ライフサイエンスコーパス: motor-evoked potential

1 onitor spinal cerebrospinal fluid signal and motor evoked potentials).

2 al muscle twitch can be produced, called the motor-evoked potential.

3 ficient of variation, and shorter latency of motor evoked potentials.

4 ike) of cortical excitability as measured by motor evoked potentials.

5 on and assessed using a limb motor score and motor-evoked potentials.

6 in cortical excitability were assessed using motor-evoked potentials.

7 Motor evoked potentials after stimulation of PMdAH were,

8 CI group showed greater: FMA-UE improvement; motor evoked potential amplitude; beta oscillatory power

9 in intracortical facilitation (P < .01) and motor-evoked potential amplitude (P < .05) as well as a

10 The mean motor-evoked potential amplitude increase was 31% of the

11 ncy, duty cycle, and sonication duration) on motor-evoked potential amplitude were examined.

12 We measured motor-evoked potential amplitude, short-interval intraco

13 Tibialis anterior motor-evoked potentials amplitude increased to 121% over

14 During this movement, motor-evoked potential amplitudes from the little finger

15 by transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potential amplitudes.

16 by transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potential amplitudes.

17 by transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potential amplitudes.

18 c stimulation paradigm to elicit ipsilateral motor evoked potentials, an index of reticulospinal trac

19 eus), as shown by increased amplitude of the motor evoked potentials and decreased duration of the co

20 ntensity to elicit a predefined amplitude of motor-evoked potential and EEG theta activity) and decre

21 F-OPC grafts recovered transcranial magnetic motor-evoked potential and magnetic interenlargement ref

22 ed associative stimulation induced change in motor-evoked potential and memory formation) after sleep

23 timulation were used to induce diaphragmatic motor-evoked potentials and compound muscle action poten

24 icians, vibration increases the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials and decreases the short-latency

25 imulation parameters that enhance upper-limb motor-evoked potentials and grip forces in anesthetized

26 ning-dependent increases in the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials and motor map reorganization are

27 Stopping latencies, motor evoked potentials, and frontal beta power (13-20 H

28 By measuring spinal cord areas, motor-evoked potentials, and motor coordination and bala

29 with primary lateral sclerosis had abnormal motor-evoked potentials as assessed using transcranial m

30 nd transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials before and after treatment.

31 ances, larger motor cortex maps, and smaller motor evoked potentials compared to young subjects.

32 cortical silent period, and amplitude of the motor evoked potentials conditioned by cortico-cortical

33 ance deteriorates and both somatosensory and motor evoked potentials decrease over contralateral sens

34 The current literature suggests that motor-evoked potential, despite some advantages, still r

35 elivered to the C3-C5 level on (1) diaphragm motor-evoked potentials (DiMEPs) elicited by transcrania

36 We recorded motor-evoked potentials during a faked-action discrimina

37 efore the stimulation over M1, hV6A inhibits motor-evoked potentials during planning of either rightw

38 In this study, we examined motor evoked potentials elicited by cortical (MEPs) and

39 Here, we examined motor evoked potentials elicited by cortical and subcort

40 Motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magneti

41 lectromyography, electroencephalography, and motor evoked potentials elicited with transcranial magne

42 n cognitive context: pre-SMA facilitated the motor evoked-potential elicited by M1 stimulation only d

43 aves) can be probed by the excess latency of motor-evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magneti

44 During observation, MR was assessed via motor-evoked potentials elicited with transcranial magne

45 rent inhibition was measured by conditioning motor evoked potentials, elicited by transcranial magnet

46 r activation, comparable to the monosynaptic motor-evoked potential evoked by TMS of primary motor co

47 n with an AP orientation over the latency of motor-evoked potentials evoked by direct activation of c

48 sterior (AP) orientation over the latency of motor-evoked potentials evoked by direct activation of c

49 order to characterize spinal cord functional motor evoked potentials (fMEPs).

50 ial (LM) latency; i.e. the excess latency of motor-evoked potentials generated by transcranial magnet

51 pairment exhibited more frequent ipsilateral motor evoked potentials (ie, higher reticulospinal tract

52 d in healthy subjects) to elicit ipsilateral motor evoked potentials (iMEPs) from the paretic biceps

53 rimary motor cortex, we examined ipsilateral motor-evoked potentials (iMEPs) in a proximal arm muscle

54 from the arm representation, as measured by motor evoked potentials in the biceps.

55 ural excitability were assessed by measuring motor-evoked potentials in a small hand muscle before an

56 Here we examined motor-evoked potentials in arm muscles elicited by corti

57 transection, 70% of OEG-treated rats showed motor-evoked potentials in hindlimb muscles after transc

58 ion significantly increased the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials in individuals with the SNP that

59 wo independent assays and recorded hind-limb motor-evoked potentials in infected class I-deficient an

60 the primary motor cortex (M1) and measuring motor-evoked potentials in the hand affected by stroke.

61 On each day, motor-evoked potentials in upper limb muscles were first

62 amplitude of subcortical, but not cortical, motor-evoked potentials increased in proximal and distal

63 xpression, increased ipsilateral TMS-induced motor evoked potentials, increased fMRI responses in the

64 The amplitude of diaphragmatic motor-evoked potentials induced by transcranial magnetic

65 ility was tested by measuring recruitment of motor-evoked-potentials "input-output (IO) curve" and of

66 rotocols to evaluate motor excitability with motor-evoked potentials, input-output (IOcurve) and shor

67 Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, recruitment curv

68 We measured motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes elicited by tran

69 Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were recorded as

70 ally used as the criterion for identifying a motor evoked potential (MEP) during the motor thresholdi

71 he motor cortex, reflected by changes in the motor evoked potential (MEP) following the paired stimul

72 netic stimulation of the motor cortex on the motor evoked potential (MEP) from transcranial magnetic

73 ect many motor units (MUs) that constitute a motor evoked potential (MEP) in response to TMS.

74 ize the optimal site (hotspot) for evoking a motor evoked potential (MEP) in two intrinsic hand muscl

75 hemispheric) before acquisition of baseline motor evoked potential (MEP) recordings from each site a

76 ered at a subthreshold intensity to elicit a motor evoked potential (MEP), on the MEP response to an

77 odels per TMS markers: motor threshold (MT), motor evoked potential (MEP), short intracortical inhibi

78 Motor evoked potentials (MEP) were measured in 10-min in

79 and corticospinal excitability, measured by motor evoked potentials (MEP).

80 Baseline and post-TBS changes in motor evoked potentials (MEP-measure of corticospinal ex

81 ed with TMS, measuring motor threshold (MT), motor evoked-potential (MEP) size, and intracortical inh

82 hreshold, a greater proportional increase in motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude with voluntary fa

83 s usually limited to M1 through recording of motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude.

84 imulation (TMS) each significantly predicted motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes.

85 One of the principal outcome measures is the motor-evoked potential (MEP) elicited in a muscle follow

86 The amplitude of the motor-evoked potential (MEP) following a single or a pai

87 timulus (TS) was applied over M1 producing a motor-evoked potential (MEP) in the relaxed hand.

88 l motor neurons, central conduction time and motor-evoked potential (MEP) latency.

89 the first stimulus (S1) was set to produce a motor-evoked potential (MEP) of 1 mV in the resting cont

90 We measured motor-evoked potential (MEP) recruitment curves (RCs) an

91 rug application, INB plus rTMS increased the motor-evoked potential (MEP) size and decreased intracor

92 Whereas controls showed inhibition of APB motor-evoked potential (MEP) size during movement initia

93 On each paired-pulse, we recorded a motor-evoked potential (MEP) to continuously trace the e

94 entify EAE31, a locus controlling latency of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and clinical onset of exp

95 Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and motor threshold were

96 nd cervicomedullary stimulation, we examined motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and the activity in intra

97 Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by cortical, but

98 on in the corticospinal pathway by examining motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial

99 representations during response preparation, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial

100 rtex (PMd) (CS2) suppresses the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from a test pulse (TS) ov

101 pain have been restricted to measurements of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from peripheral muscles.

102 The analysis of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) generated by transcranial

103 otor conduction times, normal thresholds for motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in leg muscles, and a nor

104 er the primary motor cortex (M1) we examined motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the contralateral erec

105 anscranial magnetic stimulation, we assessed motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the ES before and afte

106 , or during the left limb movement to obtain motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the muscles of the rig

107 was administered, during walking, to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the plantarflexor musc

108 mulation over the leg motor cortex to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the quadriceps femoris

109 Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) monitoring can promptly d

110 he corticospinal output, we used the size of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) obtained by transcranial

111 We evaluated the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) produced by a single TMS

112 voluntary contractions followed by simulated motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recruiting an increasing

113 TMS-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs) showed a modulation withi

114 Here we used the latency of TMS motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to index these inter-indi

115 We recorded motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial magnetic

116 tudies measuring the threshold for eliciting motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial magnetic

117 Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured before and

118 and the dorsal cervical spinal cord in rats; motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured from biceps

119 Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from contra

120 In addition, Hoffman reflex (H-reflex) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the ga

121 The effects on the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs), short interval intracort

122 primary motor cortex and the measurement of motor evoked potentials (MEPs), we have previously demon

123 ity was measured by single pulse TMS-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs).

124 a method for standardized quantification of motor evoked potentials (MEPs).

125 n interference flanker task, while measuring motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) after agonistic and antag

126 creases cortical excitability as measured by motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and (2) alters functional

127 eral nerve stimulation we examined in humans motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and the activity in intra

128 We evaluated motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and the cortical silent p

129 lity were traced by simultaneously recording motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and TMS-evoked EEG potent

130 We also measured motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) bilaterally with epidural

131 To test this hypothesis, we examined motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial

132 To test this hypothesis, we examined motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial

133 ing the effect of ulnar nerve stimulation on motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial

134 Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) evoked by single-pulse tr

135 10% resting motor threshold (RMT) suppressed motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) evoked in the first dorsa

136 y volunteers in two experiments, we measured motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from TMS of the motor cor

137 etic stimulation to compare the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in a hand muscle before a

138 ested this hypothesis in humans by measuring motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in a left finger muscle d

139 asure corticospinal excitability by means of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in both the hand and the

140 pulse TMS at a specific interval facilitates motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in hand muscles in a mann

141 suprathreshold test stimulus (TS) to elicit motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in the right hand.

142 spinal excitability and RT, such that larger motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) measured at rest were ass

143 Neurophysiologic effects were assessed using motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded before and after

144 .8 in the BBB scale), decreased amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded on tibialis ante

145 tic stimulation paradigm, where TMS-elicited motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) served as an index of cor

146 TMS, inducing motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) simultaneously in the ext

147 ranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to measure motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) together with recruitment

148 We evaluated motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) using single-pulse transc

149 Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were obtained by transcra

150 Ipsilateral motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were obtained in hand and

151 A paired-pulse protocol was used, in which motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were produced by cortical

152 transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), 25 motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded before, and

153 Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the ri

154 , with input from one hand muscle increasing motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), decreasing short and inc

155 ates during which TMS evoked small and large motor-evoked potentials (MEPs).

156 measure]) and neurophysiological (changes in motor evoked potentials [MEPs]) assessments were perform

157 r disturbances abolish hind limb myoelectric motor evoked potentials (mMEPs).

158 review was conducted to examine the role of motor-evoked potential monitoring in spine and central n

159 the cervical level and were correlated with motor-evoked potentials (n = 34).

160 threshold, the intensity needed to produce a motor evoked potential of 0.5 mV, and the amplitude of t

161 We found that the motor evoked potential of the effector that might need t

162 Baseline pharyngeal motor evoked potentials (PMEPs) and swallowing performan

163 Interestingly, ipsilateral motor evoked potential presence was correlated with moto

164 We found that ipsilateral motor evoked potential presence was higher in the pareti

165 al changes in descending motor pathways with motor-evoked potentials recorded during cooling, we repo

166 pressure, we could increase the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials recorded from below or just abov

167 Our results show that the amplitude of the motor-evoked potentials recorded from the real hand is s

168 Analysis of motor-evoked potentials recorded from the thoracic spina

169 were provided visual feedback on the size of motor evoked potentials, reflecting their finger-specifi

170 of D15A-GRPs recovered transcranial magnetic motor-evoked potential responses, indicating that conduc

171 duced (38%; SD +/- 7; P = 0.01) and the post-motor evoked potential silent period (101 ms; SEM +/- 10

172 We found that motor evoked potentials size increased in spinal cord in

173 short-term enhancement of cortico-pharyngeal motor evoked potentials, suggesting the feasibility of a

174 and grid walking] and transcranial magnetic motor-evoked potentials (tcMMEP) were studied at 1, 2, a

175 spinal motor (anterior) stimulation produced motor evoked potentials that were over five times larger

176 As many previous reports have found, the motor evoked potential threshold was higher in DAO than

177 Corticospinal excitability was measured with motor-evoked potentials under transcranial magnetic stim

178 The amplitude of TMS-induced motor-evoked potentials was taken as a measure of motor

179 Motor evoked potentials were recorded before training an

180 Motor evoked potentials were recorded in 29 typically de

181 Repeated measurements of pharyngeal motor-evoked potentials were assessed with transcranial

182 rier frequency both subcortical and cortical motor-evoked potentials were facilitated without changin

183 Motor-evoked potentials were inhibited in task-irrelevan

184 Motor-evoked potentials were recorded from a hand muscle

185 Motor-evoked potentials were recorded from the resting a

186 physiological effects (change in heart rate, motor evoked potentials) were observed during any of the

187 pendulum test) and descending connectivity (motor evoked potentials) were tested in the rectus femor

188 -pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and motor-evoked potentials while healthy humans watched vid