戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 s' expression with or without infection with necrotrophic Alternaria solani, though no adverse effect
2                                         Both necrotrophic and biotrophic fungi have larger genomes th
3                                              Necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens are resisted by di
4 se tomato, Solanum lycopersicum, plants, and necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens to show that a com
5 the enhanced resistance of cwm plants to the necrotrophic and vascular pathogens negatively impacted
6 s increased susceptibility of plants against necrotrophic attackers by suppressing the jasmonic acid-
7 the increase in PA production in response to necrotrophic B. cinerea and virulent Pst DC3000 infectio
8  tomato DC3000 and for susceptibility to the necrotrophic bacteria Erwinia caratovora pv.
9                                              Necrotrophic bacteria within the order Enterobacterales
10 ency was most harmful to the host during the necrotrophic colonization phase.
11                  With the elucidation of the necrotrophic disease-synergistic role played by miR6024,
12 s inverse gene-for-gene recognition leads to necrotrophic effector-triggered susceptibility and ultim
13 nverse gene-for-gene interactions leading to necrotrophic effector-triggered susceptibility in the wh
14 nvolves the recognition of pathogen-secreted necrotrophic effectors (NEs) by corresponding wheat NE s
15 ated by the recognition of pathogen-produced necrotrophic effectors (NEs) by specific wheat genes.
16 ne interactions involving the recognition of necrotrophic effectors (NEs) by wheat sensitivity genes
17 the US, was evaluated for SNB resistance and necrotrophic effectors (NEs) sensitivity at the seedling
18 es a template for the study of less explored necrotrophic effectors and their host target functions.
19            Parastagonospora nodorum secretes necrotrophic effectors that target wheat susceptibility
20 hormonal network typically activated by both necrotrophic (ET/JA) and biotrophic (SA) pathogens suppo
21 vora is a devastating plant pathogen causing necrotrophic fire blight disease of apple, pear, and oth
22 n the tomato plant's defense response to the necrotrophic foliar pathogen Botrytis cinerea and the bi
23  sucrose and at the expense of starch during necrotrophic fungal growth.
24 thus limiting the defense function of UPI to necrotrophic fungal infection and insect herbivory.
25 cumulated JA in response to infection by the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Alternaria brassicicola.
26  is required for potato defences against the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Alternaria solani.
27  host plant during successful infection by a necrotrophic fungal pathogen and the resistance response
28 ed JA production and plant resistance to the necrotrophic fungal pathogen B. cinerea, but a negative
29 chanisms involved in plant resistance to the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea and their
30 nts displayed enhanced susceptibility to the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea, but showe
31 dopsis thaliana leaf during infection by the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea.
32 wa2 displayed increased tolerance toward the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea.
33 phagosomes are induced in Arabidopsis by the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea.
34  against herbivorous M. sexta larvae and the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea.
35 terial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae and the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea.
36  were highly susceptible to infection by the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea.
37 mutants impaired in defense responses to the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea.
38 tivity is important for the virulence of the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea.
39 efense gene expression and resistance to the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea.
40 rop facing threats from Alternaria solani, a necrotrophic fungal pathogen causing early blight diseas
41    Southern leaf blight (SLB), caused by the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Cochliobolus heterostrophus
42 e of wheat (Triticum aestivum) leaves to the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola
43 nospora nodorum is an economically important necrotrophic fungal pathogen of wheat.
44 odorum blotch (SNB), a disease caused by the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Parastagonospora nodorum, i
45 ants also exhibit enhanced resistance to the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia solani.
46 e oryzae, but enhanced susceptibility to the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia solani.
47  culture filtrate elicitor1 (SCFE1) from the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum th
48                                          The necrotrophic fungal pathogen Sclerotinia trifoliorum exh
49     Alternaria brassicicola is an important, necrotrophic fungal pathogen that causes black spot dise
50 investigated how Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, a necrotrophic fungal pathogen that causes disease in a ra
51 y, the sma4 mutant was highly resistant to a necrotrophic fungal pathogen, Botrytis cinerea.
52 adian clock influences susceptibility to the necrotrophic fungal pathogen, Botrytis cinerea.
53 es, caterpillars and aphids, and against the necrotrophic fungal pathogen, Botrytis cinerea.
54 tivation of PGN results in susceptibility to necrotrophic fungal pathogens as well as hypersensitivit
55 phagy exhibit enhanced susceptibility to the necrotrophic fungal pathogens B. cinerea and Alternaria
56 sive genes and compromised resistance to the necrotrophic fungal pathogens Botrytis cinerea and Alter
57 cichoracearum but enhanced resistance to the necrotrophic fungal pathogens Botrytis cinerea and Alter
58 of HUB1 show increased susceptibility to the necrotrophic fungal pathogens Botrytis cinerea and Alter
59 gnaling conferred enhanced resistance to the necrotrophic fungal pathogens Botrytis cinerea and Alter
60  factor cause enhanced susceptibility to the necrotrophic fungal pathogens Botrytis cinerea and Alter
61 FENSIN1.2 (PDF1.2) and for resistance to the necrotrophic fungal pathogens Botrytis cinerea and Alter
62 tion of BIK1 causes severe susceptibility to necrotrophic fungal pathogens but enhances resistance to
63 es conferred heritable resistance to several necrotrophic fungal pathogens, suggesting that disease d
64 echanisms of susceptibility, particularly to necrotrophic fungal pathogens.
65  other hand, increases resistance to the two necrotrophic fungal pathogens.
66 f cognate PINE1 proteins in broad host range necrotrophic fungal pathogens.
67 their host targets are largely unexplored in necrotrophic fungal pathogens.
68  to regulate plant defense responses against necrotrophic fungal pathogens.
69 recently proven vital in plant resistance to necrotrophic fungal pathogens.
70 d cell death-eliciting toxin produced by the necrotrophic fungal plant pathogen Fusarium moniliforme,
71 d shared defense mechanism for resistance to necrotrophic fungi and herbivorous insects.
72 the agronomically and economically important necrotrophic fungi B. cinerea, Alternaria brassicicola,
73 ele displayed enhanced susceptibility to the necrotrophic fungi Botrytis cinerea and Alternaria brass
74 plays a pivotal role in the virulence of the necrotrophic fungi Botrytis cinerea and Sclerotinia scle
75 ation of disease responses to biotrophic and necrotrophic fungi in that it antagonizes salicylic acid
76 le of SA-dependent defense responses against necrotrophic fungi is currently unclear.
77                          Plant resistance to necrotrophic fungi is regulated by a complex set of sign
78 th regulatory roles in plant defense against necrotrophic fungi most likely through modulation of gen
79   Plants challenged by pathogens, especially necrotrophic fungi such as Botrytis cinerea, produce hig
80 As play in plant defense against insects and necrotrophic fungi, (2) argue for a reassessment of sign
81 nse, generally associated with resistance to necrotrophic fungi, is attenuated in the bik1 mutant bas
82 e modulate the resistance of hub1 mutants to necrotrophic fungi.
83 ant defenses against herbivorous insects and necrotrophic fungi.
84 defence against insect herbivores and foliar necrotrophic fungi.
85  of MAMP-triggered immunity in resistance to necrotrophic fungi.
86 y regulating SA/JA/ET-mediated resistance to necrotrophic fungi.
87 s (ROS) is critical for pathogenicity in the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria alternata.
88    Alternaria leaf blight (ALB), caused by a necrotrophic fungus Alternaria brassicae is a serious di
89 ingly, the elevated resistance of gai to the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria brassicicola and suscepti
90 iggered immunity and immune responses to the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria brassicicola and the bact
91 ble genes and enhanced susceptibility to the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria brassicicola.
92                  Early blight, caused by the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria solani, is an increasing
93              Ascochyta blight, caused by the necrotrophic fungus Ascochyta rabiei, is a major threat
94 production and Arabidopsis resistance to the necrotrophic fungus B. cinerea.
95 ) of sorghum, a foliar disease caused by the necrotrophic fungus Bipolaris cookei (also known as Bipo
96 Target Leaf Spot (TLS) disease caused by the necrotrophic fungus Bipolaris cookei in the SCP.
97 ty to the isolate ND90Pr (Bs(ND90Pr)) of the necrotrophic fungus Bipolaris sorokiniana.
98 s present an increased susceptibility to the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea and an increased to
99 ence (BOI RNAi) were more susceptible to the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea and less tolerant t
100 e expression and increased resistance to the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea and the caterpillar
101 RNAi) increases tomato susceptibility to the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea and to feeding by l
102 eudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 and the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea As pldgamma1 mutant
103      Atdpl1 mutants exhibit tolerance to the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea but susceptibility
104            In Arabidopsis, resistance to the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea is conferred by eth
105  of lipid species altered in response to the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea revealed decreases
106  Nup88/MOS7 is essential for immunity to the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea The mos7-1 mutation
107 interaction of Arabidopsis thaliana with the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea using millicell cul
108 sion show an increased susceptibility to the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea, and increased sens
109 of PS improves Arabidopsis resistance to the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea, consistent with su
110 expression of defense markers induced by the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea, including the gene
111 cete Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis, and the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea.
112 r WRKY33 is essential for defense toward the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea.
113 defense responses and protection against the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea.
114    Southern leaf blight (SLB), caused by the necrotrophic fungus Cochliobolus heterostrophus, is a ma
115  among victorin (an effector produced by the necrotrophic fungus Cochliobolus victoriae), TRX-h5 (a d
116  findings suggest an explanation for why the necrotrophic fungus Gibberella fujikuroi, causal agent o
117 We observe that the lesions produced by this necrotrophic fungus on Arabidopsis leaves are smaller wh
118 ically important wheat disease caused by the necrotrophic fungus Parastagonospora nodorum.
119 the enhanced susceptibility of agb1-2 to the necrotrophic fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina BMM (PcB
120 sis (Arabidopsis thaliana) resistance to the necrotrophic fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina.
121               Sheath blight (ShB), caused by necrotrophic fungus Rhizoctonia solani, is one of the mo
122 ed global gene expression in response to the necrotrophic fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in 23 Arabi
123           Botrytis cinerea is a well-studied necrotrophic fungus taken as a model organism in fungal
124                         S. sclerotiorum is a necrotrophic fungus that causes stem rot diseases on mor
125 nt parasitic styles: a vascular bacterium, a necrotrophic fungus, and a biotrophic oomycete.
126 allenge by a hemi-biotrophic bacterium and a necrotrophic fungus, as well as in the growth response t
127  pretreatment induced resistance against the necrotrophic fungus, Botrytis cinerea The induced resist
128 a pathogen stress response, specifically for necrotrophic fungus, is poorly understood.
129 ve to aos, opr3 has enhanced resistance to a necrotrophic fungus.
130 ty against avirulent bacteria and a virulent necrotrophic fungus.
131 ng fructan metabolites, during the switch to necrotrophic growth and reproduction.
132            We hypothesize that the switch to necrotrophic growth enables the fungus to evade the effe
133 ase in the penetrated epidermis cell, before necrotrophic growth is initiated upon further host colon
134 le during the transition from symptomless to necrotrophic growth of Septoria.
135 m Phytophthora that are expressed during the necrotrophic growth phase, as well as programmed cell de
136 host cells followed by a rapid transition to necrotrophic growth resulting in disease lesions.
137 s indicate that this bacterium is capable of necrotrophic growth, is able to metabolize halogenated c
138 g of host transcription marks this switch to necrotrophic growth.
139 pressorium on the cuticle and biotrophic and necrotrophic hyphae in its host.
140 ophic hyphae was unaffected in RNAi strains, necrotrophic hyphae showed severe distortions.
141 all rigidity in appressoria and fast-growing necrotrophic hyphae, its rigorous downregulation during
142 re detected in cell walls of appressoria and necrotrophic hyphae.
143 er, the AtECS plants exhibited resistance to necrotrophic infection and salt stress, while the pad2-1
144 es can result in impaired plant tolerance to necrotrophic infection or abiotic stress.
145 iption is downregulated by methyl JA (MeJA), necrotrophic infection or mechanical injury.
146 nses by switching from a hemibiotrophic to a necrotrophic infection program, thereby gaining an advan
147 -HAC boosts JA-dependent defenses during the necrotrophic infection stage of F. graminearum but suppr
148  and senescence, the pathogens switch to the necrotrophic lifestyle and cause decay.
149 ls during the transition from biotrophy to a necrotrophic lifestyle.
150 host plant and later switch to a destructive necrotrophic lifestyle.
151 ate the transition from the quiescent to the necrotrophic lifestyle.
152 merina alternates between hemibiotrophic and necrotrophic lifestyles, depending on initial spore dens
153 abidopsis thaliana) immune responses against necrotrophic microorganisms via a SA-independent mechani
154 n plants and biotrophic, hemibiotrophic, and necrotrophic oomycetes affect disease progression.
155 ions, such as the marine carbon pump through necrotrophic-parasitism, facilitating the export of diat
156  is required for potato defences against the necrotrophic pathogen A. solani.
157 ant immunity, and facilitates disease by the necrotrophic pathogen A. solani.
158 nse, rendered plants more susceptible to the necrotrophic pathogen Alternaria brassicicola by suppres
159 stress as well as in the defense against the necrotrophic pathogen Alternaria brassicicola.
160  novel components of plant immunity toward a necrotrophic pathogen and provides mechanistic insights
161                                However, upon necrotrophic pathogen attack, how JA-mediated defense re
162 ols broad-spectrum disease resistance to the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea and contributes t
163 equired for JA-mediated defenses against the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea and for the shade
164 tudy suggests that plant defense against the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea is primarily quan
165 SIB2 are rapidly and strongly induced by the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea.
166 ociated with increased susceptibility to the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea.
167 ponsive gene PDF1.2 and in resistance to the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea.
168 th plant growth and defense responses to the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea.
169  Golovinomyces cichoracearum, but not to the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea.
170 rophic pathogen Pseudomonas syringae and the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea.
171 was sufficient to change the host range of a necrotrophic pathogen but not a hemibiotroph or saprotro
172                 How QDR against a generalist necrotrophic pathogen evolved and whether it is driven b
173 ce to pitch canker, a disease incited by the necrotrophic pathogen Fusarium circinatum.
174 t be advantageous to the plant by preventing necrotrophic pathogen growth in tissues undergoing PCD.
175 ay, during JA-mediated defense response upon necrotrophic pathogen interaction.
176 PR1 during JA mediated defense response upon necrotrophic pathogen interaction.
177 ns of wheat (Triticum aestivum), including a necrotrophic pathogen of barley, a hemibiotrophic pathog
178              Stagonospora nodorum is a major necrotrophic pathogen of wheat that causes the diseases
179                     Against infection by the necrotrophic pathogen Plectosphaerella cucumerina, nrpe1
180                  Botrytis cinerea is a major necrotrophic pathogen responsible for significant crop l
181 s required to restrict the spread of another necrotrophic pathogen, Alternaria brassicicola, suggesti
182  developmental stages and in response to the necrotrophic pathogen, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum.
183 tibility to Alternaria brassicicola, another necrotrophic pathogen, suggesting a broader role for the
184 trates that CMNs transfer jasmonic acid from necrotrophic pathogen-infected to uninfected tomato plan
185 ced resistance to Cochliobolus miyabeanus, a necrotrophic pathogen.
186 by necrosis that occurred in response to the necrotrophic pathogen.
187 1 protein in plant immunization against this necrotrophic pathogen.
188 in shaping resistance against a cosmopolitan necrotrophic pathogen.
189  the outcome of NLR-miRNA interaction during necrotrophic pathogenesis is a hindrance to the deployme
190 atively impacts plant immune response during necrotrophic pathogenesis.
191 or envelopment of the diatom nuclei infers a necrotrophic-pathogenic interaction.
192 rmones critical for plant resistance against necrotrophic pathogens and chewing herbivores.
193 way that enables the plant to defend against necrotrophic pathogens and herbivorous insects apparentl
194         The fungal genus Armillaria contains necrotrophic pathogens and some of the largest terrestri
195                                              Necrotrophic pathogens are important plant pathogens tha
196                                              Necrotrophic pathogens are notorious for their aggressiv
197                                        While necrotrophic pathogens are sensitive to jasmonic acid (J
198                       Because wound-invading necrotrophic pathogens are vulnerable to biocontrol, ant
199                               Biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens attack plants using different str
200                                 In contrast, necrotrophic pathogens benefit from host cell death, so
201 branch of immunity and are more resistant to necrotrophic pathogens but not insect herbivores.
202 ospora nodorum, to review the means by which necrotrophic pathogens circumvent, or outright hijack, t
203 between defence against (hemi)biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens has been widely described across
204 ts of host resistance against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens have been documented in various p
205    Few studies of quantitative resistance to necrotrophic pathogens have used large plant mapping pop
206 nhance understanding of host manipulation by necrotrophic pathogens in causing disease.
207 -dependent defence responses engaged against necrotrophic pathogens in root tissue.
208 f mechanisms of resistance to biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens is crucial for activating or supp
209 derstanding of the plant defense response to necrotrophic pathogens is limited.
210     Genetic resistance to disease incited by necrotrophic pathogens is not well understood in plants.
211                This work suggests that these necrotrophic pathogens may thrive by subverting the resi
212                                              Necrotrophic pathogens produce toxins, necrosis-inducing
213  cells, whereas JA activates defense against necrotrophic pathogens that kill host cells for nutritio
214 ssociated PCD could leave them vulnerable to necrotrophic pathogens that thrive on dead host cells.
215  No elevated resistance toward herbivores or necrotrophic pathogens was detected for cpk28 plants, ei
216                     Plant resistance against necrotrophic pathogens with a broad host range is comple
217 ant role in plant defense, especially toward necrotrophic pathogens, and highlight a novel connection
218  by a dramatic increase in susceptibility to necrotrophic pathogens, such as Botrytis cinerea.
219 rsely, ros1 displayed enhanced resistance to necrotrophic pathogens, which was not associated with in
220 n resistance of Arabidopsis thaliana against necrotrophic pathogens.
221 dentified a role for TGA3 in defense against necrotrophic pathogens.
222 rky33 mutant, which is highly susceptible to necrotrophic pathogens.
223 plays a critical role in plant resistance to necrotrophic pathogens.
224 on factor that is required for resistance to necrotrophic pathogens.
225 ctivators of WRKY33 in plant defense against necrotrophic pathogens.
226 hance our understanding of plant immunity to necrotrophic pathogens.
227 the regulation of plant defense responses to necrotrophic pathogens.
228 hways mediating responses to P. syringae and necrotrophic pathogens.
229 nses to resistance to several biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens.
230 plex roles in defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens.
231 in response to wounding, feeding insects, or necrotrophic pathogens.
232  that are less vulnerable to modification by necrotrophic pathogens.
233 isms of plant defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens.
234 te-based defense responses to herbivores and necrotrophic pathogens.
235 teraction with biotrophic, hemibiotrophic or necrotrophic pathogens.
236 phic pathogen without becoming vulnerable to necrotrophic pathogens.
237 ar from being understood, especially against necrotrophic pathogens.
238 timise defences against (hemi)biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens.
239  required for defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens; however, the upstream and downst
240  factor is important for plant resistance to necrotrophic pathogens; therefore, elucidation of its fu
241  hemibiotrophic Pseudomonas syringae and the necrotrophic Pectobacterium carotovorum bacteria.
242  host tissue asymptomatically, followed by a necrotrophic phase, during which host-cell death is indu
243 ere highly expressed by the mycobiota at the necrotrophic phase, showing an active pathogen response
244 at the switch between the biotrophic and the necrotrophic phases.
245  Here we characterized a CP (SsCP1) from the necrotrophic phytopathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum.
246   In the case of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, a necrotrophic phytopathogen, a secreted protein named SsP
247 ynthase, encoded by the BcBOT2 gene from the necrotrophic plant pathogen Botrytis cinerea, catalyzes
248 pecies and diversifying selection within the necrotrophic plant pathogen ecological niche.
249  brassicicola is a successful saprophyte and necrotrophic plant pathogen.
250 l death as a component of diseases caused by necrotrophic plant pathogens.
251 re caused by biotrophic, hemibiotrophic, and necrotrophic plant pathogens.
252                                          The necrotrophic plant-pathogen fungus Botrytis cinerea prod
253 e resistance toward (hemi)biotrophic but not necrotrophic rice pathogens.
254                                         As a necrotrophic specialist, it deploys effector proteins th
255     The diversity of virulence strategies in necrotrophic species corresponds to multifaceted host im
256 ession of effector-triggered necrosis at the necrotrophic stage by an NLR receptor in plants.
257  transition from the biotrophic stage to the necrotrophic stage in disease symptom expression are mai
258 thways associated with senescence during the necrotrophic stage of fungal development.
259  stabilizes APIP5 to prevent necrosis at the necrotrophic stage.
260 nal activity and protein accumulation at the necrotrophic stage.
261 or enhanced JA-dependent defenses during the necrotrophic stages of infection.
262 mechanism includes sequential biotrophic and necrotrophic stages.
263             SsPINE1 enhances S. sclerotiorum necrotrophic virulence by specifically interacting with
264 ic vs. non-pathogenic) and pathogenic niche (necrotrophic vs. biotrophic).

 
Page Top