戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ctions of the background selection model (or neutral theory).
2 ncreases, which is consistent with classical neutral theory.
3 e patterns are statistically consistent with neutral theory.
4 rted correlations support rather than reject neutral theory.
5 om the expected frequency spectrum under the neutral theory.
6 ions with large effective size by the nearly neutral theory.
7 s observed to deviate from that predicted by neutral theory.
8 arkers, including those foundational for the neutral theory.
9  of the ecological equivalence assumption of neutral theory.
10  genomic data considered consistent with the neutral theory.
11                     Analogies with niche and neutral theory and assembly models are also considered.
12 ory resolves many of the differences between neutral theory and classical tradeoff-based niche theori
13 genetic relatedness in pioneering studies of neutral theory and human migrations.
14 is is based on a partial misunderstanding of neutral theory and that their data alone cannot unambigu
15                               The ecological neutral theory argues that community similarity decays d
16 pective between niche-based theories and the neutral theory, arguing that niche and neutral factors a
17 a potential explanation for the successes of neutral theory as a description of macroecological patte
18                  Here, we develop ecological neutral theory as a general framework for modeling fossi
19 enetic drift, recasting Kimura's selectively neutral theory as a special case of a generalized drift
20 ults were consistent with the predictions of neutral theory, as the abundant species almost always ha
21                                              Neutral theory assumes all species and individuals in a
22                                            A neutral theory (assuming no environmental selection or o
23                                   The nearly neutral theory attributes most nucleotide substitution a
24                                              Neutral theory, built around the hypothesis that individ
25 s relative abundances for which, contrary to neutral theory but consistent with numerous observations
26  clarifying the semantics of coexistence and neutral theories, but rather reflects key differences th
27 so improves on the ecological predictions of neutral theory by explaining the occurrence of very comm
28            Thus, strong hypothesis tests for neutral theory can be formulated.
29                Our results also confirm that neutral theory cannot be used to infer an absence of nic
30                                     However, neutral theory cannot explain what generates high divers
31  about whether an alternative formulation of neutral theory could explain the data after all.
32                                    Niche and neutral theories emphasize different processes contribut
33 gth of the K(A)-K(S) correlation exceeds the neutral theory expectation when substitution rates are e
34 ill inflate the value of ZnS relative to its neutral theory expectations.
35 amus) are consistently too short relative to neutral-theory expectations, and they are also distorted
36                                    Under the neutral theory, genetic diversity is expected to increas
37             More recently, proponents of the neutral theory have placed a premium on how stochastic f
38 re we show that the framework of the current neutral theory in ecology can easily be generalized to i
39 metric community dynamics to yield Hubbell's neutral theory in the limit of functional equivalence am
40                           The success of the neutral theory in two-dimensional forest ecosystems and
41                          Poor performance of neutral theory is driven by its consistent inability to
42 , mathematical developments such as Kimura's neutral theory, Kingman's coalescent theory and efficien
43 zonian tree inventory data set, we show that neutral theory not only underestimates the number of rar
44 r departure from the predictions of standard neutral theories of biodiversity and that an alternative
45 ributions to models associated with niche or neutral theories of community assembly, and tested the i
46 d provide an important alternative to recent neutral theories of diversity.
47 ntinents, which they suggested falsifies the neutral theory of biodiversity (NTB).
48                            Specifically, the neutral theory of biodiversity (Sloan's near neutral mod
49 sent a theoretical framework for the unified neutral theory of biodiversity and an analytical solutio
50                                  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography provides
51                                  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and related theories base
52                                          The neutral theory of biodiversity explored the structure of
53 ral theory of protein evolution to Hubbell's neutral theory of biodiversity, quantifying the relative
54         Consistent with predictions from the neutral theory of biodiversity, we found that ecological
55 however, has recently been challenged by the neutral theory of biodiversity, which explains coexisten
56 based theory by adding mild selection to the neutral theory of biodiversity.
57 ersity than alternatives such as the Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity.
58 es, except for the neutral case-the "unified neutral theory of biodiversity." Employing spatiotempora
59 at is essentially indistinguishable from the neutral theory of ecology.
60 tterns in the selected reefs, supporting the neutral theory of ecology.
61                  A general prediction of the neutral theory of evolution is that genetic diversity sh
62 dance patterns are seemingly well fit by the neutral theory of metacommunity assembly, we show that t
63 ual framework that establishes the classical neutral theory of molecular evolution (NTME) as the basi
64 on and evolution are not consistent with the neutral theory of molecular evolution and might be inapp
65                                   The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution posits variation a
66                                   The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution predicts that slig
67                                          The neutral theory of molecular evolution predicts that the
68                                          The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution serves as the null
69 egrate evolutionary predictions based on the neutral theory of molecular evolution with protein dynam
70                                          The neutral theory of molecular evolution, positing that mos
71                                    Under the neutral theory of molecular evolution, the expected hete
72  sites must be relaxed before abandoning the neutral theory of molecular evolution.
73 ance hypothesis for genetic variability; the neutral theory of molecular evolution.
74 heory on metabolic rate with the now-classic neutral theory of molecular evolution.
75 ion that is far higher than permitted by the neutral theory of molecular evolution.
76                                From Kimura's neutral theory of protein evolution to Hubbell's neutral
77                       We lack a general, non-neutral theory of SADs.
78                     Three areas in which the Neutral Theory plays a vital role are: interpreting rati
79                                              Neutral theory posits that genetic diversity will increa
80 ws that predicted by the neutral theory, the neutral theory predicts poorly the field experimental re
81                                              Neutral theory predicts that genetic diversity increases
82 rare end of the abundance spectrum, however, neutral theory predicts the existence of approximately 5
83 ation of stochastic environmental exposures (neutral theory) rather than by the influence of an agein
84 tion models, the zero-sum model derived from neutral theory showed the best fit to our data.
85 e considered the dominant factor, whereas in neutral theory, stochastic forces, such as demographic n
86 ese results, when considered in light of the neutral theory, suggest fundamentally different modes of
87 ere, I introduce a strong method to test the neutral theory that combines field parameterization of t
88  of the system follows that predicted by the neutral theory, the neutral theory predicts poorly the f
89 a flexible community assembly model based on neutral theory to ask: How do dispersal, drift and selec
90                                       We use neutral theory to estimate the number, relative abundanc
91                     Hubbell generalized this neutral theory to explore the expected steady-state dist
92                                     Applying neutral theory to synonymous substitutions, we dated the
93 atially explicit mechanistic model, based on neutral theory, to test hypotheses of early tetrapod div
94       Recently, a new formulation of spatial neutral theory was published showing an incompatibility
95 size, and, consistent with prediction by the neutral theory, we find evidence of strong purifying sel
96 vation consistent with a simple model of the neutral theory where most sites are either invariable or