ライフサイエンスコーパス: minimum inhibitory concentration

1 ted by combination with ciprofloxacin (2.5 x minimum inhibitory concentration).

2 y to discern the molecular mechanism and the minimum inhibitory concentration.

3 y be associated with an increased vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration.

4 icrog/ml, well below the clinically relevant minimum inhibitory concentration.

5 onsistently below or close to the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration.

6 red at combined PNU levels > or =2 times the minimum inhibitory concentration.

7 s was evaluated by disk diffusion assays and minimum inhibitory concentration.

8 MR phenotypes, as well as metadata including minimum inhibitory concentrations.

9 GroEL/GroES overexpression did not increase minimum inhibitory concentrations.

10 rial growth media at lower levels than their minimum inhibitory concentrations.

11 patterns at concentrations well below their minimum inhibitory concentrations.

12 nem to assess its effect on the antibiotics' minimum inhibitory concentrations.

13 tb in vitro identified compounds with potent minimum inhibitory concentrations.

14 was equivalent to unencapsulated tobramycin (minimum inhibitory concentration 0.625mg/L).

15 he CS-PAEO-Nm exhibited improved antifungal (minimum inhibitory concentration = 0.08 muL/mL) and anti

16 inimum inhibitory concentration (>= fT > 1 x minimum inhibitory concentration); 2) were above four ti

17 d by a DAP-susceptible Enterococcus faecium (minimum inhibitory concentration, 3 microg/mL) harboring

18 to the oxyimino-cephalosporin, ceftazidime (minimum inhibitory concentration; 32-->128 mg/liter) whe

19 of NSC319726 was 35-800-fold higher than the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration 50% (MIC50 values), whi

20 e use at presentation had a 2.01-fold-higher minimum inhibitory concentration (95% CI, 1.39-fold to 2

21 well-turbidity detection accuracy of 98.21%, minimum-inhibitory-concentration accuracy of 95.12%, and

22 compare antibiotic use at presentation with minimum inhibitory concentration against moxifloxacin fo

23 Minimum inhibitory concentrations against B237 were 20-f

24 These inhibitors show potent minimum inhibitory concentrations against fluoroquinolon

25 from AMP disruption corresponded with lower minimum inhibitory concentrations against the Gram-posit

26 Minimum inhibitory concentration analysis of the 20 posi

27 Vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration and in vitro killing, a

28 In the minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericida

29 724A-resistant mutants increase the in vitro minimum inhibitory concentration and the in vivo 99% eff

30 THPP-binding and increased both the in vitro minimum inhibitory concentration and the in vivo effecti

31 mulsions (coarse and nano) was tested by the minimum inhibitory concentration and time kill assay.

32 The minimum inhibitory concentrations and minimum fungicidal

33 Minimum inhibitory concentrations and minimum microbicid

34 imum inhibitory concentration (>= % fT > 4 x minimum inhibitory concentration); and 3) were always ab

35 at both agr functional status and vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration are determinants associ

36 icillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus with minimum inhibitory concentration as low as 0.39 mug/mL.

37 proach will be used, along with the existing minimum inhibitory concentration, as a standard for the

38 , including circular dichroism spectroscopy, minimum inhibitory concentration assays, hemolysis and m

39 t active antibiotic against S. constellatus (minimum inhibitory concentration at 90% [MIC90] 0.25 mg/

40 id not achieve day 2 area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) thresholds pr

41 target area under the curve over 24 hours to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC).

42 under the concentration/time curve for 24 h:minimum inhibitory concentration [AUC24:MIC] ratio) and

43 T9363) associated with elevated azithromycin minimum inhibitory concentration (AZIem), characterized

44 eae treated with quinolones suggest that the minimum inhibitory concentration break point for resista

45 as reasonable in vitro and urinary activity (minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoint </=64 microg

46 ittee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, and minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoints to standard

47 activity also occurred at > or =2 times the minimum inhibitory concentration, but it was only -0.16

48 ng MRSA and strains with elevated vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations, but clinicians should

49 Concentrations exceeding 10 times the minimum inhibitory concentration completely inhibited th

50 While most variation in minimum inhibitory concentrations could be explained by

51 Minimum inhibitory concentration distributions of the re

52 the 24-hour concentration-time curve to the minimum inhibitory concentration (fAUC/MIC) was found to

53 Evaluation of the minimum inhibitory concentrations, followed by whole gen

54 y against methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (minimum inhibitory concentration for 50% [MIC(50)] and 9

55 resulting in heterogeneous increases in the minimum inhibitory concentration for a range of antibiot

56 micin mean fecal levels were >5000 times the minimum inhibitory concentration for C. difficile of 0.2

57 The minimum inhibitory concentration for capsidiol (3-10 ng)

58 d sufficient antibiotic concentration (above minimum inhibitory concentration for most common bacteri

59 A decrease of >3 doubling dilutions in the minimum inhibitory concentration for third-generation ce

60 the D-Ala-D-Ala ligase enzyme we reduced the minimum inhibitory concentration for vancomycin from >25

61 Fungal minimum inhibitory concentration for voriconazole was 4

62 Only Al derived from the clay exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentrations for E. coli under acid

63 performing susceptibility tests to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations for M. genitalium.

64 Minimum inhibitory concentrations for the lead compounds

65 Minimum inhibitory concentrations for various antibiotic

66 tion (called the lethal concentration or the minimum inhibitory concentration) for activity, below wh

67 ivitiy (selecitviy = hemolytic concentration/minimum inhibitory concentration) for bacteria over mamm

68 nimum inhibitory concentration (>= 100% fT > minimum inhibitory concentration) for the first 72 hours

69 ored colistin susceptibility by reducing the minimum inhibitory concentration from 8 to 0.5 mug/ml, 4

70 higher positive predictive value compared to minimum inhibitory concentrations generated by commercia

71 listin-tigecycline therapy given tigecycline minimum inhibitory concentration greater than 2 mg/L com

72 tigecycline in the subgroup with tigecycline minimum inhibitory concentration greater than 2 mg/L com

73 Isolates with ceftriaxone minimum inhibitory concentration >/= 1 microg/mL decreas

74 lates were highly resistant to voriconazole (minimum inhibitory concentration >/=16 mg/L).

75 ion of isolates clinically resistant to AZM (minimum inhibitory concentration >/=16 microg/mL) was al

76 sole pathogen or S. aureus with a vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration >1 microg/mL, however,

77 Isolates with ceftriaxone minimum inhibitory concentrations >/=2 microg/mL underwe

78 isolates demonstrated ceftolozane-tazobactam minimum inhibitory concentrations >/=8 mug/mL.

79 inst DAP-susceptible E. faecium strains with minimum inhibitory concentrations >2 microg/mL.

80 concentration); 2) were above four times the minimum inhibitory concentration (>= % fT > 4 x minimum

81 concentration); and 3) were always above the minimum inhibitory concentration (>= 100% fT > minimum i

82 ns (fT): 1) were above the target organism's minimum inhibitory concentration (>= fT > 1 x minimum in

83 heteroresistance in MRSA and increase in the minimum inhibitory concentrations (>1 or 2 microg/mL); h

84 patients colonized with FQREC (levofloxacin minimum inhibitory concentration, >/=8 mug/mL) were incl

85 solates with high but susceptible vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations have been associated w

86 including antibiotic-resistant strains, with minimum inhibitory concentrations in the range of 0.4-2.

87 methyl and ethyl ester prodrug forms showed minimum inhibitory concentrations in the range of 21-43

88 nals from ROS are greatly diminished and the minimum inhibitory concentration increases 20-fold.

89 Achieving 100% fT greater than minimum inhibitory concentration is a more stringent ben

90 susceptibility testing, and determination of minimum inhibitory concentration is conventionally perfo

91 harmacodynamic target of fT greater than 1 x minimum inhibitory concentration led to similarly high r

92 However, in our studies RA did not attain minimum inhibitory concentration levels in sweet basil's

93 nstitute susceptible breakpoint of cefepime (minimum inhibitory concentration </= 8 mug/mL), cefepime

94 All isolates had minimum inhibitory concentration </=0.50 microg/mL.

95 Here, using recombinantly expressed enzymes, minimum inhibitory concentration measurements, steady-st

96 from resistance, which is measured using the minimum inhibitory concentration metric, tolerance and p

97 ory strains of M. tuberculosis was observed [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC(meropenem)) less t

98 tal isolates, there were 10 with ceftriaxone minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) >/=0.06 mg/L and

99 oup A) and 11.8% (group B) of patients had a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) >2 mug/mL to peni

100 erred resistance to kanamycin [5 microg/mL < minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) <or=40 microg/mL]

101 e even more potent antimicrobial agents [VRE minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) = 0.01-0.005 mug/

102 is effective against Staphylococcus aureus [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) = 4 ug/mL], while

103 The significant modulation of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against a Mtb str

104 ion of piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and beta-lactam r

105 Biological tests of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and hemolytic con

106 ial activity was determined by measuring the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bacte

107 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bacte

108 TEO reached minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungi

109 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungi

110 The vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and staphylococca

111 PPMOs were evaluated in vitro using minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and viability ass

112 ment strains were constructed to perform the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays, which ind

113 and benchmark its performance with standard minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays.

114 anced antibacterial activities, lowering the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) by more than one

115 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) can be determined

116 PZA resistance but genotypic DST (gDST) and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) could be benefici

117 testing method for telavancin, resulting in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determinations th

118 ogistic models to end points calculated from minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions bas

119 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) does not provide

120 berculosis in vitro, revealing 143 hits with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) equal to or less

121 Furthermore, sulphated PEPS had the lowest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for E. coli ATCC

122 uently infected by fungi at levels above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for many fungi.

123 rain Pen6 showed reduction of the penicillin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) from 6 to 0.75 mi

124 outcomes in vivo, although the importance of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) has been debated.

125 Vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) has been shown to

126 with Staphylococcus aureus to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) have revealed com

127 he sensors enable accurate prediction of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in 60 min (p < 0.

128 ureus bacteremia (MRSAB) when the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is >1 microg/mL.

129 It is unclear whether higher-vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is associated wit

130 nt observations that the traditional test of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is not informativ

131 ftaroline and comparator agents by reference minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) methods.

132 is reflected by laboratory estimates of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) needed to prevent

133 rved only for VGS isolates with a penicillin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of >/= 2 microg/m

134 able and more potent than compound 3, with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.2 microM and

135 al action in dose-time dependent manner with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 125 mM.

136 ary BV pathogen Gardnerella vaginalis with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 3.6 mg/ml.

137 ](m- tolyl)methanone (16), which displayed a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 36.6 microM vs

138 tuberculosis; the most potent compound had a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 52 nM and was

139 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of an antimicrobi

140 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of GEO was determ

141 Culture assays showed that the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of RSM-932A and M

142 levant concentrations of LL-37 increased the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of S. aureus towa

143 n; in addition, we determined the gentamicin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the E. coli is

144 ere free antibiotic concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the pathogen a

145 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the peptide ra

146 as plasma antibiotic concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) on days 3 and 4.

147 either voriconazole at 1x, 10x, 25x, or 50x minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) or amphotericin B

148 terial cells in 60 min and susceptibility at minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range of 6.25-12.

149 ies of 1323 C. difficile isolates showed the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range of fidaxomi

150 ezolid efficacy was linked to the AUC0-24 to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio (r(2) = 0.9

151 to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio of >/=400.

152 -2010) and correlated treatment outcome with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results and the p

153 FC procedure using acridine orange provided minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results within 7

154 Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing, unlike r

155 Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) tests and growth

156 vancomycin (VAN) area under the curve (AUC)/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to ensure clinica

157 The lowest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value (0.13mg gal

158 sistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value as low as 0

159 A remarkable 1000-fold decrease in minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value is observed

160 st all tested fungal strains, with excellent minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values against no

161 i-Mtb activity of these dihydropyridomycins (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values around 2.5

162 Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values at the hig

163 ted drug concentrations are greater than the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for inhibi

164 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values generated

165 eplicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis , with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values lower than

166 gainst Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 9.65 an

167 This covers the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of the mos

168 SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Study, and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were obtai

169 displayed very potent activities [sub-mug/mL minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values] against G

170 The daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was 4 mg/L in 78

171 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined fo

172 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was much lower fo

173 The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was set as the lo

174 , we compared its spectrum of inhibition and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) with that of nisi

175 yr period with clarithromycin-resistant MAC (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)>or=32 microg/ml)

176 metric sigma correlates not with a peptide's minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), but rather its a

177 broth microdilution method to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

178 nt activity, antimicrobial activity (AA) and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

179 n at a concentration 8 times higher than the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

180 low as one-eighth of the resistant strain's minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

181 e bacteria to a given drug and establish its minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

182 ampicillin at a lower concentration than the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

183 ssociation between exposure and azithromycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

184 ssociation between exposure and azithromycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).

185 Several compounds had submicromolar minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) against R-TB and

186 Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and fractional i

187 Leg1/Leg2 showed minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) down to 15.6 umo

188 e broad spectrum antibacterial activity with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) in the low micro

189 lyses based on 735 literature data points of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of Plantae, Bact

190 Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of their MAC iso

191 whole-cell Mtb activity varied greatly with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) ranging from 0.7

192 vatives of zingerone (2b-2e) exhibited lower minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) values than zing

193 Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined

194 nsisting of two circular micropumps, and the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were then determ

195 ptible breakpoint of </= 0.25 microg/mL (50% minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC(50)], 0.01 microg/

196 sceptibility breakpoint for enterococci (ie, minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] <=4 mg/L) is appr

197 rated potent activity against staphylococci (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] for which 90% of

198 reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] to levofloxacin,

199 oxic ciprofloxacin concentrations (i.e., 50x minimum inhibitory concentration, MIC), despite the lack

200 isolates were more likely to have meropenem minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) >/=16 microg/mL

201 All demonstrated elevated azithromycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) >256 mug/mL and

202 B1 showed potent minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against canine

203 However, we additionally found that the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against fluoroq

204 Macrolides show high minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against Pseudom

205 ithromycin, and ciprofloxacin geometric mean minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) as the outcome

206 entration (Cmax), and standard antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) by agar dilutio

207 Although polyamine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) decreased 4-fol

208 erifying protein production when determining minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) especially by b

209 s were itraconazole susceptible, whereas the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for 15 MB isola

210 Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for ampicillin

211 Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for ampicillin

212 Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) from some conte

213 Time-kill kinetic assay was performed at minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in all plankton

214 owed that E. faecium strains with daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in the higher e

215 -disubstituted quinazoline-2,4-diamines with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in the low micr

216 nical outcomes of children with piperacillin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of </=16 microg

217 tion at concentrations of <5 microM and have minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of <8 microg/mL

218 gainst the replicating bacteria (R-TB), with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 0.77 and 0.9

219 acterium tuberculosis (R-TB) phenotype, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 1.7, 1.9, an

220 RUSD can measure minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of commonly use

221 logue lowered the ceftazidime and cefotaxime minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of Escherichia

222 entrations nontoxic to mammalian cells), the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of imipenem aga

223 However, we observed that the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of penicillin,

224 n chlorophyte, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, to minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of single-herbi

225 were done in the presence or absence of sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of vancomycin.

226 vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from 0.

227 Isolates with higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) required higher

228 Increased minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to cefixime hav

229 ns, cultured Neisseria species, and measured minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to ciprofloxaci

230 tatin, atorvastatin, and simvastatin and the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined

231 Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined

232 Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined

233 Daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were inversely

234 Plasma drug concentrations and bacterial minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were used to de

235 ream infections (BSIs) and higher vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), despite MICs b

236 erculosis isolates with different antibiotic minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs).

237 daxomicin treatment had elevated fidaxomicin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs; MIC(90), 256 mi

238 e compounds was significantly lower than the minimum inhibitory concentration needed to prevent the g

239 ceptible-only interpretive breakpoint at the minimum inhibitory concentration of <=1 ug/mL.

240 similarity to S. malaysiensis and exhibited minimum inhibitory concentration of 0.024 ug/mL against

241 A minimum inhibitory concentration of 0.62 ng/mL and minim

242 alogue with a KD of 76 nM against BioA and a minimum inhibitory concentration of 1.7 muM (0.6 mug/mL)

243 inst Listeria monocytogenes: cIsf pool had a minimum inhibitory concentration of 10microg/ml prenylat

244 was higher among isolates with a vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration of 2 mg/L (P = .026).

245 Interestingly, however, the minimum inhibitory concentration of 2B8 against M. tuber

246 kinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling estimated a minimum inhibitory concentration of 83 ng/mL and a minim

247 Minimum inhibitory concentration of AgNPs needed to inhi

248 Normally, the minimum inhibitory concentration of an antibiotic, the d

249 this library that is capable of lowering the minimum inhibitory concentration of beta-lactam antibiot

250 The median minimum inhibitory concentration of DSM265 in blood was

251 The minimum inhibitory concentration of each plasma preparat

252 etermined alone or in combination changes in minimum inhibitory concentration of mutants.

253 ucted to evaluate the cytopathic effect, the minimum inhibitory concentration of ten antimicrobial ag

254 d amphotericin B concentrations in ELF above minimum inhibitory concentration of the Aspergillus near

255 The minimum inhibitory concentration of the obtained hydroly

256 Minimum inhibitory concentration of voriconazole and nat

257 Comparing the structures and minimum inhibitory concentrations of 1-4, the alpha,beta

258 required for killing bacteria with colistin minimum inhibitory concentrations of 2 mug/mL.

259 ial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (minimum inhibitory concentrations of 4-32 muM).

260 i and 240 epistatic pairs that influence the minimum inhibitory concentrations of 5 different antibio

261 Antibacterial susceptibility testing shows minimum inhibitory concentrations of 80 mg/mL against a

262 rowth of the tested pathogenic bacteria with minimum inhibitory concentrations of 8~32 ug/mL, while c

263 Isolates had low minimum inhibitory concentrations of an investigational

264 so that the concentration will persist above minimum inhibitory concentrations of Candida species for

265 The minimum inhibitory concentrations of P-A1 and P-A2 were

266 mplicity, marcAST can accurately measure the minimum inhibitory concentrations of reference bacterial

267 Minimum inhibitory concentrations of relevant antibiotic

268 The minimum inhibitory concentrations of these compounds rea

269 tivity through the estimation of amoxicillin minimum inhibitory concentration on a subset of 990 muta

270 f area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (r2 = 0.90).

271 M-1 variants possessed a distinct ampicillin minimum inhibitory concentration, ranging from 500 to >1

272 4-5 (area under the concentration-time curve/minimum inhibitory concentration ratio, 100).

273 24h) of 132 and 1,782 h.mg/L, and AUC(0-24h)/minimum inhibitory concentration ratios of 528 and 7129,

274 .1% in 2010), with a bimodal distribution of minimum inhibitory concentration recorded between 2009 a

275 ever, resistant isolates had alarmingly high minimum inhibitory concentration shifts (16- to >128-fol

276 Polymyxin minimum inhibitory concentrations showed stepwise increa

277 ults of culture-based antibiotic sensitivity minimum inhibitory concentration, sociodemographic and b

278 is a potent small molecule (1) that, at sub-minimum inhibitory concentration (sub-MIC) levels, lower

279 We perform minimum inhibitory concentration testing for 12 anti-TB

280 ones were associated with a 3.48-fold-higher minimum inhibitory concentration than those isolates tha

281 Minocycline (minimum inhibitory concentration that inhibits 50% and 9

282 ntage of time that faropenem persisted above minimum inhibitory concentration (TMIC) on the moxifloxa

283 in the disk-diffusion test and had elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations to other fluoroquinolo

284 Reassessment of the carbapenem minimum inhibitory concentrations using revised 2011 Cli

285 ports on the impact of increasing vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (V-MICs) and MRSA clon

286 ly isolated strains of M. tuberculosis, with minimum inhibitory concentration values as low as 0.03 m

287 Minimum inhibitory concentration values for azole drugs

288 S. aureus, E. coli, and S. typhimurium, with minimum inhibitory concentration values from 14,211 to 3

289 The minimum inhibitory concentration values measured after 2

290 ivity of enzyme to drug, resulting in higher minimum inhibitory concentration values.

291 Treatment response and echinocandin minimum inhibitory concentrations varied among specific

292 For the consistently infected, the average minimum inhibitory concentration was 0.26 microg/mL for

293 The minimum inhibitory concentration was 0.57 mg/ml for E. f

294 dilution method to accurately determine the minimum inhibitory concentration was developed herein.

295 Minimum inhibitory concentrations were higher across ant

296 Minimum inhibitory concentrations were interpreted as su

297 asamycins, mutants with elevated fasamycin A minimum inhibitory concentrations were selected from a w

298 oncentration was 19-fold above the linezolid minimum inhibitory concentration, whereas biofilm vancom

299 ia to aminoglycosides as measured by reduced minimum inhibitory concentrations, whereas GroEL/GroES o

300 t benchmark compared with T greater than 4 x minimum inhibitory concentration with standard antibioti