ライフサイエンスコーパス: occupational group

1 was based on 12,426 subjects (92 to 1018 per occupational group).

2 a on economic aspects of employment for each occupational group.

3 vers with significant effect modification by occupational group.

4 orts can be found, mostly because of a small occupational group.

5 improve working conditions in very specific occupational groups.

6 the predominant change observed in all three occupational groups.

7 ransmission may have been more intense among occupational groups.

8 eters using echocardiography within distinct occupational groups.

9 ctional and structural parameters in diverse occupational groups.

10 exposures may occur in gymnasts and certain occupational groups.

11 ons, including small numbers for many of the occupational groups, a high percentage of proxy responde

12 onal titles and was classified into 14 broad occupational groups and 16 more narrowly defined occupat

13 MS/MS approaches to pooled samples from each occupational group, and we annotated them using spectral

14 Participation exceeded 80% in 33 of the 47 occupational groups, and after pre-specified exclusions,

15 t education, applicant gender, study method, occupational groups, and local labor market conditions d

16 ral and functional cardiac parameters across occupational groups, and to discern their associated eff

17 the risk of cataract formation in high-risk occupational groups, but risk to the population has not

18 sibility of uncontrolled confounding in some occupational groups by lifestyle factors, and higher dos

19 ibing of ionising radiation across the three occupational groups captured by questionnaire were analy

20 All three occupational groups exhibited a tendency towards septal

21 ologic technologists were among the earliest occupational groups exposed to ionizing radiation and re

22 status, and were not influenced by specific occupational groups, exposures, or studies.

23 selected and surveyed general population and occupational groups from 6 July to 24 August 2020, in 3

24 We also find that some occupational groups have greater general transferability

25 As the largest occupational group in international healthcare systems n

26 There was substantial heterogeneity between occupational groups in economic and psychosocial aspects

27 exposure of nonsmokers to SHS across various occupational groups is therefore needed.

28 0.9% to 3.0%, whereas adjusted prevalence in occupational groups ranged from 0.0% to 6.6% with variat

29 The prevalence in occupational groups ranged from 2.8% (95% CI, 1.3%-5.2%)

30 d loss in life expectancy according to socio-occupational group, separately by sex.

31 ng knowledge and beliefs about MSDs) between occupational groups should allow the study hypothesis to

32 tality has improved in men and women in most occupational groups, some groups have experienced increa

33 To assess respiratory health of this occupational group, we conducted a cross-sectional study

34 of overweight and obesity prevalence in each occupational group were calculated with 95% confidence i

35 ases and controls, matched for age, sex, and occupational group were interviewed with the life events

36 from the general population and 10 040 from occupational groups, were included across all 3 cities.