ライフサイエンスコーパス: neonatal intensive care

1 Opioid analgesia is commonly used during neonatal intensive care.

2 a risk-adjustment instrument widely used in neonatal intensive care.

3 rved in infancy, in preterm infants still in neonatal intensive care.

4 bers of survivors of high-risk obstetric and neonatal intensive care.

5 ity of similar evidence for babies receiving neonatal intensive care.

6 d to stressful and painful procedures during neonatal intensive care.

7 ; RR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.54-1.92]), transfer to neonatal intensive care (19.3% vs 13.8%; RR, 1.40 [95% C

8 0.51, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.90; p=0.0210), fewer neonatal intensive care admissions lasting more than 24

9 stroschisis have paralleled advances made in neonatal intensive care and the use of parenteral nutrit

10 tional age, placental abruption, transfer to neonatal intensive care, and 5-minute Apgar score.

11 s variability as requests for resuscitation, neonatal intensive care, and surgical intervention are b

12 Level and volume of neonatal intensive care at the hospital of birth.

13 no consistent relation between the number of neonatal intensive care beds and neonatal mortality.

14 o calculate the supply of neonatologists and neonatal intensive care beds in 246 neonatal intensive c

15 hether a greater supply of neonatologists or neonatal intensive care beds is associated with lower ne

16 etween the supply of both neonatologists and neonatal intensive care beds per capita (in quintiles) a

17 Despite recent advances in neonatal intensive care, CDH still has a high mortality

18 Admission for neonatal intensive care during the first week of life.

19 s of the European Society for Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care; four experts of the European So

20 Neonatal intensive care has been highly effective at imp

21 re in 1998-99, and shown how mortality after neonatal intensive care has fallen in the past 12 years.

22 ritical care services, similar to trauma and neonatal intensive care, has been suggested.

23 Existing studies of neonatal intensive care have focused on specific subsets

24 han 1500 g) born during the initial years of neonatal intensive care have now reached young adulthood

25 Cost-effective adaptations for neonatal intensive care, improved health-care funding, c

26 from a UK-wide sample of infants admitted to neonatal intensive care in 1998-99, and shown how mortal

27 port personnel in 32 (62.7%), and absence of neonatal intensive care in 29 (56.9%).

28 , which raises the possibility of overuse of neonatal intensive care in some newborns.

29 ed regional variation in the availability of neonatal intensive care in the United States.

30 ne in tandem with national audit systems for neonatal intensive care, incorporating measures of morbi

31 lid and simple method of risk-adjustment for neonatal intensive care is important to ensure accurate

32 risk of complications including admission to neonatal intensive care, macrosomia, low Apgar scores, a

33 t appears to have wide-spread application in neonatal intensive care nurseries where the babies' own

34 Recent neonatal intensive care outcome studies are asking more

35 ists and neonatal intensive care beds in 246 neonatal intensive care regions.

36 ons in the United States may have inadequate neonatal intensive care resources, whereas many others m

37 As neonatal intensive care services in middle-income develo

38 middle-income countries that have introduced neonatal intensive-care services for preterm and low-bir

39 In modern neonatal intensive care settings, ophthalmologic problem

40 : macrosomia, low birth weight, admission to neonatal intensive care/special care baby unit, and peri

41 ugh red blood cells (RBCs) are lifesaving in neonatal intensive care, transfusing older RBCs may resu

42 s previously been shown to increase risk for neonatal intensive care treatment, but otherwise the ass

43 rcent and 6 percent); who were admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (6 percent and 7 percent);

44 ycemia, newborn sepsis, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (ICU).

45 < .0001); and those with intensive care unit/neonatal intensive care unit (ICU/NICU) admissions (OR =

46 nates (moderate evidence), or admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (low evidence).

47 The primary outcomes were prematurity, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, congenita

48 ek at delivery, birth weight, resuscitation, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, NICU leng

49 newborn as presence of any of the following: neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, surfactan

50 between fetal exposure to oral pathogens and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission.

51 and large for gestational age (SGA/LGA), and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission.

52 mple of children who were hospital ized in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) after birth.

53 xposed to multiple painful procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) during a period of r

54 Mothers with babies in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) face a host of chall

55 A cohort from the Tuebingen neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from 1995-1998 serve

56 e if modifications to the preterm gut on the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) impacted the gut mic

57 emely low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is associated with a

58 and very preterm infants, yet the impact of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) level on moderate an

59 a greater effect on mortality risk than does neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) level.

60 uencing on stool swab samples collected from neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients within 7 da

61 d with a reference sample of the US clinical neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) population from the

62 xisting vital sign monitoring systems in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) require multiple wir

63 trointestinal tracts of infants and from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) room environment.

64 We analyzed the relation between neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) strategies concernin

65 e of death within 7 days or admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) with moderate-to-sev

66 ty-four of these babies were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and one of them had

67 mall-footprint, 1.5-T MRI scanner within our neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), diagnostic-quality

68 parents voice their dissatisfaction with the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), it is often not bec

69 SA) is a frequent source of infection in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), often associated wi

70 tal of 266 infants in a single institutional neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), whose gestational a

71 s were acquired in nonsedated infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

72 CC5/ST105/USA100 clone among 18 infants in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

73 of health care-associated infections in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

74 is (PFGE) typing to analyze an outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

75 mmended during infant hospitalization in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

76 s in an ophthalmic operation theater (OT) or neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

77 nGS in well newborns and those admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

78 y; small for gestational age (SGA); need for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU); new onset of hypert

79 OR, 3.39; 95% CI, 1.20-9.62), admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (OR, 7.17; 95% CI, 2.21-23.

80 infancy, cesarean delivery, breast-feeding, neonatal intensive care unit [NICU] admission, and absen

81 el thrombosis and bleeding, and death in the neonatal intensive care unit [NICU]) after the first 50

82 r neonatal complications, and admission to a neonatal intensive care unit [NICU]) of patients who rec

83 higher rates of low birth weight (30.8%) and neonatal intensive care unit admission (30.8%) among neo

84 (PTB), small for gestational age (SGA), and neonatal intensive care unit admission (NICUa) associate

85 ed with glyburide were at increased risk for neonatal intensive care unit admission (RR = 1.41; 95% C

86 tress syndrome (RR = 6.5, 99% CI: 5.9, 7.1), neonatal intensive care unit admission (RR = 3.4, 99% CI

87 natal information and assessments during the neonatal intensive care unit admission and longitudinal

88 (2) Delayed intubation, (3) Normothermia on Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admission, (4) Use of a pre

89 glyburide was 2.97% (95% CI, 1.82-4.12) for neonatal intensive care unit admission, 1.41% (95% CI, 0

90 Ten neonates required neonatal intensive care unit admission, five for respira

91 e for gestational age, low birth weight, and neonatal intensive care unit admission.

92 orn hospital stay, and 3.6 times the risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission.

93 partum contraceptive use, preterm birth, and neonatal intensive care unit admission.

94 ntilation and respiratory support during the neonatal intensive care unit admission.

95 similar trend was observed for EONI without neonatal intensive care unit admission; the expected inc

96 [95% CI, -3.2 to 2.0 percentage points]), or neonatal intensive care unit admissions (increase of 0.8

97 o, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.11-0.99]; ARD, 0.2%), and neonatal intensive care unit admissions (RR, 0.73 [95% C

98 weeks]) with various stages of ROP: 3 in the neonatal intensive care unit and 1 in the operating room

99 is of prematurity requiring admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and asthma.

100 ical center among 4 neonates with ROP in the neonatal intensive care unit and in the operating room.

101 Nurses are principal caregivers in the neonatal intensive care unit and support mothers to esta

102 justing after an infant's discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit and support the positive ps

103 Parents of infants hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit are routinely taught cardio

104 udy is an observational study in the level 3 neonatal intensive care unit at Parkland Hospital, Dalla

105 children were recruited as infants from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Queen Charlotte's and Ha

106 (<30 weeks' gestational age; admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit at the Royal Women's Hospit

107 t 22 or 23 weeks of gestation at a level III neonatal intensive care unit at the University of Cologn

108 health care worker inadvertently exposed 32 neonatal intensive care unit babies to 2009 influenza A

109 All 408 newborns admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit between January 2021 and Fe

110 During an outbreak of MRSA in a neonatal intensive care unit between July 18, 1991 and J

111 ll antibiotic use in infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit between March 1, 2012, and

112 tibiotic stewardship strategies in a level 3 neonatal intensive care unit by surveillance and assessm

113 gh assessment of antibiotic consumption in a neonatal intensive care unit can inform high-yield stewa

114 atal intensive care unit length of stay, and neonatal intensive care unit complications.

115 invasive tissue sampling in 126 (11%) of the neonatal intensive care unit deaths.

116 stillbirth, perinatal death, or admission to neonatal intensive care unit did not differ between wome

117 tal age, 1109 (29%) of those admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit died.

118 etected in specimens from six infants in our neonatal intensive care unit due to phenotypic character

119 sion to the Palomar Rady Children's Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit during the 35 month study p

120 2502 infants were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit during the two study period

121 racic Surgery, Pediatric Intensive Care, and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Follow-Up teams to provide

122 ate recovery was associated with a stay in a neonatal intensive care unit for >28 days (P = 0.039), v

123 Among 32 infants transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit for morphine treatment who

124 gh March 2012, we surveyed 272 babies in our neonatal intensive care unit for rectal colonization wit

125 weight <or=1.5kg admitted to a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit from 2002 to 2006 were retr

126 nsensus Workshop to Address Kidney Health in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Graduates meeting conducted

127 Twenty-eight of 56 infants in a neonatal intensive care unit had stools positive for ade

128 Any platelet transfusion during neonatal intensive care unit hospitalization.

129 ies) guidelines at a tertiary level academic neonatal intensive care unit in 2014.

130 erobacter sakazakii infections occurred in a neonatal intensive care unit in France from 5 May to 11

131 We conducted a prospective cohort study in a neonatal intensive care unit in Zambia where we implemen

132 ion in the health and development of preterm/neonatal intensive care unit infants.

133 trition in health and development of preterm/neonatal intensive care unit infants.

134 Extended early antibiotic exposure in the neonatal intensive care unit is associated with an incre

135 Exposure to stressors in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit is associated with regional

136 ase or mitigate exposure to stressors in the neonatal intensive care unit is warranted.

137 Of 13 neonatal intensive care unit isolates tested, all were m

138 The median neonatal intensive care unit length of stay was 34 days

139 mission to the neonatal intensive care unit, neonatal intensive care unit length of stay, and neonata

140 were higher and the odds for admission to a neonatal intensive care unit lower with planned out-of-h

141 We hypothesized that neonatal intensive care unit managerial practices and or

142 ith a structured neurobehavioral assessment (Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Sca

143 group had the least favorable scores on the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Network Neurobehavioral Sca

144 of prematurely born infants were obtained by neonatal intensive care unit nurses.

145 inborn babies with type 1 zone 1 ROP at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of the Catholic University,

146 ll eligible patients were transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit of the Wilhelmina Children'

147 hough severe outcomes such as admission to a neonatal intensive care unit or perinatal mortality show

148 ved ROP screening examinations at a level IV neonatal intensive care unit over a 7-year period.

149 ic potential and 20% of thrombocytopenias in neonatal intensive care unit patients are severe.

150 uencing on stool swab samples collected from neonatal intensive care unit patients within 7 days of d

151 gnificant morbidity and late mortality among neonatal intensive care unit patients.

152 macologic treatment received morphine in the neonatal intensive care unit per standard care.

153 Recent pilot randomized trials in the neonatal intensive care unit population have assessed th

154 A confirmatory analysis used neonatal intensive care unit preference for high early a

155 ome was measured within the entire period of neonatal intensive care unit stay up to 90 days after ra

156 with or without fundoplication during their neonatal intensive care unit stay.

157 c P. aeruginosa infection among infants in a neonatal intensive care unit that was associated with ca

158 isk factors, neurodevelopmental follow-up of neonatal intensive care unit trials offers the potential

159 with neurological impairment admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit underwent GT placement alon

160 Cardiac arrests occurring in the neonatal intensive care unit were excluded.

161 less than 29 weeks who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit were prospectively studied

162 ial was conducted in infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit who weighed less than 1000

163 ar prospective carriage study in a Cambodian neonatal intensive care unit with hyperendemic third-gen

164 All neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit with signs of respiratory d

165 Prospectively collected clinical data in the neonatal intensive care unit's medical database, nutriti

166 chanical ventilation, transfer to a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit, and adverse events did not

167 holucent lesion on an ultrasound scan in the neonatal intensive care unit, and cerebral palsy, microc

168 rrests occurring in the delivery department, neonatal intensive care unit, and in the out-of-hospital

169 Apgar scores, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, and perinatal mortality we

170 microbiologically constrained ecosphere of a neonatal intensive care unit, gut bacterial communities

171 tential factor, exposure to stressors in the neonatal intensive care unit, has not yet been studied i

172 al mortality, fetal deaths, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, neonatal intensive care un

173 Infants hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit, particularly preterm infan

174 ng to standard procedures at the institute's neonatal intensive care unit, patients concurrently rece

175 h gentamicin at the time of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, using a standard protocol,

176 nal recordings during the baby's stay in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

177 Antibiotics are used frequently in the neonatal intensive care unit.

178 Observational cohort study in a level III neonatal intensive care unit.

179 gestational age, and hospitalization in the neonatal intensive care unit.

180 d prematurity that required admission to the neonatal intensive care unit.

181 e investigated a putative MRSA outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit.

182 reduce the rates of nosocomial sepsis in the neonatal intensive care unit.

183 n 8-month retrospective investigation in our neonatal intensive care unit.

184 cant cause of morbidity and mortality in the neonatal intensive care unit.

185 was significantly higher in neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit.

186 al sepsis, or admission of the infant to the neonatal intensive care unit.

187 ontact isolation during the outbreak in this neonatal intensive care unit.

188 90 and 2019 at the Jackson Memorial Hospital neonatal intensive care unit.

189 clinical noninferiority trial at a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit.

190 for gestational age (SGA) baby; need for the neonatal intensive care unit; doubling of serum creatini

191 cted age, all children were scheduled in the Neonatal Intensive-Care Unit Follow-Up Clinic for a visi

192 ive care units (15.5%, 95% CI 11.6-20.3) and neonatal intensive care units (10.7%, 9.0-12.7).

193 onducted from January 2010 to June 2013 at 3 neonatal intensive care units (2 academically affiliated

194 ital care workers (HCWs) in the surgical and neonatal intensive care units (ICUs) of four hospitals.

195 led randomized clinical trial at 16 Canadian neonatal intensive care units (June 2015-April 2018 with

196 ts born in the United States are admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICU) annually.

197 enter cohort study of 156 ELBW infants at 16 neonatal intensive care units (NICU) within the NICHD Ne

198 rugs in a cohort of neonates admitted to 290 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) (the Pediatrix Dat

199 re born, and most spend their first weeks in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) [1].

200 nence syndrome from 2004 through 2013 in 299 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) across the United

201 Premature infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) are highly suscept

202 Outbreaks of adenovirus in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) can lead to widesp

203 Bacterial species associated with BSIs in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) commonly colonize

204 CCC cases were reviewed from 2 academic neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) from 2004 to 2015.

205 To determine the proportion of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in 2014 that achie

206 been a large increase in both the number of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in community hospi

207 es were collected from infants nursed in two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in East London, Un

208 sion in the number of low-level and midlevel neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in recent decades.

209 g less than 750 g at birth (N = 361) from 32 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in the United Stat

210 illin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) of two hospitals.

211 bstantial shortfalls in nurse staffing in US neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) relative to nation

212 It is difficult for neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) to determine the o

213 responsible for sepsis in preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) worldwide.

214 lied SourceTracker to microbial surveys from neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), offices and molec

215 ors influencing azithromycin use in European neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

216 se of morbidity and mortality in neonates in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

217 tly performed skin-breaking procedure in the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

218 o a loading-dose of phenobarbital from eight neonatal intensive care units across Europe.

219 significant PDA was conducted at 3 tertiary neonatal intensive care units and affiliated follow-up p

220 31, 2014, to 24 participating level II to IV neonatal intensive care units and received intravenous f

221 However, most infants at modern neonatal intensive care units are predominantly fed with

222 Neonatal intensive care units are willing to apply envir

223 from June 29, 2011, to October 14, 2014, in neonatal intensive care units at 8 academic institutions

224 The setting was neonatal intensive care units at The Children's Hospital

225 Two equivalent "Level III" neonatal intensive care units at the University Hospital

226 esistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the neonatal intensive care units at two hospitals, we asses

227 born in 558 Vermont Oxford Network hospital neonatal intensive care units between January 1, 2007, a

228 o 29 participating Canadian Neonatal Network neonatal intensive care units between January 1, 2010, a

229 VLBW infants (<1500 g) admitted to level III neonatal intensive care units between January 1, 2010, a

230 than 1250 g admitted to 6 Canadian tertiary neonatal intensive care units between May 2006 and June

231 A quarter of all neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units develop thrombocytopenia,

232 Given that less than one-third of all neonatal intensive care units follow Mexican National RO

233 term) of gestational age, were maintained in neonatal intensive care units for </=14 d.

234 Images were obtained from 13 North American neonatal intensive care units from eyes of infants with

235 All neonates admitted to 24 participating neonatal intensive care units from four countries (Austr

236 gly, preterm infants exposed to music in the neonatal intensive care units have significantly increas

237 nfants with birth weight less than 1251 g in neonatal intensive care units in 13 North American cente

238 between January 2006 and December 2013 from neonatal intensive care units in 25 US children's hospit

239 al ophthalmologists participating in level 3 neonatal intensive care units in academic centers with i

240 days of birth, were enrolled at 3 level III neonatal intensive care units in Atlanta, Georgia.

241 onal cohort study in pediatric, cardiac, and neonatal intensive care units in eight hospitals, carrie

242 , randomised controlled trial was done in 18 neonatal intensive care units in England.

243 clinical trial conducted in 36 level III/IV neonatal intensive care units in Europe among 1013 infan

244 29 weeks of gestation and hospitalized in 68 neonatal intensive care units in France from April throu

245 5, 2009, and March 25, 2012, in 13 level III neonatal intensive care units in Germany.

246 33) were linked with structural data from 66 neonatal intensive care units in Germany.

247 intestinal food allergy was conducted in 126 neonatal intensive care units in Japan between April 201

248 Among 259 311 infants (47.2% female) in 359 neonatal intensive care units in the clinical cohort, de

249 -controlled randomized trial conducted in 19 neonatal intensive care units in the Netherlands and Bel

250 In 9 neonatal intensive care units in the Netherlands and Bel

251 ts (birth weight <1500 g) admitted to 1 of 6 neonatal intensive care units in the Netherlands from Ma

252 Louis with clinical data from the four neonatal intensive care units in the St.

253 ective multicentre cohort study across eight neonatal intensive care units in the UK and USA, recruit

254 1 hospitalized VLBW (<1500 g) infants at 348 neonatal intensive care units in the United States from

255 andomized clinical study was conducted at 16 neonatal intensive care units in the United States, with

256 low birth weight children from six regional neonatal intensive care units in Wisconsin and Iowa who

257 e hospital discharge of premature infants in neonatal intensive care units is often delayed due to th

258 rge, nationally representative cohort at 348 neonatal intensive care units managed by the Pediatrix M

259 ween 401 and 1000 g who were cared for in US neonatal intensive care units managed by the Pediatrix M

260 of hand antisepsis of healthcare workers in neonatal intensive care units may be associated with lon

261 Twenty-two academic neonatal intensive care units participated.

262 n between 2010 and 2011 who were admitted to neonatal intensive care units participating in the Canad

263 gh close to half of the newborns admitted to neonatal intensive care units receive treatment for "hyp

264 nization with P. aeruginosa among infants in neonatal intensive care units should be investigated by

265 ical and surgical wards to the pediatric and neonatal intensive care units that occurred during 370,5

266 hic Association and 1998 and 1999 surveys of neonatal intensive care units to calculate the supply of

267 ices as rated by healthcare professionals in neonatal intensive care units were associated with the d

268 nce sample of 76 infants across four level-3 Neonatal Intensive Care Units were enrolled, and 136 com

269 met the criteria for ROP screening in three neonatal intensive care units were included in the study

270 tation enrolled at 19 US sites comprising 30 neonatal intensive care units were included.

271 ntra-abdominal infections hospitalized in 24 neonatal intensive care units were studied in an open-la

272 Neonatal intensive care units with better work environme

273 7 years); 34% were female; and 57% were from neonatal intensive care units, 33% were from pediatric i

274 acheal intubation at two Australian tertiary neonatal intensive care units, nasal high-flow therapy d

275 collected from 4 geographically independent neonatal intensive care units, over a 48-month period.

276 e become an increasingly frequent problem in neonatal intensive care units, particularly among extrem

277 rtery bypass graft, angioplasty, cardiac and neonatal intensive care units, positron emission tomogra

278 results in at least 20 human infants from US neonatal intensive care units, published in English, and

279 ndardized kit for the CD64 index was used in neonatal intensive care units, showing high sensitivity

280 In contrast, in infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units, thrombocytopenia develops

281 iated infections represent a major burden in neonatal intensive care units.

282 d for more than 48 h admitted to two level 3 neonatal intensive care units.

283 (VLBW) infants varies widely among different neonatal intensive care units.

284 yndrome and has become a standard of care in neonatal intensive care units.

285 ation in approaches to oxygen therapy within neonatal intensive care units.

286 a and resistome persist after discharge from neonatal intensive care units.

287 hs 500-1499 g, and we assessed this in eight neonatal intensive care units.

288 icarbonate therapy is used routinely in many neonatal intensive care units.

289 in the preterm and term infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units.

290 olled in the study and 3852 were admitted to neonatal intensive care units.

291 nificant cause of morbidity and mortality in neonatal intensive care units.

292 Retrospective cohort study at tertiary neonatal intensive care units.

293 inical trial performed at 33 US and Canadian neonatal intensive care units.

294 ommonly critically ill patients in adult and neonatal intensive care units.

295 conducted between 2008 and 2014 in 21 French neonatal intensive care units.

296 ere obtained during routine ROP screening in neonatal intensive care units.

297 ty are still low and vary considerably among neonatal intensive care units.

298 SI; (4) management of staphylococcal BSIs in neonatal intensive care units; and (5) defining the impa

299 UK recommendations suggest that large neonatal intensive-care units (NICUs) have better outcom

300 res of quality to explain overall quality of neonatal intensive care was modest.