ライフサイエンスコーパス: myocardial flow reserve

1 res, left ventricular function, and absolute myocardial flow reserve.

2 PA repair demonstrate regional impairment of myocardial flow reserve.

3 increases coronary vasodilatory capacity and myocardial flow reserve.

4 .17]) were independent predictors of reduced myocardial flow reserve.

5 ), independently beyond percent ischemia and myocardial flow reserve.

6 chemia (0.60 [95% CI, 0.54-0.66]; P <0.001), myocardial flow reserve (0.70 [95% CI, 0.64-0.76], P <0.

7 - 2.6 vs. 3.7 +/- 5.3; P < 0.02), and global myocardial flow reserve (2.1 +/- 0.8 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.6; P

8 +/-28% underestimated with CT (PET versus CT myocardial flow reserve, 2.5+/-0.6 versus 2.2+/-0.6).

9 que inflammation [64Cu-DOTATATE PET/CT], and myocardial flow reserve [82Rb PET/CT]).

10 ass (left ventricular) from these scans with myocardial flow reserve and heart failure hospitalizatio

11 rest and stress myocardial blood flow (MBF), myocardial flow reserve, and coronary vascular resistanc

12 (121-282) days, global rest and stress MBF, myocardial flow reserve, and CVR significantly improved

13 with apical TTS, improvements in stress MBF, myocardial flow reserve, and CVR were noted in all myoca

14 eversible reductions in rest and stress MBF, myocardial flow reserve, and increases in CVR, suggestiv

15 culopathy), relative perfusion defects, mean myocardial flow reserve, and mean stress myocardial bloo

16 s and rest perfusion, myocardial blood flow, myocardial flow reserve, and spill-over fraction combine

17 e hyperemic response to dipyridamole and the myocardial flow reserve did not differ between the 2 gro

18 BF resulted in a significant increase in the myocardial flow reserve during metoprolol (3.14 +/- 0.80

19 Myocardial flow reserve estimation was not as accurate a

20 tients with elevated VAT density and reduced myocardial flow reserve had a significantly increased ri

21 Although myocardial flow reserve in collateral-dependent segments

22 This study sought to evaluate regional myocardial flow reserve in long-term survivors of repair

23 of heart failure hospitalization and reduced myocardial flow reserve in patients undergoing cardiac P

24 constants as surrogates of absolute MBF and myocardial flow reserve index (MFRi) in humans as assess

25 The corresponding COV for myocardial flow reserve is 33% to 38%.

26 Myocardial flow reserve is impaired in systemic RVs in s

27 Global myocardial flow reserve is not routinely identified, alt

28 Lower myocardial flow reserve is related to reduced regional f

29 Myocardial flow reserve is the ratio of MBF measured at

30 We evaluated PET-derived myocardial flow reserve (MFR) and coronary vascular resi

31 Impaired myocardial flow reserve (MFR) and stress myocardial bloo

32 e the stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) assessments.

33 nd coronary vascular dysfunction by impaired myocardial flow reserve (MFR) by (13)N-Ammonia positron

34 r positron emission tomography (PET)-derived myocardial flow reserve (MFR) can predict adverse events

35 ty to obtain quantitative values of flow and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) has been perceived as an i

36 udy aims to evaluate the prognostic value of myocardial flow reserve (MFR) in patients with very high

37 Impaired global myocardial flow reserve (MFR) may be associated with inc

38 Cardiac vascular function was assessed as myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measured by cardiac (82)Rb

39 Myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measured with PET have cli

40 ucibility of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measurement in patients re

41 3 mL/min/g during stress, with a mean global myocardial flow reserve (MFR) of 3.70.

42 Absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) provide incremental diagno

43 (SPECT) for myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) quantification, which was

44 ification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) using PET with (82)Rb in p

45 Myocardial flow reserve (MFR) was calculated as peak str

46 Diagnostic performances of stress MBF and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) were determined by perform

47 osine stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) were measured using (15)O-

48 dial blood flow (MBF) at stress and rest and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) with (13)N-ammonia myocard

49 invasive, quantitative approach to measuring myocardial flow reserve (MFR), a surrogate marker for co

50 rest and stress myocardial blood flow (MBF), myocardial flow reserve (MFR), and wall motion abnormali

51 Myocardial flow reserve (MFR), derived from quantitative

52 y, (82)Rb PET provides a measure of absolute myocardial flow reserve (MFR), describing the vasculatur

53 strong evidence for the prognostic value of myocardial flow reserve (MFR), there are fewer data on t

54 xamined the effects of HRVB on mental stress myocardial flow reserve (MFR), which is the ratio of MBF

55 th positron emission tomography, we assessed myocardial flow reserve (MFR), which, in absence of sign

56 ion (LVEF), myocardial blood flow (MBF), and myocardial flow reserve (MFR).

57 ary atherosclerosis morphology and extent on myocardial flow reserve (MFR).

58 of absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR).

59 nting for stress total perfusion deficit and myocardial flow reserve (odds ratio, 3.08 [95% CI, 1.49-

60 alues were 2.3 and 2.5 for hyperemic MBF and myocardial flow reserve, respectively.

61 ith maximal stress myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve (stress/rest myocardial blood fl

62 tegrates hyperemic myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve to quantify the pathophysiologic

63 The corresponding myocardial flow reserve values were 86%, 72%, and 78% (p

64 Myocardial flow reserve was -14+/-28% underestimated wit

65 The COV for the difference in repeated myocardial flow reserve was 33% to 38%, whereas the inte

66 ermined by positron emission tomography, and myocardial flow reserve was calculated.

67 As a result, myocardial flow reserve was lower in systemic RVs than i

68 As a result, myocardial flow reserve was lower in the left coronary t

69 The myocardial flow reserve was reduced in patients (1.82 +/

70 ntally validated approach to quantify global myocardial flow reserve was used.

71 th heart failure hospitalization and reduced myocardial flow reserve were assessed in a multivariable

72 s in the lowest 10th percentile for regional myocardial flow reserve were compared with the other par

73 As a result, estimates of myocardial flow reserve were lower in the patients with

74 mission tomography myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve were reduced in the left circumf

75 an global flow at stress and at rest, termed myocardial flow reserve, were calculated.