ライフサイエンスコーパス: money

1 portunity to gain a more traditional reward (money).

2 unresolved by the context (e.g., candy-mint-money).

3 on to a particular meaning (e.g., candy-mint-money).

4 ifferences strongly influence LLIN value for money.

5 e two actions may save considerable time and money.

6 d a Roulette task in which they won and lost money.

7 ve money; used alternative therapies to save money.

8 g constant the overall proportion of donated money.

9 icular, MCBs and SBCs provide good value for money.

10 within accepted benchmarks of good value for money.

11 rison, also elicited equivalent choices with money.

12 ambles with equal odds of winning and losing money.

13 alignancies may provide reasonable value for money.

14 der) decide how to split a certain amount of money.

15 ca, where participants traded stocks to earn money.

16 confounded by differences in how teens value money.

17 a target to either win money or avoid losing money.

18 stressfulness may improve recovery and save money.

19 s complete web-based tasks for small sums of money.

20 ove programme performance and thus value for money.

21 es of either winning or avoiding the loss of money.

22 farin, they may not represent good value for money.

23 pensity to 'ride' financial bubbles and lose money.

24 is technique to the cold case of DB Cooper's money.

25 n exerting effort in anticipation of winning money.

26 ld be made available on grounds of value for money.

27 er costs, GSK VCV may offer higher value for money.

28 ting and unsafe sex in exchange for drugs or money.

29 ngulate cortex mainly represented the SV for money.

30 unclear whether AGH provides good value for money.

31 for most ID patients provides good value for money.

32 g techniques could save significant time and money.

33 and in a loss condition using a fictive $100 money.

34 ing, at thresholds considered good value for money.

35 ing money illegally and scamming someone for money.

36 ns and therefore provide excellent value-for-money.

37 ction involving squeezing a handgrip to earn money.

38 offered a 50/50 chance of gaining or losing money.

39 as predictive of the choice for cocaine over money.

40 are given one opportunity to split a sum of money.

41 chance that BPM provides the best value for money.

42 , or delaying filling a prescription to save money.

43 ts willing to give up half of their allotted money.

44 uate compounds earlier, saving both time and money.

45 ificantly lower happiness than obtaining the money.

46 likely to return wallets that contained more money.

47 substantially by 2030, saving both lives and money.

48 among which RFA provided the best value for money.

49 ives decisions," and "95% the bottom line is money.

50 hich of two receivers would receive the most money.

51 dds and obstacles, and all the while on soft money?

52 Mobile money, a service that allows monetary value to be stored

53 limit, they would "bust" and either lose the money accrued on the current trial (low-penalty trials)

54 ticular, we explore the meanings and uses of money across ethnic groups and at different positions on

55 nation continues to represent good value for money across most Gavi countries despite lower rotavirus

56 We use a public goods game played with money and a naturalistic measure of behavior involving t

57 Double-duty interventions could save money and be more efficient than single-duty interventio

58 ts made choices between different amounts of money and different numbers of painful electric shocks.

59 NESCO World Heritage Site, and estimated the money and effort required to remove the remaining debris

60 ascades, resulting in loss of precious time, money and finally compromised data.

61 ven by factors that fall into three domains: money and finance; knowledge, bias, and uncertainty; and

62 e vmPFC significantly represented the SVs of money and food on a common scale appropriate for choice

63 on analysis demonstrated interactions across money and food valuation areas and the common areas in t

64 dition using both real and hypothetical $100 money and in a loss condition using a fictive $100 money

65 However, transformation of money and insurance coverage into cost-effective service

66 le energy development can bring infusions of money and jobs to local communities, an array of risks t

67 design as well as saving considerable time, money and labor.

68 ency and accountability for efficient use of money and maximise the effect of available funding to pr

69 Lack of money and negative staff attitudes were reasons for low

70 pendently to the stochastic delivery of both money and pain, we studied the impact of decreased brain

71 s there a difference between ACOs that saved money and those that did not (P = .391).

72 ialized personnel and it involves much lower money and time investment compared to traditional method

73 rpretations, and drain resources in terms of money and time spent.

74 is true for both decisions incentivized with money and with food.

75 s as they performed a concurrent appetitive (money) and aversive (effort) learning task.

76 signal of reward in both the economic (e.g., money) and social (e.g., praise and status) domains.

77 benefit or requires infeasibly large sums of money, and it distracts from the real problem: maximizin

78 mprove consumer safety and air quality, save money, and lower greenhouse gas emissions.

79 a panoply of societal costs, save taxpayers money, and promote prosperity.

80 d consent allegations, still present a time, money, and reputation toll for physicians.

81 cess; clinicians are frustrated by the time, money, and resources required for prior authorizations,

82 r pursuit of rewards, such as food, alcohol, money, and sex, the basis for these shifts is not clearl

83 iance comes at the cost of significant time, money, and staff resources.

84 rding the costs and benefits of giving time, money, and support to others and the costs and benefits

85 requires a specific combination of time and money, and there are inherent problems associated with e

86 in the face of these events, users of mobile money are better able to tap into remittances to finance

87 Since saving time and money are critical issues while developing innovative fu

88 As such, large amounts of money are spent each year on attempts to control them.

89 It would potentially save time and money arising from gelatinization and lead to improvemen

90 of reward, with the goal of earning as much money as possible.

91 offer (in which case both players split the money as proposed) or reject the offer (in which case bo

92 to the species extinction crisis is to spend money as soon as it becomes available, and this is often

93 imaging while they pressed a button to earn money as the response-reward relationship changed over t

94 oney; delayed filling a prescription to save money; asked doctor for lower cost medication to save mo

95 0 lost wallets containing varying amounts of money at public and private institutions and measured wh

96 dapted to the difficulty of the task and the money at stake.

97 trading is, the less likely they are to lose money at the end of the day.

98 computer mouse to choose between amounts of money at various delays.

99 ured by bids in an incentive-compatible real-money auction), although a modest share was willing to p

100 involving choice between varying amounts of money available immediately and a standard amount of $10

101 Lack of trust among strangers thus made money behaviorally essential.

102 : one player proposes a division of a sum of money between herself and a second player, who either ac

103 ation (HD-tDCS) while participants allocated money between themselves and a charity in a modified dic

104 ked doctor for lower cost medication to save money; bought prescription drugs from another country to

105 series of offers in which they will receive money but a planned actual charity donation will be redu

106 he selection of one meaning (e.g., coin-mint-money) but failed to emerge when competition between the

107 els of positive outcomes (e.g., prestige and money), but women anticipated more negative outcomes (e.

108 ccording to typical benchmarks for value for money, but achieving substantial population-level health

109 Humans may be patient when it comes to money, but chimpanzees are willing to wait longer than h

110 ticipants' willingness to harm strangers for money, but not participants' willingness to harm strange

111 trangers when they imagined harming them for money, but not when they imagined harming them for their

112 We raise the question of whether money buys happiness, separately for these two aspects o

113 an unfair procedure than when allocated less money by a fair procedure (studies 6 and 7).

114 nal magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) gained money by accurately predicting the outcomes of computeri

115 age receiver was happier when allocated more money by an unfair procedure than when allocated less mo

116 arterial and central venous catheters saves money by preventing major catheter-related infections, e

117 ever, despite large investments of staff and money by the organizations involved, only a fraction of

118 nning phase in which the participants earned money by working, and a neuronal scanning phase in which

119 lso variable, so that much time, effort, and money can go into the preparation and initial analysis o

120 qual access to care means that we spend less money caring for Black patients than for White patients.

121 Current variation in the forms of money challenges economic anthropologists and historians

122 the intervention represented good value-for-money, clinicians should discuss referral for CBT with a

123 ndustry-sponsored funding, with most of this money concentrated among clinical trial ($110,869) and m

124 iately before each block of 10 trials of the money condition and at 1 Hz (inhibitory stimulation) bef

125 ctiveness, avoid drug overexposure, and save money considering the extremely high cost of the drug.

126 Significantly, we eliminated the time- and money-consuming oligonucleotide purification steps throu

127 reach a fixed target sum through successive money contributions, knowing that if they fail, they wil

128 ant of the arcade whac-a-mole game) in which money could be earned if players hit brief-appearing vis

129 ed when lying had financial consequences and money could be gained; when losses were at stake, indivi

130 y that society is getting less value for its money could not be statistically excluded, and there is

131 days at a pub), or merely estimated what the money could purchase in the scenario.

132 cts expressed preferences between amounts of money delayed by 4 months and smaller amounts available

133 es to save money; took less medicine to save money; delayed filling a prescription to save money; ask

134 s music, claim much of our time, energy, and money despite lacking any clear adaptive benefits like f

135 elf-reported accuracy, allowing them to gain money dishonestly by lying about the accuracy of their p

136 HR, 5.7); for HCV, being a male who receives money/drugs for sex (HR, 5.6) and sharing noninjecting c

137 either imagined specific events of spending money (e.g., pound 35 in 180 days at a pub), or merely e

138 djusted spending quintile spent 124% as much money each day as those in the lowest quintile.

139 ctrical shocks to a 'victim' in exchange for money, either by their own free choice, or following ord

140 as independent beneficial effects other than money, especially for women with no formal education.

141 ombinations of the classic four functions of money, especially the relationship between store of valu

142 What makes money essential for the functioning of modern society?

143 pragmatism, patient centeredness, value for money, feasibility, and transparency define useful clini

144 f imports and exports based on international money flow.

145 ter-deprived subjects make risky choices for money, food, and water both in and out of a brain scanne

146 Risk factors (lacking money for basic needs, combat experience, alcohol misuse

147 made choices between receiving an amount of money for certain and taking a gamble.

148 Most important, allowing families to receive money for donation from a deceased person, who is at no

149 lack of innovation, an over-reliance on soft money for faculty salaries, the use of graduate students

150 eeking surgical care when needed included no money for health care (Sierra Leone: n = 103; 55%), a pe

151 d longer-term trips, and that travelers save money for longer trips when travelers adhere to malaria

152 ntification of SDM clones will save time and money for researchers.

153 inconsistent condom use, acceptance of more money for sex without a condom, and experience of client

154 r model suggests that healthcare payers save money for short- and longer-term trips, and that travele

155 thout these problems took significantly more money for themselves and left significantly less money i

156 imately happier if they ended up getting the money for themselves.

157 Sofosbuvir provides good value for money for treatment-experienced patients with HCV genoty

158 e function of cash, soft currencies, and new money forms.

159 ebt, sold or refinanced their home, borrowed money from friends or family, or experienced a 20% or gr

160 otential to improve health outcomes and save money from the societal perspective over the long-term.

161 care beneficiaries would save both lives and money from the societal perspective.

162 increases the likelihood of winners to steal money from their counterparts in a subsequent unrelated

163 paid to punish those they believed had taken money from them by administering varying amounts of unpl

164 Citizens do differentiate between aid money given to nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) comp

165 his may reverse a decades-long trend of more money going to older PIs.

166 Personal resources (eg, time and money) had a minimal association with charity care provi

167 h prior research, informing donors that seed money has already been raised increases donations, as do

168 cale-up is urgent, the emphasis on value for money has become an increasing priority.

169 Mobile money has therefore increased the efficiency of the allo

170 te problem (paying the bills takes away some money I need for other activities); and a great problem

171 ip strength to assess the motivation to earn money (i) for oneself, (ii) for anonymous ingroup fans,

172 in incentive groups, additionally, received money if their child was timely immunised (immunisation

173 ngly associated with shoplifting were making money illegally and scamming someone for money.

174 es of winning or losing different amounts of money in 15 patients with problem gambling (PRGs) and 16

175 re likely to work for cigarette puffs versus money in a progressive ratio, choice task (odds ratio 2.

176 palpation of the abdomen, and expenditure of money in ANC.

177 rmless, commensal relatives, saving time and money in clinical diagnostics.

178 As with attitudes about money in humans, these risk attitudes were strongly weal

179 The birth and explosive growth of mobile money in Kenya has provided economists with an opportuni

180 cument the lightning-fast adoption of mobile money in Kenya, which was faster than most documented mo

181 y for themselves and left significantly less money in the charity donation; AlAn's game outcomes were

182 When winning money in the real world, individuals sustaining positive

183 re pessimistic predictions regarding winning money in the study (d = -0.47) and were less willing to

184 nt cultures, and we analyze the gendering of money in the world of high finance and in contexts of ec

185 tral-medial amygdala invest nearly 100% more money in unfamiliar others in a trust game than do healt

186 ght to equalize allocations of both pain and money, in a manner which indicated that inequality carri

187 willing to sacrifice a more tangible reward, money, in order to reminisce about positive past experie

188 incidental, and 9 lagging) and 5 other trade/money indexes.

189 ed with self-reports of task engagement, and money-induced activations in the lateral prefrontal cort

190 l predictor of the noncontingent delivery of money inducing participants to perform more avidly an ac

191 Given the small amount of money involved, it seems unlikely that financial incenti

192 orticolimbic reward circuit to gradations of money is altered; 2) the lack of a correlation between o

193 Mobile money is an innovation that allows individuals to store,

194 t, even when subjects cannot report how much money is at stake, they nevertheless deploy more force f

195 is low, the apparent motive to gain research money is distrusted.

196 Knowing how much money is invested in funding mental health research, and

197 health outcomes, and a significant amount of money is lost into the system by paying for these compli

198 The money itself also has significant effects on most outcom

199 al cost that represents reasonable value for money judged using US benchmarks for cost-effectiveness.

200 to many factors, including cost (in time and money), lack of proven efficacies of practices and lack

201 ral shifts in the salience of cocaine now vs money later, we found that ketamine, as compared to the

202 individual discount rates-the rate by which money loses value over time.

203 back-related negativity (FRN) in response to money loss during risk taking with real rewards compared

204 reduced risk taking after negative feedback (money loss) during the BART with real rewards compared t

205 ters were evaluated in two tomato genotypes (Money maker and high pigment-1) subjected to post harves

206 ntration of ascorbic acid and carotenoids in Money maker flesh and peel, while high pigment-1 fruits

207 ith the exception of redness (a *), which in Money maker was found to increase in both flesh and peel

208 as experiencing SD (everyday living, 19.5%; money matters, 15.6%; self and others, 18.1%).

209 al distress (SD) comprising everyday living, money matters, and self and others subscales, plus five

210 Nurse staffing cuts to save money might adversely affect patient outcomes.

211 ch as deciding on whether to keep undeserved money, motivated forgetting is more likely.

212 This method greatly decreases the time and money necessary to perform DNA-based comparisons of biod

213 d that provides an estimate of the value for money of an expensive repair of a congenital heart disea

214 ults report greater happiness after spending money on a time-saving purchase than on a material purch

215 sk predicting whether they would win or lose money on each trial given three known win probabilities

216 ons, participants were willing to spend more money on food items only after sleep deprivation.

217 irmed or discarded to avoid wasting time and money on novel projects.

218 such as misrepresenting their income to save money on taxes.

219 lows individuals to store, send, and receive money on their mobile phone via text message.

220 = 6,271), we show that individuals who spend money on time-saving services report greater life satisf

221 mprove maternal and infant outcomes and save money; Option B increases health benefits and decreases

222 ry cues to respond to a target to either win money or avoid losing money.

223 Overall, 15.6% of parents borrowed money or cut back on necessities to pay for their childr

224 hardship was measured by ever (1) borrowing money or going into debt, (2) filing for bankruptcy, (3)

225 points]), but had fewer reports of borrowing money or going without necessities (difference of 5.5 pe

226 ale sex workers who sell or exchange sex for money or goods encompass a very diverse population acros

227 r incremental unit of resource (for example, money or human capacity).

228 is not yet clear that such differences save money or improve quality of care.

229 That is, if one just lost money or won money, this may impact future decisions.

230 appropriate to the context (e.g., coin-mint-money) or under conditions of increased competition when

231 o save money, taking less medication to save money, or delaying filling a prescription to save money.

232 mmon neural currency for outcomes like food, money, or social praise.

233 perceptual effects: the more a person valued money over pain, the more perceived intensity increased

234 Participants promised to spend money over the next 4 weeks either on others (experiment

235 however, rapid and accurate testing can save money overall by initiating appropriate treatment and in

236 predictions about future performance (e.g., money raised) for racially homogenous teams than for rac

237 eparated, not in a relationship, not earning money, receipt of government welfare, and experiencing f

238 Xpert, it is likely to offer good value for money relative to smear microscopy.

239 from their partner (input) and the amount of money repaid to their partner (output).

240 While the time and money required for the collection of genotype data were

241 , knowing that if they did not stop pursuing money reward before a secret varying time limit, they wo

242 tly, no learning deficits were observed with money reward.

243 ived food reward and the other half received money reward.

244 difficulty inhibiting food-rewarded, but not money-rewarded, appetitive behaviour, suggesting that ob

245 We explore money's ability to ascribe value, give autonomy, and pro

246 e conducted a randomized, voucher-based real-money sales trial with 1638 households with unimproved l

247 21, respectively; 1.12, 1.03-1.21; p=0.005), money saved for delivery or emergency (5730 [86%] of 668

248 ms of malaria at ANC visit and the amount of money spent during the visit.

249 of QIIs has opportunity costs; the time and money spent on an ineffective QII might be better spent

250 consistently operate with limited budgets of money, status, trust, or other forms of social utility.

251 h trustworthy identities attracting 42% more money (Study 1), and remains significant though reduced

252 Tokens endogenously became money: subjects took to reward help with a token and to

253 d harming them for immoral behavior, but not money, suggesting that morally motivated perpetrators ma

254 We estimate that access to the Kenyan mobile money system M-PESA increased per capita consumption lev

255 months they reported skipping doses to save money, taking less medication to save money, or delaying

256 Humans bargaining over money tend to reject unfair offers, whilst chimpanzees b

257 ded more quality-adjusted life year for less money than treatment after LT or nontreatment.

258 fluenced by conditioned reinforcers, such as money, than by primary reinforcers.

259 n the state contribute to an overall pool of money that is used to reimburse costs to individual mark

260 We explore the psychological meanings of money that parallel its economic functions.

261 ers experimentally manipulated the amount of money that participants would receive, the participants'

262 in which participants exchanged some of the money that they had earned for brief views of attractive

263 he rate of button pressing and the amount of money they earned.

264 ons were largely predictive of the amount of money they returned to the partner.

265 That is, if one just lost money or won money, this may impact future decisions.

266 Together, these results suggest that using money to buy time can protect people from the detrimenta

267 We provide evidence that using money to buy time can provide a buffer against this time

268 ldlife exceeds $2.3 billion, which is enough money to construct 155 landfills with state-of-the-art c

269 ement task for which participants could earn money to delay smoking and subsequently purchase cigaret

270 Moreover, individuals were willing to forgo money to disclose about the self.

271 cation which gave no apparent reason for the money to end up there.

272 intervention could represent good value for money to help prevent malaria in more remote areas, wher

273 nts) and 21 (21%) of 98 individuals borrowed money to pay for medications.

274 eviewed journal; to get a job in academia or money to run a lab, we present these published papers to

275 tes (6.9%-1.3%; P < .001), and spending less money to save for medications (8.0% to 3.5%; P < .001).

276 ator Game, where the 'dictator' can allocate money to the partner (the 'receiver').

277 .04, 95% CI 2.12-4.36, P < 0.001), and owing money to their practice (OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.34-5.50, P =

278 medication; skipped medication doses to save money; took less medicine to save money; delayed filling

279 dia testing and given the option of donating money toward testing for future participants.

280 ing in the pay-it-forward group donated some money toward testing for future participants.

281 etwork with applications ranging from secure money transfer to multiparty quantum computation.

282 scription drugs from another country to save money; used alternative therapies to save money.

283 y tasks involving different incentive types (money vs. social affective images) to a sample of 28 par

284 were a cost-beneficial investment of public money, warranting careful consideration by policy makers

285 Although spending more money was associated with a healthier diet, large improv

286 on a recovered bill which indicates that the money was immersed before burial.

287 ne abusers, prefrontal cortex sensitivity to money was instead associated with motivation and self-co

288 rom summer bloom species suggesting that the money was not directly buried dry and the immersion happ

289 uninformative did not provide good value for money when compared to using AGH as first-line testing.

290 h as investing more-whether time, effort, or money-when reward is more certain.

291 es of gaining or losing different amounts of money while their brain activity was measured with funct

292 The prize money will be used to fund outreach activities aimed at

293 hey fail, they will lose all their remaining money with 50% probability.

294 e, a proposer suggests how to split a sum of money with a responder.

295 mble of gaining or losing the same amount of money with equal chance.

296 investment of time and energy, and possibly money, with no guarantee of finding a job or of returnin

297 ences for pain were more altruistic than for money, with several participants assigning more than hal

298 further improved LE (38.32 years), and saved money within 4 years after delivery ($5630 per mother-in

299 e world to reduce costs in terms of time and money without compromising patients outcome.

300 ome-sequencing efforts, saving both time and money without sacrificing quality.