戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 urprise was indicative of a one-off outlier (oddball).
2 ther than low-informative attentional tasks (OddBall).
3  images) and "targetness" (target vs neutral oddballs).
4 ticity respond to stimuli streams containing oddballs.
5                      We observed significant oddball amplitudes for all single notations, showing for
6 orded pupillary responses during an auditory oddball and an illuminance change task, in a female with
7 ognitive control tasks, including the Simon, oddball and interval-timing tasks.
8 /) in young adults, with stimuli arranged in oddball and reversed oddball blocks (deviant probability
9 e inhibition (Go/NoGo), selective attention (oddball), and selective working memory updating (1-back)
10  delayed word recognition, rhyming, auditory oddball, and cued conditional letter-discrimination task
11 ttention tasks (visual expectation, auditory oddball) as well as the Bayley Scales of Infant and Todd
12 keys during passive presentation of auditory oddballs before and after propofol-mediated loss of cons
13                                         Each oddball block consisted of 1000-Hz and 1500-Hz standards
14 ith stimuli arranged in oddball and reversed oddball blocks (deviant probability, p=0.2), allowing fo
15 d stimulus is also relatively rare (e.g., in oddball blocks of mismatch negativity paradigms, or in r
16                        Here, three different oddball categories (novel, neutral, and target images) w
17 tion, subjects monitored for any infrequent "oddball" changes in object identity, location, or identi
18 uggest that differential responses under the oddball condition in macaque A1 reflect stimulus-specifi
19 d the larger responses to deviants under the oddball condition.
20                      Such differentiation of oddball conditions was mediated primarily by stimulus-in
21                                          Two oddball conditions were constructed with a common devian
22 ontal and striatal functions during a visual oddball continuous performance task, in ultra-high-risk,
23  counterfeit banknotes presented in a visual oddball counterfeit detection task.
24 nent of the ERP, but not to neutral auditory oddball cues.
25 f ERP subcomponents from 64-channel auditory oddball data in 144 individuals with schizophrenia, 210
26 signal acquisition, resting EEG and auditory oddball data were collected in the morning and in the af
27                 P1 amplitude was greater for oddballs, demonstrating that the initial feedforward swe
28                                           An oddball design was used and both N1 and MMN components w
29                                        In an oddball design, participants were stimulated with standa
30 of each category as stimuli in a "categorial oddball" design.
31 splayed transient responses to targets in an oddball detection task and to transitions between task b
32 lue and green deviant stimuli during a color oddball detection task in English participants, but it w
33                    Participants performed an oddball detection task while viewing images of objects,
34 acquired while subjects performed a semantic oddball detection task.
35  biologically plausible mechanism for neural oddball detection.
36 ditory cortex in these aged rats by using an oddball discrimination task.
37 er, these results demonstrate: (1) classical oddball effect exists even when ISI is jittered and the
38                                    A similar oddball effect was found for P3.
39                               However, vowel oddball effects increased coupling within the left poste
40 s, whereas perceptually equivalent nonspeech oddball effects increased coupling within the right prim
41 6) to establish the repeatability of complex oddball ERPs across multiple psychosis syndromes (r valu
42               SSA was especially strong when oddball frequency matched neuronal preference.
43 differentiate "item novelty" (new vs neutral oddballs) from "contextual deviance" (neutral oddballs v
44 rowing observations(3-6) have suggested that oddball GRBs do exist, and several criteria (prompt emis
45 n-autistic controls correctly identified the oddball identities more often than our autistic particip
46 ify which of four ambient images depicted an oddball identity.
47 urations can be distorted by saccades, by an oddball in a sequence, or by stimulus complexity or magn
48  there was a loss of differential spiking to oddballs in the higher-order cortex.
49 ches after contingency reversals and reduced oddball learning.
50                     The authors investigated oddball neural deviations that discriminate multiple dia
51                                          The oddball P3, however, only emerged when the stimuli were
52 on and cognition (a three-stimulus auditory 'oddball' P300 task).
53 human participants in an auditory three-tone oddball paradigm (including rare nontarget sounds) and o
54          The stimuli were presented using an oddball paradigm and consisted of short vibratory bursts
55 ex with low- and high-frequency chirps in an oddball paradigm and observed significant deviance detec
56 When stimuli were presented in the classical oddball paradigm at jittered ISI (0.8-1.2 s), neural res
57              We revisit the passive auditory oddball paradigm by manipulating sound predictability an
58 gh-intensity standard sounds in an intensity oddball paradigm can elicit an electroencephalographic m
59                                          The oddball paradigm embeds infrequent targets and distracto
60 , we used several variations of the auditory oddball paradigm from the human literature and examined
61 300 latency and amplitude elicited by visual oddball paradigm in 20 participants with MCI and age, ed
62  range (0.5-45.0 Hz) during processing of an oddball paradigm in patients with schizophrenia (N=66),
63 imary auditory cortex (A1) using a frequency oddball paradigm in which rare "deviant" tones are rando
64 ppropriate modification of the multifeatured oddball paradigm incorporating, within one run, deviants
65 ts display stimulus-specific adaptation upon oddball paradigm stimulation in the three recorded cell
66             Here we use various forms of the oddball paradigm to disentangle temporal and ordinal com
67           In this study, we used an auditory oddball paradigm to estimate detection and discriminatio
68 h response (MMR) measured with a traditional oddball paradigm using magnetoencephalography (MEG).
69                                    A passive oddball paradigm was adopted to examine two groups (16 i
70  their P3 amplitude measured, using a visual oddball paradigm when they were approximately 17 years o
71 hy controls who performed a passive auditory oddball paradigm while electroencephalography (EEG) was
72 y was recorded during an unattended auditory oddball paradigm with duration-, pitch-, and double-devi
73 guals were presented with a multiple-deviant oddball paradigm with four deviant conditions (duration,
74                             First, during an oddball paradigm with frequency deviants, neuronal respo
75 ive processing, we embedded an event-related oddball paradigm within a blocked design.
76 imination paradigm, we administered a FT-EEG oddball paradigm, assessing neural sensitivity for equal
77    These predictions were tested in a double oddball paradigm, in which frequent standard stimuli and
78 (AC) of anesthetized rats during an auditory oddball paradigm, including cascade controls.
79 sk, which was a modification of the standard oddball paradigm, participants were instructed to view a
80 ion paradigm, we administered a sweep FT-EEG oddball paradigm, sweeping from one end of the morph seq
81 ere presented with the local-global auditory oddball paradigm, which distinguishes 2 levels of proces
82 ally with Chinese homophone characters in an oddball paradigm, while they performed a visual detectio
83 deling of mismatch responses, elicited in an oddball paradigm.
84  (MMN) response was elicited using a passive oddball paradigm.
85 nts in three experiments that made use of an oddball paradigm.
86 rols were studied during a standard auditory oddball paradigm.
87 during an experimental three-stimulus visual Oddball paradigm.
88 raphy was recorded during a passive auditory oddball paradigm.
89 pillometry, EEG, and fMRI during an auditory oddball paradigm.
90  recording modalities using the global-local oddball paradigm.
91 maging and electrophysiology during a visual oddball paradigm.
92 ange = 3-9 months) using an auditory novelty oddball paradigm.
93 ic data acquired during an auditory location oddball paradigm.
94 mologous MMN and P3a ERPs during an auditory oddball paradigm.
95 ogether with a previously established visual oddball paradigm.
96 ophysiological responses were assessed in an oddball paradigm.
97 phalography sessions using a roving auditory oddball paradigm: once on placebo and once on 10 mg of t
98 akers, 10 English and 10 Thai speakers in an oddball paradigm: The Thai syllable [k(h)a:] pronounced
99 ying novelty detection, we used an auditory "oddball" paradigm and two-photon calcium imaging to meas
100           ERP abnormalities in the auditory "oddball" paradigm were found only in corticobasal degene
101 ent with the literature on visual search and oddball paradigms and suggests that damage to these regi
102 d loudness cues were presented in controlled oddball paradigms that directly electrically stimulated
103                                      Second, oddball paradigms using intensity or duration deviants r
104 ith these tone pairs, four randomly arranged oddball paradigms were presented to derive mismatch nega
105                                           In oddball paradigms, infrequent stimuli elicit larger P300
106    Many studies measured neural responses in oddball paradigms, showing a different response to the s
107 surprising or unlikely events in traditional oddball paradigms.
108  (V1) from awake mice presented with visual "oddball" paradigms, we identify both reductions and augm
109              While the identity and location oddballs preferentially activated ventral and dorsal bra
110                                        While oddball recognition remained intact, estimated LC input
111 nal modulation of attention, with a stronger oddball response in a high-arousal state.
112 alyses could better identify unique auditory oddball responses among patients with different psychoti
113 ed stimuli generate suppressed responses but oddball responses are large and distinct.
114                                     Auditory oddball responses to standard and target tones from 64 s
115 phalographic observations during an auditory oddball roving paradigm in healthy adults.
116 clusters and the rest of the brain during an oddball salience processing task.
117 se a model in which the efficiency of global oddball search depends on contrast-enhancing lateral int
118 fic associations, with unique variability in oddball search performance predicted by early/posterior
119 e monkeys to perform an urgent version of an oddball search task in which a red target appeared among
120  (SC) neurons during performance of a color, oddball selection task.
121                    We hypothesize that SPN's oddball selectivity can direct the development of L4 res
122 ration, respond to sounds before ECO showing oddball selectivity.
123 n the second compared with first half of the oddball sequence at mo 3 and 12.
124 attentional blindness paradigm with a visual oddball sequence of geometrical shapes presented to male
125 ater response to the deviant stimulus in the oddball sequence than to the same stimulus presented wit
126                                  An auditory oddball sequence was presented to measure cortical respo
127 e deviant, underlies the responses in visual oddball sequences even in higher visual cortex.
128 of a surprise response to deviants in visual oddball sequences in macaque (Macaca mulatta) inferior t
129 andard compared with the deviant stimulus in oddball sequences.
130 ferent contexts: as Standard and Deviants in Oddball sequences; in equiprobable sequences; in sequenc
131 a simultaneously-presented visual categorial oddball shape discrimination task; in Exp 2 (Auditory-At
132 ore illusion, silence-based warping, and the oddball-silence illusion-each adapted from a prominent p
133  performance improves for distinct and rare (oddball) sound elements, at the expense of rare sounds t
134 ide the first evidence of enhanced coding of oddball sounds in a human auditory discrimination task a
135       Before ECO, SPNs are more selective to oddball sounds in auditory streams than thalamo-recipien
136 d single-unit mismatch responses to auditory oddball stimulation at different intensities, together w
137 suggest a two-phase cortical activation upon oddball stimulation, with oddball tones first reactivati
138 ted to discriminate between the standard and oddball stimuli at either the central location or at the
139                                              Oddball stimuli embedded in a sequence of regularly repe
140                                 As a result, oddball stimuli evoked enhanced gamma power, late period
141 NA estimates being positively correlated for oddball stimuli in a high-arousal but not a low-arousal
142  induce different cognitive states, with the oddball stimuli involving emotionally evocative images,(
143 i, trials were run in four subjects in which oddball stimuli required a different-sized vergence move
144     Furthermore, we demonstrate that salient oddball stimuli suppress the DMN and enhance AI neuronal
145 vity during processing of target and novelty oddball stimuli that engage attention.
146                            Most responses to oddball stimuli were not significantly different from re
147  in which frequent standard stimuli and rare oddball stimuli were presented at central and peripheral
148 ng "standard" and periodically introduced 3 "oddball" stimuli that differed in the frequency spectrum
149 regions of human patients during an auditory oddball stimulus paradigm.
150  to a standard repeated stimulus and a rare 'oddball' stimulus, is proposed as such a change detectio
151 ed during which subjects performed a visual "oddball" target detection task.
152 two independent studies of a simple auditory oddball task (n = 82), we compared adaptation and Bayesi
153 ed in a same-different task, a variant of an oddball task [2].
154 current neural network models trained on the oddball task also exhibited slow network dynamics and re
155  included P300 amplitudes during an auditory oddball task and eyes-closed resting state.
156 to fewer resources being directed toward the oddball task during dual-task locomotion.
157 ubjects (15 HC, 14 SZ) performed an auditory oddball task during electroencephalogram recording befor
158 arison subjects (N=22) performed an auditory oddball task during functional magnetic resonance imagin
159 tes by using a combined flanker with novelty-oddball task in children (7-12 years) and adolescents (1
160 tentials (ERP) were acquired during a visual oddball task in patients with depressive disorder, patie
161           They were administered an auditory oddball task in the electroencephalography environment.
162 cessing were investigated using an emotional oddball task in which circles were presented infrequentl
163 ministered a hybrid error-monitoring/novelty-oddball task in which the frequency of novel, surprising
164 mplitude (p<0.00001) during a three-stimulus oddball task independent of trait cognitive control.
165  monetary rewards--we modified the emotional oddball task to use behaviorally irrelevant reward stimu
166 s a broad frequency range during an auditory oddball task using a comprehensive analysis approach to
167 during the prestimulus baseline period of an oddball task using Lempel-Ziv complexity, a nonlinear me
168 pared on neural responses during an auditory oddball task using multisensor electroencephalography.
169                    Performance on the visual oddball task was measured with percentage of hits and d'
170                                     A visual oddball task was presented to 22 patients with schizophr
171  activity elicited during an auditory roving oddball task was recorded using electroencephalography t
172              Participants completed a visual oddball task whereby neutral, exercise, and cannabis cue
173 mages were presented, and a neutral auditory oddball task while event-related brain potentials (ERPs)
174               In rats performing an auditory oddball task, both the amplitude and timing of the front
175                                       In the oddball task, participants with aphantasia demonstrated
176 alography data recorded during a cross-modal oddball task, we tested whether there are separate predi
177 icipants performed a three-stimulus auditory oddball task.
178  collected while subjects performed a visual oddball task.
179 s while they performed a visual and auditory oddball task.
180 ded while participants performed an auditory oddball task.
181  strategy was even more prominent during the oddball task.
182 atients (n = 3) performed a visual affective oddball task.
183 of occipital areas that increased during the oddball task.
184 on, subjects periodically performed a visual oddball task.
185 itional experiments: (i) a visual attention "oddball" task and (ii) a task-free resting state.
186 t baseline and follow-up) using an auditory "oddball" task.
187 e marmosets performing two distinct auditory oddball tasks and investigated to what extent event-rela
188 while subjects performed auditory and visual oddball tasks and used these data to investigate the BOL
189 h passive (listening) and active (detecting) oddball tasks in a pretest and two posttests (1 and 9 we
190           Neural activations during auditory oddball tasks may be endophenotypes for psychosis and bi
191 the P300 event-related potential in auditory oddball tasks may characterize schizophrenia (SZ) but is
192 t is often assessed with target detection or oddball tasks, and individuals with ADHD perform poorly
193 temporal P3 reductions reported for auditory oddball tasks.
194 ited by reliance on simple target detection (oddball) tasks with pure tones.
195 ralizing to a low-probability deviant tone ("oddball") that breaks the preceding regularity.
196                         When adding a visual oddball, the elderly displayed an increase in theta acti
197 al activation upon oddball stimulation, with oddball tones first reactivating the adapted auditory co
198 bthreshold and suprathreshold responses with oddball tones of a deviant frequency eliciting enlarged
199 nts of membrane potential responses encoding oddball tones that break stimulus regularity.
200  and dorsal brain regions respectively, each oddball type activated both pathways.
201  stimulus (passive or active listening to an oddball-type paradigm).
202                             Furthermore, all oddball types recruited the lateral temporal cortex and
203 ic (different word) and acoustic (same word) oddballs using dynamic causal modelling.
204 ring in instructions: cued visual search and oddball visual search.
205 he second set of experiments incorporated an oddball visual task.
206 ddballs) from "contextual deviance" (neutral oddballs vs standard images) and "targetness" (target vs
207                  Neural input in response to oddballs was estimated via pupil dilation, a reported pr

 
Page Top