ライフサイエンスコーパス: neighboring cell

1 trans-membrane ligands on the membrane of a neighboring cell.

2 n of a cell while minimizing activation of a neighboring cell.

3 lied in a wide range of angles relative to a neighboring cell.

4 iple modes of communication to interact with neighboring cells.

5 s leading and trailing edge dynamics between neighboring cells.

6 regates from brain cells and their uptake by neighboring cells.

7 a single virus that spreads inefficiently to neighboring cells.

8 the type VI secretion system (T6SS) to kill neighboring cells.

9 onds between beta-sheet-rich G5-E domains on neighboring cells.

10 plicases, and certain structural proteins to neighboring cells.

11 which inhibits the activator and diffuses to neighboring cells.

12 antly between the mediolateral interfaces of neighboring cells.

13 ere the global reporter is exchanged between neighboring cells.

14 d, budding is driven by proliferation of the neighboring cells.

15 ms orient their mitotic spindles relative to neighboring cells.

16 ence of exopolysaccharides (EPS) produced by neighboring cells.

17 e emerging cell and mechanical properties of neighboring cells.

18 acellular targets and affect the function of neighboring cells.

19 ected mutations depends on the nature of the neighboring cells.

20 o the extracellular space and endocytosed by neighboring cells.

21 es a molecular warhead to inject toxins into neighboring cells.

22 anatomy of individual neurons packed between neighboring cells.

23 require communication and interplay between neighboring cells.

24 of C. psittaci-infected cells and uninfected neighboring cells.

25 same cell surface, but not in trans between neighboring cells.

26 d, FAs reassociated with LDs and fluxed into neighboring cells.

27 myosin activities and from interactions with neighboring cells.

28 e NF-kappaB inhibitor for translocation into neighboring cells.

29 h and Delta leading to lateral inhibition of neighboring cells.

30 ow significant displacements with respect to neighboring cells.

31 ting products that are commonly available to neighboring cells.

32 c good" molecules that enhance the growth of neighboring cells.

33 self-processes, while allowing contact with neighboring cells.

34 although it plays a potent paracrine role in neighboring cells.

35 transient and coordinated elongation of the neighboring cells.

36 soluble factors that affect the function of neighboring cells.

37 but promote the survival and reproduction of neighboring cells.

38 communication to coordinate polarity between neighboring cells.

39 onomous contact guidance information between neighboring cells.

40 h allows highly efficient virion delivery to neighboring cells.

41 that activated P2Y1 purinergic receptors on neighboring cells.

42 which are deployed to inhibit the growth of neighboring cells.

43 en cell-associated, and thus only signals to neighboring cells.

44 rons resembled the preferred orientations of neighboring cells.

45 lay a microheterogeneity in phenotypes, even neighboring cells.

46 acting as a soluble pro-apoptotic factor in neighboring cells.

47 cilitating the transformation of one or more neighboring cells.

48 rcellular Frizzled-Vang interactions between neighboring cells.

49 FQ inhibits HCV cell-to-cell spread between neighboring cells.

50 us receptors in influenza virus-infected and neighboring cells.

51 ses by establishing physical contact between neighboring cells.

52 lf that is conductive and makes contact with neighboring cells.

53 ne into protrusions that are internalized by neighboring cells.

54 ction forces applied by myosin motors and by neighboring cells.

55 teroid hormones on stem cells via the mature neighboring cells.

56 ellular space, producing oxidative stress in neighboring cells.

57 nfluenced by signaling molecules produced by neighboring cells.

58 ons are distributed to minimize proximity to neighboring cells.

59 trafficking by tunneling nanotubes bridging neighboring cells.

60 r within the RA-synthesizing cells or in the neighboring cells.

61 , metabolites, and second messengers between neighboring cells.

62 ave the potential to affect the epigenome of neighboring cells.

63 hat a signal should be sensed equally by all neighboring cells.

64 ed by coupling of contractile forces between neighboring cells.

65 Of interest, this effect is propagated to neighboring cells.

66 ractions mediated by secreted metabolites of neighboring cells.

67 opagation as it may exert noxious effects on neighboring cells.

68 chromosome, replication, and transduction to neighboring cells.

69 le an inhibitor complex suppresses it in the neighboring cells.

70 communicate directional information between neighboring cells.

71 mation that is transmitted via relay between neighboring cells.

72 tion of purinergic (P2) calcium responses in neighboring cells.

73 and a repressor in combination with Hdac1 in neighboring cells.

74 mage signals that induce immune responses in neighboring cells.

75 nct, stably maintained, and coordinated with neighboring cells.

76 ore rapidly and supercompetitively eliminate neighboring cells.

77 lasma membrane that propel the bacteria into neighboring cells.

78 and degradation, and purinergic responses in neighboring cells.

79 signals in the cilium from the cell body and neighboring cells.

80 wth inhibition (CDI) systems to compete with neighboring cells.

81 cell but also their interacting partners on neighboring cells.

82 complexes that bridge the junctions between neighboring cells.

83 ndrites receive and process information from neighboring cells.

84 11cRAL is carried out by enzyme pathways in neighboring cells.

85 are selectively eliminated without affecting neighboring cells.

86 yosin and junctions and apical relaxation of neighboring cells.

87 kle on Frizzled requires Prickle activity in neighboring cells.

88 ng to increased mechanical conflicts between neighboring cells.

89 and inflammation by influencing autophagy in neighboring cells.

90 e cell, and from the other allele-or both-in neighboring cells.

91 sfer that contributes to pharmacodynamics of neighboring cells.

92 they form intercellular complexes that link neighboring cells [1-3].

93 f IIF by enabling propagation of ice between neighboring cells, a process thought to be mediated by g

94 key ligand for activating Notch signaling in neighboring cells, a well-known mechanism for maintainin

95 s also determined relative to the fitness of neighboring cells: a cell that is of suboptimal fitness

96 human monocyte-derived dendritic cells alert neighboring cells about viral infection using diffusing

97 agen indicating that uptake of collagen from neighboring cells account for much of the fibrocyte coll

98 itch, giving rise to two distinct fates that neighboring cells adopt--Sender (high ligand, low recept

99 is polarity such that the apical surfaces of neighboring cells all point toward the central lumen.

100 that Rhes tunnels establish contact with the neighboring cell and deliver Rhes-positive cargoes, whic

101 estigating the effects of NP damaged TAFs on neighboring cells and alteration of stromal structure af

102 gnaling can potentiate communication between neighboring cells and between cells separated by large d

103 Cells communicate with neighboring cells and condition their local environment

104 T6SS delivers effectors to neighboring cells and corresponding antagonistic protein

105 rved pathway that transduces signals between neighboring cells and determines major decisions in cell

106 t tumors trigger non-autonomous autophagy in neighboring cells and distant organs, thus fueling tumor

107 4% of myocytes were poorly synchronized with neighboring cells and exhibited asynchronous (AS) Ca tra

108 d cells, cadherins sustain the force between neighboring cells and integrins between cells and matrix

109 comparison of relative cell fitness between neighboring cells and is a striking example of tissue ad

110 ndle-like, elongated, and disassociated from neighboring cells and lost their original cobblestone mo

111 e coordinated acquisition of invasiveness by neighboring cells and mediate the communication between

112 gesting that glucose restriction may benefit neighboring cells and not only an individual cell.

113 to how melanocyte dendrites communicate with neighboring cells and offer a new model system for study

114 le of transferring biological information to neighboring cells and play an active role in inflammator

115 cteria deploy a variety of toxins to inhibit neighboring cells and protect themselves from autoinhibi

116 ecules responsible for physically connecting neighboring cells and signaling this cell-cell contact.

117 n the role of JNKs in compensatory growth of neighboring cells and stem cells, which may provide new

118 l-cell boundaries to suppress protrusions in neighboring cells and that Plexin A is the receptor that

119 iently propagates motion information between neighboring cells and the background subtraction and sup

120 prevented the formation of contacts between neighboring cells and the subsequent downstream signalin

121 of mechanical and chemical cues presented by neighboring cells and the surrounding extracellular matr

122 verse signals that have a profound impact on neighboring cells and tissues.

123 eir primary function is to physically couple neighboring cells and withstand mechanical force.

124 protein distribution that are transmitted to neighboring cells, and asymmetric Ds localization result

125 ratricide, the kin-discriminatory killing of neighboring cells, and competence-mediated growth arrest

126 nsion can be influenced by type of settlers, neighboring cells, and further community merging and sca

127 both extrinsic cues, such as signaling from neighboring cells, and intrinsic factors, such as chroma

128 ovide FcgammaRIIB to cross-link anti-CD40 on neighboring cells, and only when this is blocked does th

129 morphological changes in adjacent regions of neighboring cells, and require their neighbors to coordi

130 e exchange of molecular cargo with nuclei of neighboring cells, and the gut lumen.

131 rins occur in vivo through interactions with neighboring cells, and these forces result in coordinate

132 rin-dependent contractile forces for pulling neighboring cells apart.

133 nels that electrically and chemically couple neighboring cells are formed when two hemichannels (conn

134 r using micropipette action and responses in neighboring cells are monitored with atomic force micros

135 ens junctions, and thus mechanically connect neighboring cells, are poorly understood.

136 whereby dying cells induce proliferation in neighboring cells as a means to restore homeostasis.

137 ctive infection through concentric layers of neighboring cells as cellular differentiation progressed

138 same cell or different genes into different neighboring cells as well as rapid cell selective functi

139 rces applied by the cytoplasmic skeleton and neighboring cells, as well as to internal nuclear forces

140 ich travel across the plasma membrane of the neighboring cell before entering it.

141 e a second influx of calcium that spreads to neighboring cells beyond the footprint of cavitation.

142 Cell surface ligands bind Notch on neighboring cells but require endocytosis to activate si

143 , KCs extend their cytoplasmic aprons toward neighboring cells, but anti-Dsg antibodies prevent assem

144 th interactions influencing polarity between neighboring cells, but not distant ones.

145 starvation, they successfully competed with neighboring cells by autonomous and non-autonomous mecha

146 wnstream immune signaling pathways and alert neighboring cells by eliciting the expression of antivir

147 ssion affects the sphere-forming capacity of neighboring cells by indirectly enhancing expression of

148 endogenous molecules to salvage the injured neighboring cells by regulating apoptosis, inflammation,

149 EPI cells promote PE fate in neighboring cells by secreting Fgf4, and Oct4 is require

150 sicle-producing cells induce MV formation in neighboring cells by the enzymatic action of the release

151 al cells in a tissue is highly variable, and neighboring cells can grow at different rates.

152 influenza A virus (IAV) infectious cores to neighboring cells can occur within intercellular connect

153 tend protrusions that invade luminally along neighboring cell-cell junctions.

154 as a result of inelastic collisions between neighboring cells: collisions lead to a mutual alignment

155 ell-to-cell spread and CD81 transfer between neighboring cells correlates with the capacity of target

156 m basal stress fibers and extend penetrating neighboring cell cortexes.

157 calcium oscillation depends on the number of neighboring cells coupled via gap junctional intercellul

158 t fluorescent proteins (RFP, YFP and CFP) in neighboring cells, creating a 'Brainbow' of colors.

159 he cell (self-dose) and emitted by decays in neighboring cells (cross-dose), among other factors.

160 , suggesting that local interactions between neighboring cells determine their territories.

161 of dopamine neurotransmission, many VTA and neighboring cells display dynamic gene expression phenot

162 to a non-cell autonomous migration defect in neighboring cells, due at least in part to derepression

163 ract with the extracellular matrix (ECM) and neighboring cells during migration.

164 d that voltage spikes, which develop between neighboring cells during the spread of action potentials

165 ydrophobic boundaries can spatially separate neighboring cells effectively.

166 etinotopy, the organizing principle by which neighboring cells encode neighboring spatial locations.

167 Coactivation of neighboring cells enhances the activation of an excitato

168 helix-loop-helix transcription factors into neighboring cells, especially in the backgrounds where t

169 ring biosynthetic cells or indirectly to non-neighboring cells expressing GTR1/2.

170 evant for Notch signaling, which coordinates neighboring cell fates through direct cell-cell signalin

171 detectable transgene expression, first to EC neighboring cells, followed by propagation to neurons do

172 volves activation of purinergic receptors in neighboring cells following ATP release through hemichan

173 live imaging we observed that variability of neighboring cell growth was reduced in ftsh4 sepals.

174 y organ cells are in continuous contact with neighboring cells, immune cells circulate throughout the

175 racts with dysfunctional mitochondria in the neighboring cell in a Nix-dependent manner.

176 l provided by a groove can propagate between neighboring cells in a confluent monolayer, and that the

177 ered Ca(2+) signals that were transmitted to neighboring cells in a manner that scaled with agonist c

178 ard aggregate centroids, and alignment among neighboring cells in a radial direction to the nearest a

179 ion systems (T6SS) enable bacteria to engage neighboring cells in contact-dependent competition.

180 Using Brainbow methods to label neighboring cells in different colors, we find that Mull

181 The maximum distance of responding neighboring cells in ex vivo human corneas was measured.

182 biologically active cytokine for release to neighboring cells in soluble form.

183 orm electrical synapses between dendrites of neighboring cells in support of lateral information exch

184 rimeter of each cell and communicated across neighboring cells in the epithelial organization.

185 elative to the stimulus, activation state of neighboring cells in the microenvironment or within prog

186 barely replicating well enough to spread to neighboring cells in the mouth.

187 Microvascular ECs instruct neighboring cells in their organ-specific vascular niche

188 regeneration are influenced by signals from neighboring cells, in particular Schwann cells of the pe

189 ll reactivity, while acquisition of HLA from neighboring cells increased NK cell reactivity.

190 g mediates short-range communication between neighboring cells instead of transmitting long-range inf

191 n and uptake of dead cells, thereby tricking neighboring cells into taking up the invader.

192 e change initiates epithelial folding, while neighboring cell invagination determines the final depth

193 N-beta, which restrains viral propagation in neighboring cells involving paracrine mechanisms.

194 Interdigitated growth of neighboring cells is an evolutionarily conserved develop

195 afficking may explain why viral infection of neighboring cells is established rapidly and efficiently

196 whether oscillations depend on signals from neighboring cells is unknown.

197 egulates the growth of LMSP cells via mature neighboring cells is unknown.

198 cytosis, in which cells nibble away parts of neighboring cells, is an intercellular cannibalism proce

199 riptionally and phenotypically distinct from neighboring cells lacking stem cell antigen-1 or CD45 an

200 ironments, while short-range activation from neighboring cells leads to positive feedback.

201 lignifying cells themselves, but not in the neighboring cells, lignin was still deposited in the xyl

202 cultured cells that do not communicate with neighboring cells located in the same microenvironment a

203 , the ADAM17-EGFR signaling axis coordinates neighboring cell migration toward oncogenic cells and is

204 is work we study cooperative effects between neighboring cells of different types, migrating in a maz

205 d from primary human tumors but is absent in neighboring cells of healthy tissue has resulted in sign

206 be specifically activated without activating neighboring cells of the same type or other types.

207 Eph receptors bind ephrins on neighboring cells, oligomerizing into adhesive complexes

208 he basic processes of life, the influence of neighboring cells on the individual remains poorly under

209 ate myelin and that failed interactions with neighboring cells or factors in the diseased microenviro

210 ce receptors that bind prototypic ligands on neighboring cells or in the extracellular matrix.

211 ate multiple signals originating either from neighboring cells or systemically.

212 Although arbors of neighboring cells overlap extensively, imaging populatio

213 ocyte lumina interrupt the lateral domain of neighboring cells perpendicular to two basal domains and

214 tically different wiring of Hpo signaling in neighboring cell populations of distinct developmental o

215 interactions between neural crest cells and neighboring cell populations of ectodermal, endodermal a

216 otubule-free zones at the periclinal wall in neighboring cells predicted sites of new lobes.

217 usly, short-range lateral inhibition between neighboring cells produce competitive effects that are a

218 2 T cells are activated through their TCR by neighboring cells producing phosphoantigens.

219 clustering revealed shared subunits between neighboring cells, producing a parsimonious population m

220 Acquisition of plastids from neighboring cells provides a mechanism by which cells ma

221 Whereas opposing membranes from neighboring cells rapidly assemble junctional complexes,

222 tween density and genetic similarity between neighboring cells (relatedness).

223 ell interacts with the Notch receptor of its neighboring cell, releasing the Notch Intracellular Doma

224 e associated with the plasma membrane, while neighboring cells remain dark.

225 signaling between apoptotic cells and their neighboring cells remains largely unknown.

226 iche for intracellular bacteria and alerting neighboring cells, respectively.

227 ar membranes as well as between infected and neighboring cells, respectively.

228 s stimulation of EphA forward signaling from neighboring cells, resulting in enhanced basal glucagon

229 Targeted cell(s) are discriminated from neighboring cell(s) by focusing NIR light emitted from a

230 lecules into physically connected individual neighboring cells separately with high precision and low

231 Conversely, infected cells and neighboring cells showed increased ISG mRNA levels, demo

232 uch as protein, mRNA, and microRNAs, between neighboring cells, such as in the tumor microenvironment

233 ng macrophage-derived HB-EGF, enhance DDR in neighboring cells suffering from DNA damage.

234 p junction-permeable dyes did not diffuse to neighboring cells, suggesting that SP neurons were not s

235 eptors (aGPCRs) bind extracellular matrix or neighboring cell-surface ligands to regulate organ and t

236 s often exhibit coordinated patterns between neighboring cells, termed tissue cell polarity.

237 y triggers ERK activity waves in unperturbed neighboring cells that depend on the membrane metallopro

238 hich cells within an epithelium can react to neighboring cells that have genetic differences, resulti

239 ccompanied by a major actin rearrangement in neighboring cells that maintained epithelium integrity b

240 e (S1P), which activates S1P(2) receptors in neighboring cells that seamlessly squeeze the cell out o

241 de an important structural interface between neighboring cells, the actin cytoskeleton, and intracell

242 s that propagated electrical signals between neighboring cells, thereby activating voltage-gated Ca(2

243 ctor Sup35 persistently propagate and invade neighboring cells, thereby inducing a self-perpetuating

244 0 ms, which represents capacitive loading of neighboring cells through gap junctions.

245 ependent antiviral signaling is amplified in neighboring cells through gap junctions.

246 ropose that LINKIN promotes adhesion between neighboring cells through its extracellular domain and r

247 h cells harboring the genetic changes and in neighboring cells through microenvironmental alterations

248 ught to limit stem cell activity to directly neighboring cells, thus endowing them with unique proper

249 ogenicity and exported Wnt3a via exosomes to neighboring cells, thus modulating population equilibriu

250 tion (AJ) couples the actin cytoskeletons of neighboring cells to allow mechanical integration and ti

251 intermingling their processes with those of neighboring cells to approximate a constant volumetric d

252 This phenotype allows neighboring cells to both send and receive signals, ther

253 polarity proteins, crawling over and between neighboring cells to converge at diametrically opposed p

254 act near their sites of synthesis to signal neighboring cells to coordinate their responses (e.g. wh

255 eage cells require Hh signaling to stimulate neighboring cells to differentiate via an unknown signal

256 rocesses) that interdigitate with those from neighboring cells to form the glomerular filtration barr

257 nteract within the cell membrane and between neighboring cells to form tight junction strands and con

258 ins will dysregulate the machinery, allowing neighboring cells to fuse to make syncytia, but this can

259 oscillate autonomously, they coordinate with neighboring cells to generate a sweeping wave of cyclic

260 e, coordinate and process signals from their neighboring cells to generate diverse functional respons

261 s of enhanced motion then generate stress on neighboring cells to guide their migration.

262 from coordination of differentiation between neighboring cells to guiding axon growth during neurogen

263 is dominant: Delta-mediated signaling drives neighboring cells to have an opposite fate; Jagged-media

264 racellular space or even across membranes of neighboring cells to influence their environment, preven

265 ed over a wide range of spatial scales, from neighboring cells to left versus right sides of the body

266 ands signal through one of four receptors on neighboring cells to mediate cell-cell communication and

267 wall hydrolases that act autonomously or on neighboring cells to modulate invasion of prey cells, ce

268 acts as an autoinduction signal to stimulate neighboring cells to phenocopy Cfl1-expressing cells via

269 Free aggregates then enter neighboring cells to seed further fibrillization.

270 development, Wnt-expressing cells can direct neighboring cells to take on specific fates.

271 and found that this resulted in the loss of neighboring cells to which they were coupled via GJs.

272 cases, the mechanical constraints imposed by neighboring cells triggered this efficient mode of migra

273 mmature OSNs, and the residual population of neighboring cell types, and then comparing these ratios

274 airs that have opposite expression levels in neighboring cell types, implying cell-type-specific role

275 Crosstalk between neighboring cells underlies many biological processes, i

276 Interactions among neighboring cells underpin many physiological processes

277 pon experiencing tensile forces generated by neighboring cells, unfolding of the probes leads to a la

278 totic bodies), which induce proliferation in neighboring cells upon contact.

279 in larval epithelia confirms that Tai kills neighboring cells via a mechanism involving Toll, Spz fa

280 related from one cell regulates autophagy in neighboring cells via an ancient immune signaling progra

281 the extracellular matrix via integrins or to neighboring cells via cadherins, yet little is known reg

282 confer interconnectivity of the cytoplasm in neighboring cells via docking of two connexons expressed

283 are polarized, motile, and interact with the neighboring cells via harmonic forces.

284 to communicate cellular health and danger to neighboring cells via purinergic signaling.

285 ning vesicles between the apoptotic cell and neighboring cells, which are absent or greatly reduced i

286 nels that allow direct communication between neighboring cells, which are involved in electrical impu

287 relies on well-ordered communication between neighboring cells, which is established and fine-tuned d

288 ization revealed correlated activation among neighboring cells, which, taken together with genetic da

289 eri is to prevent the spread of infection to neighboring cells while IpaH9.8 helps bacterial propagat

290 sing the tradeoff of maximizing contact with neighboring cells while minimizing shorts in the structu

291 end into gaps between E-cadherin clusters on neighboring cells, while reformation of cadherin cluster

292 with reduced fitness are often eliminated by neighboring cells with greater fitness.

293 identified a pattern of two, four, and eight neighboring cells with synchronized replication along th

294 llagen gel and align collagen fibers between neighboring cells within 24 h.

295 >25,000 cells as a function of the number of neighboring cells within a droplet and of time.

296 hin the hour, after which they recruit their neighboring cells within a few hours.

297 The coordinated polarization of neighboring cells within the plane of the tissue, known

298 cancer cells with the ability to label their neighboring cells (within the tumor niche) by transferri

299 ield of cells around the wound and spread to neighboring cells, within seconds of wounding.

300 umors, both cells with NFATc1 activation and neighboring cells without NFATc1 activation have signifi