ライフサイエンスコーパス: monocular

1 riod onset are poorly tuned and are rendered monocular.

2 ts of short-term exposure (2 or 48 hours) to monocular +10 and -10 diopter (D) lenses, on RPE gene ex

3 Monocular adaptation to one grating before the presentat

4 We observed a monocular advantage, which indicates subcortical facilit

5 was much larger (1.67 x, P < 0.01) than the monocular amplitude.

6 Most patients were functionally monocular and 80% had undergone 4 or more prior ocular s

7 o 6 months after surgery) with the following monocular and binocular assessments: high- and low-contr

8 ntile nystagmus syndrome and myopia improved monocular and binocular BCVA and contrast sensitivity.

9 isual system can switch effortlessly between monocular and binocular conditions.

10 with and without optical correction, and in monocular and binocular conditions; one condition was me

11 alens AO and ReSTOR +3.0 demonstrated better monocular and binocular contrast sensitivity without gla

12 modal versus unimodal responses of the adult monocular and binocular cortices also mirror regional sp

13 Comparison of the adaptation of the medial monocular and binocular cortices to long-term ME or dark

14 ria and supernormal VFV underwent MRI during monocular and binocular fixation of a centered, near tar

15 ight level on normal, age-related changes in monocular and binocular functional contrast sensitivity.

16 Here we show that, in rat monocular and binocular primary visual cortex (V1m and V

17 ibility to encode visual features under both monocular and binocular situations.

18 cuity (CDVA) remained almost unchanged after monocular and binocular surgery.

19 Our results suggest that structured monocular and binocular training are necessary to fully

20 TCOME MEASURE(S): Three-months-postoperative monocular and binocular UCVA and DCVA in 4 m, 80 cm, and

21 1 and 3 months included manifest refraction; monocular and binocular uncorrected (UCVA) and distance-

22 stalens AO demonstrated significantly better monocular and binocular uncorrected and distance-correct

23 The ReSTOR+3.0 lens had significantly better monocular and binocular uncorrected and distance-correct

24 The main outcome measures were monocular and binocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), cor

25 patients underwent: monocular defocus curve; monocular and binocular uncorrected visual acuity in pho

26 ed at the Wills Eye Institute using standard monocular and binocular VF testing, as well as an object

27 Monocular and binocular visual acuity (VA) and contrast

28 t there has been no systematic study on both monocular and binocular visual functions.

29 Or are monocular and fused percepts three sub-states of one dyn

30 mask interact nonlinearly at two stages, one monocular and one binocular.

31 These results suggest that monocular, and not binocular, mechanisms set the limit o

32 sed eye response that normally occurs in the monocular as well as binocular zone is delayed, but only

33 riority of TFNT00 to SN60AT in mean photopic monocular BCDVA (95% upper confidence limit of the diffe

34 o a spherical monofocal IOL, with comparable monocular BCDVA.

35 Monocular BCVA improved from 0.36 +/- 0.21 logMAR to 0.2

36 of the BEFIE test was assessed by comparing monocular BEFIE test results with those of standard conv

37 Comparison of monocular BEFIE tests with standard conventional perimet

38 ry effectiveness outcomes were mean photopic monocular best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA;

39 Follow-up OCT imaging and monocular best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were perfo

40 Monocular best-corrected visual acuity and reading acuit

41 object motion judgments in environments with monocular, binocular, and ambiguous depth.

42 Corneal ulcer, a major cause of monocular blindness in developing countries has consiste

43 respectively, even in neurons classified as monocular by conventional ocular dominance (OD) measurem

44 Eyes treated for monocular cataract in infancy have axial growth similar

45 nths after the surgery, 95% of eyes achieved monocular CDVA equal or better than 0.3 logMAR, mean pos

46 Monocular CDVA improved significantly (p < 0.0001) from

47 cro F, binocular UDVA, 0.01 logMAR +/- 0.05; monocular CDVA, 0.03 logMAR +/- 0.06; binocular UNVA, 0.

48 iple, contiguous, quasicoronal planes during monocular central gaze fixation.

49 ands that control both eyes or from separate monocular commands that control the eyes independently.S

50 Monocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), corre

51 table for laser in situ keratomileusis, with monocular corrected distance visual acuity of 20/32 or b

52 ation remained incomplete, especially in the monocular cortex medial to V1.

53 In the medial monocular cortex, cortical inhibition via the GABAA rece

54 s followed by cross-modal adaptations in the monocular cortex, in which whiskers become a dominant no

55 increase again at the representation of the monocular crescent.

56 .SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Motion parallax is a monocular cue to depth that commonly arises during obser

57 r, there is a common misconception that only monocular cues can be used to deceive stereotests.

58 Observers can use monocular cues to deceive some of the most common stereo

59 One possibility is that the brain uses monocular cues to identify that a surface is specular an

60 The Randot test has been found free of monocular cues, and here we confirm that result by testi

61 stereoscope and a computerized test removing monocular cues.

62 Analysis included a monocular data set from single eyes of 97 subjects (age:

63 R] margin), and superiority in mean photopic monocular DCNVA (difference of 0.42 logMAR; P < 0.001) a

64 The TFNT00 exhibited superior monocular DCNVA and DCIVA to a spherical monofocal IOL,

65 s established that amblyopia is not simply a monocular deficit, and therefore the most promising new

66 One month after surgery patients underwent: monocular defocus curve; monocular and binocular uncorre

67 The monocular defocus curves showed that the best visual acu

68 isual area V2 of monkeys reared with chronic monocular defocus.

69 Monocular defocusing lenses were worn for 10-15 days fro

70 loping primary visual cortex is initiated by monocular deprivation (MD) and consolidated during subse

71 adult mice that visuomotor experience during monocular deprivation (MD) augmented enhancement of visu

72 Monocular deprivation (MD) during a critical period of p

73 Here, we show that monocular deprivation (MD) during the adolescent critica

74 Monocular deprivation (MD) during the critical period (C

75 to recover cortical responsiveness following monocular deprivation (MD) during the critical period, a

76 Monocular deprivation (MD) during the visual critical pe

77 Monocular deprivation (MD) engages synaptic mechanisms o

78 Monocular deprivation (MD) imposed early in postnatal li

79 on dendritic spine turnover before and after monocular deprivation (MD) in adult V1 with chronic in v

80 f-century of research on the consequences of monocular deprivation (MD) in animals has revealed a gre

81 In layer 4 of visual cortex (V1), monocular deprivation (MD) induces either depression or

82 Monocular deprivation (MD) induces ocular dominance (OD)

83 s in OD index following a short-term (2-3 d) monocular deprivation (MD) of the contralateral eye with

84 ging to characterize the effects of juvenile monocular deprivation (MD) on the responses of neurons i

85 We found that monocular deprivation (MD) or auditory-cued fear conditi

86 Brief monocular deprivation (MD) shifts ocular dominance and r

87 , we visualized V1 activity before and after monocular deprivation (MD) using intrinsic signal optica

88 We found that monocular deprivation (MD), but not binocular deprivatio

89 After brief monocular deprivation (MD), STAT1 knock-out (KO) mice sh

90 city in primary visual cortex in response to monocular deprivation (MD), the maturation of inhibition

91 ts on unit activity during the first 48 h of monocular deprivation (MD), we show that PNN removal res

92 nd of promoting recovery from the effects of monocular deprivation (MD).

93 reased sensitivity of excitatory synapses to monocular deprivation (MD).

94 e wave gratings for 6 h/d during a period of monocular deprivation (MD).

95 rapid ocular dominance plasticity following monocular deprivation (MD).

96 Depriving one eye of vision (monocular deprivation [MD]) during the critical period a

97 s receptor alters the microglial response to monocular deprivation and abrogates ocular dominance pla

98 al period peak, postnatal day 28 (P28) after monocular deprivation and dark rearing, and in the adult

99 lar dominance (OD) plasticity resulting from monocular deprivation and stimulus-selective response po

100 lly induced activity-dependent plasticity by monocular deprivation caused rapid changes in single uni

101 sensitivity called the critical period (CP), monocular deprivation causes a shift in the response of

102 Chronic monocular deprivation decreased thalamic input from the

103 Monocular deprivation disrupts the binocular balance of

104 Monocular deprivation disrupts the binocular balance of

105 Monocular deprivation during the CP affects ocular domin

106 Here we show that brief monocular deprivation during the critical period downreg

107 responsiveness to open-eye stimulation after monocular deprivation during the critical period is a ho

108 We find that microglia respond to monocular deprivation during the critical period, alteri

109 binocular matching is completely blocked by monocular deprivation during the critical period.

110 y.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We demonstrate that monocular deprivation during the developmental critical

111 Moreover, monocular deprivation elicited amblyopia only during a d

112 ng in vivo optical imaging, we observed that monocular deprivation in adult EE mice (i) caused a very

113 and to restore cortical plasticity following monocular deprivation in vivo Together, our results show

114 We demonstrate that in mice long-term monocular deprivation increases oligodendrogenesis in th

115 itivity of ocular dominance to regulation by monocular deprivation is the canonical model of plastici

116 tiation of open eye responses resulting from monocular deprivation relies on a homeostatic response t

117 binocular-like excitatory firing rates after monocular deprivation results from a rapid, although tra

118 However, monocular deprivation results in adaptive myelin remodel

119 ar matching process is completely blocked by monocular deprivation spanning the entire critical perio

120 In adult humans, short-term monocular deprivation strongly modifies ocular balance,

121 Loss of visual acuity in response to brief monocular deprivation was concomitantly delayed and resc

122 but did occur in wild-type littermates when monocular deprivation was imposed during the critical pe

123 ivity in V1 can be unmasked following 4 d of monocular deprivation when the mice older than 2 months

124 NT Microglia in the visual cortex respond to monocular deprivation with increased lysosome content, b

125 equence of occluding vision through one eye (monocular deprivation) is a rapid loss of excitatory syn

126 l in adult Long Evans rats following chronic monocular deprivation, a manipulation that reduces the s

127 Monocular deprivation, a model of sensory input-dependen

128 After monocular deprivation, resting GABA concentration decrea

129 cells phenocopies the changes observed after monocular deprivation, suggesting that glutamate may con

130 male and female mice before and after a 7 d monocular deprivation, which allowed us to examine both

131 emoval of tPA in Lynx1 KO mice can block the monocular deprivation-dependent reduction of dendritic s

132 markably, sustained MET signaling eliminates monocular deprivation-induced ocular dominance plasticit

133 und in ensemble mean FR induced by prolonged monocular deprivation.

134 and can rescue deficits induced by prolonged monocular deprivation.

135 ocular dominance plasticity (ODP) following monocular deprivation.

136 g recovery from amblyopia induced by chronic monocular deprivation.

137 g recovery from amblyopia induced by chronic monocular deprivation.

138 nce spectroscopy before and after short-term monocular deprivation.

139 mblyopic mice that underwent early long-term monocular deprivation.

140 cantly reduced the OD shift of EE mice after monocular deprivation.

141 , and adult mice remained sensitive to brief monocular deprivation.

142 s already reached a matured level before the monocular deprivation.

143 eceptive fields (RFs) in response to complex monocular depth cues.

144 eal distinct duration encoding mechanisms at monocular, depth-selective and depth-invariant stages of

145 R] 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.52-0.91), monocular deviation (OR 0.64), complex surgery (OR 1.63)

146 Using a monocular/dichoptic paradigm, across four experiments, w

147 The prevalence of monocular diplopia and binocular diplopia unrelated to g

148 All patients had preoperative monocular diplopia or unstable vision attributable to th

149 Monocular diplopia was found in a similar proportion of

150 diplopia), 1 (4%) optical/refractive error (monocular diplopia), 2 (8%) mixed retinal misregistratio

151 raft folds may explain subjective reports of monocular diplopia.

152 visual acuity (UDVA), -0.01 logMAR +/- 0.06; monocular distance corrected visual acuity (CDVA), 0.02

153 med comprehensive eye examinations including monocular distance visual acuity (VA), cover testing, an

154 condary effectiveness outcomes included mean monocular distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity

155 ilitation of responses of both binocular and monocular dLGN inputs during binocular viewing.

156 y of image quality increased due to extended monocular DoF.

157 urations associated with states of exclusive monocular dominance and states of mixed perception durin

158 Neural concomitants of this improvement in monocular dominance are reflected in measurements of bra

159 Withdrawing attention causes the alternating monocular dominance that characterizes rivalry to cease,

160 Monocular enucleation (ME) drastically affects the contr

161 In adult mice, monocular enucleation (ME) results in an immediate deact

162 t when intereye competition is eliminated by monocular enucleation, blocking cholinergic stage II ret

163 ochrome oxidase (CO) activity patterns after monocular enucleation.

164 s lower than for hyperopic subjects for both Monocular Estimation Method (1.03 +/- 0.51 D vs 2.03 +/-

165 ar (P) and magnocellular (M) layers received monocular excitatory inputs.

166 y and facilitation of OD plasticity by prior monocular experience were both present in GluA1(-/-) mic

167 Subjects underwent monocular exposure to narrowband blue light (469 nm) or

168 reater than this limit cause the two unfused monocular features to appear flattened into the fixation

169 Binocular and monocular FERGs had similar amplitudes.

170 Monocular FERGs were recordable from the stimulated eye

171 Integrated BVFs were calculated from the monocular fields of each patient.

172 ted binocular fields were estimated from the monocular fields.

173 These data indicate that early monocular form deprivation does not alter the segregatio

174 Monocular form-deprivation was produced in 18 rhesus mon

175 these novel observations with insights from monocular, frontoparallel motion studies concurrently in

176 S definitions, DME and CSME prevalences from monocular fundus photographs (28.5% and 21.0%, respectiv

177 ross-sectional study of DME grading based on monocular fundus photographs and OCT images obtained fro

178 eyes diagnosed as not having DME or CSME on monocular fundus photographs have DME on OCT.

179 many eyes diagnosed as having DME or CSME on monocular fundus photographs have no DME based on OCT CS

180 Prevalence of DME based on monocular fundus photographs or OCT.

181 nically significant macular edema (CSME), on monocular fundus photographs used definitions from the M

182 12.9%-24.2%) were diagnosed as having DME on monocular fundus photographs using MESA and NHANES defin

183 ot diagnosed as having either DME or CSME on monocular fundus photographs using MESA and NHANES defin

184 d CSME (48.5%) based on MESA definitions for monocular fundus photographs were greater than the DME p

185 Diagnosing diabetic macular edema (DME) from monocular fundus photography vs optical coherence tomogr

186 ies and telemedicine screening typically use monocular fundus photography, while treatment of DME use

187 to obtain MIC values from 221 patients with monocular fungal keratitis.

188 The model involves monocular gain controls with interocular suppression fro

189 Transient or persistent monocular ghost images or diplopia occurred in 10 of 178

190 ular group, whereas safety was better in the monocular group.

191 Binocular VFs were derived from monocular Humphrey VFs to estimate a binocular VF index

192 The purpose of this study was to compare the monocular Humphrey Visual Field (HVF) with the binocular

193 Early results demonstrate that monocular IC-8 intraocular lens implantation provides a

194 be induced by prior, extended viewing of two monocular images differing only in contrast.

195 pic patients is more successful in UNVA than monocular implantation.

196 -Fos, and zinc finger protein, Zif268, after monocular inactivation (MI) to identify ODCs in V1 of Ne

197 Monocular infantile blindness may be associated with bil

198 associated with the individual stimuli from monocular inputs (self-terms) and responses due to inter

199 two things can happen: sufficiently similar monocular inputs are combined into a fused representatio

200 tation in visual and non-visual areas during monocular interferences.

201 reduction in PV-cell-evoked responses after monocular lid suture is restricted to the critical perio

202 Visual modification with monocular lid suturing reduced correlation between left

203 Outcome measures were monocular logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (

204 Outcome measures were monocular logMAR visual acuity scores for each test: ETD

205 cted VA than the ReSTOR +3.0 and better mean monocular low-contrast DCVA than the Tecnis Multifocal l

206 nd Mouth Disease (HFMD) and concurrent acute monocular maculopathy, and to describe multimodal imagin

207 with retinal outputs maintained as separate monocular maps en route through the lateral geniculate n

208 de a small but significant contribution from monocular mechanisms.

209 blood glucose (BG) concentration, HbA1c, and monocular mfERG were performed on 115 adolescent patient

210 oveal optokinetic contribution suggests that monocular nasotemporal optokinetic asymmetry is partly a

211 to play an important role in maintaining the monocular nasotemporal optokinetic asymmetry seen in pat

212 The initial screening included testing of monocular near and distance visual acuity, stereoacuity,

213 are established by conversion of well-tuned monocular neurons as they gain matched input from the ot

214 ow that, despite responding to only one eye, monocular neurons in all layers, including the input lay

215 an previously appreciated, as even so-called monocular neurons in V1's input layers encode what is sh

216 However, most V1 monocular neurons were significantly reduced, or suppres

217 main input layers of V1 contain most of the monocular neurons while binocular neurons dominate the l

218 rons respond to stimulation of only one eye (monocular neurons), while most neurons respond to stimul

219 d duration information that was invisible to monocular neurons.

220 te in dense "cyclopean" images containing no monocular objects.

221 ) and near (0.3 m) fixation after >1 hour of monocular occlusion at preoperative and postoperative ex

222 Monocular occlusion did not diminish ants' ability to lo

223 nkeys reared under conditions of alternating monocular occlusion during their first few months of lif

224 the esodeviated eye can supplement temporal monocular optokinetic responses in the fixating eye unde

225 Monocular optotype acuity was assessed at 4(1/2) years o

226 dging visuotactile simultaneity after either monocular or binocular deprivation.

227 Using monocular or binocular visual deprivation, we examined t

228 of mouse simple cells is nearly identical to monocular orientation selectivity in both anaesthetized

229 of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and monocular pattern reversal visually evoked potentials (p

230 Monocular peripheral VF defects were measured and define

231 ssibility of PAP, especially when initiating monocular PGA therapy.

232 visual system's anatomical progression from monocular, pre-cortical neurons to their binocular, cort

233 l for in-phase and antiphase conditions, and monocular presentation, but increased a little at interm

234 are more likely to be mediated at an earlier monocular, rather than a binocular stage.

235 Activity was less bilateral in the monocular region of primary visual cortex and, especiall

236 eriods, whereby low-SF regions coincide with monocular regions.

237 isible to both eyes do indeed form part of a monocular representation of the contralateral visual fie

238 eous yet separate presence of two segregated monocular representations, rather than a joint represent

239 Comparing the monocular results to the binocular results there was a s

240 depth and thus require the co-ordination of monocular saccade amplitudes and binocular vergence eye

241 inocular visual field was estimated from the monocular SAP tests, and rates of change in mean sensiti

242 score was less than that of the better eye's monocular score).

243 s rivalry to cease, apparently allowing both monocular signals to be processed simultaneously.

244 ion occurs after spatiotemporal filtering of monocular signals, which leads to restrictions on dispar

245 the DSpecs was comparable to the integrated monocular standard automated perimetry based on point-by

246 rivation, GABA concentration measured during monocular stimulation correlated with the deprived eye d

247 ratio of excitation to inhibition evoked by monocular stimulation decreased mainly for nonpreferred

248 ms can be recruited in vivo by pairing brief monocular stimulation with pharmacological or chemogenet

249 sponses were weaker with binocular than with monocular stimulation.

250 (1-4) numbers of dots, is facilitated in the monocular, subcortical portions of the visual system.

251 label technique in three animals raised with monocular suture.

252 f 127 subjects, 11 (8.7%) could not complete monocular TAC testing in either eye; 39 (30.7%) could no

253 In interocular suppression, a suprathreshold monocular target can be rendered invisible by a salient

254 axed when binocular fusion was attained from monocular target fixation (P < .01).

255 nstrate the benefit of binocular relative to monocular text presentation for both parafoveal and fove

256 Monocular threshold VA was tested using a single-surroun

257 ring response in the fellow eye when using a monocular trial eliminates the need for additional offic

258 The monocular trial of therapy is effective in accurately pr

259 3-0.76), and the effect when adjusted by the monocular trial was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.49-0.86).

260 Median postoperative monocular UDVA was 0.13logMAR (range - 0.08 to 0.42logMA

261 The mean monocular UDVA, UIVA, and UNVA improved significantly fr

262 The examination included: monocular uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visu

263 OLs displayed in tabular format include mean monocular uncorrected distance, intermediate, and near v

264 Some monocular V1 neurons' responses were significantly enhan

265 omprehensive ophthalmic evaluation including monocular VA testing, cover testing, cycloplegic autoref

266 consequences for either pairing differ after monocular versus binocular deprivation [8-11].

267 The diagnostic monocular VF testing algorithm was comparable to standar

268 Participants underwent monocular VF testing in both eyes using a Humphrey Field

269 The sequence of monocular VF was tested and customized image remapping w

270 The monocular VF was used to calculate remapping parameters

271 Monocular VFs were scored according to the mean defect,

272 (6.49%) had bilateral VI and 43 (10.34%) had monocular VI.

273 ereopsis, and comparing the performance to a monocular viewing condition.

274 onviewing (mean, 39.7% +/- 6.2%) eyes during monocular viewing conditions, even in cases with large a

275 We tested smooth pursuit adaptation during monocular viewing in strabismic monkeys with exotropia.

276 he left and right, during both binocular and monocular viewing.

277 iority of visual function for binocular over monocular viewing.

278 as they performed eye movement tasks during monocular viewing.

279 nfirm that result by testing observers under monocular viewing.

280 velopmental visual disorder that alters both monocular vision and binocular interaction.

281 ked reduction in horizontal eye velocity and monocular visual acuity improved to 20/80.

282 nt comprehensive eye examinations, including monocular visual acuity testing, stereoacuity testing, a

283 Monocular visual acuity was tested using both the new ey

284 neurons in the same region of the layer 2/3 monocular visual cortex following enucleation.

285 of GABAergic signaling in layer 2/3 of mouse monocular visual cortex.

286 ate deactivation of the contralateral medial monocular visual cortex.

287 Plasticity produced by monocular visual deprivation (MD) has been dissected int

288 ic and postsynaptic sites in mice undergoing monocular visual deprivation (MD) were compared to those

289 ortex of freely behaving rats during chronic monocular visual deprivation (MD).

290 short period of time: contrary to intuition, monocular visual deprivation actually improves the depri

291 Following monocular visual deprivation during the critical period,

292 Here, we show that monocular visual deprivation enhances GABAergic synaptic

293 Monocular visual field (VF) and visual acuity (VA) tests

294 ssesses two distinct visual fields-a focused monocular visual field suitable for detecting features e

295 The monocular visual field test (HVF) gave more specific inf

296 visual field constructed from combining the monocular visual fields of each eye.

297 sion-weighted imaging (DWI) in patients with monocular visual loss of presumed ischemic origin (MVL).

298 near, intermediate and distance compared to monocular visual outcome at the same distances in patien

299 Binocular, compared to monocular, visual processing typically leads to superior

300 s binocular zone is delayed, but only in the monocular zone in GluA1(-/-) mice and only in a backgrou