ライフサイエンスコーパス: neck dissection

1 [75%] had salvage surgery; and 36 [71%.] had neck dissection).

2 dectomy to 12.5% for thyroidectomy involving neck dissections).

3 PET/CT was compared with findings at neck dissection.

4 ated the need for lateral (modified radical) neck dissection.

5 D) from 14 patients undergoing mastectomy or neck dissection.

6 chest, including three who also had radical neck dissection.

7 l tumor resection with selective or complete neck dissection.

8 ents were treated with primary resection and neck dissection.

9 tomography/computed tomography to assess for neck dissection.

10 to 47 patients undergoing staged completion neck dissection.

11 umber of lymph nodes recovered from elective neck dissection.

12 extirpation with or without upfront elective neck dissection.

13 ead to improved prognostication than regular neck dissection.

14 docetaxel and cisplatin followed by TORS and neck dissection.

15 3 of these patients (65%) also had a central neck dissection.

16 larised tissue reconstruction, and extensive neck dissection.

17 after chemoradiation do not require elective neck dissection.

18 t LN count is a potential quality metric for neck dissection.

19 fetuses were randomly assigned to TO or sham neck dissection.

20 val, and the health utility reduction from a neck dissection.

21 neck cancer patients undergoing an elective neck dissection.

22 d disease-free survival than did therapeutic neck dissection.

23 rrow-exposure SLNB, and completion selective neck dissection.

24 tus with that of nodes within the completion neck dissection.

25 rged lymph nodes who would otherwise undergo neck dissection.

26 undissected neck compared with high-quality neck dissection.

27 he rates of patients with a negative post-RT neck dissection.

28 ) for the clinically N0 neck on the basis of neck dissection.

29 I underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT before elective neck dissection.

30 e of surgery or CRT and the role of post-CRT neck dissection.

31 one patients (62%) underwent planned post-RT neck dissection.

32 g may identify patients who require adjuvant neck dissection.

33 included teeth #27 through #31 and a radical neck dissection.

34 ase should have at least a bilateral central neck dissection.

35 ll treatment time, and addition of a planned neck dissection.

36 ite was performed in 13 patients, and 39 had neck dissection.

37 or delayed central and bilateral functional neck dissections.

38 difference in fistula rate between elective neck dissection (12 patients [14.8%]) and observed (8 pa

39 Among patients with elective neck dissection, 13 patients had occult nodal positivity

40 Elective neck dissections (26 unilateral, 5 bilateral; a total of

41 associated with 5 fewer free flaps, 4 fewer neck dissections, 5 more organ-preserving resections, an

42 [85.0%] men), 81 patients underwent elective neck dissection (75.7%) and 26 patients underwent observ

43 motherapy if node-positive) versus TORS plus neck dissection (+/- adjuvant RT/chemoradiation).

44 Neck dissection after CCRT was associated with an increa

45 mary site (odds ratio, 4.17; P = .0041); and neck dissection after CRT (odds ratio, 2.39; P = .018).

46 e of the primary surgery or with therapeutic neck dissection after nodal relapse has been a matter of

47 ts with cT1-2N0 OCSCC who underwent elective neck dissections after primary surgical extirpation were

48 Modern treatment of SCCUP by neck dissection alone, neck dissection followed by radia

49 and sequela than thyroid lobectomy (TL) and neck dissection alone.

50 of a three-dimensional surface scanner after neck dissection and before microvascular anastomosis.

51 mental mandibulectomy with ipsilateral right neck dissection and fibular free flap reconstruction.

52 ng from vagal nerve manipulation during deep neck dissection and partially by the fever he developed

53 Animals were anesthetized for neck dissection and placement of a 14-gauge catheter in

54 Therefore, total thyroidectomy with left neck dissection and segmental resection of the left inte

55 ajor Oto tray with 118 instruments and novel neck dissection and sentinel lymph node biopsy trays.

56 ve head and neck surgery including selective neck dissection and studied from the preoperative throug

57 isease also underwent post-radiation therapy neck dissection and two more chemotherapy cycles.

58 he need for prophylactic central compartment neck dissection and use of recombinant human thyroid sti

59 this tray that were used in more than 40% of neck dissections and sentinel lymph node biopsies, respe

60 hundred forty-one patients underwent planned neck dissection, and 18 patients received induction (17

61 ually treated with total thyroidectomy (TT), neck dissection, and adjuvant radioactive iodine (RAI).

62 ion included undergoing concurrent selective neck dissection (AOR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.22-0.41).

63 ith routine central and bilateral functional neck dissection are recommended.

64 oral cancers should be treated with elective neck dissection at the time of the primary surgery or wi

65 val of elective node dissection (ipsilateral neck dissection at the time of the primary surgery) vers

66 Group 1 comprised patients who underwent a neck dissection before the intervention; and group 2, th

67 e the number of pathologically node-negative neck dissections but also accurately identify patients w

68 surveillance and those who underwent planned neck dissection, but surveillance resulted in considerab

69 consists of total thyroidectomy with central neck dissection, but the rationale for bilateral surgery

70 be performed to test the outcome of omitting neck dissection by using PET/CT.

71 All patients had a central neck dissection (CND) combined with total parathyroidect

72 Prophylactic bilateral central neck dissection (CND) is gaining acceptance in the treat

73 However, elective neck dissection comes with greater upfront cost and pati

74 A lateral neck dissection conferred the highest risk for persisten

75 neck cancer undergoing ablative surgery and neck dissection develop postoperative pain with detrimen

76 disease in these patients, upfront elective neck dissections (END) for patients with clinically node

77 Central compartment neck dissection entails removal of the prelaryngeal, pre

78 ratively, and most patients should receive a neck dissection even when clinically N0.

79 arios focused on hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, factors that would favor operative vers

80 treatment of SCCUP by neck dissection alone, neck dissection followed by radiation with or without co

81 Total thyroidectomy and central neck dissection followed by radioactive iodine ablation

82 dectomy or hemithyroidectomy with or without neck dissection, followed by postoperative radioiodine a

83 s of RT alone and RT combined with a planned neck dissection for carcinoma of the tonsillar area and

84 ds of 417 patients who had undergone lateral neck dissection for malignant thyroid disease from June

85 prescribing at hospital discharge home after neck dissection for malignant thyroid disease with a sho

86 ent with opioid medication following lateral neck dissection for malignant thyroid disease with a sho

87 ode dissection (watchful waiting followed by neck dissection for nodal relapse) in patients with late

88 nt a cost-effectiveness analysis of elective neck dissection for the initial surgical management of e

89 d for the average patient undergoing lateral neck dissection for thyroid cancer based on the upper ra

90 udy suggest that patients undergoing lateral neck dissections for thyroid cancer with short hospitali

91 underwent thyroidectomy, parathyroidectomy, neck dissections for thyroid malignancy, and adrenalecto

92 emotherapy and, therefore, had postradiation neck dissections, four of which were positive for residu

93 If a decision regarding the need for neck dissection had been based solely on PET/CT, 3 false

94 y for subclinical nodal metastasis, elective neck dissection has become standard practice for many pa

95 Although modified radical neck dissections have increased in popularity to reduce

96 ventory-Head and Neck (MDASI-HN) module, the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII), and the Effecti

97 vantage among patients who received elective neck dissection in conjunction with primary surgery for

98 rall survival and lymph node (LN) count from neck dissection in patients with head and neck cancer.

99 incomplete or equivocal response) to planned neck dissection in patients with stage N2 or N3 disease.

100 guided surveillance as compared with planned neck dissection in the treatment of patients with squamo

101 4-1.52; P = .02) and a 22% increased rate of neck dissection (incident rate ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.07

102 ions for and the hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, indications for postoperative radiother

103 ary tumor is treated surgically, a selective neck dissection is now performed routinely in the patien

104 Modified radical neck dissection is recommended for patients when the pri

105 lliative operations consisted of reoperative neck dissection/mass excision (11), mediastinal mass res

106 asonography, a thyroid lobectomy and central neck dissection may be considered.

107 Concurrent neck dissection may be protective against readmission.

108 n patients without residual lymphadenopathy, neck dissection may be withheld safely.

109 platin in node-positive patients) vs TOS and neck dissection (ND) (with adjuvant reduced-dose RT depe

110 eoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by TORS and neck dissection (NECTORS), reserving radiation therapy f

111 A neck dissection of a minimum of 10 LNs was required.

112 Previous ipsilateral CEA, neck dissection or irradiation was present in 10.6% of p

113 onary disease (COPD); prior ipsilateral CEA, neck dissection or irradiation; high carotid bifurcation

114 is identified either at the time of elective neck dissection or regional recurrence within 2 years of

115 es disease [odds ratio (OR) = 2.06], lateral neck dissections (OR: 3.10), and unexpected reoperations

116 overall stage (P =.0131), and addition of a neck dissection (P =.0021).

117 luenced by overall stage (P =.0001), planned neck dissection (P =.0074), and histologic differentiati

118 wound complications increased after radical neck dissections (p < 0.00001).

119 ntial role of acupuncture in addressing post-neck dissection pain and dysfunction, as well as xerosto

120 Correlation of response with neck dissection pathology indicated a negative predictiv

121 By correlating post-RT CT to neck dissection pathology, criteria associated with a lo

122 its branches are thought to be spared during neck dissection, patients may postoperatively present wi

123 e the risks/benefits of prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) in patients with clinically node

124 eks after the end of chemoradiotherapy, with neck dissection performed only if PET-CT showed an incom

125 RT alone or combined with a planned neck dissection provides cure rates that are as good as

126 cs that incorporate quantitative measures of neck dissection quality and regional disease burden, suc

127 ur study found that the addition of elective neck dissection reduces costs and improves health outcom

128 weeks after RT can be spared from a post-RT neck dissection regardless of initial node stage.

129 epted treatment, but the need for subsequent neck dissection remains controversial.

130 ly-stage oral squamous-cell cancer, elective neck dissection resulted in higher rates of overall and

131 ients likely undergoing prophylactic central neck dissection resulted in three, four, and eight nodes

132 PET-CT-guided surveillance, as compared with neck dissection, resulted in savings of pound1,492 (appr

133 Routine central and bilateral functional neck dissections should be considered in all patients wi

134 were validated by biopsy, histopathology of neck dissection specimens (n = 18), or clinical and imag

135 PET-CT-guided surveillance resulted in fewer neck dissections than did planned dissection surgery (54

136 nically negative patients frequently undergo neck dissections that may not be necessary.

137 years) with rCR who did not undergo post-RT neck dissection, the 5-year ultimate neck control rate (

138 hat over a lifetime the addition of elective neck dissection to primary surgery reduced overall costs

139 N1-2) versus transoral robotic surgery plus neck dissection (TORS + ND) (with or without adjuvant th

140 alone (73 patients) or followed by a planned neck dissection (two patients) at the University of Flor

141 my based on tumor size, prophylactic central neck dissection, use of radioactive iodine, and degree o

142 survival between patients receiving elective neck dissection vs observation.

143 e decrease in overall cost despite the added neck dissection was a result of less use of salvage ther

144 py followed by transoral robotic surgery and neck dissection was an effective treatment option for pa

145 Neck dissection was considered for N2 or greater disease

146 Neck dissection was considered for patients with N2 or g

147 analysis found that treatment with elective neck dissection was cost effective 76% of the time at a

148 Central neck dissection was done only if the serum calcitonin wa

149 Undergoing elective neck dissection was not associated with a clinically mea

150 eased occult nodal positivity rate, elective neck dissection was not associated with survival, and pa

151 graphic response who did not undergo post-RT neck dissection was observed for recurrence.

152 ontrol was significantly better if a planned neck dissection was performed.

153 ing concomitant parathyroidectomy or lateral neck dissection were excluded.

154 OPSCC and node-positive disease confirmed on neck dissection were included in analyses.

155 sion (ENE) who underwent definitive TORS and neck dissection were included in the analysis.

156 th chronic pain or dysfunction attributed to neck dissection were randomly assigned to weekly acupunc

157 n 1991 and 1994, 213 patients undergoing 311 neck dissections were accrued at three institutions.

158 Neck dissections were carried out and the vascular tree

159 Central and lateral neck dissections were performed as part of initial thera

160 Femoral, axillary, or modified neck dissections were performed using standardized surgi

161 positive when >/= 18 LNs are examined after neck dissection, which suggests that LN count is a poten

162 ld be considered in patients undergoing deep neck dissection who develop characteristic ECG changes i

163 rcinoma who underwent surgical resection and neck dissection with a PN0 neck and high-risk features m

164 TOS and neck dissection with deintensified postoperative managem

165 definitive chemoradiation for which salvage neck dissection would be recommended.