts (intrahost) remain unk
77 DNA is consistent with a model of continuous microevolution within its cognate host.
78           Whole-genome sequencing can detect microevolution within Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains
79 e of substantial diversity and ward-specific microevolution within the population.