コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 s of children with age-adjusted ALD < -1 mm (myopic).
2 , 51% were hyperopic, 32% emmetropic and 17% myopic.
7 sed by a limited repertoire of reflexive and myopic actions, reflecting reduced decision and state sp
9 osage, effectiveness as prophylaxis in lower myopic and hyperopic ablations, and long-term safety, pa
10 and sex-related refractive parameters among myopic and hyperopic patients seeking refractive surgery
11 of demographic and refractive parameters of myopic and hyperopic patients who underwent laser in sit
13 sis: sex, age at examination, anisometropia, myopic and hyperopic refractive error (>/= 3 dioptres),
15 spherical equivalent was significantly more myopic and the Cardiff acuity was significantly poorer i
21 anisometrope, the odds of an eye being more myopic are related to laterality, ocular dominance, and
24 that, compared to normal chicks, the highly myopic-astigmatic chicks had significantly higher expres
25 Twenty-six patients with high myopia and/or myopic astigmatism received randomized treatment with LA
26 eyes of 100 patients with myopia or compound myopic astigmatism undergoing bilateral LASIK between Oc
27 antation has been used to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism, although corneal decompensation can
34 roviding evidence for a common mechanism for myopic behavior in foraging and intertemporal choice.
35 h greater five-year axial elongation in both myopic (beta = 196 mum/mm, 95%CI 127 to 265, p < 0.0001)
37 increases an eye's probability of being more myopic by another 10% if the magnitude of anisometropia
38 eline, and 59% lower for every 1.0 D less in myopic change in the untreated eyes over the first year.
39 cone density was lower in myopic versus non-myopic children at eccentricities of 0.2 mm (mean +/- SD
40 antly differ with age, results indicate that myopic children have lower linear cone densities close t
41 ion rate of the manifest refractive error of myopic children in a longer follow-up period (up to 12 y
42 we hypothesize that biofeedback training in myopic children wearing MFCLs might improve the treatmen
44 spherical equivalent </= -0.5 diopter in non-myopic children). 2. Myopia progression (myopia shift of
48 ns and outcomes in eyes with treatment-naive myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) in the United
49 finding that correlated with signs of active myopic CNV (either subretinal fluid/intraretinal cysts o
50 Two main patterns were identified on FAF in myopic CNV and were related to the prognostic evolution,
53 21: Progressive High (Degenerative) Myopia." Myopic CNV was defined as HM with the presence of subret
54 Twenty-seven eyes (27 patients) affected by myopic CNV were enrolled from January 2011 to January 20
56 ong with the absence of tomographic signs of myopic CNV, and the presence on autofluorescence of mult
59 y effective and safe drug in cases of active myopic CNV; however, a larger number of patients and a l
61 e final classification of myopic glaucoma or myopic control was based on consensus assessment by 3 cl
64 in 24 myopic subjects and 20 age-similar non-myopic controls, with RA estimated using iterative two-p
66 ions experienced a smaller IOP decrease than myopic corrections for both PRK and LASIK (P<0.0001).
68 al tissue is damaged by the development of a myopic crescent, rather than simply translocated in a te
71 ting hyperopic defocus with short periods of myopic defocus before compensation occurs prevents axial
72 ide population-based prevalence estimates of myopic degeneration (MD) among Chinese Americans, the fa
73 s, syphilis, primary vitreoretinal lymphoma, myopic degeneration, and central serous chorioretinopath
74 uated, especially in the nasal regions where myopic degenerations are most commonly seen clinically.
76 age 1.5 years, the mean rate of change in a myopic direction was 0.97 D/year (95% CI, 0.66-1.28 D/ye
78 ely; P < .001) and that CSF was 53% worse in myopic eyes (3.30 +/- 1.24 Weber index [%W]) than in non
80 the highly myopic eyes than in the non-high myopic eyes (45.56 vs. 96.90 pg/mL, p < 0.0001, n = 153)
81 mum) and higher total choroidal volume than myopic eyes (9.80 +/- 1.87 mm(3) vs 8.14 +/- 1.48 mm(3))
82 enter to analyze aqueous samples from highly myopic eyes (axial length >25 mm, n = 92) and ametropic
83 the highly myopic eyes than in the non-high myopic eyes (IL-6: 11.90 vs. 4.38 pg/mL, p < 0.0001; MMP
86 ears were noted in 18.2% of eyes; 86.4% were myopic eyes (p = 0.01); 81.8% occurred within a 120 days
89 ean axial length was 28.5+/-2.2 mm in highly myopic eyes and 23.3+/-1.1 mm in controls (P < 0.001).
90 ckness for the identification of glaucoma in myopic eyes and offers a valuable diagnostic tool for pa
91 RPE humps were frequently observed in highly myopic eyes and they resulted from the presence of an un
93 ntitative mapping of the choriocapillaris in myopic eyes compared with an age-matched normal control
95 matically differ with age in children, while myopic eyes have decreased linear cone density near the
98 th 3-day postoperative positioning in highly myopic eyes resulted in satisfactory anatomic and functi
99 humor was significantly lower in the highly myopic eyes than in the non-high myopic eyes (45.56 vs.
100 MP-2 were significantly higher in the highly myopic eyes than in the non-high myopic eyes (IL-6: 11.9
111 l groups, with sensitivities of about 83% in myopic eyes, and specificity over 91% in all groups.
112 ERM and MH were present more often in more myopic eyes, associated with an increase in levels of hi
113 the risk for retinal damage in these highly myopic eyes, indicating that individual preoperative ass
114 uracy of the T2 formula as applied to highly myopic eyes, to compare the T2 formula to the SRK/T and
115 ive in the repair of RD resulting from MH in myopic eyes, with retinal reattachment achieved more fre
118 d from 22 to 29.2 mm (mean: 24.9 +/- 1.8 mm; myopic eyes: 26.35 +/- 1.35 mm; and nonmyopic eyes: 23.4
121 lowed by focal ischemic (41.8% [40.0-43.6]), myopic glaucoma (42.1% [40-44.2]), and generalized cup e
122 = 45), generalized cup enlargement (n = 60), myopic glaucoma (n = 38), and senile sclerotic (n = 50).
124 ian: 26.2 mm; range: 26.1 to 28.0 mm] in the myopic group and 23.9 +/- 1.1 mm [median: 23.9 mm; range
126 Volume (GLV) showed the highest AUCs in all myopic group and the best diagnostic ability in distingu
127 s to assess the level of trait anxiety among myopic group of teenagers in comparison to teenagers wit
131 urements, RA was significantly larger in the myopic group, with a significant positive correlation al
134 ces rely on immediate predator probability-a myopic heuristic policy-and on the optimal policy, which
135 the probability of the right eye being more myopic increased to 80% if the anisometropia was less th
136 , the probability of the left eye being more myopic increased to above 40% if the anisometropia was l
138 gher levels of community trust and make less myopic intertemporal choices than residents in control u
139 iduals with higher community trust make less myopic intertemporal decisions because they believe thei
140 are the visual and refractive outcomes after myopic LASEK using three different excimer lasers and st
141 late IOL power accurately in eyes with prior myopic laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive
144 ion-matched patients scheduled for bilateral myopic LASIK were enrolled and followed for 6 months aft
145 able to explain 42% of the IOP change after myopic LASIK, 34% of the change after myopic PRK, 25% of
149 , amblyopia or organic conditions, 6.0% were myopic </= - 0.50DS, 0.6% hyperopic >/= + 2.00DS, 7.7% a
157 aduated from school after 13 years were more myopic (median, -0.5 diopters [D]; first quartile [Q1]/t
160 single time step into the future (hence its myopic nature), which omits the need to pre-calculate a
162 pters (D) (spherical equivalent) and typical myopic optic disc morphology, with and without glaucoma,
167 ve study of patients affected by idiopathic, myopic or traumatic stage 4 MH (minimum diameter > 400 m
169 61 cells/mm(2) (standard error, 6.30) in the myopic (P < 0.001) and toric (P < 0.001) groups, respect
173 neration (AMD) patient, 1 from a 58-year-old myopic patient, and 1 from a 77-year-old nonexudative AM
174 ometer measurements were taken for 63 highly myopic patients (> 25 mm) undergoing uneventful crystall
177 with posterior vitreous detachment [PVD]; 17 myopic patients [>-2 diopters] without PVD; 30 myopic pa
180 Thirty-one eyes of 31 consecutive highly myopic patients with CNV and showing a subretinal hyperr
182 ng from unilateral vitreous floaters (20 non-myopic patients with posterior vitreous detachment [PVD]
183 opic patients [>-2 diopters] without PVD; 30 myopic patients with PVD) completed the National Eye Ins
184 ndings may explain some common complaints of myopic patients with respect to vision and quality of li
186 re ruptures of SR-LR band ligament in highly myopic patients with staphyloma than in those without st
190 f tendon repositioning in moderate to highly myopic patients, with reductions in per-mill imeter dose
193 In high myopia, a region resembling the myopic peripapillary crescent was visible in cortical se
195 In university graduates, the proportion of myopic persons was higher (53%) than that of those who g
196 t, and combined causes (each 25%); in highly myopic persons, the major cause was myopic macular degen
197 leted by 193 and 127 eyes implanted with the myopic pIOL and by 40 and 20 eyes implanted with the tor
200 tive manifest spherical equivalent (MSE) for myopic PRK and LASIK (P<0.0001), weakly correlated with
201 after myopic LASIK, 34% of the change after myopic PRK, 25% of the change after hyperopic LASIK, and
203 , but they were associated with less rebound myopic progression (for atropine 0.01%, mean myopic prog
205 e effects, and similar long-term results for myopic progression after the study period and rebound ef
206 myopic progression (for atropine 0.01%, mean myopic progression after treatment cessation of 0.28+/-0
207 s but the control group showed a significant myopic progression compared to the 0.125 % atropine grou
208 doctors to uniformly embrace treatments for myopic progression control, possibly due to existence of
209 Orthokeratology may be effective in slowing myopic progression for children and adolescents, with a
212 Younger children and those with greater myopic progression in year 1 were more likely to require
213 ealed less myopic progression with atropine (myopic progression ranging from 0.04+/-0.63 to 0.47+/-0.
214 D)/year) compared with control participants (myopic progression ranging from 0.38+/-0.39 to 1.19+/-2.
215 el I and II studies that evaluated primarily myopic progression revealed less myopic progression with
216 d primarily myopic progression revealed less myopic progression with atropine (myopic progression ran
217 with higher myopia, and greater tendency of myopic progression) who may still progress while receivi
218 he optimal dosage of atropine with regard to myopic progression, rebound after treatment cessation, a
225 lation between the magnitude of preoperative myopic refraction and the central epithelial thickness a
229 ighty three students were identified to have myopic refractive error making the prevalence of 6.5% (9
231 n the subfoveal choroidal thickness with the myopic refractive error was -10.45 mum per diopter.
232 For each participant, the eye with the worse myopic refractive error was included in this analysis.
234 eal choroidal thickness and axial length and myopic refractive error were obtained (r = -0.649, P < 0
235 e mCNV, which was defined as the presence of myopic refractive error worse than -6.0 diopters with th
236 eyes revealed a nonsignificant trend toward myopic regression from 3 to 12 months postoperative with
243 The primary causes of VI were cataracts and myopic retinopathy; the primary cause of blindness was m
245 uated from school after 13 years, 50.9% were myopic (SE, </=-0.5 D) versus 41.6%, 27.1%, and 26.9% af
253 IOL implantation during infancy, the rate of myopic shift occurs most rapidly during the first 1.5 ye
254 +/- 0.47 to 3.32 +/- 0.57, P < .001), and a myopic shift of 1.04 diopters (95% CI 0.03-2.05, P = .04
260 ths who underwent IOL implantation had large myopic shifts that often resulted in high myopia or seve
261 Thirty patients scheduled for bilateral myopic SMILE and 30 age-, sex-, and refraction-matched p
262 9.3 +/- 1.5 years; P = .023), to have higher myopic spherical equivalent (SE) at baseline (-3.6 +/- 1
264 s from a population-based study suggest that myopic status is associated with lower odds of having di
266 deg(2)) presented at 10o eccentricity in 24 myopic subjects and 20 age-similar non-myopic controls,
267 The prevalence of MD was higher among older myopic subjects and among participants with more severe
268 capillaris (CC) flow in widefield in high in myopic subjects compared with an age-matched normal cont
273 d larger ARs in quasi-coronal images than in myopic subjects without staphyloma or normal controls.
275 s (normative database), 7.1 +/- 4.3 degrees (myopic subjects), and 7.6 +/- 4.2 degrees (glaucomatous
277 The prevalence of any MD was 44.9% among myopic subjects, based on the presence of any degenerati
279 selected cases of asymmetrical topographies, myopic surface ablation could induce a premature biomech
280 Asymmetrical-topography corneas treated with myopic surface ablation presented an increased short-ter
282 0.81, p < 0.001) with higher coefficient in myopic than in hyperopic children (r = 0.91, p = 0.0002
283 autofluorescence was significantly lower in myopic than in nonmyopic subjects (31.9 mm(2) vs 47.9 mm
285 In comparison, women were significantly more myopic than men (spherical equivalent of -3.73 diopter [
286 10) and at T(8) had grown less and were less myopic than those interrupted later (IOD change from bas
288 lution of foveal detachment in patients with myopic traction maculopathy without posterior vitreous d
289 c abnormality associated with retinoschisis, myopic traction maculopathy, epiretinal membrane, vitreo
290 sociated with PVD can occur in cases of high myopic traction maculopathy, especially in those without
291 However, linear cone density was lower in myopic versus non-myopic children at eccentricities of 0
295 postoperative refractive outcomes were more myopic when the IOL was fixated 2 mm from the limbus com
296 f the subjects had a right eye that was more myopic, while 30% of them had a more myopic left eye.
297 percent of eyes were from females, 74% were myopic with a refractive error of +3.00 to -17.00 diopte
298 , myopic with axial length (AL) < 25 mm, and myopic with AL > 25 mm, to analyze the effect of myopia.
299 subgroups based on axial length: emmetropic, myopic with axial length (AL) < 25 mm, and myopic with A